Girls Tryouts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is great for MCE. It really is a great landing spot for those that don't make Capital.

Why? So they can compare two poorly run programs?

100%, both programs are free falling downhill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is great for MCE. It really is a great landing spot for those that don't make Capital.

Why? So they can compare two poorly run programs?

Girls who tryout for Capital obviously don’t want to commute to a Baltimore program. If they did they would have done so and never tried out for Capital. So once they do and don’t make it where else besides MCE would they go? Pride just started high school. Stars just started high school. NL has high school but seems to be a rec program.

Although MCE is poorly run, it is the best available option.

Not everyone buys into Capital or Balto teams as the end all be all. MCE really is not poorly run, they operate with the athletes in mind, not for parents who think they know what is best. MCE is a great option - talented coaches who coach or coached successful HS programs, great practice fields, hi level HS and college success,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is great for MCE. It really is a great landing spot for those that don't make Capital.

Why? So they can compare two poorly run programs?

Girls who tryout for Capital obviously don’t want to commute to a Baltimore program. If they did they would have done so and never tried out for Capital. So once they do and don’t make it where else besides MCE would they go? Pride just started high school. Stars just started high school. NL has high school but seems to be a rec program.

Although MCE is poorly run, it is the best available option.

Not everyone buys into Capital or Balto teams as the end all be all. MCE really is not poorly run, they operate with the athletes in mind, not for parents who think they know what is best. MCE is a great option - talented coaches who coach or coached successful HS programs, great practice fields, hi level HS and college success,

OK Jenna.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is great for MCE. It really is a great landing spot for those that don't make Capital.

Why? So they can compare two poorly run programs?

Girls who tryout for Capital obviously don’t want to commute to a Baltimore program. If they did they would have done so and never tried out for Capital. So once they do and don’t make it where else besides MCE would they go? Pride just started high school. Stars just started high school. NL has high school but seems to be a rec program.

Although MCE is poorly run, it is the best available option.

Not everyone buys into Capital or Balto teams as the end all be all. MCE really is not poorly run, they operate with the athletes in mind, not for parents who think they know what is best. MCE is a great option - talented coaches who coach or coached successful HS programs, great practice fields, hi level HS and college success,

OK Jenna.

This made me lol. I always wonder why people attack the Pride owner by name but never any of the other clubs. I think many of the clubs have similar problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any clubs posted rosters?

I believe M&D is the only one who has publicly posted.

Hero’s is slowly rolling out rosters. Tough to tell for sure which teams have been updated but I know a couple have been.

MCE is posting rosters as well

Odd that MCE 2026 rosters still not posted. Anyone know what’s going on?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any clubs posted rosters?

I believe M&D is the only one who has publicly posted.

Hero’s is slowly rolling out rosters. Tough to tell for sure which teams have been updated but I know a couple have been.

MCE is posting rosters as well

Odd that MCE 2026 rosters still not posted. Anyone know what’s going on?

I have been wondering about this too. Some of the younger teams have less than 12 kids so clearly that isn't necessarily the issue.

Did too many people leave? Did too many people accept? Or reject? Curious.

[Anonymous]

That is interesting - I had not noticed because they had other ages up - the website has all the recruits listed nicely as well - I give them credit for that - although I did notice that the person that was running the social media for them must have bailed because they were super active for a while there then nothing -

[Anonymous]

So now that Fall has started, how did everything shake out? How many teams do each of the clubs have at each level? From what I hear NL is still one team only at each level except for 2027. Did BLC get two teams at each level? MCE seems to have a few years with only one team but rosters are still not posted at each age group. I am curious because as much as I understand that clubs want that B team money, I think it serves everyone (player and club reputation) to have one team at each level and commit resources to that team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now that Fall has started, how did everything shake out? How many teams do each of the clubs have at each level? From what I hear NL is still one team only at each level except for 2027. Did BLC get two teams at each level? MCE seems to have a few years with only one team but rosters are still not posted at each age group. I am curious because as much as I understand that clubs want that B team money, I think it serves everyone (player and club reputation) to have one team at each level and commit resources to that team.

Amen

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now that Fall has started, how did everything shake out? How many teams do each of the clubs have at each level? From what I hear NL is still one team only at each level except for 2027. Did BLC get two teams at each level? MCE seems to have a few years with only one team but rosters are still not posted at each age group. I am curious because as much as I understand that clubs want that B team money, I think it serves everyone (player and club reputation) to have one team at each level and commit resources to that team.

Amen

Silly post that plan does not serve the account balance of the club owner. Clubs like 3D and true would have 10 clubs at each age if they could

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now that Fall has started, how did everything shake out? How many teams do each of the clubs have at each level? From what I hear NL is still one team only at each level except for 2027. Did BLC get two teams at each level? MCE seems to have a few years with only one team but rosters are still not posted at each age group. I am curious because as much as I understand that clubs want that B team money, I think it serves everyone (player and club reputation) to have one team at each level and commit resources to that team.

Any word yet on what fall and summer tourneys NL is playing in? Doesn't look like they are playing in any of the larger ones.

[Anonymous]

Are NL rosters posted anywhere?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are NL rosters posted anywhere?

Definitely not on their website. looks like it hasnt been updated in quite some time.

[Anonymous]

Many many clubs don’t post rosters. Quit stalking.

It so clear that the posters criticizing B teams are clueless. There are many competitive B teams and girls whole love it and are thriving. Without B teams, many girls would not play. Rec is a joke around here.

[Anonymous]

There are also developing “A” teams. Depends on the club. Depends on the tryout.