Indiana's Religious Freedom law

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lost track of this thread many pages back, before the discussion turned to whatever the Bible says. Here's my question though:

No matter what the Bible says or doesn't say about certain practices, does it really make sense for the United States to pull its modern laws out of a few random passages in a religious book written 2000-3000 years ago in another part of the world???

I get that some people say the United States was formed by (largely) Christian men, so those beliefs helped provide a context for some of the laws they created for the United States. But none of those foundation laws say the United States will pull its laws from the religious texts -- indeed, they seem to say quite the opposite! So the idea that the Bible has passages criticizing homosexuality seems irrelevant to this discussion.

The laws of the US ARE largely similar to those of many great faiths: thou shall not steal, thou shall not kill, etc...but it permits religious freedom, regardless of how old that religion is and whether it seems strange in todays times.

"Permitting religious freedom" does not equal "basing laws of the country on the laws of one religion."

And outlying stealing and killing is a good idea for government and society at large whether it's based on the Ten Commandments or not. Notice there are no US or state laws against taking the Lord's name in vain.

If you are going by what's a good idea for govt and society, lets start by getting rid of homosexuality then. Gay lifestyles do not produce children. Not good for society if you want society to survive. They permit anal sex which breeds infections and diseases. Get rid of alcohol too then, since too many people have died as a result of drunk drivers and leaving alcohol consumption up to people obviously isn't working.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lost track of this thread many pages back, before the discussion turned to whatever the Bible says. Here's my question though:

No matter what the Bible says or doesn't say about certain practices, does it really make sense for the United States to pull its modern laws out of a few random passages in a religious book written 2000-3000 years ago in another part of the world???

I get that some people say the United States was formed by (largely) Christian men, so those beliefs helped provide a context for some of the laws they created for the United States. But none of those foundation laws say the United States will pull its laws from the religious texts -- indeed, they seem to say quite the opposite! So the idea that the Bible has passages criticizing homosexuality seems irrelevant to this discussion.

The laws of the US ARE largely similar to those of many great faiths: thou shall not steal, thou shall not kill, etc...but it permits religious freedom, regardless of how old that religion is and whether it seems strange in todays times.

"Permitting religious freedom" does not equal "basing laws of the country on the laws of one religion."

And outlying stealing and killing is a good idea for government and society at large whether it's based on the Ten Commandments or not. Notice there are no US or state laws against taking the Lord's name in vain.

If you are going by what's a good idea for govt and society, lets start by getting rid of homosexuality then. Gay lifestyles do not produce children. Not good for society if you want society to survive. They permit anal sex which breeds infections and diseases. Get rid of alcohol too then, since too many people have died as a result of drunk drivers and leaving alcohol consumption up to people obviously isn't working.

Then kill all the priests and nuns, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, go look at Romans 1:26. If I'm not mistaken that's the verse in the NT that says homosexuality is a shameful lust. That's not condoning homosexuality. That's not staying silent on it either. That's an outright rejection of it. Stop trying to twist Christianity to make it what you want it to be for today's times. Accept it for what it is or reject it, but don't lie about what it says.

If the Bible doesn't move you, common sense should. I'll say what a lot of anti-homosexuality ppl think - what in the world is natural, wholesome, or pure about men having sex in the area which other men defecate from? In my opinion, it's pretty disgusting and if love has to be expressed by getting excrement on oneself, something is amiss.

So if a heterosexual couple happens to prefer any number of potential sexual positions that you do not like, or find unpleasant or even disgusting, are they allowed to engage in their intimate activities the way they would prefer or must they defer to your standards?

Are couples only allowed to marry if they are going to have sex in some 'approved' way? Who has the list? Quick I need to check it before DH gets home! See, that doesn't make much sense, does it?

Any kind of consensual sex between adults is perfectly fine... it's only the business of the people engaging in it. No one is/should be/has any right to be asking you to see or experience anal sex, or any other kind of sex you don't want, so why would you get to decide what kind of sex other people can have?

The only thing that society as a whole should get to judge as objectively wrong is something that harms another person or violates their consent and rights. Everything else should be a matter of personal freedom -- especially in America of all places!

Using your body in any way that feels good seems pretty natural to me, and as long as it's not hurting someone else I can't for the life of me figure out why it would be 'impure' or 'unwholesome'.

