Who do you think will win MoCo county exec?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawando. Glass and Friedson are competing for the same voters.

+1. Jawando will win easily.

Let’s hope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My vote will be based on who is least likely to favor the widespread elimination of SFH zoning, and so I'm voting for Jawando.

Same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hate all three of these candidates. How can this be our choices?

I agree with you. I think Jawando will be the most ineffective, and so that's why I'm voting for him. In contrast, the other two will get things done, but those things will be terrible for the county.

[Anonymous]

Who would be the absolute worst for Montgomery County?

Because that’s who I’d like to vote for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who would be the absolute worst for Montgomery County?

Because that’s who I’d like to vote for.

Glass and Friedson will destroy all zoning for single-family housing, so either of those two.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who would be the absolute worst for Montgomery County?

Because that’s who I’d like to vote for.

All 3 of them in different ways.

[Anonymous]

Glass introduced a bill to recruit ice agents to work for the county police today, so he’s a hard no for me now. None of his colleagues co-sponsored.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Glass introduced a bill to recruit ice agents to work for the county police today, so he’s a hard no for me now. None of his colleagues co-sponsored.

Really? That's how you read it? Interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glass introduced a bill to recruit ice agents to work for the county police today, so he’s a hard no for me now. None of his colleagues co-sponsored.

Really? That's how you read it? Interesting.

If it’s not what he meant I don’t know why there’s a bill because the police already screen applicants for these things, well before final offer of employment. Moving that screening later makes it easier for ice agents to get hired because they won’t have to certify anything before taking the poly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My vote will be based on who is least likely to favor the widespread elimination of SFH zoning, and so I'm voting for Jawando.

Same.

Really? I thought Jawando was also pro more multi family housing?
I’m still upset with Jawando for pushing for the removal of SROs from schools—I think that was him, right?

Honestly it’s hard to really see much daylight between the candidates — none of them seem particularly great.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My vote will be based on who is least likely to favor the widespread elimination of SFH zoning, and so I'm voting for Jawando.

Same.

Really? I thought Jawando was also pro more multi family housing?
I’m still upset with Jawando for pushing for the removal of SROs from schools—I think that was him, right?

Honestly it’s hard to really see much daylight between the candidates — none of them seem particularly great.

I think Jawando has been best about opposing widespread elimination of SFH zoning:

https://montgomeryperspective.com/2025/01/07/jawando-calls-for-pause-on-attainable-housing/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My vote will be based on who is least likely to favor the widespread elimination of SFH zoning, and so I'm voting for Jawando.

Same.

Really? I thought Jawando was also pro more multi family housing?
I’m still upset with Jawando for pushing for the removal of SROs from schools—I think that was him, right?

Honestly it’s hard to really see much daylight between the candidates — none of them seem particularly great.

I think Jawando has been best about opposing widespread elimination of SFH zoning:

https://montgomeryperspective.com/2025/01/07/jawando-calls-for-pause-on-attainable-housing/

He's also destroyed our schools while his go to private (or at least some go to private)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My vote will be based on who is least likely to favor the widespread elimination of SFH zoning, and so I'm voting for Jawando.

Same.

Really? I thought Jawando was also pro more multi family housing?
I’m still upset with Jawando for pushing for the removal of SROs from schools—I think that was him, right?

Honestly it’s hard to really see much daylight between the candidates — none of them seem particularly great.

I think Jawando has been best about opposing widespread elimination of SFH zoning:

https://montgomeryperspective.com/2025/01/07/jawando-calls-for-pause-on-attainable-housing/

He's also destroyed our schools while his go to private (or at least some go to private)

"Will Jawando’s four children have attended Montgomery County public schools. One now attends a private school."

https://bethesdamagazine.com/2026/03/30/county-executive-candidates-wheaton-collective-forum/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My vote will be based on who is least likely to favor the widespread elimination of SFH zoning, and so I'm voting for Jawando.

Same.

Really? I thought Jawando was also pro more multi family housing?
I’m still upset with Jawando for pushing for the removal of SROs from schools—I think that was him, right?

Honestly it’s hard to really see much daylight between the candidates — none of them seem particularly great.

Yes, Jawando was behind SRO removal. He spent a a few years attacking MCPD, which is now very understaffed. He seems to have calmed that down, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glass introduced a bill to recruit ice agents to work for the county police today, so he’s a hard no for me now. None of his colleagues co-sponsored.

Really? That's how you read it? Interesting.

If it’s not what he meant I don’t know why there’s a bill because the police already screen applicants for these things, well before final offer of employment. Moving that screening later makes it easier for ice agents to get hired because they won’t have to certify anything before taking the poly.

What I don't understand is this. Am I reading it wrong? Seems like it was ok to violate someone's civil rights before 2025 but not after? So a bad OCE agent under Biden is ok? Even under the first Trump administration?


"an affidavit on a form approved by the Office of the County
Attorney that the applicant has never intentionally violated an
individual’s constitutional rights in the performance of their duties
enforcing federal immigration laws relating to the deportation,
expulsion, or removal of individuals, excluding operations at an
external boundary or port of entry, on or after January 21, 2025."