Kamala Harris for President

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: She has no policy prescriptions. She has no plans.

She has plans to pass federal legislation protecting reproductive rights; pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act and the Freedom to Vote Act; adopting universal background checks, red flag laws, and an assault weapons ban; protecting the Affordable Care Act; raising the minimum wage; eliminating taxes on tips for service & hospitality workers; enforcement of laws against illegal price-fixing schemes; and passing the bipartisan border security bill.

That's just what I know about from watching her speeches in Philadelphia and Las Vegas.

"Plans?" Or, empty promises?

PP said she had no plans or policy prescriptions. if you don't like them or don't think they are realistic, fine. But she has given an indication of the direction her administration would take on these issues.

She has given no policy platform, plans, or specifics.
Sorry. Stump speeches amount to empty promises without specifics.
Saying "I am going to focus on the middle class" means absolutely zilch.

All candidates do this. It's analogous to running for class president and promising pizza every day for lunch and no dress code Fridays. It's absolutely not going to happen but it makes people feel good.
Politicians know that most voting Americans are at that grade school level mentally they don't ask hard questions but vote for who makes them feel good or who their clique is voting for.

I think they would ask hard questions. The media does not and they circle themselves with sycophantic stenographers so they don't have to.

But things are heating up everywhere around the world, China and Russia there to challenge us militarily, the cities are going broke by overextending the "social compact", and people sense a weak economy (plus our national credit card is overextended, so we can't use that to bail us out - and the BRICS are telling us they're going to challenge the USD).

Maybe we have to hit a brick wall at 100 mph for people to say F the political correctness; gravity sill exists.

[Anonymous]

Everything about her campaign and the candidate is phony and manipulated.

[Anonymous]

https://x.com/simonateba/status/1823363657826238968[twitter]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/simonateba/status/1823363657826238968[twitter]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everything about her campaign and the candidate is phony and manipulated.

They’re called ads. The Trump campaign has also done it, just not now, probably because the funds being raised are being channeled into Trump’s pockets instead of being spent on the campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here people.

She’s just keeping the debate previously agreed to by Biden. If it wasn’t a problem then, why is it a problem now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: She has no policy prescriptions. She has no plans.

She has plans to pass federal legislation protecting reproductive rights; pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act and the Freedom to Vote Act; adopting universal background checks, red flag laws, and an assault weapons ban; protecting the Affordable Care Act; raising the minimum wage; eliminating taxes on tips for service & hospitality workers; enforcement of laws against illegal price-fixing schemes; and passing the bipartisan border security bill.

That's just what I know about from watching her speeches in Philadelphia and Las Vegas.

"Plans?" Or, empty promises?

PP said she had no plans or policy prescriptions. if you don't like them or don't think they are realistic, fine. But she has given an indication of the direction her administration would take on these issues.

She has given no policy platform, plans, or specifics.
Sorry. Stump speeches amount to empty promises without specifics.
Saying "I am going to focus on the middle class" means absolutely zilch.

All candidates do this. It's analogous to running for class president and promising pizza every day for lunch and no dress code Fridays. It's absolutely not going to happen but it makes people feel good.
Politicians know that most voting Americans are at that grade school level mentally they don't ask hard questions but vote for who makes them feel good or who their clique is voting for.

I think they would ask hard questions. The media does not and they circle themselves with sycophantic stenographers so they don't have to.

But things are heating up everywhere around the world, China and Russia there to challenge us militarily, the cities are going broke by overextending the "social compact", and people sense a weak economy (plus our national credit card is overextended, so we can't use that to bail us out - and the BRICS are telling us they're going to challenge the USD).

Maybe we have to hit a brick wall at 100 mph for people to say F the political correctness; gravity sill exists.

The bolded only happens if Russia is successful in its military goals and crypto us successful. Crypto is nothing but a mafia ponzi scheme and yet we have the billionaires and GOP touring it as a legitimate thing of value.

[Anonymous]

What's worse - ditching your press poll to go to Howard for the evening or ditching your tie breaking vote on taxes for tips?

[Anonymous]

The attack lines against Harris are so scattered and not very hard hitting as evidenced by this thread. No wonder Trump is struggling in the polls now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now we know why Eric Schmidt visited the White House at least 427 times during the Obama administration.

This isn't either illegal or unethical. Do you think Trump's campaign hasn't done this? Or every Fortune500 company? Or anyone else who places social media or PPC ads?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This thread perfectly explains the Harris strategy on media access

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This thread perfectly explains the Harris strategy on media access

Taking power back? More like showing voters how she’ll waste their tax dollars if she wins.

Why the h$ll would she money on online advertising like this when the media already gushes over her with constant positive press?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: She has no policy prescriptions. She has no plans.

She has plans to pass federal legislation protecting reproductive rights; pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act and the Freedom to Vote Act; adopting universal background checks, red flag laws, and an assault weapons ban; protecting the Affordable Care Act; raising the minimum wage; eliminating taxes on tips for service & hospitality workers; enforcement of laws against illegal price-fixing schemes; and passing the bipartisan border security bill.

That's just what I know about from watching her speeches in Philadelphia and Las Vegas.

"Plans?" Or, empty promises?

PP said she had no plans or policy prescriptions. if you don't like them or don't think they are realistic, fine. But she has given an indication of the direction her administration would take on these issues.

She has given no policy platform, plans, or specifics.
Sorry. Stump speeches amount to empty promises without specifics.
Saying "I am going to focus on the middle class" means absolutely zilch.

All candidates do this. It's analogous to running for class president and promising pizza every day for lunch and no dress code Fridays. It's absolutely not going to happen but it makes people feel good.
Politicians know that most voting Americans are at that grade school level mentally they don't ask hard questions but vote for who makes them feel good or who their clique is voting for.

I think they would ask hard questions. The media does not and they circle themselves with sycophantic stenographers so they don't have to.

But things are heating up everywhere around the world, China and Russia there to challenge us militarily, the cities are going broke by overextending the "social compact", and people sense a weak economy (plus our national credit card is overextended, so we can't use that to bail us out - and the BRICS are telling us they're going to challenge the USD).

Maybe we have to hit a brick wall at 100 mph for people to say F the political correctness; gravity sill exists.

Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This thread perfectly explains the Harris strategy on media access

Taking power back? More like showing voters how she’ll waste their tax dollars if she wins.

Why the h$ll would she money on online advertising like this when the media already gushes over her with constant positive press?

She's actually giving the middle finger to the voters. Since the MSM is giving her glowing coverage despite the fact that she has yet to outline one policy she plans to implement (other than the one she stole from Trump), she isn't bothering to speaking to voters or the media. Why should she? The media doesn't seem to mind that nobody knows anything about her plans.

The voters, however, are becoming increasingly wary of her ideas considering her past statements and actions.

[Anonymous]

Even Abilio is acting somewhat like a journalist