Let's say hypothetically you are in a heterosexual marriage, and I find your and your partner's favorite sexual act disgusting or awful in some way. Would you want me telling you you can't do that and it invalidates your relationship? Probably not, and unless you're forcing me to participate in it I would have no right to do so and would never think to attempt it.

(FWIW, I am personally also a bit grossed out by the idea of anal sex, but that doesn't mean others don't have the right to engage in it with the consent of their partners. I don't enjoy tennis either, but someone does and there's nothing wrong with that.)

We are talking about whether Christianity as a religion rejects homosexuality, and it does. Clearly. Its not even ambiguous. Some people simply want to twist Christianity to fit their lifestyle choices today.

I happened to express my own opinion of how utterly disgusting and unnatural it is for homosexuals to be expressing love via anal sex. Anal sex is unnatural, period. But its the predominant way homosexuals show affection. What my opinion is shouldn't affect what you do with your DH. If you change your habits every time you read an opinion on a blog, maybe you're too sensirive and should stay clear of blogs?

This is sad. Some of you folks are so fixated on other peoples' sex lives!

PP, how does your husband "predominately show you affection"-- on all fours, or while you're on your back? Does that question sound a little intrusive? If so, ask yourself how do you feel when your relationship is denigrated and your love for another person is described as no more than a sex act? You need to butt out and mind your own business. Jesus doesn't like people who think about sex all the time, just as He despises those who judge their fellow men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is sad. Some of you folks are so fixated on other peoples' sex lives!

I agree. Some people are so disgusted by butt screwing that they obsess about it all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I lost track of this thread many pages back, before the discussion turned to whatever the Bible says. Here's my question though:

No matter what the Bible says or doesn't say about certain practices, does it really make sense for the United States to pull its modern laws out of a few random passages in a religious book written 2000-3000 years ago in another part of the world???

I get that some people say the United States was formed by (largely) Christian men, so those beliefs helped provide a context for some of the laws they created for the United States. But none of those foundation laws say the United States will pull its laws from the religious texts -- indeed, they seem to say quite the opposite! So the idea that the Bible has passages criticizing homosexuality seems irrelevant to this discussion.

Bumping this ^^ in hopes that we can get past "What the Baaa-ble says" and continue the discussion as a political one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, go look at Romans 1:26. If I'm not mistaken that's the verse in the NT that says homosexuality is a shameful lust. That's not condoning homosexuality. That's not staying silent on it either. That's an outright rejection of it. Stop trying to twist Christianity to make it what you want it to be for today's times. Accept it for what it is or reject it, but don't lie about what it says.

If the Bible doesn't move you, common sense should. I'll say what a lot of anti-homosexuality ppl think - what in the world is natural, wholesome, or pure about men having sex in the area which other men defecate from? In my opinion, it's pretty disgusting and if love has to be expressed by getting excrement on oneself, something is amiss.

So if a heterosexual couple happens to prefer any number of potential sexual positions that you do not like, or find unpleasant or even disgusting, are they allowed to engage in their intimate activities the way they would prefer or must they defer to your standards?

Are couples only allowed to marry if they are going to have sex in some 'approved' way? Who has the list? Quick I need to check it before DH gets home! See, that doesn't make much sense, does it?

Any kind of consensual sex between adults is perfectly fine... it's only the business of the people engaging in it. No one is/should be/has any right to be asking you to see or experience anal sex, or any other kind of sex you don't want, so why would you get to decide what kind of sex other people can have?

The only thing that society as a whole should get to judge as objectively wrong is something that harms another person or violates their consent and rights. Everything else should be a matter of personal freedom -- especially in America of all places!

Using your body in any way that feels good seems pretty natural to me, and as long as it's not hurting someone else I can't for the life of me figure out why it would be 'impure' or 'unwholesome'.

Let's say hypothetically you are in a heterosexual marriage, and I find your and your partner's favorite sexual act disgusting or awful in some way. Would you want me telling you you can't do that and it invalidates your relationship? Probably not, and unless you're forcing me to participate in it I would have no right to do so and would never think to attempt it.

(FWIW, I am personally also a bit grossed out by the idea of anal sex, but that doesn't mean others don't have the right to engage in it with the consent of their partners. I don't enjoy tennis either, but someone does and there's nothing wrong with that.)

