erm. that should have been sockpuppet anti-adoption brigade, representing all their personalities today. |
|
The news announced that the adoptive parents will not drop the custodial interference charges against the father (he may be extradited to SC and jailed), and the adoptive couple also plan to sue the bio father for their attorneys fees. They are true scum of the earth!
|
Do you have a NON-BIASED citation, or are are you just spewing more of your sock-puppeting venom? |
| Wow, they are just going to destroy that child. |
If you were in his situation or had a family member or even your child, how would you feel about another family just taking a child with no concern for your wishes. What they ddi was wrong. They should have let the child be with her father and found another child to adopt. They are cruel, nasty people who give adoption a bad name. |
This is not an unbiased source. Please try again when you come to (again) bash Veronica's parents tomorrow at the same time you do every day. |
Did you kidnadopt a baby? Are you the crazy DC attorney with an axe to grind? Adoption done ethically is FINE...it is the illegal "adoptions" I do not support. Hope this type of thing does not happen to your son/child someday. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid and get your facts straight. If you can or wish to cite a more "unbiased or accurate" news source than do so. |
It is the only media source that relays Brown's perspective. Of course, you will discount it. The truth is that he loves and fought until the end for his daughter. That will always be true, no matter the legalities involved. |
| "then" |
| Fuck it. At least the bio dad did not go down without a fight. His daughter will always know that he went down kicking. |
You are mental and clearly have a personal axe to grind. I wonder what's bothering you about your personal life? In any case, I hope you get personal resolution soon and stop projecting on a case that's been in the media. You cannot seek your personal peace and solace through the Browns or anyone else. |
Why is this not unbiased? Because it is an Indian publication? Has to be white-owned to be unbiased, or what? |
cosign |
As an actual Indian (ie, with family from India, and I don't mean 1/64 of my ancestry like Veronica and her Native American ancestry), I couldn't give two shits what skin color owns a publication. An unbiased outlet means one that can be externally verified elsewhere and outside themselves and the opinions of their own staff. |