Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It means we don't know who assaulted Ngo, anarchists or someone else. But now at least you admit that the anarchists are not antifa- they are their own beast that are neither left nor right.

I admitted no such thing, liar. Antifa may be used interchangeably with anarchists as far as I can see. It's not like these people issue membership cards. Ideologically, anarchists seem to be on the left, and I don't see why any would be a problem for you, unless you are an anarchist apologist, and you wouldn't be that, would you?

Whoever is doing that would be wildly inaccurate. Anarchists are anarchists. They are different people and ideology than ANTIFA. How about we start using language with accuracy?

Language with accuracy? That's a joke, when Ngo gets called every name in the book, except "journalist" because, you know, reasons. So I will call them what I damn well please, and you will just have to sputter and fume about how "wrong" I am. If those people don't like what I call them, they can hire a PR rep to announce their preferred appelation and trademark their symbol. Sounds like you are angling for tbe job.

You are conflaging different groups with different ideologies only making you look like a fool.

Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Researched this. He did in fact contribute to general education, abd it't not clear what his direct involvement was with the Indian schools, other than they used the same ideas everyone else in Canada used. In event, as with everyonr else in history, if them mob thinks you are a racist, your statue comes down and that's that. There is no time for keeping a cool head when you have tear down something that has been there for 100 years.

Also PP:
"I mean, between friends, is a mass grave really that disqualifying?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Researched this. He did in fact contribute to general education, abd it't not clear what his direct involvement was with the Indian schools, other than they used the same ideas everyone else in Canada used. In event, as with everyonr else in history, if them mob thinks you are a racist, your statue comes down and that's that. There is no time for keeping a cool head when you have tear down something that has been there for 100 years.

Also PP:
"I mean, between friends, is a mass grave really that disqualifying?"

Did he kill those people? Did he even know about it? As usual nothing matters, it's just the desire to destroy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

Ignorance is bliss. They really are not that close at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It means we don't know who assaulted Ngo, anarchists or someone else. But now at least you admit that the anarchists are not antifa- they are their own beast that are neither left nor right.

I admitted no such thing, liar. Antifa may be used interchangeably with anarchists as far as I can see. It's not like these people issue membership cards. Ideologically, anarchists seem to be on the left, and I don't see why any would be a problem for you, unless you are an anarchist apologist, and you wouldn't be that, would you?

Whoever is doing that would be wildly inaccurate. Anarchists are anarchists. They are different people and ideology than ANTIFA. How about we start using language with accuracy?

Language with accuracy? That's a joke, when Ngo gets called every name in the book, except "journalist" because, you know, reasons. So I will call them what I damn well please, and you will just have to sputter and fume about how "wrong" I am. If those people don't like what I call them, they can hire a PR rep to announce their preferred appelation and trademark their symbol. Sounds like you are angling for tbe job.

You are conflaging different groups with different ideologies only making you look like a fool.

Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

Yes, I agree criminals belong in jail. It's too bad most of the GOP doesn't agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It means we don't know who assaulted Ngo, anarchists or someone else. But now at least you admit that the anarchists are not antifa- they are their own beast that are neither left nor right.

I admitted no such thing, liar. Antifa may be used interchangeably with anarchists as far as I can see. It's not like these people issue membership cards. Ideologically, anarchists seem to be on the left, and I don't see why any would be a problem for you, unless you are an anarchist apologist, and you wouldn't be that, would you?

Whoever is doing that would be wildly inaccurate. Anarchists are anarchists. They are different people and ideology than ANTIFA. How about we start using language with accuracy?

Language with accuracy? That's a joke, when Ngo gets called every name in the book, except "journalist" because, you know, reasons. So I will call them what I damn well please, and you will just have to sputter and fume about how "wrong" I am. If those people don't like what I call them, they can hire a PR rep to announce their preferred appelation and trademark their symbol. Sounds like you are angling for tbe job.

You are conflaging different groups with different ideologies only making you look like a fool.

Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

If you generically lump them in with "the left" then you don't truly understand them. These same anarchists also protested Obama, and hate Biden, Pelosi and Schumer too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

Ignorance is bliss. They really are not that close at all.

Okay whatever. And you have spoken to these people? You know what they think? Do they have a manifesto? A spokesman? How do you know what the difference is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It means we don't know who assaulted Ngo, anarchists or someone else. But now at least you admit that the anarchists are not antifa- they are their own beast that are neither left nor right.