We are talking about whether Christianity as a religion rejects homosexuality, and it does. Clearly. Its not even ambiguous. Some people simply want to twist Christianity to fit their lifestyle choices today.

I happened to express my own opinion of how utterly disgusting and unnatural it is for homosexuals to be expressing love via anal sex. Anal sex is unnatural, period. But its the predominant way homosexuals show affection. What my opinion is shouldn't affect what you do with your DH. If you change your habits every time you read an opinion on a blog, maybe you're too sensirive and should stay clear of blogs?

This is sad. Some of you folks are so fixated on other peoples' sex lives!

PP, how does your husband "predominately show you affection"-- on all fours, or while you're on your back? Does that question sound a little intrusive? If so, ask yourself how do you feel when your relationship is denigrated and your love for another person is described as no more than a sex act? You need to butt out and mind your own business. Jesus doesn't like people who think about sex all the time, just as He despises those who judge their fellow men.

My money's on that PP comes back and gives the ol' line about how she's actually "judging the sin not the sinner" and piles on some more anal chat...just to get the point across.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is sad. Some of you folks are so fixated on other peoples' sex lives!

I agree. Some people are so disgusted by butt screwing that they obsess about it all the time.

Seems to me the ones fixated on making Christians accept it are the ones obsessed. ,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is sad. Some of you folks are so fixated on other peoples' sex lives!

I agree. Some people are so disgusted by butt screwing that they obsess about it all the time.

Seems to me the ones fixated on making Christians accept it are the ones obsessed. ,

Wrong. We're for ending discrimination. You Fundies are the ones bringing up the mechanics of intimate acts between adults who you're discriminating against.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lost track of this thread many pages back, before the discussion turned to whatever the Bible says. Here's my question though:

No matter what the Bible says or doesn't say about certain practices, does it really make sense for the United States to pull its modern laws out of a few random passages in a religious book written 2000-3000 years ago in another part of the world???

I get that some people say the United States was formed by (largely) Christian men, so those beliefs helped provide a context for some of the laws they created for the United States. But none of those foundation laws say the United States will pull its laws from the religious texts -- indeed, they seem to say quite the opposite! So the idea that the Bible has passages criticizing homosexuality seems irrelevant to this discussion.

The laws of the US ARE largely similar to those of many great faiths: thou shall not steal, thou shall not kill, etc...but it permits religious freedom, regardless of how old that religion is and whether it seems strange in todays times.

"Permitting religious freedom" does not equal "basing laws of the country on the laws of one religion."

And outlying stealing and killing is a good idea for government and society at large whether it's based on the Ten Commandments or not. Notice there are no US or state laws against taking the Lord's name in vain.

If you are going by what's a good idea for govt and society, lets start by getting rid of homosexuality then. Gay lifestyles do not produce children. Not good for society if you want society to survive. They permit anal sex which breeds infections and diseases. Get rid of alcohol too then, since too many people have died as a result of drunk drivers and leaving alcohol consumption up to people obviously isn't working.

Then kill all the priests and nuns, right?

What?!?! Explain this. I can not understand the inner workings of your mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, go look at Romans 1:26. If I'm not mistaken that's the verse in the NT that says homosexuality is a shameful lust. That's not condoning homosexuality. That's not staying silent on it either. That's an outright rejection of it. Stop trying to twist Christianity to make it what you want it to be for today's times. Accept it for what it is or reject it, but don't lie about what it says.

If the Bible doesn't move you, common sense should. I'll say what a lot of anti-homosexuality ppl think - what in the world is natural, wholesome, or pure about men having sex in the area which other men defecate from? In my opinion, it's pretty disgusting and if love has to be expressed by getting excrement on oneself, something is amiss.

So if a heterosexual couple happens to prefer any number of potential sexual positions that you do not like, or find unpleasant or even disgusting, are they allowed to engage in their intimate activities the way they would prefer or must they defer to your standards?

Are couples only allowed to marry if they are going to have sex in some 'approved' way? Who has the list? Quick I need to check it before DH gets home! See, that doesn't make much sense, does it?

