Who do you think will win MoCo county exec?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an admitted NIMBY and against more bike lanes. I read synopses of all three candidates on these issues and Jawando seemed the least bad. Am I wrong? Any recommendations welcome.

So interesting split here. If it was just NIMBY, as in "no big apartment buildings and keep single family zoning" Jawando is your guy. But he would absolutely put in more bike lanes.

I don’t think he would go out of his way to add bike lanes. If someone else proposes them he’d probably go along unless there was a lot of pushback. He did get endorsed by Somerset in part because he was the only one who engaged with them on Little Falls Parkway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you care about special education go with Jawando

That's a BOE issue. Not CEX.

It still natters

If it matters so much, I guess that anti-Jawando PAC ad was on the money -- all the problems in the school system are Jawando's fault because he's the chair of the Education Committee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you care about special education go with Jawando

That's a BOE issue. Not CEX.

It still natters

If it matters so much, I guess that anti-Jawando PAC ad was on the money -- all the problems in the school system are Jawando's fault because he's the chair of the Education Committee.

That's what Friedson is desparately hoping people think instead of pinning him with the negative effects of his development initiatives that undercut school funding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you care about special education go with Jawando

That's a BOE issue. Not CEX.

It still natters

If it matters so much, I guess that anti-Jawando PAC ad was on the money -- all the problems in the school system are Jawando's fault because he's the chair of the Education Committee.

That's what Friedson is desparately hoping people think instead of pinning him with the negative effects of his development initiatives that undercut school funding.

That has nothing to do with special education and everything to do with diversion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you care about special education go with Jawando

That's a BOE issue. Not CEX.

It still natters

If it matters so much, I guess that anti-Jawando PAC ad was on the money -- all the problems in the school system are Jawando's fault because he's the chair of the Education Committee.

That's what Friedson is desparately hoping people think instead of pinning him with the negative effects of his development initiatives that undercut school funding.

💯. Jawando is doing the work and has skin in the game when it comes to schools. Others not so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you care about special education go with Jawando

That's a BOE issue. Not CEX.

It still natters

If it matters so much, I guess that anti-Jawando PAC ad was on the money -- all the problems in the school system are Jawando's fault because he's the chair of the Education Committee.

That's what Friedson is desparately hoping people think instead of pinning him with the negative effects of his development initiatives that undercut school funding.

💯. Jawando is doing the work and has skin in the game when it comes to schools. Others not so much.

I early voted for Jawando but I’m thinking of getting a yard sign to support him, the first one I’ve ever had.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an admitted NIMBY and against more bike lanes. I read synopses of all three candidates on these issues and Jawando seemed the least bad. Am I wrong? Any recommendations welcome.

So interesting split here. If it was just NIMBY, as in "no big apartment buildings and keep single family zoning" Jawando is your guy. But he would absolutely put in more bike lanes.

I would think Glass would be the bike lane guy. He seems to be a fan of traffic gridlock, hence his stupid idea to make every intersection no turn on red. I really hope whomever wins rolls back no right turn on red.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you care about special education go with Jawando

That's a BOE issue. Not CEX.

It still natters

If it matters so much, I guess that anti-Jawando PAC ad was on the money -- all the problems in the school system are Jawando's fault because he's the chair of the Education Committee.

That's what Friedson is desparately hoping people think instead of pinning him with the negative effects of his development initiatives that undercut school funding.

💯. Jawando is doing the work and has skin in the game when it comes to schools. Others not so much.

That is a flat-out lie. Jawando is contacted on school problems, but can't be bothered to show up, much less return an email. Evan Glass shows up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you care about special education go with Jawando

That's a BOE issue. Not CEX.

It still natters

If it matters so much, I guess that anti-Jawando PAC ad was on the money -- all the problems in the school system are Jawando's fault because he's the chair of the Education Committee.

That's what Friedson is desparately hoping people think instead of pinning him with the negative effects of his development initiatives that undercut school funding.

💯. Jawando is doing the work and has skin in the game when it comes to schools. Others not so much.

That is a flat-out lie. Jawando is contacted on school problems, but can't be bothered to show up, much less return an email. Evan Glass shows up.

Glass never returned my emails. But he did enjoy rehashing/tweeting talking points from Biden instead of trying to solve issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an admitted NIMBY and against more bike lanes. I read synopses of all three candidates on these issues and Jawando seemed the least bad. Am I wrong? Any recommendations welcome.

So interesting split here. If it was just NIMBY, as in "no big apartment buildings and keep single family zoning" Jawando is your guy. But he would absolutely put in more bike lanes.

I don’t think he would go out of his way to add bike lanes. If someone else proposes them he’d probably go along unless there was a lot of pushback. He did get endorsed by Somerset in part because he was the only one who engaged with them on Little Falls Parkway.

He was endorsed by two of five current members of Somerset government. Three did not endorse him. He spun it as endorsed by the whole town...which is shady.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an admitted NIMBY and against more bike lanes. I read synopses of all three candidates on these issues and Jawando seemed the least bad. Am I wrong? Any recommendations welcome.

