Gavin 2028

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The "Catholic" Gavin with the biggest unforced error I've ever seen in parroting the DNC mocking Christianity crap. This is up there with Whitmer's lesbian mock Eucharist Dorito video. Way to shoot yourself in the foot. So dumb and teases out Gavin doesn't have any genuine Catholics in his immediate orbit and his social media team is all atheist libs.

The mayor of MN said those words. But, it's true, those kids were praying. He wasn't mocking them. He was mocking Rs' "thoughts and prayers". But you are too much of a dunce to realize this.

-lifelong church goer

Why mock someone saying thoughts and prayers?

Because they are fake Christians that refuse to do anything about it, and just revel in killing kids? I guess from the party of pedos it’s not a surprise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He made the comment mocking faith and prayer because he's an atheist hedonist.

He was not mocking faith. He stated a fact that cannot be disputed. Faith without work does not work. Ask Jesus.

He was mocking their useless thoughts and prayers, and rightfully so, because those scumbags refuse to try to save children.

[Anonymous]

Gavin is sending state troops to clean out the homeless encampments. Wouldn't want those visuals as he is running for President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The "Catholic" Gavin with the biggest unforced error I've ever seen in parroting the DNC mocking Christianity crap. This is up there with Whitmer's lesbian mock Eucharist Dorito video. Way to shoot yourself in the foot. So dumb and teases out Gavin doesn't have any genuine Catholics in his immediate orbit and his social media team is all atheist libs.

The mayor of MN said those words. But, it's true, those kids were praying. He wasn't mocking them. He was mocking Rs' "thoughts and prayers". But you are too much of a dunce to realize this.

-lifelong church goer

Why mock someone saying thoughts and prayers?

It is unsurprising that Gavin, a 900 SAT dullard, had an /r/atheism take but it's a little surprising he doesn't have enough political horse sense to know not to post it. His social media team is millennial cornball redditors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s the best. There will be a primary and the most popular candidate will win. Until then, he is the de facto leader of the Democratic Party.

And maga is freaking out. Just look at all the comments on this thread alone.

You aren’t understanding. It’s CA Democrats who are posting we can’t stand him.

He’s a nepobaby who got tapped to be a politician by an intertwined family /very close friends of intertwined connected SF elite- Governor Browns (father and son), the Newsom family, the Getty’s and Pelosi families.

He’s a guy who got 960 on his SAT and lives saying he got in because of baseball. Yet he only tried out and never practiced or played games with the baseball team.

He got in because he was so well connected his family got letters of recommendations from power people.

Newsom’s family solicited letters of recommendation from former Gov. Jerry Brown, who appointed his father William Newsom to the Superior Court and the state Court of Appeal during his first term as governor. His father was also and advisor to the Getty family. He also go a letter from John Mallen, an attorney who served on Santa Clara’s board of regents at the time.

Mallen, who described William Newsom as “my best friend for 75 years,” said he did not frequently write letters of recommendation for applicants while he was on the board.

You could write very similar stories about FDR and John Kennedy. Neither were the “best and brightest” of their generation, and advanced on someone else’s coattails. But I’d sure take them today.

A very different era. That was the 1920s, 1930s and 40s. When the offspring of the elite often grew up with a sense of purpose and obligation. JFK jr was probably the last remnant of that era, which I don't think he wanted. But it's a different time today. In 2025, does anyone want Mark Zuckerberg's kids or the Walmart heirs running anything?

The inherited rich have been useless for a very long time now. And actually, the wealthy offspring of successful families are often the enemy to all that is good and decent about America. Leave those children to their instagram posts and do not encourage wealthy parasites to become involved in politics. Money matters so much in contemporary politics. But we really don't need useless, untalented rich kids to represent anyone today. That time is done.

How soon George W. Bush has been forgotten. Ouch. George W. = great grandson of American steel scion. grandson of U.S. senator and business executive. son of former POTUS.

But you'll note that the Bush family is done as a political force in America today. The only person keeping the Kennedy family relevant in 2025 is Trump. Just boomer legacy bc Trump is old and that's a catch for him.

There aren't any other scions of prominent families making a name for themselves today. Now it's all dark money - like Ken Griffen at Citadel and the hedge fund money or Miriam Adelson and the casino money. Not good people. The billionaire people today are profoundly trashy. There is no Roosevelt or Kennedy family today. Those that inherit all that money nowadays tend to be very scummy individuals - whether the Walton family or the Sackler family and so on.

It's been decades since anyone with inherited wealth did anything good. And Newsom is a part of that world. He is not a champion of the working or middle class because he doesn't even know what that is.

I cannot vote for anyone today that has no life experience in the working or middle class. Today's inherited rich are genuine scum, and Newsom is a part of that. There are no Kennedys or Roosevelts among these families.