Any kind of consensual sex between adults is perfectly fine... it's only the business of the people engaging in it. No one is/should be/has any right to be asking you to see or experience anal sex, or any other kind of sex you don't want, so why would you get to decide what kind of sex other people can have?

The only thing that society as a whole should get to judge as objectively wrong is something that harms another person or violates their consent and rights. Everything else should be a matter of personal freedom -- especially in America of all places!

Using your body in any way that feels good seems pretty natural to me, and as long as it's not hurting someone else I can't for the life of me figure out why it would be 'impure' or 'unwholesome'.

Let's say hypothetically you are in a heterosexual marriage, and I find your and your partner's favorite sexual act disgusting or awful in some way. Would you want me telling you you can't do that and it invalidates your relationship? Probably not, and unless you're forcing me to participate in it I would have no right to do so and would never think to attempt it.

(FWIW, I am personally also a bit grossed out by the idea of anal sex, but that doesn't mean others don't have the right to engage in it with the consent of their partners. I don't enjoy tennis either, but someone does and there's nothing wrong with that.)

We are talking about whether Christianity as a religion rejects homosexuality, and it does. Clearly. Its not even ambiguous. Some people simply want to twist Christianity to fit their lifestyle choices today.

I happened to express my own opinion of how utterly disgusting and unnatural it is for homosexuals to be expressing love via anal sex. Anal sex is unnatural, period. But its the predominant way homosexuals show affection. What my opinion is shouldn't affect what you do with your DH. If you change your habits every time you read an opinion on a blog, maybe you're too sensirive and should stay clear of blogs?

This is sad. Some of you folks are so fixated on other peoples' sex lives!

PP, how does your husband "predominately show you affection"-- on all fours, or while you're on your back? Does that question sound a little intrusive? If so, ask yourself how do you feel when your relationship is denigrated and your love for another person is described as no more than a sex act? You need to butt out and mind your own business. Jesus doesn't like people who think about sex all the time, just as He despises those who judge their fellow men.

My money's on that PP comes back and gives the ol' line about how she's actually "judging the sin not the sinner" and piles on some more anal chat...just to get the point across.

Pp here. He sure as hell doesn't need to do an excrement check on his private area to make sure he didn't get any on him. And DH & I can have children, another indication how we do it is natural and intended.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, go look at Romans 1:26. If I'm not mistaken that's the verse in the NT that says homosexuality is a shameful lust. That's not condoning homosexuality. That's not staying silent on it either. That's an outright rejection of it. Stop trying to twist Christianity to make it what you want it to be for today's times. Accept it for what it is or reject it, but don't lie about what it says.

If the Bible doesn't move you, common sense should. I'll say what a lot of anti-homosexuality ppl think - what in the world is natural, wholesome, or pure about men having sex in the area which other men defecate from? In my opinion, it's pretty disgusting and if love has to be expressed by getting excrement on oneself, something is amiss.

So if a heterosexual couple happens to prefer any number of potential sexual positions that you do not like, or find unpleasant or even disgusting, are they allowed to engage in their intimate activities the way they would prefer or must they defer to your standards?

Are couples only allowed to marry if they are going to have sex in some 'approved' way? Who has the list? Quick I need to check it before DH gets home! See, that doesn't make much sense, does it?

Any kind of consensual sex between adults is perfectly fine... it's only the business of the people engaging in it. No one is/should be/has any right to be asking you to see or experience anal sex, or any other kind of sex you don't want, so why would you get to decide what kind of sex other people can have?

The only thing that society as a whole should get to judge as objectively wrong is something that harms another person or violates their consent and rights. Everything else should be a matter of personal freedom -- especially in America of all places!

Using your body in any way that feels good seems pretty natural to me, and as long as it's not hurting someone else I can't for the life of me figure out why it would be 'impure' or 'unwholesome'.

Let's say hypothetically you are in a heterosexual marriage, and I find your and your partner's favorite sexual act disgusting or awful in some way. Would you want me telling you you can't do that and it invalidates your relationship? Probably not, and unless you're forcing me to participate in it I would have no right to do so and would never think to attempt it.

(FWIW, I am personally also a bit grossed out by the idea of anal sex, but that doesn't mean others don't have the right to engage in it with the consent of their partners. I don't enjoy tennis either, but someone does and there's nothing wrong with that.)

