What are your honest opinions of Camilla Parker Bowles today in 2022 ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t forget the secret love letters between Charles and Camilla that were made public when Diana was still alive … bonkers nonsense about Charles wanting to be Camilla’s tampon … it was not cool of her to break up that marriage when two young kids were involved but she seems to make Charles happy …

Not sure she will ever be truly accepted … hopefully Charles will abdicate fairly quickly and let William and Kate take the reigns … if they want the monarchy, which depends on public good will and support, to survive ..

Abdicating for William and Kate is truly a horrible idea unless he is planning on still doing the same number of events that they currently do without being king and Queen consort. Which I don’t see Charles doing. Also Kate and William aren’t particularly popular with the youngest set. So the biggest argument in favor of continuing the BRF is tradition which you undermine if you skip the line.

I personally think that the monarchy is not long forgotten this world. And would be shocked if George doesn’t end up leading a greatly reduced institution.

Why would Charles abdicate at all? I really don't understand why people keep bringing this up.

because he's past retirement age.

Since when is that a requirement? There’s no age to rule.

+1. People seem to forget that the monarchy is not an elected position even if it's authority has been greatly reduced to a figurehead type of institution. They think they are chosen by God/Divine Providence. Serving until death is expected. If you start saying, Oh, Charles is too old or William is too this or that then you really do start degrading the integrity of the institution.

- Not forgetting those things — but wondering just how unpopular Charles and Camilla might be. I think many people may support Queen Elizabeth as the only monarch they’ve ever known. This support might not extend to Charles, but might extend to William, if only as George’s father. It’s not an elected position, but it does, very much, depend upon popularity.

When it comes to “God/Divine Providence “, the people who most strongly hold that belief might also be the ones who are the most put off by Charles’s quite messy divorce, and what it means to have a “defender of the Faith” who has had some very public and very messy faithless moments.
To use your words, in some ways, Charles has already degraded the integrity of the institution. While people might not warm to William, it’s easy to see why some are tempted to imagine that Charles could advise and talk to his plants, while William could be the first young-ish ruler in over 50 years. I personally think that Charles should be King, but I get why the prospect of leap frogging Charles in favor of William might seem like a good solution to some.

[Anonymous]

I was 10 years old when the beautiful 19 year old preschool teacher became the fiancée of Prince Charles. I adored her. My mother woke me up in the middle of the night so I could watch her fairy tale wedding. I continued to adore her and thought very highly of the important things she did to raise awareness and create empathy in the public for AIDS patients, etc. I could see that she was a very loving mother.

And then over time the truth of her unhappiness in the marriage and how she had been duped and manipulated and used as a broodmare by a man who never loved her not even a little bit became public fodder. The Prince was revealed to be a nasty selfish man. At this time I was a college student undergoing my own awakening about patriarchy and the oppression of women and I began to see the beautiful Princess as an example of all the wrongs that are done to women - going far back before she even met her Prince. And a few years later I was a graduate student cheering her independence via divorce and her efforts to forge her own place apart from the nasty institution that used her and discarded her. And then the weekend before I started law school I came home late at night from a dinner with new friends/classmates and turned on the news to hear of her tragic end. I was heartbroken and something in me changed with that tragedy that never changed back again.

When you really care about someone for years and you see them devastated in a loveless marriage and the biggest instrument of that marriage’s destruction is a selfish vile person who doesn’t respect the sanctity of her own vows or anyone else’s, do you ever really forgive that person just because your friend dies and is no longer there as the reminder of her suffering? I can’t.

I fully understand that Diana was broken in childhood, like many of us are, by truly toxic parenting. I admire her all the more for having retained a huge heart for other people and for being determined to raise her sons differently, with an abundance of affection and encouragement and closeness. I believe if her husband had made the effort they could have had a marriage that lasted and wasn’t miserable - but he never intended to make the effort, not even before he put the ring on her finger. He had his girlfriend befriend her and they manipulated and gaslighted her together, and drove her further into eating disorder and cutting and other destructive behavior by showing her not one ounce of compassion.

