RHOBH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And LVP and Ken with the dogs???

Look, I'm sure the dogs are being mistreated and that's terrible and great that someone is speaking up for them. But I can't help thinking, you have this huge platform and there are HUMANS suffering all over the world. Hey LVP, there are probably people suffering within 20 miles of your house! And your passion issue is dogs.

First off, I'm sure Lisa and Ken do donate to "human" causes; we've seen them do so on the show, we've seen them volunteer, etc. So it doesn't have to be all or nothing.

That being said, humans are not more important than animals; we humans believe that human life is the most important life, but that's not objectively so. Humans have more agency and can advocate for themselves; animals cannot. Animals cannot organize and stop animal cruelty. So it's important for humans to work to protect animals, especially from other humans!

Finally, it's Lisa and Ken's money/time/energy, and they can do with it what they like.

Lots of humans can't effectively advocate for themselves for all sorts of reasons (structural, political, economic, religious). I'm not saying it's not important to stick up for animals, however clearly they chose one thing to highlight at this level on this show in front of a huge national audience (in fact, I read it was a condition LVP gave to return to the show...this dog business had to be featured) and I don't agree with their choice. That's it.

You most vote as a liberal. Why else would you be so outraged over some people doing some good in the world, just because they aren't doing what YOU feel is most important?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Quick, a house is on fire and you can save a dog or a child..... Yeah, I thought so....

I would absolutely save my dog over some random child, or a child I knew. I love my dog more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quick, a house is on fire and you can save a dog or a child..... Yeah, I thought so....

I would absolutely save my dog over some random child, or a child I knew. I love my dog more.

Think about this. And let all your friends know you would save you dog over their child. Or any child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quick, a house is on fire and you can save a dog or a child..... Yeah, I thought so....

I would absolutely save my dog over some random child, or a child I knew. I love my dog more.

Think about this. And let all your friends know you would save you dog over their child. Or any child.

Oh, they already know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And LVP and Ken with the dogs???

Look, I'm sure the dogs are being mistreated and that's terrible and great that someone is speaking up for them. But I can't help thinking, you have this huge platform and there are HUMANS suffering all over the world. Hey LVP, there are probably people suffering within 20 miles of your house! And your passion issue is dogs.

First off, I'm sure Lisa and Ken do donate to "human" causes; we've seen them do so on the show, we've seen them volunteer, etc. So it doesn't have to be all or nothing.

That being said, humans are not more important than animals; we humans believe that human life is the most important life, but that's not objectively so. Humans have more agency and can advocate for themselves; animals cannot. Animals cannot organize and stop animal cruelty. So it's important for humans to work to protect animals, especially from other humans!

Finally, it's Lisa and Ken's money/time/energy, and they can do with it what they like.

Lots of humans can't effectively advocate for themselves for all sorts of reasons (structural, political, economic, religious). I'm not saying it's not important to stick up for animals, however clearly they chose one thing to highlight at this level on this show in front of a huge national audience (in fact, I read it was a condition LVP gave to return to the show...this dog business had to be featured) and I don't agree with their choice. That's it.

You most vote as a liberal. Why else would you be so outraged over some people doing some good in the world, just because they aren't doing what YOU feel is most important?

Take that liberal bashing to the political forum. This is entertainment FFS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quick, a house is on fire and you can save a dog or a child..... Yeah, I thought so....

I would absolutely save my dog over some random child, or a child I knew. I love my dog more.

Think about this. And let all your friends know you would save you dog over their child. Or any child.

Oh, they already know.

Ha, I like you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And LVP and Ken with the dogs???

Look, I'm sure the dogs are being mistreated and that's terrible and great that someone is speaking up for them. But I can't help thinking, you have this huge platform and there are HUMANS suffering all over the world. Hey LVP, there are probably people suffering within 20 miles of your house! And your passion issue is dogs.

First off, I'm sure Lisa and Ken do donate to "human" causes; we've seen them do so on the show, we've seen them volunteer, etc. So it doesn't have to be all or nothing.

That being said, humans are not more important than animals; we humans believe that human life is the most important life, but that's not objectively so. Humans have more agency and can advocate for themselves; animals cannot. Animals cannot organize and stop animal cruelty. So it's important for humans to work to protect animals, especially from other humans!

Finally, it's Lisa and Ken's money/time/energy, and they can do with it what they like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And LVP and Ken with the dogs???

