Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all feels like typical fake posturing on both sides. He'll be confirmed, he was always going to be confirmed. Distract the population with this crap theater while both sides of the same coin do nothing but help their 9, 10, 11, and 12 figure net worth puppetmasters loot the nation.

This all feels typical to you?

Agree. This whole thing is bonkers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The people who don't know what proof and corroboration mean are incredibly frustrating. There is no corroboration or proof of Ford having been assaulted by Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh drinking in high school, Ford knowing his friend's names...none of that is proof of sexual assault.

Yes it is. Proof is evidence. Ford testified under oath that she was 100% certain it was Kavanaugh who sexually assaulted her. Her testimony is evidence. All of the other evidence that tends to support the details of her testimony -- that he got extremely drunk, that he ran with a certain group of guys, that those people tended to gather together at parties - is corroboration. "The testimony of a witness is said to be corroborated when it is shown to correspond with the representation of some other witnesses, or to comport with some facts otherwise known or established." If she's being honest about the surrounding details, it adds to an inference that the main assertion is also true.

Again, it may be too weak to establish, in your opinion, that Kavanaugh assaulted her. That's not irrational. But, "no proof" is simply not true. There is evidence.

Go back to school. Saying you are sure of something is NOT evidence. LOL.

Are you insane? Of course it's evidence. It's the sort of evidence that's admitted in courtrooms all day every day.

Yeah, along with real evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the vote will be moved to Sunday now. They can't afford to lose even one vote.

Yowzzaa. There will be a million people protesting in DC Saturday.

Seriously? I have kids to drive around on Saturday afternoon in NW DC.

Have you seen the pictures from the middle of the workday today? On a pretty Saturday, protestors will shut down the White zhouse, mall, Capital area and Supreme Court area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His WSJ op-ed is tepid and pathetic.

But befitting a Pillsbury Doughboy.

He really is. Kinda hope he didn’t see his former roommate Jamie Roche talking about and exposing liarface, drunken-ralphing frosh Kavanaugh; Roche is a looker and talks in an intelligent, responsive, pleasant-toned manner. Kind of hard to imagine Roche making puckered butthole faces and crying over calendars as he denied a credible sexual assault, a la Brett.

Mr. Roche does have a delightful face.

[Anonymous]

For the July 1 party folks, time to change your theories:

Christine Blasey Ford lawyer says FBI wrongly focused on July 1, 1982 party
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/4/christine-blasey-ford-lawyer-says-fbi-wrongly-focu/

A member of Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team says FBI interviewers are focusing on the wrong date.

The FBI has interviewed people who, calendar entries show, were present for a July 1, 1982, gathering of high school students, including Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

But Ford has never believed the assault occurred that night because some of those listed as having been present are people she knew well and would have remembered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Again this country club set today was saying very unkind things about Dr. Ford from her youth.

AND THEY ARE WOMEN.

I simply cannot believe the women in this town.

Tear down other women. Boost up a$$holes like Kavanaugh. Simply because your husband's pay the bills and you cannot take care of yourselves.

PATHETIC.

Did the things they said have any relevance to the situation at hand? If so, why would they not be worthy of consideration?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the vote will be moved to Sunday now. They can't afford to lose even one vote.

Yowzzaa. There will be a million people protesting in DC Saturday.

Seriously? I have kids to drive around on Saturday afternoon in NW DC.

Have you seen the pictures from the middle of the workday today? On a pretty Saturday, protestors will shut down the White zhouse, mall, Capital area and Supreme Court area.

They really ought to protest in Chevy Chase, shut down the country clubs on a beautiful Saturday. Or head out to Bethany. Wherever the preppies are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Again this country club set today was saying very unkind things about Dr. Ford from her youth.

AND THEY ARE WOMEN.

I simply cannot believe the women in this town.

Tear down other women. Boost up a$$holes like Kavanaugh. Simply because your husband's pay the bills and you cannot take care of yourselves.