I’ve changed so much from that 10 year old that I find the concept of monarchy utterly abhorrent and I cannot understand why any country keeps it still. I hope I live to see the end of monarchy in the UK. From the comments on British tabloid articles about the Queen’s pronouncement it seems that many of her subjects are offended by the prospect of King Tampax and Queen Slag the blatant adulterers, so to that end maybe it’s a great thing that she will disgrace the throne with her tampax boy - drive up the numbers of republicans in the UK. Pedophiles, adulterers, traders of knighthoods to foreigners for cash donations - the Queen’s most famous children are no credit to her. Ironically it is Diana’s child who is the last best hope for redeeming the monarchy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was 10 years old when the beautiful 19 year old preschool teacher became the fiancée of Prince Charles. I adored her. My mother woke me up in the middle of the night so I could watch her fairy tale wedding. I continued to adore her and thought very highly of the important things she did to raise awareness and create empathy in the public for AIDS patients, etc. I could see that she was a very loving mother.

And then over time the truth of her unhappiness in the marriage and how she had been duped and manipulated and used as a broodmare by a man who never loved her not even a little bit became public fodder. The Prince was revealed to be a nasty selfish man. At this time I was a college student undergoing my own awakening about patriarchy and the oppression of women and I began to see the beautiful Princess as an example of all the wrongs that are done to women - going far back before she even met her Prince. And a few years later I was a graduate student cheering her independence via divorce and her efforts to forge her own place apart from the nasty institution that used her and discarded her. And then the weekend before I started law school I came home late at night from a dinner with new friends/classmates and turned on the news to hear of her tragic end. I was heartbroken and something in me changed with that tragedy that never changed back again.

When you really care about someone for years and you see them devastated in a loveless marriage and the biggest instrument of that marriage’s destruction is a selfish vile person who doesn’t respect the sanctity of her own vows or anyone else’s, do you ever really forgive that person just because your friend dies and is no longer there as the reminder of her suffering? I can’t.

I fully understand that Diana was broken in childhood, like many of us are, by truly toxic parenting. I admire her all the more for having retained a huge heart for other people and for being determined to raise her sons differently, with an abundance of affection and encouragement and closeness. I believe if her husband had made the effort they could have had a marriage that lasted and wasn’t miserable - but he never intended to make the effort, not even before he put the ring on her finger. He had his girlfriend befriend her and they manipulated and gaslighted her together, and drove her further into eating disorder and cutting and other destructive behavior by showing her not one ounce of compassion.

I’ve changed so much from that 10 year old that I find the concept of monarchy utterly abhorrent and I cannot understand why any country keeps it still. I hope I live to see the end of monarchy in the UK. From the comments on British tabloid articles about the Queen’s pronouncement it seems that many of her subjects are offended by the prospect of King Tampax and Queen Slag the blatant adulterers, so to that end maybe it’s a great thing that she will disgrace the throne with her tampax boy - drive up the numbers of republicans in the UK. Pedophiles, adulterers, traders of knighthoods to foreigners for cash donations - the Queen’s most famous children are no credit to her. Ironically it is Diana’s child who is the last best hope for redeeming the monarchy.

You do recognize that you didn’t know her and much of her life and what was shown to you was scripted? You sound a bit too invested in strangers.

[Anonymous]

Well said PP although I don't see Charles as that much different than the institution he represents- the monarchy. They clearly feel that people are pawns in their sick games.

[Anonymous]

The Monarchy brings a lot of tourism dollars to the UK, so there's that. It pays for itself, even though it's a crazy institution that should be abandoned. But people still love it. I don't know if they will love Camilla. I find her sickening, but I don't know her, and maybe she's just a product of her upbringing. Charles seems to like her, so that's something. They are hardly role models, so I do think they'll end the monarchy, unless William and Kate step in with their three cute kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was 10 years old when the beautiful 19 year old preschool teacher became the fiancée of Prince Charles. I adored her. My mother woke me up in the middle of the night so I could watch her fairy tale wedding. I continued to adore her and thought very highly of the important things she did to raise awareness and create empathy in the public for AIDS patients, etc. I could see that she was a very loving mother.

And then over time the truth of her unhappiness in the marriage and how she had been duped and manipulated and used as a broodmare by a man who never loved her not even a little bit became public fodder. The Prince was revealed to be a nasty selfish man. At this time I was a college student undergoing my own awakening about patriarchy and the oppression of women and I began to see the beautiful Princess as an example of all the wrongs that are done to women - going far back before she even met her Prince. And a few years later I was a graduate student cheering her independence via divorce and her efforts to forge her own place apart from the nasty institution that used her and discarded her. And then the weekend before I started law school I came home late at night from a dinner with new friends/classmates and turned on the news to hear of her tragic end. I was heartbroken and something in me changed with that tragedy that never changed back again.

