What are your honest opinions of Camilla Parker Bowles today in 2022 ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diana has been dead 25 years. Why are people rehashing these details like they just happened? It’s well past time to move on and most people have. The queen didn’t make her announcement expecting much backlash. She had a sense people would accept it.

You're right - she's been dead for 25 years, and the world HAS moved on. But the world has long memories for details like this one. I could care less about Charles and Camilla. But I do remember a beautiful young woman who was mistreated and didn't have the tools to handle the hot mess she was thrown into.

Ok, but that was then and this is now. The public is ready for Camilla as Queen Consort. Her image has been overhauled all these years. Diana's wedding was 40 years ago. You must be pretty old to remember all that so clearly and still be hung up on it.

You missed the polling on this earlier in the thread. The public isn’t as ready as you think they are.

That's not what I'm hearing. Most people are over Diana and have moved on. They don't care about this as much as the obsessed tabloids would have you believe.

Anecdotes are not data.

Where is the data that everyone is upset about this?

right here in the thread, you gaslighting idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like it or not, people have come around to Camilla. It's been a long road but people have warmed up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60279761
"Since then, Camilla has won over a cautious public. She has been praised for championing her own causes and interests, including supporting literacy charities, animal welfare and organisations helping victims of domestic abuse"

https://news.sky.com/story/camilla-from-mrs-parker-bowles-to-the-next-queen-consort-12534245
"But as she has carved out her own royal role and been accepted by the rest of the family, the mood towards her has softened."

LOL

Still waiting on all the evidence that people are upset about this recent announcement. Maybe it's just you. Diana's #1 fan.

A poll from last June is not relevant to the Queen's announcement a few days ago. Got anything else?

Nothing has change. The people despise her.

A rolling YouGov poll regularly asking the surveyed the question "Should the Duchess of Cornwall become Queen if Prince Charle becomes King?" showed that, on November 15 last year, only 14 percent were in favour of this scenario.

Among the polled, 41 percent said they would rather see her taking on the title of Princess Consort and 26 percent said they didn't want her to have any title at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diana has been dead 25 years. Why are people rehashing these details like they just happened? It’s well past time to move on and most people have. The queen didn’t make her announcement expecting much backlash. She had a sense people would accept it.

You're right - she's been dead for 25 years, and the world HAS moved on. But the world has long memories for details like this one. I could care less about Charles and Camilla. But I do remember a beautiful young woman who was mistreated and didn't have the tools to handle the hot mess she was thrown into.

Ok, but that was then and this is now. The public is ready for Camilla as Queen Consort. Her image has been overhauled all these years. Diana's wedding was 40 years ago. You must be pretty old to remember all that so clearly and still be hung up on it.

You missed the polling on this earlier in the thread. The public isn’t as ready as you think they are.

That's not what I'm hearing. Most people are over Diana and have moved on. They don't care about this as much as the obsessed tabloids would have you believe.

Anecdotes are not data.

Where is the data that everyone is upset about this?

right here in the thread, you gaslighting idiot.

All 2 of you? You are not proof that Brits are upset about this. You are completely out of touch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like it or not, people have come around to Camilla. It's been a long road but people have warmed up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60279761
"Since then, Camilla has won over a cautious public. She has been praised for championing her own causes and interests, including supporting literacy charities, animal welfare and organisations helping victims of domestic abuse"

https://news.sky.com/story/camilla-from-mrs-parker-bowles-to-the-next-queen-consort-12534245
"But as she has carved out her own royal role and been accepted by the rest of the family, the mood towards her has softened."

LOL

Still waiting on all the evidence that people are upset about this recent announcement. Maybe it's just you. Diana's #1 fan.

A poll from last June is not relevant to the Queen's announcement a few days ago. Got anything else?

Nothing has change. The people despise her.

A rolling YouGov poll regularly asking the surveyed the question "Should the Duchess of Cornwall become Queen if Prince Charle becomes King?" showed that, on November 15 last year, only 14 percent were in favour of this scenario.

Among the polled, 41 percent said they would rather see her taking on the title of Princess Consort and 26 percent said they didn't want her to have any title at all.

