Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.

Unless VA state court works differently?

We need that document. Not some podcast.

I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.

Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.

If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?

Because there isn't a lot of information and little to no evidence included in the indictment. It is likely only a few pages long because each charge will have its own partial page that essentially states something like:

"The grand jurors of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in and for the body of the County of Fairfax, and now attending the said Court at its ***** term, charges that ***** did feloniously kill and murder ****.
Then it will include the code section that applies to the charge and signed a true bill or not a true bill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.

Unless VA state court works differently?

We need that document. Not some podcast.

I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.

Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.

If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?

Because there isn't a lot of information and little to no evidence included in the indictment. It is likely only a few pages long because each charge will have its own partial page that essentially states something like:

"The grand jurors of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in and for the body of the County of Fairfax, and now attending the said Court at its ***** term, charges that ***** did feloniously kill and murder ****.
Then it will include the code section that applies to the charge and signed a true bill or not a true bill.

I have a copy and it’s a page and a half long and only has the charges listed like PP says. No evidence, no interesting information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone heard with the judge ruled in JPMs case this morning about evidence suppression?

Is there a live feed for Fairfax county trials such as this one?

This is what the online case update says, no idea what it means


09/26/2024 09:51 AM EVID LOG Evidence Log

09/26/2024 09:00 AM HRHD Hearing Held Hearing type: Motion Hearing - Criminal Hearing date: 09/26/2024 Time: 9:00 AM Hearing type: (ruling)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, let's leave BB's mother alone on this thread.

Most of us I am guessing are mothers. Can you imagine the heartache. What if this were your son? And you really thought he was innocent. I would be doing everything I could as well to help his case. I understand that she is taking it too far and victim blaming, but none of us can really say what we would do in this situation.

Let's have some grace her. It is only going to get worse for her....

I agree completely. Even the victim blaming, she (right now) truly believes that it was JR. her life is going to get a lot worse over the next year

[Anonymous]

Per WUSA 9, judge denied evidence suppression! Wow! And they are going to allow cameras in the court room for the trial.

[Anonymous]

Now I bet she flips……

[Anonymous]

Yep. She will be stupid not to flip.

[Anonymous]

This will be an interesting one to watch on Court TV.

[Anonymous]

Brendan’s bond hearing is tomorrow. His side states he is not a flight risk, is the sole caretaker for his daughter and will be living with his daughter mother and grandmother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brendan’s bond hearing is tomorrow. His side states he is not a flight risk, is the sole caretaker for his daughter and will be living with his daughter mother and grandmother.

Hmmmm....I want him to rot in prison but I feel for that little girl who has lost so much. At the same time, she will grow up and know the truth, its probably best she not spend more time with him.

[Anonymous]

He’s a risk to his daughter….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brendan’s bond hearing is tomorrow. His side states he is not a flight risk, is the sole caretaker for his daughter and will be living with his daughter mother and grandmother.

Source ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brendan’s bond hearing is tomorrow. His side states he is not a flight risk, is the sole caretaker for his daughter and will be living with his daughter mother and grandmother.

Source ?

NBC4 Washington

[Anonymous]

For those who don't wan't to watch on youtube:
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/au-pairs-statements-to-police-wont-be-suppressed-in-herndon-murder-case/3726879/

[Anonymous]

Any prosecutors or criminal defense attorneys on here? Does BB have a shot at bail?