When you really care about someone for years and you see them devastated in a loveless marriage and the biggest instrument of that marriage’s destruction is a selfish vile person who doesn’t respect the sanctity of her own vows or anyone else’s, do you ever really forgive that person just because your friend dies and is no longer there as the reminder of her suffering? I can’t.

I fully understand that Diana was broken in childhood, like many of us are, by truly toxic parenting. I admire her all the more for having retained a huge heart for other people and for being determined to raise her sons differently, with an abundance of affection and encouragement and closeness. I believe if her husband had made the effort they could have had a marriage that lasted and wasn’t miserable - but he never intended to make the effort, not even before he put the ring on her finger. He had his girlfriend befriend her and they manipulated and gaslighted her together, and drove her further into eating disorder and cutting and other destructive behavior by showing her not one ounce of compassion.

I’ve changed so much from that 10 year old that I find the concept of monarchy utterly abhorrent and I cannot understand why any country keeps it still. I hope I live to see the end of monarchy in the UK. From the comments on British tabloid articles about the Queen’s pronouncement it seems that many of her subjects are offended by the prospect of King Tampax and Queen Slag the blatant adulterers, so to that end maybe it’s a great thing that she will disgrace the throne with her tampax boy - drive up the numbers of republicans in the UK. Pedophiles, adulterers, traders of knighthoods to foreigners for cash donations - the Queen’s most famous children are no credit to her. Ironically it is Diana’s child who is the last best hope for redeeming the monarchy.

Bravo! Eloquently and well said. I also adored Diana. She won her desired moniker of "Queen Of Hearts" so far as I'm concerned.

Of course part of her image was scripted by the BRF PR machine. But I think the huge love in her heart is what people were responding to. When she died, it felt like a very special spirit was extinguished from our world.

[Anonymous]

I was about to write what I truly think but who cares? She's 74 years old now and in the end, she was able to marry the man she loved. Who cares what I think? She certainly doesn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was 10 years old when the beautiful 19 year old preschool teacher became the fiancée of Prince Charles. I adored her. My mother woke me up in the middle of the night so I could watch her fairy tale wedding. I continued to adore her and thought very highly of the important things she did to raise awareness and create empathy in the public for AIDS patients, etc. I could see that she was a very loving mother.

And then over time the truth of her unhappiness in the marriage and how she had been duped and manipulated and used as a broodmare by a man who never loved her not even a little bit became public fodder. The Prince was revealed to be a nasty selfish man. At this time I was a college student undergoing my own awakening about patriarchy and the oppression of women and I began to see the beautiful Princess as an example of all the wrongs that are done to women - going far back before she even met her Prince. And a few years later I was a graduate student cheering her independence via divorce and her efforts to forge her own place apart from the nasty institution that used her and discarded her. And then the weekend before I started law school I came home late at night from a dinner with new friends/classmates and turned on the news to hear of her tragic end. I was heartbroken and something in me changed with that tragedy that never changed back again.

When you really care about someone for years and you see them devastated in a loveless marriage and the biggest instrument of that marriage’s destruction is a selfish vile person who doesn’t respect the sanctity of her own vows or anyone else’s, do you ever really forgive that person just because your friend dies and is no longer there as the reminder of her suffering? I can’t.

I fully understand that Diana was broken in childhood, like many of us are, by truly toxic parenting. I admire her all the more for having retained a huge heart for other people and for being determined to raise her sons differently, with an abundance of affection and encouragement and closeness. I believe if her husband had made the effort they could have had a marriage that lasted and wasn’t miserable - but he never intended to make the effort, not even before he put the ring on her finger. He had his girlfriend befriend her and they manipulated and gaslighted her together, and drove her further into eating disorder and cutting and other destructive behavior by showing her not one ounce of compassion.

I’ve changed so much from that 10 year old that I find the concept of monarchy utterly abhorrent and I cannot understand why any country keeps it still. I hope I live to see the end of monarchy in the UK. From the comments on British tabloid articles about the Queen’s pronouncement it seems that many of her subjects are offended by the prospect of King Tampax and Queen Slag the blatant adulterers, so to that end maybe it’s a great thing that she will disgrace the throne with her tampax boy - drive up the numbers of republicans in the UK. Pedophiles, adulterers, traders of knighthoods to foreigners for cash donations - the Queen’s most famous children are no credit to her. Ironically it is Diana’s child who is the last best hope for redeeming the monarchy.