The same you gov polls that show people hate Harry and Meghan that are discounted all the time? So convenient Again, from November, so not relevant. You have nothing to show people give a shit about the recent announcement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diana has been dead 25 years. Why are people rehashing these details like they just happened? It’s well past time to move on and most people have. The queen didn’t make her announcement expecting much backlash. She had a sense people would accept it.

You're right - she's been dead for 25 years, and the world HAS moved on. But the world has long memories for details like this one. I could care less about Charles and Camilla. But I do remember a beautiful young woman who was mistreated and didn't have the tools to handle the hot mess she was thrown into.

Ok, but that was then and this is now. The public is ready for Camilla as Queen Consort. Her image has been overhauled all these years. Diana's wedding was 40 years ago. You must be pretty old to remember all that so clearly and still be hung up on it.

You missed the polling on this earlier in the thread. The public isn’t as ready as you think they are.

That's not what I'm hearing. Most people are over Diana and have moved on. They don't care about this as much as the obsessed tabloids would have you believe.

Anecdotes are not data.

Where is the data that everyone is upset about this?

right here in the thread, you gaslighting idiot.

All 2 of you? You are not proof that Brits are upset about this. You are completely out of touch.

Looks like palace PR is frantic to get the homewrecker a crown. Please - I hope they're paying you well. I advise you to take some time off around November this year, the stress is not going to be worth it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like it or not, people have come around to Camilla. It's been a long road but people have warmed up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60279761
"Since then, Camilla has won over a cautious public. She has been praised for championing her own causes and interests, including supporting literacy charities, animal welfare and organisations helping victims of domestic abuse"

https://news.sky.com/story/camilla-from-mrs-parker-bowles-to-the-next-queen-consort-12534245
"But as she has carved out her own royal role and been accepted by the rest of the family, the mood towards her has softened."

LOL

Still waiting on all the evidence that people are upset about this recent announcement. Maybe it's just you. Diana's #1 fan.

A poll from last June is not relevant to the Queen's announcement a few days ago. Got anything else?

Nothing has change. The people despise her.

A rolling YouGov poll regularly asking the surveyed the question "Should the Duchess of Cornwall become Queen if Prince Charle becomes King?" showed that, on November 15 last year, only 14 percent were in favour of this scenario.

Among the polled, 41 percent said they would rather see her taking on the title of Princess Consort and 26 percent said they didn't want her to have any title at all.

The same you gov polls that show people hate Harry and Meghan that are discounted all the time? So convenient Again, from November, so not relevant. You have nothing to show people give a shit about the recent announcement.

If someone gave you a poll dated today, you'd ask for one only within the last hour.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like it or not, people have come around to Camilla. It's been a long road but people have warmed up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60279761
"Since then, Camilla has won over a cautious public. She has been praised for championing her own causes and interests, including supporting literacy charities, animal welfare and organisations helping victims of domestic abuse"

https://news.sky.com/story/camilla-from-mrs-parker-bowles-to-the-next-queen-consort-12534245
"But as she has carved out her own royal role and been accepted by the rest of the family, the mood towards her has softened."

LOL

Still waiting on all the evidence that people are upset about this recent announcement. Maybe it's just you. Diana's #1 fan.

A poll from last June is not relevant to the Queen's announcement a few days ago. Got anything else?

Nothing has change. The people despise her.

A rolling YouGov poll regularly asking the surveyed the question "Should the Duchess of Cornwall become Queen if Prince Charle becomes King?" showed that, on November 15 last year, only 14 percent were in favour of this scenario.

Among the polled, 41 percent said they would rather see her taking on the title of Princess Consort and 26 percent said they didn't want her to have any title at all.

The same you gov polls that show people hate Harry and Meghan that are discounted all the time? So convenient Again, from November, so not relevant. You have nothing to show people give a shit about the recent announcement.

If someone gave you a poll dated today, you'd ask for one only within the last hour.

So, you've got nothing but your own opinion. Got it.