I admitted no such thing, liar. Antifa may be used interchangeably with anarchists as far as I can see. It's not like these people issue membership cards. Ideologically, anarchists seem to be on the left, and I don't see why any would be a problem for you, unless you are an anarchist apologist, and you wouldn't be that, would you?

Whoever is doing that would be wildly inaccurate. Anarchists are anarchists. They are different people and ideology than ANTIFA. How about we start using language with accuracy?

Language with accuracy? That's a joke, when Ngo gets called every name in the book, except "journalist" because, you know, reasons. So I will call them what I damn well please, and you will just have to sputter and fume about how "wrong" I am. If those people don't like what I call them, they can hire a PR rep to announce their preferred appelation and trademark their symbol. Sounds like you are angling for tbe job.

You are conflaging different groups with different ideologies only making you look like a fool.

Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

If you generically lump them in with "the left" then you don't truly understand them. These same anarchists also protested Obama, and hate Biden, Pelosi and Schumer too.

Obama, Biden, Pelosi and Schumer are liberals, not leftists. I understand them fine. But maybe you can explain their positions on equity, anti-conservatism, and agitation in detail, since you know so much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It means we don't know who assaulted Ngo, anarchists or someone else. But now at least you admit that the anarchists are not antifa- they are their own beast that are neither left nor right.

I admitted no such thing, liar. Antifa may be used interchangeably with anarchists as far as I can see. It's not like these people issue membership cards. Ideologically, anarchists seem to be on the left, and I don't see why any would be a problem for you, unless you are an anarchist apologist, and you wouldn't be that, would you?

Whoever is doing that would be wildly inaccurate. Anarchists are anarchists. They are different people and ideology than ANTIFA. How about we start using language with accuracy?

Language with accuracy? That's a joke, when Ngo gets called every name in the book, except "journalist" because, you know, reasons. So I will call them what I damn well please, and you will just have to sputter and fume about how "wrong" I am. If those people don't like what I call them, they can hire a PR rep to announce their preferred appelation and trademark their symbol. Sounds like you are angling for tbe job.

You are conflaging different groups with different ideologies only making you look like a fool.

Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

Yes, I agree criminals belong in jail. It's too bad most of the GOP doesn't agree.

Do you think the people who beat Ngo belong in jail? Yes or No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It means we don't know who assaulted Ngo, anarchists or someone else. But now at least you admit that the anarchists are not antifa- they are their own beast that are neither left nor right.

I admitted no such thing, liar. Antifa may be used interchangeably with anarchists as far as I can see. It's not like these people issue membership cards. Ideologically, anarchists seem to be on the left, and I don't see why any would be a problem for you, unless you are an anarchist apologist, and you wouldn't be that, would you?

Whoever is doing that would be wildly inaccurate. Anarchists are anarchists. They are different people and ideology than ANTIFA. How about we start using language with accuracy?

Language with accuracy? That's a joke, when Ngo gets called every name in the book, except "journalist" because, you know, reasons. So I will call them what I damn well please, and you will just have to sputter and fume about how "wrong" I am. If those people don't like what I call them, they can hire a PR rep to announce their preferred appelation and trademark their symbol. Sounds like you are angling for tbe job.

You are conflaging different groups with different ideologies only making you look like a fool.

Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

Yes, I agree criminals belong in jail. It's too bad most of the GOP doesn't agree.

Do you think the people who beat Ngo belong in jail? Yes or No.

CRICKETS. So telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Researched this. He did in fact contribute to general education, abd it't not clear what his direct involvement was with the Indian schools, other than they used the same ideas everyone else in Canada used. In event, as with everyonr else in history, if them mob thinks you are a racist, your statue comes down and that's that. There is no time for keeping a cool head when you have tear down something that has been there for 100 years.

Also PP:
"I mean, between friends, is a mass grave really that disqualifying?"

I’m dying laughing - thank you for this app.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It means we don't know who assaulted Ngo, anarchists or someone else. But now at least you admit that the anarchists are not antifa- they are their own beast that are neither left nor right.

I admitted no such thing, liar. Antifa may be used interchangeably with anarchists as far as I can see. It's not like these people issue membership cards. Ideologically, anarchists seem to be on the left, and I don't see why any would be a problem for you, unless you are an anarchist apologist, and you wouldn't be that, would you?