Look, I'm sure the dogs are being mistreated and that's terrible and great that someone is speaking up for them. But I can't help thinking, you have this huge platform and there are HUMANS suffering all over the world. Hey LVP, there are probably people suffering within 20 miles of your house! And your passion issue is dogs.

First off, I'm sure Lisa and Ken do donate to "human" causes; we've seen them do so on the show, we've seen them volunteer, etc. So it doesn't have to be all or nothing.

That being said, humans are not more important than animals; we humans believe that human life is the most important life, but that's not objectively so. Humans have more agency and can advocate for themselves; animals cannot. Animals cannot organize and stop animal cruelty. So it's important for humans to work to protect animals, especially from other humans!

Finally, it's Lisa and Ken's money/time/energy, and they can do with it what they like.

Insanity. Yes, dear, humans are more important than animals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And LVP and Ken with the dogs???

Look, I'm sure the dogs are being mistreated and that's terrible and great that someone is speaking up for them. But I can't help thinking, you have this huge platform and there are HUMANS suffering all over the world. Hey LVP, there are probably people suffering within 20 miles of your house! And your passion issue is dogs.

First off, I'm sure Lisa and Ken do donate to "human" causes; we've seen them do so on the show, we've seen them volunteer, etc. So it doesn't have to be all or nothing.

That being said, humans are not more important than animals; we humans believe that human life is the most important life, but that's not objectively so. Humans have more agency and can advocate for themselves; animals cannot. Animals cannot organize and stop animal cruelty. So it's important for humans to work to protect animals, especially from other humans!

Finally, it's Lisa and Ken's money/time/energy, and they can do with it what they like.

Insanity. Yes, dear, humans are more important than animals.

By what standard? Oh, a human one? Oh, OK.

Animals lived on this planet long before humans, and will live on this planet long after. It's a big world, sweetheart; and an even bigger galaxy. You are dust--with opposable thumbs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And LVP and Ken with the dogs???

Look, I'm sure the dogs are being mistreated and that's terrible and great that someone is speaking up for them. But I can't help thinking, you have this huge platform and there are HUMANS suffering all over the world. Hey LVP, there are probably people suffering within 20 miles of your house! And your passion issue is dogs.

First off, I'm sure Lisa and Ken do donate to "human" causes; we've seen them do so on the show, we've seen them volunteer, etc. So it doesn't have to be all or nothing.

That being said, humans are not more important than animals; we humans believe that human life is the most important life, but that's not objectively so. Humans have more agency and can advocate for themselves; animals cannot. Animals cannot organize and stop animal cruelty. So it's important for humans to work to protect animals, especially from other humans!

Plants lived on this planted longer than humans. So has dirt. Is that the standard of ranking the importance of life? We own pets. We love them. If we had to choose between saving one of our pets or a stranger who was human we'd save the stranger. If you wouldn't, you're missing a little something upstairs.

Finally, it's Lisa and Ken's money/time/energy, and they can do with it what they like.

Insanity. Yes, dear, humans are more important than animals.

By what standard? Oh, a human one? Oh, OK.

Animals lived on this planet long before humans, and will live on this planet long after. It's a big world, sweetheart; and an even bigger galaxy. You are dust--with opposable thumbs.

[Anonymous]

Jesus CHRIST this discussion went way off the rails....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jesus CHRIST this discussion went way off the rails....

Way to get it back on track!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does this mean the Kim storyline is done? No more talk about her sobriety? Please?

Man I hope so. I was over that two seasons ago.

Me too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does this mean the Kim storyline is done? No more talk about her sobriety? Please?

Man I hope so. I was over that two seasons ago.

Me too.

Yep.

Everything about Kim Richards annoys me. She is mean and never takes responsibility for anything. Also, if you are serious about sobriety and don't want people questioning it, stop whoring yourself out on this show!!!!! I'm sure she needs the money, but c'mon. Enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does this mean the Kim storyline is done? No more talk about her sobriety? Please?

Man I hope so. I was over that two seasons ago.

Me too.

Yep.

Everything about Kim Richards annoys me. She is mean and never takes responsibility for anything. Also, if you are serious about sobriety and don't want people questioning it, stop whoring yourself out on this show!!!!! I'm sure she needs the money, but c'mon. Enough.

Yeah, but needing the money is no small thing. And beyond that, needing to stay somewhat relevant/recognizable is even more important, when your one career has been actor/entertainer. She got cast in one of the "Sharknado" movies and probably a few small things here and there because of RHOBH. Those paychecks are paychecks.