So interesting split here. If it was just NIMBY, as in "no big apartment buildings and keep single family zoning" Jawando is your guy. But he would absolutely put in more bike lanes.

I would think Glass would be the bike lane guy. He seems to be a fan of traffic gridlock, hence his stupid idea to make every intersection no turn on red. I really hope whomever wins rolls back no right turn on red.

I'm the PP and yes Glass would be for more bike infrastructure. But so would Jawando. So if the person is looking for somebody who would oppose them, it isn't Jawando.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an admitted NIMBY and against more bike lanes. I read synopses of all three candidates on these issues and Jawando seemed the least bad. Am I wrong? Any recommendations welcome.

So interesting split here. If it was just NIMBY, as in "no big apartment buildings and keep single family zoning" Jawando is your guy. But he would absolutely put in more bike lanes.

I don’t think he would go out of his way to add bike lanes. If someone else proposes them he’d probably go along unless there was a lot of pushback. He did get endorsed by Somerset in part because he was the only one who engaged with them on Little Falls Parkway.

He was endorsed by two of five current members of Somerset government. Three did not endorse him. He spun it as endorsed by the whole town...which is shady.

Right of course. Towns can’t endorse people but elected officials who make up the town government can. It was very telling that across the county those officials overwhelmingly went for Glass and Jawando.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an admitted NIMBY and against more bike lanes. I read synopses of all three candidates on these issues and Jawando seemed the least bad. Am I wrong? Any recommendations welcome.

So interesting split here. If it was just NIMBY, as in "no big apartment buildings and keep single family zoning" Jawando is your guy. But he would absolutely put in more bike lanes.

I don’t think he would go out of his way to add bike lanes. If someone else proposes them he’d probably go along unless there was a lot of pushback. He did get endorsed by Somerset in part because he was the only one who engaged with them on Little Falls Parkway.

He was endorsed by two of five current members of Somerset government. Three did not endorse him. He spun it as endorsed by the whole town...which is shady.

Right of course. Towns can’t endorse people but elected officials who make up the town government can. It was very telling that across the county those officials overwhelmingly went for Glass and Jawando.

Glass: Endorsed by 10 current local office holders.
Jawando: Endorsed by 5 current local office holders.
Friedson: Endorsed by 9 current local office holders.

Not counting county council or state offices. Several have former local office holder endorsements. This is sourced from their endorsement pages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an admitted NIMBY and against more bike lanes. I read synopses of all three candidates on these issues and Jawando seemed the least bad. Am I wrong? Any recommendations welcome.

So interesting split here. If it was just NIMBY, as in "no big apartment buildings and keep single family zoning" Jawando is your guy. But he would absolutely put in more bike lanes.

I don’t think he would go out of his way to add bike lanes. If someone else proposes them he’d probably go along unless there was a lot of pushback. He did get endorsed by Somerset in part because he was the only one who engaged with them on Little Falls Parkway.

He was endorsed by two of five current members of Somerset government. Three did not endorse him. He spun it as endorsed by the whole town...which is shady.

Right of course. Towns can’t endorse people but elected officials who make up the town government can. It was very telling that across the county those officials overwhelmingly went for Glass and Jawando.

Glass: Endorsed by 10 current local office holders.
Jawando: Endorsed by 5 current local office holders.
Friedson: Endorsed by 9 current local office holders.

Not counting county council or state offices. Several have former local office holder endorsements. This is sourced from their endorsement pages.

How many of those were in Friedson’s own district? It looks like Friedson has a problem there. It doesn’t seem like he did a great job representing his constituents.

https://andrewfriedson.org/

Vote Glass or Jawando.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an admitted NIMBY and against more bike lanes. I read synopses of all three candidates on these issues and Jawando seemed the least bad. Am I wrong? Any recommendations welcome.

So interesting split here. If it was just NIMBY, as in "no big apartment buildings and keep single family zoning" Jawando is your guy. But he would absolutely put in more bike lanes.

I don’t think he would go out of his way to add bike lanes. If someone else proposes them he’d probably go along unless there was a lot of pushback. He did get endorsed by Somerset in part because he was the only one who engaged with them on Little Falls Parkway.

He was endorsed by two of five current members of Somerset government. Three did not endorse him. He spun it as endorsed by the whole town...which is shady.

Right of course. Towns can’t endorse people but elected officials who make up the town government can. It was very telling that across the county those officials overwhelmingly went for Glass and Jawando.

Glass: Endorsed by 10 current local office holders.
Jawando: Endorsed by 5 current local office holders.
Friedson: Endorsed by 9 current local office holders.

Not counting county council or state offices. Several have former local office holder endorsements. This is sourced from their endorsement pages.

How many of those were in Friedson’s own district? It looks like Friedson has a problem there. It doesn’t seem like he did a great job representing his constituents.

https://andrewfriedson.org/

Vote Glass or Jawando.

The municipalities in his district are tiny and a bit crazy.