Bravo! Eloquently and well said. I also adored Diana. She won her desired moniker of "Queen Of Hearts" so far as I'm concerned.

Of course part of her image was scripted by the BRF PR machine. But I think the huge love in her heart is what people were responding to. When she died, it felt like a very special spirit was extinguished from our world.

I actually agree with everything you said. Except for the Diana's child part. Wills and his wife disappears for weeks and months at a time. It would be different if he was like King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia of Spain who are doing their absolute best to wipe the stain of his father off the Spanish monarchy through hard work, hundreds of annual appearances alone and together, and preparing their heir (who did her first solo speech at 13 for 4 minutes in 3 languages!) to be a strong monarch herself. But the effort is not there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was 10 years old when the beautiful 19 year old preschool teacher became the fiancée of Prince Charles. I adored her. My mother woke me up in the middle of the night so I could watch her fairy tale wedding. I continued to adore her and thought very highly of the important things she did to raise awareness and create empathy in the public for AIDS patients, etc. I could see that she was a very loving mother.

And then over time the truth of her unhappiness in the marriage and how she had been duped and manipulated and used as a broodmare by a man who never loved her not even a little bit became public fodder. The Prince was revealed to be a nasty selfish man. At this time I was a college student undergoing my own awakening about patriarchy and the oppression of women and I began to see the beautiful Princess as an example of all the wrongs that are done to women - going far back before she even met her Prince. And a few years later I was a graduate student cheering her independence via divorce and her efforts to forge her own place apart from the nasty institution that used her and discarded her. And then the weekend before I started law school I came home late at night from a dinner with new friends/classmates and turned on the news to hear of her tragic end. I was heartbroken and something in me changed with that tragedy that never changed back again.

When you really care about someone for years and you see them devastated in a loveless marriage and the biggest instrument of that marriage’s destruction is a selfish vile person who doesn’t respect the sanctity of her own vows or anyone else’s, do you ever really forgive that person just because your friend dies and is no longer there as the reminder of her suffering? I can’t.

I fully understand that Diana was broken in childhood, like many of us are, by truly toxic parenting. I admire her all the more for having retained a huge heart for other people and for being determined to raise her sons differently, with an abundance of affection and encouragement and closeness. I believe if her husband had made the effort they could have had a marriage that lasted and wasn’t miserable - but he never intended to make the effort, not even before he put the ring on her finger. He had his girlfriend befriend her and they manipulated and gaslighted her together, and drove her further into eating disorder and cutting and other destructive behavior by showing her not one ounce of compassion.

I’ve changed so much from that 10 year old that I find the concept of monarchy utterly abhorrent and I cannot understand why any country keeps it still. I hope I live to see the end of monarchy in the UK. From the comments on British tabloid articles about the Queen’s pronouncement it seems that many of her subjects are offended by the prospect of King Tampax and Queen Slag the blatant adulterers, so to that end maybe it’s a great thing that she will disgrace the throne with her tampax boy - drive up the numbers of republicans in the UK. Pedophiles, adulterers, traders of knighthoods to foreigners for cash donations - the Queen’s most famous children are no credit to her. Ironically it is Diana’s child who is the last best hope for redeeming the monarchy.

What a truly bizarre post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was 10 years old when the beautiful 19 year old preschool teacher became the fiancée of Prince Charles. I adored her. My mother woke me up in the middle of the night so I could watch her fairy tale wedding. I continued to adore her and thought very highly of the important things she did to raise awareness and create empathy in the public for AIDS patients, etc. I could see that she was a very loving mother.

And then over time the truth of her unhappiness in the marriage and how she had been duped and manipulated and used as a broodmare by a man who never loved her not even a little bit became public fodder. The Prince was revealed to be a nasty selfish man. At this time I was a college student undergoing my own awakening about patriarchy and the oppression of women and I began to see the beautiful Princess as an example of all the wrongs that are done to women - going far back before she even met her Prince. And a few years later I was a graduate student cheering her independence via divorce and her efforts to forge her own place apart from the nasty institution that used her and discarded her. And then the weekend before I started law school I came home late at night from a dinner with new friends/classmates and turned on the news to hear of her tragic end. I was heartbroken and something in me changed with that tragedy that never changed back again.

When you really care about someone for years and you see them devastated in a loveless marriage and the biggest instrument of that marriage’s destruction is a selfish vile person who doesn’t respect the sanctity of her own vows or anyone else’s, do you ever really forgive that person just because your friend dies and is no longer there as the reminder of her suffering? I can’t.