We are talking about whether Christianity as a religion rejects homosexuality, and it does. Clearly. Its not even ambiguous. Some people simply want to twist Christianity to fit their lifestyle choices today.

I happened to express my own opinion of how utterly disgusting and unnatural it is for homosexuals to be expressing love via anal sex. Anal sex is unnatural, period. But its the predominant way homosexuals show affection. What my opinion is shouldn't affect what you do with your DH. If you change your habits every time you read an opinion on a blog, maybe you're too sensirive and should stay clear of blogs?

This is sad. Some of you folks are so fixated on other peoples' sex lives!

PP, how does your husband "predominately show you affection"-- on all fours, or while you're on your back? Does that question sound a little intrusive? If so, ask yourself how do you feel when your relationship is denigrated and your love for another person is described as no more than a sex act? You need to butt out and mind your own business. Jesus doesn't like people who think about sex all the time, just as He despises those who judge their fellow men.

My money's on that PP comes back and gives the ol' line about how she's actually "judging the sin not the sinner" and piles on some more anal chat...just to get the point across.

Pp here. He sure as hell doesn't need to do an excrement check on his private area to make sure he didn't get any on him. And DH & I can have children, another indication how we do it is natural and intended.

When you put it that way, how's life as a pilgrim?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, go look at Romans 1:26. If I'm not mistaken that's the verse in the NT that says homosexuality is a shameful lust. That's not condoning homosexuality. That's not staying silent on it either. That's an outright rejection of it. Stop trying to twist Christianity to make it what you want it to be for today's times. Accept it for what it is or reject it, but don't lie about what it says.

If the Bible doesn't move you, common sense should. I'll say what a lot of anti-homosexuality ppl think - what in the world is natural, wholesome, or pure about men having sex in the area which other men defecate from? In my opinion, it's pretty disgusting and if love has to be expressed by getting excrement on oneself, something is amiss.

So if a heterosexual couple happens to prefer any number of potential sexual positions that you do not like, or find unpleasant or even disgusting, are they allowed to engage in their intimate activities the way they would prefer or must they defer to your standards?

Are couples only allowed to marry if they are going to have sex in some 'approved' way? Who has the list? Quick I need to check it before DH gets home! See, that doesn't make much sense, does it?

Any kind of consensual sex between adults is perfectly fine... it's only the business of the people engaging in it. No one is/should be/has any right to be asking you to see or experience anal sex, or any other kind of sex you don't want, so why would you get to decide what kind of sex other people can have?

The only thing that society as a whole should get to judge as objectively wrong is something that harms another person or violates their consent and rights. Everything else should be a matter of personal freedom -- especially in America of all places!

Using your body in any way that feels good seems pretty natural to me, and as long as it's not hurting someone else I can't for the life of me figure out why it would be 'impure' or 'unwholesome'.

Let's say hypothetically you are in a heterosexual marriage, and I find your and your partner's favorite sexual act disgusting or awful in some way. Would you want me telling you you can't do that and it invalidates your relationship? Probably not, and unless you're forcing me to participate in it I would have no right to do so and would never think to attempt it.

(FWIW, I am personally also a bit grossed out by the idea of anal sex, but that doesn't mean others don't have the right to engage in it with the consent of their partners. I don't enjoy tennis either, but someone does and there's nothing wrong with that.)

We are talking about whether Christianity as a religion rejects homosexuality, and it does. Clearly. Its not even ambiguous. Some people simply want to twist Christianity to fit their lifestyle choices today.

I happened to express my own opinion of how utterly disgusting and unnatural it is for homosexuals to be expressing love via anal sex. Anal sex is unnatural, period. But its the predominant way homosexuals show affection. What my opinion is shouldn't affect what you do with your DH. If you change your habits every time you read an opinion on a blog, maybe you're too sensirive and should stay clear of blogs?

This is sad. Some of you folks are so fixated on other peoples' sex lives!

PP, how does your husband "predominately show you affection"-- on all fours, or while you're on your back? Does that question sound a little intrusive? If so, ask yourself how do you feel when your relationship is denigrated and your love for another person is described as no more than a sex act? You need to butt out and mind your own business. Jesus doesn't like people who think about sex all the time, just as He despises those who judge their fellow men.

