What are your honest opinions of Camilla Parker Bowles today in 2022 ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

I think this sums up how people feel about the royal family in general. But as far as news goes, they have bigger fish to fry like Party Gate than spending too much time thinking about Camilla.

Eghhh you can wage two wars at the same time and what happens when you have a despised King and Queen on the throne with a despised Prime Minister and his third wife at the start of a true economic downturn thanks to Brexit which they've basically been putting on hold for two years? Fun. That's what happens.

Nobody expects Charlies to reign for very long so there isn't a lot of urgency where he is concerned. He might be 80 years old before he's crowned.

The Queen is 95 and as frail as nursing home residents who mysteriously die overnight. I'd be surprised if she makes to her husband's anniversary death date.

Regardless 4 years is more than enough time to wreck a country, let alone the decade I expect he'll rule just like Victoria's son (who wasn't anywhere near as hated).

How can the monarch ruin the country? They have no teeth.

Guess you have no idea it was Queen Elizabeth who ushered in Brexit in the first place when she prorogued Parliament (only the monarch has the power to do so). They don't like talking about that...I wonder why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

I think this sums up how people feel about the royal family in general. But as far as news goes, they have bigger fish to fry like Party Gate than spending too much time thinking about Camilla.

Eghhh you can wage two wars at the same time and what happens when you have a despised King and Queen on the throne with a despised Prime Minister and his third wife at the start of a true economic downturn thanks to Brexit which they've basically been putting on hold for two years? Fun. That's what happens.

Nobody expects Charlies to reign for very long so there isn't a lot of urgency where he is concerned. He might be 80 years old before he's crowned.

The Queen is 95 and as frail as nursing home residents who mysteriously die overnight. I'd be surprised if she makes to her husband's anniversary death date.

Regardless 4 years is more than enough time to wreck a country, let alone the decade I expect he'll rule just like Victoria's son (who wasn't anywhere near as hated).

How can the monarch ruin the country? They have no teeth.

Guess you have no idea it was Queen Elizabeth who ushered in Brexit in the first place when she prorogued Parliament (only the monarch has the power to do so). They don't like talking about that...I wonder why.

That's squarely on Boris Johnson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

I think this sums up how people feel about the royal family in general. But as far as news goes, they have bigger fish to fry like Party Gate than spending too much time thinking about Camilla.

Eghhh you can wage two wars at the same time and what happens when you have a despised King and Queen on the throne with a despised Prime Minister and his third wife at the start of a true economic downturn thanks to Brexit which they've basically been putting on hold for two years? Fun. That's what happens.

Nobody expects Charlies to reign for very long so there isn't a lot of urgency where he is concerned. He might be 80 years old before he's crowned.

The Queen is 95 and as frail as nursing home residents who mysteriously die overnight. I'd be surprised if she makes to her husband's anniversary death date.

Regardless 4 years is more than enough time to wreck a country, let alone the decade I expect he'll rule just like Victoria's son (who wasn't anywhere near as hated).

How can the monarch ruin the country? They have no teeth.

Guess you have no idea it was Queen Elizabeth who ushered in Brexit in the first place when she prorogued Parliament (only the monarch has the power to do so). They don't like talking about that...I wonder why.

That's squarely on Boris Johnson.

Who doesn't have the power to prorogue Parliament. Neither does the President of the United States vis-a-vis Congress or Biden would have done it already just to get rid of Manchin's recalcitrant behind. Benefits of a written Constitution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

NP. Agree with this. It’s not like I spend so much time thinking about this royal family thing but this Camilla news just rubbed me the wrong way. She’s not very likable and it’s hard to overcome her history with this family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

I think this sums up how people feel about the royal family in general. But as far as news goes, they have bigger fish to fry like Party Gate than spending too much time thinking about Camilla.

Eghhh you can wage two wars at the same time and what happens when you have a despised King and Queen on the throne with a despised Prime Minister and his third wife at the start of a true economic downturn thanks to Brexit which they've basically been putting on hold for two years? Fun. That's what happens.

Nobody expects Charlies to reign for very long so there isn't a lot of urgency where he is concerned. He might be 80 years old before he's crowned.

The Queen is 95 and as frail as nursing home residents who mysteriously die overnight. I'd be surprised if she makes to her husband's anniversary death date.

Regardless 4 years is more than enough time to wreck a country, let alone the decade I expect he'll rule just like Victoria's son (who wasn't anywhere near as hated).