PATHETIC.

You mean stuff IRL or maniac trolls posting here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can't blasey ford come back here and tour various houses or be shown pictures by her lawyers?

I don’t think she could say anything about those houses that would change anyone’s mind.

What right would she have to ‘tour’ someone else’s house?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For the July 1 party folks, time to change your theories:

Christine Blasey Ford lawyer says FBI wrongly focused on July 1, 1982 party
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/4/christine-blasey-ford-lawyer-says-fbi-wrongly-focu/

A member of Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team says FBI interviewers are focusing on the wrong date.

The FBI has interviewed people who, calendar entries show, were present for a July 1, 1982, gathering of high school students, including Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

But Ford has never believed the assault occurred that night because some of those listed as having been present are people she knew well and would have remembered.

Why would ford or ford’s lawyers know what date the FBI focused on, unless they we’re trying to meddle in an investigation? Should investigate ford for evidence tampering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the July 1 party folks, time to change your theories:

Christine Blasey Ford lawyer says FBI wrongly focused on July 1, 1982 party
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/4/christine-blasey-ford-lawyer-says-fbi-wrongly-focu/

A member of Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team says FBI interviewers are focusing on the wrong date.

The FBI has interviewed people who, calendar entries show, were present for a July 1, 1982, gathering of high school students, including Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

But Ford has never believed the assault occurred that night because some of those listed as having been present are people she knew well and would have remembered.

Why would ford or ford’s lawyers know what date the FBI focused on, unless they we’re trying to meddle in an investigation? Should investigate ford for evidence tampering.

Everybody knows the date that the FBI focused on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the vote will be moved to Sunday now. They can't afford to lose even one vote.

Yowzzaa. There will be a million people protesting in DC Saturday.

That's a million people with nothing better to do. Do they seriously hope to change McTurtle's mind?

Even McTurtle doesn’t want this dud. He asked Trump not to choose him. Then leaked that he had asked Trump not to choose him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can see a narrow staircase in a picture on Zillow below:

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/3333-Tennyson-St-NW-Washington-DC-20015/452556_zpid/

Picture 5 is a narrow staircase. The description of the house says the Family Rom is on 1st Floor.

I lived in a carbon copy of this house in the early 1990's down the street. The layout is exactly as Ford had described it.

If this is for sure Timmy's house--wow. This is bad for Kavanaugh..

It is not timmy's house ffs it is the house that Mark Judge's grandparents lived in at the time and bizarrely Mike Pence rented it during the transition in 2016-17

so effing do your research before you comment on this sht ok????

Article by the current occupant of the house - https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/my-house-could-be-home-of-kavanaugh-party/news-story/691ee06c01cd15a7a0e0ec6304ba1c66

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Op-Ed actually hurts him. I don't know who has been advising him, between this and the Fox interview and his demeanor when he testified, but all three have put him in a worse position than he would have been had he followed his likely instincts.

I saw an article several days ago that said the WH PR people worried about the Fox interview and had tried to set it up with CBS or someone less seemingly-partisan than Fox. But Kavanaugh felt most comfortable with MacCallum. And this WSJ letter? A dumb idea, and if he couldn't be talked out of it, he should have sent it to the Washington Post, not the Wall Street Journal.

Agree. But the NYT. They just did the piece on Trumps tax fraud. Sending it to them is a show of independence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For the July 1 party folks, time to change your theories:

Christine Blasey Ford lawyer says FBI wrongly focused on July 1, 1982 party
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/4/christine-blasey-ford-lawyer-says-fbi-wrongly-focu/

A member of Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team says FBI interviewers are focusing on the wrong date.

The FBI has interviewed people who, calendar entries show, were present for a July 1, 1982, gathering of high school students, including Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

But Ford has never believed the assault occurred that night because some of those listed as having been present are people she knew well and would have remembered.

Well, you have Senator Whitehouse to thank for that.