Whoever is doing that would be wildly inaccurate. Anarchists are anarchists. They are different people and ideology than ANTIFA. How about we start using language with accuracy?

Language with accuracy? That's a joke, when Ngo gets called every name in the book, except "journalist" because, you know, reasons. So I will call them what I damn well please, and you will just have to sputter and fume about how "wrong" I am. If those people don't like what I call them, they can hire a PR rep to announce their preferred appelation and trademark their symbol. Sounds like you are angling for tbe job.

You are conflaging different groups with different ideologies only making you look like a fool.

Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

If you generically lump them in with "the left" then you don't truly understand them. These same anarchists also protested Obama, and hate Biden, Pelosi and Schumer too.

Obama, Biden, Pelosi and Schumer are liberals, not leftists. I understand them fine. But maybe you can explain their positions on equity, anti-conservatism, and agitation in detail, since you know so much?

Many of the RW posters here routinely refer to Obama/Biden liberals as "leftists" and yes those RWers are fools. Glad you agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

Ignorance is bliss. They really are not that close at all.

Okay whatever. And you have spoken to these people? You know what they think? Do they have a manifesto? A spokesman? How do you know what the difference is?

Both groups have made their ideologies clear. Sorry you don't know the difference. I guess it is sort of like "they all look the same"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It means we don't know who assaulted Ngo, anarchists or someone else. But now at least you admit that the anarchists are not antifa- they are their own beast that are neither left nor right.

I admitted no such thing, liar. Antifa may be used interchangeably with anarchists as far as I can see. It's not like these people issue membership cards. Ideologically, anarchists seem to be on the left, and I don't see why any would be a problem for you, unless you are an anarchist apologist, and you wouldn't be that, would you?

Whoever is doing that would be wildly inaccurate. Anarchists are anarchists. They are different people and ideology than ANTIFA. How about we start using language with accuracy?

Language with accuracy? That's a joke, when Ngo gets called every name in the book, except "journalist" because, you know, reasons. So I will call them what I damn well please, and you will just have to sputter and fume about how "wrong" I am. If those people don't like what I call them, they can hire a PR rep to announce their preferred appelation and trademark their symbol. Sounds like you are angling for tbe job.

You are conflaging different groups with different ideologies only making you look like a fool.

Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

Yes, I agree criminals belong in jail. It's too bad most of the GOP doesn't agree.

Do you think the people who beat Ngo belong in jail? Yes or No.

Yes, they deserve to be charged and have a day in court. Do you believe the same is true for all the people who funded, planned and executed the 1/6 insurrection?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It means we don't know who assaulted Ngo, anarchists or someone else. But now at least you admit that the anarchists are not antifa- they are their own beast that are neither left nor right.

I admitted no such thing, liar. Antifa may be used interchangeably with anarchists as far as I can see. It's not like these people issue membership cards. Ideologically, anarchists seem to be on the left, and I don't see why any would be a problem for you, unless you are an anarchist apologist, and you wouldn't be that, would you?

Whoever is doing that would be wildly inaccurate. Anarchists are anarchists. They are different people and ideology than ANTIFA. How about we start using language with accuracy?

Language with accuracy? That's a joke, when Ngo gets called every name in the book, except "journalist" because, you know, reasons. So I will call them what I damn well please, and you will just have to sputter and fume about how "wrong" I am. If those people don't like what I call them, they can hire a PR rep to announce their preferred appelation and trademark their symbol. Sounds like you are angling for tbe job.

You are conflaging different groups with different ideologies only making you look like a fool.

Nope. It doesn't. They are close enough that we don't need to check their non-existent membership cards to understand them. The important point is that they committed a crime and should be in jail.

Yes, I agree criminals belong in jail. It's too bad most of the GOP doesn't agree.

Do you think the people who beat Ngo belong in jail? Yes or No.

Yes, they deserve to be charged and have a day in court. Do you believe the same is true for all the people who funded, planned and executed the 1/6 insurrection?

Here's the difference.....

Those who attacked Ngo have not been arrested, are not being held and are not going to trial.
And, many in Portland who come out, night after night, trying to set the Federal Courthouse on fire - IF they are arrested, are released a few hours later.
Those who entered the Capitol on 1/6 have been arrested, many are STILL being held despite the fact that their crimes were nonviolent, and they will eventually have a day in court.