The rich today are very different. And Democrats would be absolute idiots for choosing some mediocre rich guy as their candidate.

The Democrats need to choose a clear alternative, in affect and in positions. That’s not Newsom.

Newsom has brilliantly shined a light to the double standard Trump enjoys. Newsom’s tweets highlight the sanewashing of Trump’s tweets and other statements and actions. It’s been a huge service to the Democratic brand to stand up to Trump rather than capitulate the way so many do.

But the French Laundry thing crystallizes how Newsom enjoys the “Rules for Thee, Not for Me” level of privilege that so many others in our rigged system enjoy. Trump has made societal favoritism blatant and explicitly transactional. But that means it’s even more important that the Democrats nominate someone who runs on fairness and opportunity while NOT taking advantage of their special status. Someone who attends a luxe birthday dinner at an exclusive French restaurant during Covid when he himself had banned such gatherings, that person can’t be the nominee. It has to be someone who has opportunities to trade on their position or status and does not do so. It has to be someone who pushes for fairness and opportunity for all, while also pushing to ban the privileged from exploiting those special privileges.

That’s the contrast the Democrats must draw, a contrast that will surely cost big-dollar donors and will push ostensibly moderate Cuomo “Democrats” into the MAGA fold. But the public will be craving authenticity in the next Presidential election. That authenticity is critical to overcome all the obstacles the Republicans to throw up as they seek to consolidate their power. The question for me is which Democrat can meet that standard, but it’s certainly not Newsom.

The French Laundry thing? LOLOL

This comment is a pretty representative sample of the level of democratic discourse. I'm not sure that calling people names, LOLing, and insisting that you're the smartest and richest people in America will be a winning strategy.

In any case, the image of Newsom dining at a Thomas Keller restaurant while the rest of California was locked down and either banned or discouraged from activities basic to modern life, is absolutely going to haunt him if he runs.

+1 indeed. That picture will be featured in ads.

Those pictures don’t mean a thing. Did pictures of Trump with Epstein, Weinstein, or Diddy stop him from being elected not once but twice. Did audio tapes of Trump saying he sexually assault girls and women stop him from getting elected. Nope. Americans no longer care.

+1. you cant even be seriously considered without a certain level of depravity on display.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The "Catholic" Gavin with the biggest unforced error I've ever seen in parroting the DNC mocking Christianity crap. This is up there with Whitmer's lesbian mock Eucharist Dorito video. Way to shoot yourself in the foot. So dumb and teases out Gavin doesn't have any genuine Catholics in his immediate orbit and his social media team is all atheist libs.

The mayor of MN said those words. But, it's true, those kids were praying. He wasn't mocking them. He was mocking Rs' "thoughts and prayers". But you are too much of a dunce to realize this.

-lifelong church goer

Why mock someone saying thoughts and prayers?

Because they are fake Christians that refuse to do anything about it, and just revel in killing kids? I guess from the party of pedos it’s not a surprise.

You don't know that their prayers are fake, and you certainly take on an air of superioriry and judgment to think you know who's a "fake Christian."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He made the comment mocking faith and prayer because he's an atheist hedonist.

He was not mocking faith. He stated a fact that cannot be disputed. Faith without work does not work. Ask Jesus.

He was mocking their useless thoughts and prayers, and rightfully so, because those scumbags refuse to try to save children.

No prayer is ever useless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He made the comment mocking faith and prayer because he's an atheist hedonist.

He was not mocking faith. He stated a fact that cannot be disputed. Faith without work does not work. Ask Jesus.

Even the prayers of a prisoner hanging on a cross are heard by God.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The "Catholic" Gavin with the biggest unforced error I've ever seen in parroting the DNC mocking Christianity crap. This is up there with Whitmer's lesbian mock Eucharist Dorito video. Way to shoot yourself in the foot. So dumb and teases out Gavin doesn't have any genuine Catholics in his immediate orbit and his social media team is all atheist libs.

The mayor of MN said those words. But, it's true, those kids were praying. He wasn't mocking them. He was mocking Rs' "thoughts and prayers". But you are too much of a dunce to realize this.

-lifelong church goer

Why mock someone saying thoughts and prayers?

Because they are fake Christians that refuse to do anything about it, and just revel in killing kids? I guess from the party of pedos it’s not a surprise.

You don't know that their prayers are fake, and you certainly take on an air of superioriry and judgment to think you know who's a "fake Christian."

So were the thoughts and prayers for the living or dead. It’s always the same, tv OU go ta and prayers, and then there’s another mass shooting of children. Thought an and prayers until the next shooting and then thoughts and prayers with the same results, or lack thereof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gavin is sending state troops to clean out the homeless encampments. Wouldn't want those visuals as he is running for President.