I fully understand that Diana was broken in childhood, like many of us are, by truly toxic parenting. I admire her all the more for having retained a huge heart for other people and for being determined to raise her sons differently, with an abundance of affection and encouragement and closeness. I believe if her husband had made the effort they could have had a marriage that lasted and wasn’t miserable - but he never intended to make the effort, not even before he put the ring on her finger. He had his girlfriend befriend her and they manipulated and gaslighted her together, and drove her further into eating disorder and cutting and other destructive behavior by showing her not one ounce of compassion.

I’ve changed so much from that 10 year old that I find the concept of monarchy utterly abhorrent and I cannot understand why any country keeps it still. I hope I live to see the end of monarchy in the UK. From the comments on British tabloid articles about the Queen’s pronouncement it seems that many of her subjects are offended by the prospect of King Tampax and Queen Slag the blatant adulterers, so to that end maybe it’s a great thing that she will disgrace the throne with her tampax boy - drive up the numbers of republicans in the UK. Pedophiles, adulterers, traders of knighthoods to foreigners for cash donations - the Queen’s most famous children are no credit to her. Ironically it is Diana’s child who is the last best hope for redeeming the monarchy.

What a truly bizarre post.

+1. It sounds like this poster was as naive as Diana and bought the idea of a fairytale. Let’s not forget that most of the monarchs have been adulterers and have committed other sins arguably not in keeping with the title of the Defender of the Faith, least of not the founder of the Episcopalian Church who created it so he could marry his affair partner and then beheaded her so he could marry his next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was 10 years old when the beautiful 19 year old preschool teacher became the fiancée of Prince Charles. I adored her. My mother woke me up in the middle of the night so I could watch her fairy tale wedding. I continued to adore her and thought very highly of the important things she did to raise awareness and create empathy in the public for AIDS patients, etc. I could see that she was a very loving mother.

And then over time the truth of her unhappiness in the marriage and how she had been duped and manipulated and used as a broodmare by a man who never loved her not even a little bit became public fodder. The Prince was revealed to be a nasty selfish man. At this time I was a college student undergoing my own awakening about patriarchy and the oppression of women and I began to see the beautiful Princess as an example of all the wrongs that are done to women - going far back before she even met her Prince. And a few years later I was a graduate student cheering her independence via divorce and her efforts to forge her own place apart from the nasty institution that used her and discarded her. And then the weekend before I started law school I came home late at night from a dinner with new friends/classmates and turned on the news to hear of her tragic end. I was heartbroken and something in me changed with that tragedy that never changed back again.

When you really care about someone for years and you see them devastated in a loveless marriage and the biggest instrument of that marriage’s destruction is a selfish vile person who doesn’t respect the sanctity of her own vows or anyone else’s, do you ever really forgive that person just because your friend dies and is no longer there as the reminder of her suffering? I can’t.

I fully understand that Diana was broken in childhood, like many of us are, by truly toxic parenting. I admire her all the more for having retained a huge heart for other people and for being determined to raise her sons differently, with an abundance of affection and encouragement and closeness. I believe if her husband had made the effort they could have had a marriage that lasted and wasn’t miserable - but he never intended to make the effort, not even before he put the ring on her finger. He had his girlfriend befriend her and they manipulated and gaslighted her together, and drove her further into eating disorder and cutting and other destructive behavior by showing her not one ounce of compassion.

I’ve changed so much from that 10 year old that I find the concept of monarchy utterly abhorrent and I cannot understand why any country keeps it still. I hope I live to see the end of monarchy in the UK. From the comments on British tabloid articles about the Queen’s pronouncement it seems that many of her subjects are offended by the prospect of King Tampax and Queen Slag the blatant adulterers, so to that end maybe it’s a great thing that she will disgrace the throne with her tampax boy - drive up the numbers of republicans in the UK. Pedophiles, adulterers, traders of knighthoods to foreigners for cash donations - the Queen’s most famous children are no credit to her. Ironically it is Diana’s child who is the last best hope for redeeming the monarchy.

What a truly bizarre post.

Eh, I’m exactly “bizarre” PP’s age and I get it. I don’t agree with all of it and I don’t talk about famous people like I personally know them, but I think a lot of people rode that same ride. Including the editors of magazines like People that really shaped how the public (the American public, I can’t speak for the Brits) felt about this whole sham. My mom woke me up for the wedding, too, and I will always remember that Labor Day weekend - I was in Vermont at a huge house with a dozen friends - when she died.