How can the monarch ruin the country? They have no teeth.

Guess you have no idea it was Queen Elizabeth who ushered in Brexit in the first place when she prorogued Parliament (only the monarch has the power to do so). They don't like talking about that...I wonder why.

That's squarely on Boris Johnson.

Who doesn't have the power to prorogue Parliament. Neither does the President of the United States vis-a-vis Congress or Biden would have done it already just to get rid of Manchin's recalcitrant behind. Benefits of a written Constitution.

The queen was never going to override brexit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like it or not, people have come around to Camilla. It's been a long road but people have warmed up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60279761
"Since then, Camilla has won over a cautious public. She has been praised for championing her own causes and interests, including supporting literacy charities, animal welfare and organisations helping victims of domestic abuse"

https://news.sky.com/story/camilla-from-mrs-parker-bowles-to-the-next-queen-consort-12534245
"But as she has carved out her own royal role and been accepted by the rest of the family, the mood towards her has softened."

LOL

Still waiting on all the evidence that people are upset about this recent announcement. Maybe it's just you. Diana's #1 fan.

Maybe 87% of the UK population thinks her breath stinks. Does it matter why?

It's a poll of Daily Express readers, not the UK population. From last June.

No, it’s a poll of the British public which the tweet explicitly spells out for you. Your reading comprehension needs work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like it or not, people have come around to Camilla. It's been a long road but people have warmed up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60279761
"Since then, Camilla has won over a cautious public. She has been praised for championing her own causes and interests, including supporting literacy charities, animal welfare and organisations helping victims of domestic abuse"

https://news.sky.com/story/camilla-from-mrs-parker-bowles-to-the-next-queen-consort-12534245
"But as she has carved out her own royal role and been accepted by the rest of the family, the mood towards her has softened."

LOL

Still waiting on all the evidence that people are upset about this recent announcement. Maybe it's just you. Diana's #1 fan.

Maybe 87% of the UK population thinks her breath stinks. Does it matter why?

It's a poll of Daily Express readers, not the UK population. From last June.

No, it’s a poll of the British public which the tweet explicitly spells out for you. Your reading comprehension needs work.

As does yours. Prove that the people are upset about the Queen's recent announcements. Polls from last year, several months ago, don't make your point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like it or not, people have come around to Camilla. It's been a long road but people have warmed up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60279761
"Since then, Camilla has won over a cautious public. She has been praised for championing her own causes and interests, including supporting literacy charities, animal welfare and organisations helping victims of domestic abuse"

https://news.sky.com/story/camilla-from-mrs-parker-bowles-to-the-next-queen-consort-12534245
"But as she has carved out her own royal role and been accepted by the rest of the family, the mood towards her has softened."

LOL

Still waiting on all the evidence that people are upset about this recent announcement. Maybe it's just you. Diana's #1 fan.

Maybe 87% of the UK population thinks her breath stinks. Does it matter why?

It's a poll of Daily Express readers, not the UK population. From last June.

No, it’s a poll of the British public which the tweet explicitly spells out for you. Your reading comprehension needs work.

As does yours. Prove that the people are upset about the Queen's recent announcements. Polls from last year, several months ago, don't make your point.

DP. You're a fool. You really think because it hit New Years 2022 suddenly people's hatred of that woman which has lasted decades suddenly evaporated?

[Anonymous]

Charles wants to be her tampon. That makes her the c^^t, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like it or not, people have come around to Camilla. It's been a long road but people have warmed up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60279761
"Since then, Camilla has won over a cautious public. She has been praised for championing her own causes and interests, including supporting literacy charities, animal welfare and organisations helping victims of domestic abuse"

https://news.sky.com/story/camilla-from-mrs-parker-bowles-to-the-next-queen-consort-12534245
"But as she has carved out her own royal role and been accepted by the rest of the family, the mood towards her has softened."

LOL

Still waiting on all the evidence that people are upset about this recent announcement. Maybe it's just you. Diana's #1 fan.

Maybe 87% of the UK population thinks her breath stinks. Does it matter why?

It's a poll of Daily Express readers, not the UK population. From last June.

No, it’s a poll of the British public which the tweet explicitly spells out for you. Your reading comprehension needs work.

As does yours. Prove that the people are upset about the Queen's recent announcements. Polls from last year, several months ago, don't make your point.

