They both ruin lives, so yes one is not worse than the other. |
. + 1 |
http://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/11/03/sexual-harassment-policy-that-nearly-ruined-life/hY3XrZrOdXjvX2SSvuciPN/story.html&sa=U&ei=XxZzVdOIIYjboASP0IKQDw&ved=0CAsQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNEZgWSTM-4TwarrPMKT0iMmbeFxRQ www.ryot.org/innocent-men-accused-of-rape-college-campuses/715573 personalliberty.com/college-effectively-ends-students-career-reminded-rape-victim-attacker/ https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/05/01/students-accused-sexual-assault-struggle-win-gender-bias-lawsuits |
I almost couldn't read through these examples, they were so disgusting. Thank you for posting them. |
I don't think an article by somebody about his very own (high-profile) case really counts as an example. The second article is about how university investigations and procedures are insufficient. If so, that's the problem to fix. It's a valid question why universities are handling potential crimes. Notice this from the second article, incidentally: "Yu argued that the university’s policies are unfair, as students who are incapacitated by alcohol cannot consent to sex, but an equally drunk student can be found responsible for sexual assault. It’s a policy that is increasingly common at colleges and universities, and its fairness continues to be debated. The blame, however, is not automatically assigned to the male student, but to the student who is thought to have instigated the sex. In other words, if two equally incapacitated students have sex, the student who made the first move is to blame." The article goes on to cite several court decisions that found that the universities are not, as alleged, automatically treating men students worse because they are men. |
Remind me again, what are we talking about? The OP was about guiding sons to be respectful of girls. Somebody -- you? -- seems to want to turn this thread into a discussion of university procedures about rape accusations. |
Regarding your first sentence (bolded) - does this mean that first-person accounts of rapes (high-profile or otherwise) don't count either? For instance, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/12/16/i-was-gang-raped-at-a-uva-frat-30-years-ago-and-no-one-did-anything.html. Should we discount this account simply because the victim wrote it? According to you, we should. Secondly, regarding the next bolded sentence, if two people are equally incapacitated and the woman makes the first move, then is she to blame if she later labels the encounter as "rape"? After all, if a man is to be blamed for making the first move, then it seems the woman should also be equally at fault if she makes the first move. All of which is ridiculous, but I'm just using the examples you've provided. |
I am the PP, but I haven't mentioned anything about university procedures regarding rape accusations. I, along with others, have simply been pointing out that if we are to teach our sons to be respectful of girls (i.e. obtaining consent before sex, etc.), then we are to also teach our girls to be respectful of boys. And that includes never falsely accusing anyone of rape. Fair is fair, correct? |
Still waiting. Just one example.. |
Still waiting for this, too. |