[Anonymous]

My brother who is not into celeb or tabloids did say about Diana that whenever he heard her being on TV (news, etc) he always made a point to come into the room to see her on TV because she had that charismatic halo around her. This is why the RF did not like Diana, she stoled the show. Camilla does NOT have this charm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My brother who is not into celeb or tabloids did say about Diana that whenever he heard her being on TV (news, etc) he always made a point to come into the room to see her on TV because she had that charismatic halo around her. This is why the RF did not like Diana, she stoled the show. Camilla does NOT have this charm.

None of them do. Diana was charismatic, beautiful, hardworking and a wonderful public speaker. Charles and the BRF were and are fools.

The Queen - Hardworking

Margaret - Charismatic and a wonderful public speaker

Anne - Hardworking

Kate - Beautiful

Camilla - Hardworking

Sophie - Hardworking and a wonderful public speaker

None of the current women have all four and the less said about the crap men the better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was 10 years old when the beautiful 19 year old preschool teacher became the fiancée of Prince Charles. I adored her. My mother woke me up in the middle of the night so I could watch her fairy tale wedding. I continued to adore her and thought very highly of the important things she did to raise awareness and create empathy in the public for AIDS patients, etc. I could see that she was a very loving mother.

And then over time the truth of her unhappiness in the marriage and how she had been duped and manipulated and used as a broodmare by a man who never loved her not even a little bit became public fodder. The Prince was revealed to be a nasty selfish man. At this time I was a college student undergoing my own awakening about patriarchy and the oppression of women and I began to see the beautiful Princess as an example of all the wrongs that are done to women - going far back before she even met her Prince. And a few years later I was a graduate student cheering her independence via divorce and her efforts to forge her own place apart from the nasty institution that used her and discarded her. And then the weekend before I started law school I came home late at night from a dinner with new friends/classmates and turned on the news to hear of her tragic end. I was heartbroken and something in me changed with that tragedy that never changed back again.

When you really care about someone for years and you see them devastated in a loveless marriage and the biggest instrument of that marriage’s destruction is a selfish vile person who doesn’t respect the sanctity of her own vows or anyone else’s, do you ever really forgive that person just because your friend dies and is no longer there as the reminder of her suffering? I can’t.

I fully understand that Diana was broken in childhood, like many of us are, by truly toxic parenting. I admire her all the more for having retained a huge heart for other people and for being determined to raise her sons differently, with an abundance of affection and encouragement and closeness. I believe if her husband had made the effort they could have had a marriage that lasted and wasn’t miserable - but he never intended to make the effort, not even before he put the ring on her finger. He had his girlfriend befriend her and they manipulated and gaslighted her together, and drove her further into eating disorder and cutting and other destructive behavior by showing her not one ounce of compassion.

I’ve changed so much from that 10 year old that I find the concept of monarchy utterly abhorrent and I cannot understand why any country keeps it still. I hope I live to see the end of monarchy in the UK. From the comments on British tabloid articles about the Queen’s pronouncement it seems that many of her subjects are offended by the prospect of King Tampax and Queen Slag the blatant adulterers, so to that end maybe it’s a great thing that she will disgrace the throne with her tampax boy - drive up the numbers of republicans in the UK. Pedophiles, adulterers, traders of knighthoods to foreigners for cash donations - the Queen’s most famous children are no credit to her. Ironically it is Diana’s child who is the last best hope for redeeming the monarchy.

What a truly bizarre post.

+1. It sounds like this poster was as naive as Diana and bought the idea of a fairytale. Let’s not forget that most of the monarchs have been adulterers and have committed other sins arguably not in keeping with the title of the Defender of the Faith, least of not the founder of the Episcopalian Church who created it so he could marry his affair partner and then beheaded her so he could marry his next.

I'm Will's age and I only ever knew her as really trashy tabloid fodder. I feel like you need to have had this "fairytale princess" narrative to feel strongly about Diana. As far as Camilla, at this point it was meant to be and they seem happy together and in love. I place the blame for the scandal in the first place firmly at the feet of Elizabeth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW Charles has Covid AGAIN.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/britains-prince-charles-tests-positive-for-covid-19-for-the-2nd-time/?ftag=CNM-00-10aac3a

Camilla has also tested positive.

After breathing all over everyone at some event without a mask the same day Charles tested positive. Gross.

And now the Queen is positive.