DP. You're a fool. You really think because it hit New Years 2022 suddenly people's hatred of that woman which has lasted decades suddenly evaporated?

Moron, if the people are so upset about this it should be early to prove. Show me a single shred of evidence that the British give two effs about this announcement that Camilla will be Queen Consort. Just one. The only people who give a shit are the die hard Diana fanatics. Every day regular people do. not. care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like it or not, people have come around to Camilla. It's been a long road but people have warmed up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60279761
"Since then, Camilla has won over a cautious public. She has been praised for championing her own causes and interests, including supporting literacy charities, animal welfare and organisations helping victims of domestic abuse"

https://news.sky.com/story/camilla-from-mrs-parker-bowles-to-the-next-queen-consort-12534245
"But as she has carved out her own royal role and been accepted by the rest of the family, the mood towards her has softened."

LOL

Still waiting on all the evidence that people are upset about this recent announcement. Maybe it's just you. Diana's #1 fan.

Maybe 87% of the UK population thinks her breath stinks. Does it matter why?

It's a poll of Daily Express readers, not the UK population. From last June.

No, it’s a poll of the British public which the tweet explicitly spells out for you. Your reading comprehension needs work.

As does yours. Prove that the people are upset about the Queen's recent announcements. Polls from last year, several months ago, don't make your point.

DP. You're a fool. You really think because it hit New Years 2022 suddenly people's hatred of that woman which has lasted decades suddenly evaporated?

Because you just don't want to believe you might be wrong here's a recent poll for you that show you how quickly the tide has turned. People don't "hate" Camilla as much as you think they do. Wonder what changed? People are moving on.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1562234/camilla-news-duchess-of-cornwall-queen-title-queen-elizabeth-ii-statement-poll-results

"There’s a suggestion that the Queen’s intervention might have shifted opinion as the poll found out of 8453 responses, 51 percent (4348) backed the Queen’s wishes for Camilla to become Queen Consort during Charles's reign."

"Daily Express’s royal correspondent Richard Palmer commented on the findings, noting that in previous surveys of print and online readers of the publication “have found overwhelming opposition to Camilla becoming Queen”.

[Anonymous]

My opinion is that having an affair with a married man, much less one with children is despicable. I think having an affair when you are married and breaking your vows shows an utter lack of honor. I think a mother putting her selfish desires over her children’s happiness and security is unconscionable. I don’t think anybody who behaves thusly should be granted a position of honor.

However, it is really none of my business. William and Harry, who were impacted seem to have established a relationship with her. If they can forgive her, and wish for her to be acknowledged in this matter, I think their wishes should be respected. Moreover, the British monarch, as I understand it is largely a ceremonial position and the consort has even less power. Finally, I think as foul as Charles and Camilla behaved in their previous marriages, compared to historical precedents set by earlier heads of state (both British and international), their transgressions pale in significance.

I do find it bizarre that the marriage between Charles and Camilla could have been problematic because of their histories of divorce and the future role of Charles as the head of the Church of England when the Church of England was essentially established to allow Henry VIII to divorce and remarry.

[Anonymous]

If the Queen, William and Harry like Camilla, and want her to be Queen, then what do I care. You cannot hate your whole life. People need to forgive. Camilla did not kill Diana.

[Anonymous]

Camilla triggers people because the mistress won and the poor wronged spouse ended up dying young. There is a sense of injustice about the whole situation and Camilla does always look like the proverbial cat who got the cream.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My opinion is that having an affair with a married man, much less one with children is despicable. I think having an affair when you are married and breaking your vows shows an utter lack of honor. I think a mother putting her selfish desires over her children’s happiness and security is unconscionable. I don’t think anybody who behaves thusly should be granted a position of honor.

However, it is really none of my business. William and Harry, who were impacted seem to have established a relationship with her. If they can forgive her, and wish for her to be acknowledged in this matter, I think their wishes should be respected. Moreover, the British monarch, as I understand it is largely a ceremonial position and the consort has even less power. Finally, I think as foul as Charles and Camilla behaved in their previous marriages, compared to historical precedents set by earlier heads of state (both British and international), their transgressions pale in significance.

I do find it bizarre that the marriage between Charles and Camilla could have been problematic because of their histories of divorce and the future role of Charles as the head of the Church of England when the Church of England was essentially established to allow Henry VIII to divorce and remarry.

Diana had married lovers so do you feel the same about her?