My money's on that PP comes back and gives the ol' line about how she's actually "judging the sin not the sinner" and piles on some more anal chat...just to get the point across.

Pp here. He sure as hell doesn't need to do an excrement check on his private area to make sure he didn't get any on him. And DH & I can have children, another indication how we do it is natural and intended.

When you put it that way, how's life as a pilgrim?

If I'm a pilgrim, then I guess I should ask you -- what was the last animal you had sex with? What a ridiculous assumption that because I oppose homosexuality and unnatural acts, that I'm 'a pilgrim.'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, go look at Romans 1:26. If I'm not mistaken that's the verse in the NT that says homosexuality is a shameful lust. That's not condoning homosexuality. That's not staying silent on it either. That's an outright rejection of it. Stop trying to twist Christianity to make it what you want it to be for today's times. Accept it for what it is or reject it, but don't lie about what it says.

If the Bible doesn't move you, common sense should. I'll say what a lot of anti-homosexuality ppl think - what in the world is natural, wholesome, or pure about men having sex in the area which other men defecate from? In my opinion, it's pretty disgusting and if love has to be expressed by getting excrement on oneself, something is amiss.

So if a heterosexual couple happens to prefer any number of potential sexual positions that you do not like, or find unpleasant or even disgusting, are they allowed to engage in their intimate activities the way they would prefer or must they defer to your standards?

Are couples only allowed to marry if they are going to have sex in some 'approved' way? Who has the list? Quick I need to check it before DH gets home! See, that doesn't make much sense, does it?

Any kind of consensual sex between adults is perfectly fine... it's only the business of the people engaging in it. No one is/should be/has any right to be asking you to see or experience anal sex, or any other kind of sex you don't want, so why would you get to decide what kind of sex other people can have?

The only thing that society as a whole should get to judge as objectively wrong is something that harms another person or violates their consent and rights. Everything else should be a matter of personal freedom -- especially in America of all places!

Using your body in any way that feels good seems pretty natural to me, and as long as it's not hurting someone else I can't for the life of me figure out why it would be 'impure' or 'unwholesome'.

Let's say hypothetically you are in a heterosexual marriage, and I find your and your partner's favorite sexual act disgusting or awful in some way. Would you want me telling you you can't do that and it invalidates your relationship? Probably not, and unless you're forcing me to participate in it I would have no right to do so and would never think to attempt it.

(FWIW, I am personally also a bit grossed out by the idea of anal sex, but that doesn't mean others don't have the right to engage in it with the consent of their partners. I don't enjoy tennis either, but someone does and there's nothing wrong with that.)

We are talking about whether Christianity as a religion rejects homosexuality, and it does. Clearly. Its not even ambiguous. Some people simply want to twist Christianity to fit their lifestyle choices today.

I happened to express my own opinion of how utterly disgusting and unnatural it is for homosexuals to be expressing love via anal sex. Anal sex is unnatural, period. But its the predominant way homosexuals show affection. What my opinion is shouldn't affect what you do with your DH. If you change your habits every time you read an opinion on a blog, maybe you're too sensirive and should stay clear of blogs?

This is sad. Some of you folks are so fixated on other peoples' sex lives!

PP, how does your husband "predominately show you affection"-- on all fours, or while you're on your back? Does that question sound a little intrusive? If so, ask yourself how do you feel when your relationship is denigrated and your love for another person is described as no more than a sex act? You need to butt out and mind your own business. Jesus doesn't like people who think about sex all the time, just as He despises those who judge their fellow men.

My money's on that PP comes back and gives the ol' line about how she's actually "judging the sin not the sinner" and piles on some more anal chat...just to get the point across.

Pp here. He sure as hell doesn't need to do an excrement check on his private area to make sure he didn't get any on him. And DH & I can have children, another indication how we do it is natural and intended.

When you put it that way, how's life as a pilgrim?

If I'm a pilgrim, then I guess I should ask you -- what was the last animal you had sex with? What a ridiculous assumption that because I oppose homosexuality and unnatural acts, that I'm 'a pilgrim.'

Human, thanks. A blowjob is an unnatural act.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: Human, thanks. A blowjob is an unnatural act.

Homo sapien right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Human, thanks. A blowjob is an unnatural act.

Depending on your gender I either pity you or pity your husband.