Will there really be enough spaces in the "rich kid schools" for it have a statistically significant impact on the home schools? We're another DCC family who could afford to move and aren't going to/don't want to. We're waiting to learn if our home school will be Blair or Northwood (it's currently Northwood). I would much prefer to stay at the home school unless there is an incredibly compelling program, and even then, the commute and social aspects are not insignificant. |
My guess is it will be an average of 30-40 kids per grade in total attending the 3 programs at Whitman and BCC. Might vary by school. Einstein might have more since it is the closest to BCC and Blair will have CAP and whatever the new version of SMCS. That's not nothing especially when admin are telling kids at Einstein they "don't have enough interest" to staff the courses that kids want. |
I’m in-bound for Einstein. I think the new regional model is just a new shell game replacing the old shell game. Programs that look good on paper but actually serve relatively few students. I would prefer no regions and kids just go to the school they’re zoned for like a normal school district. |
I completely agree with you |
to clarify, 30-40 kids per grade from each other school in the region |
lol, not only do they not know how many spaces each program will have, they don’t have any way to predict whether there will be interest to fill the spaces. So they definitely can’t know what impact it will have on the home schools, and it obviously could have different impacts on different home schools for a variety of reasons. I’m no scientist but when you are trying to solve for something you use a control group to isolate the variables. MCPS is doing a “toss glitter in the air” experiment. |
It doesn’t sound like anyone will go to the “rich kid schools” bc of distance and distaste. Also: BCC has nearly a 30% FARMS rate. |
"Almost 30%" is low. Nearly 40% of MCPS high school students are enrolled in FARMS. Also, yes some families will absolutely want to send their kids to wealthier schools to access the coursework those schools offer. The fact some parents prefer not to doesn't mean no kids will use this option. |
yes!!!! With the exception of CTE programs like at Edison we really don't need all these regions and programs as they serve such a tiny number of kids. Every single high school should be offering advanced classes in core subjects of math, science, social studies, English, French and Spanish, plus a range of electives in visual arts, music, tech, engineering, business/finance, and dance for PE, for a comprehensive high school education. Guidance departments can publish ideas for pathways so that students can see ways they can cultivate a focus area from their home school course selections. We should invest in the feeder schools so kids have the prereqs, and the basics. And limit administrative and transportation costs of managing all these programs. |
On DCUM BCC and all W schools are all rich and all white. Stats like BCC has nearly 30% FARMS are not compatible with the narrative. |
On average, BCC and Whitman families are significantly wealthier and Whiter than Einstein, Blair and Northwood. The difference is not small. Nobody has said that BCC and Whitman only serve White and Wealthy kids. That is a straw man. |
Well I guess that settles it and DCC schools are all the same on average and BCC and Whitman are the same on average. No generalizing there. |
Do you not know what average means? |
Yes and focusing on averages is the thing that lets you ignore the distribution and variation, as you are doing. The note that nearly 30% of BCC kids are FARMS (and over half are not white) means that the FARMS Einstein kid who is not white will find plenty of peers at BCC, if they cannot bear socializing outside of race/ethnicity and class. |
Wow |