[Anonymous]

TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

[Anonymous]

If Harry and William were not members of the Royal Family, they would absolutely be estranged from their father and Camilla. I know people who are estranged from their parents for much less trauma.

Lets look at all the ways Charles screwed up their childhoods:
-Carried on an affair with a long standing mistress
-Exacerbated and took advantage of their mother's mental illness/fragility
-Emotionally distant, sent them off to boarding schools
-Contributed to the death of their mother

Would you stick by your father through all this crap he inflicted on your family?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

I think this sums up how people feel about the royal family in general. But as far as news goes, they have bigger fish to fry like Party Gate than spending too much time thinking about Camilla.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Harry and William were not members of the Royal Family, they would absolutely be estranged from their father and Camilla. I know people who are estranged from their parents for much less trauma.

Lets look at all the ways Charles screwed up their childhoods:
-Carried on an affair with a long standing mistress
-Exacerbated and took advantage of their mother's mental illness/fragility
-Emotionally distant, sent them off to boarding schools
-Contributed to the death of their mother

Would you stick by your father through all this crap he inflicted on your family?

He almost moved the mistress into Clarence House (pre-marriage in 2005) and basically didn't listen to either of his sons complaints about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

I think this sums up how people feel about the royal family in general. But as far as news goes, they have bigger fish to fry like Party Gate than spending too much time thinking about Camilla.

Eghhh you can wage two wars at the same time and what happens when you have a despised King and Queen on the throne with a despised Prime Minister and his third wife at the start of a true economic downturn thanks to Brexit which they've basically been putting on hold for two years? Fun. That's what happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

I think this sums up how people feel about the royal family in general. But as far as news goes, they have bigger fish to fry like Party Gate than spending too much time thinking about Camilla.

Eghhh you can wage two wars at the same time and what happens when you have a despised King and Queen on the throne with a despised Prime Minister and his third wife at the start of a true economic downturn thanks to Brexit which they've basically been putting on hold for two years? Fun. That's what happens.

Nobody expects Charlies to reign for very long so there isn't a lot of urgency where he is concerned. He might be 80 years old before he's crowned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

I think this sums up how people feel about the royal family in general. But as far as news goes, they have bigger fish to fry like Party Gate than spending too much time thinking about Camilla.

Eghhh you can wage two wars at the same time and what happens when you have a despised King and Queen on the throne with a despised Prime Minister and his third wife at the start of a true economic downturn thanks to Brexit which they've basically been putting on hold for two years? Fun. That's what happens.

Nobody expects Charlies to reign for very long so there isn't a lot of urgency where he is concerned. He might be 80 years old before he's crowned.

The Queen is 95 and as frail as nursing home residents who mysteriously die overnight. I'd be surprised if she makes to her husband's anniversary death date.

Regardless 4 years is more than enough time to wreck a country, let alone the decade I expect he'll rule just like Victoria's son (who wasn't anywhere near as hated).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TBF the only way Camilla's polling would be over the 13/14% in favor of her being Queen (and lets be real those are the hardline monarchists who would support a suicidal maniac on the throne), is if she jumped over a bridge and saved a toddler from drowning after putting out a fire with her bare hands.

She's been hanging around Charles since the 70s and Diana's been dead since the 90s. She will go to her grave despised and tolerated at best.

I think this sums up how people feel about the royal family in general. But as far as news goes, they have bigger fish to fry like Party Gate than spending too much time thinking about Camilla.

Eghhh you can wage two wars at the same time and what happens when you have a despised King and Queen on the throne with a despised Prime Minister and his third wife at the start of a true economic downturn thanks to Brexit which they've basically been putting on hold for two years? Fun. That's what happens.

Nobody expects Charlies to reign for very long so there isn't a lot of urgency where he is concerned. He might be 80 years old before he's crowned.

The Queen is 95 and as frail as nursing home residents who mysteriously die overnight. I'd be surprised if she makes to her husband's anniversary death date.

Regardless 4 years is more than enough time to wreck a country, let alone the decade I expect he'll rule just like Victoria's son (who wasn't anywhere near as hated).

How can the monarch ruin the country? They have no teeth.