Serious question - which voter will be turned off and who will they vote for instead?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The "Catholic" Gavin with the biggest unforced error I've ever seen in parroting the DNC mocking Christianity crap. This is up there with Whitmer's lesbian mock Eucharist Dorito video. Way to shoot yourself in the foot. So dumb and teases out Gavin doesn't have any genuine Catholics in his immediate orbit and his social media team is all atheist libs.

The mayor of MN said those words. But, it's true, those kids were praying. He wasn't mocking them. He was mocking Rs' "thoughts and prayers". But you are too much of a dunce to realize this.

-lifelong church goer

Why mock someone saying thoughts and prayers?

Because they are fake Christians that refuse to do anything about it, and just revel in killing kids? I guess from the party of pedos it’s not a surprise.

You don't know that their prayers are fake, and you certainly take on an air of superioriry and judgment to think you know who's a "fake Christian."

So were the thoughts and prayers for the living or dead. It’s always the same, tv OU go ta and prayers, and then there’s another mass shooting of children. Thought an and prayers until the next shooting and then thoughts and prayers with the same results, or lack thereof.

Pp here. I'm all for gun controls and voted for Harris. I still think loving thoughts and prayers are important, no matter who offers them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He made the comment mocking faith and prayer because he's an atheist hedonist.

He was not mocking faith. He stated a fact that cannot be disputed. Faith without work does not work. Ask Jesus.

He was mocking their useless thoughts and prayers, and rightfully so, because those scumbags refuse to try to save children.

No prayer is ever useless.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s the best. There will be a primary and the most popular candidate will win. Until then, he is the de facto leader of the Democratic Party.

And maga is freaking out. Just look at all the comments on this thread alone.

You aren’t understanding. It’s CA Democrats who are posting we can’t stand him.

He’s a nepobaby who got tapped to be a politician by an intertwined family /very close friends of intertwined connected SF elite- Governor Browns (father and son), the Newsom family, the Getty’s and Pelosi families.

He’s a guy who got 960 on his SAT and lives saying he got in because of baseball. Yet he only tried out and never practiced or played games with the baseball team.

He got in because he was so well connected his family got letters of recommendations from power people.

Newsom’s family solicited letters of recommendation from former Gov. Jerry Brown, who appointed his father William Newsom to the Superior Court and the state Court of Appeal during his first term as governor. His father was also and advisor to the Getty family. He also go a letter from John Mallen, an attorney who served on Santa Clara’s board of regents at the time.

Mallen, who described William Newsom as “my best friend for 75 years,” said he did not frequently write letters of recommendation for applicants while he was on the board.

You could write very similar stories about FDR and John Kennedy. Neither were the “best and brightest” of their generation, and advanced on someone else’s coattails. But I’d sure take them today.

A very different era. That was the 1920s, 1930s and 40s. When the offspring of the elite often grew up with a sense of purpose and obligation. JFK jr was probably the last remnant of that era, which I don't think he wanted. But it's a different time today. In 2025, does anyone want Mark Zuckerberg's kids or the Walmart heirs running anything?

The inherited rich have been useless for a very long time now. And actually, the wealthy offspring of successful families are often the enemy to all that is good and decent about America. Leave those children to their instagram posts and do not encourage wealthy parasites to become involved in politics. Money matters so much in contemporary politics. But we really don't need useless, untalented rich kids to represent anyone today. That time is done.

How soon George W. Bush has been forgotten. Ouch. George W. = great grandson of American steel scion. grandson of U.S. senator and business executive. son of former POTUS.

But you'll note that the Bush family is done as a political force in America today. The only person keeping the Kennedy family relevant in 2025 is Trump. Just boomer legacy bc Trump is old and that's a catch for him.

There aren't any other scions of prominent families making a name for themselves today. Now it's all dark money - like Ken Griffen at Citadel and the hedge fund money or Miriam Adelson and the casino money. Not good people. The billionaire people today are profoundly trashy. There is no Roosevelt or Kennedy family today. Those that inherit all that money nowadays tend to be very scummy individuals - whether the Walton family or the Sackler family and so on.

It's been decades since anyone with inherited wealth did anything good. And Newsom is a part of that world. He is not a champion of the working or middle class because he doesn't even know what that is.

I cannot vote for anyone today that has no life experience in the working or middle class. Today's inherited rich are genuine scum, and Newsom is a part of that. There are no Kennedys or Roosevelts among these families.

The rich today are very different. And Democrats would be absolute idiots for choosing some mediocre rich guy as their candidate.

The Democrats need to choose a clear alternative, in affect and in positions. That’s not Newsom.

Newsom has brilliantly shined a light to the double standard Trump enjoys. Newsom’s tweets highlight the sanewashing of Trump’s tweets and other statements and actions. It’s been a huge service to the Democratic brand to stand up to Trump rather than capitulate the way so many do.

But the French Laundry thing crystallizes how Newsom enjoys the “Rules for Thee, Not for Me” level of privilege that so many others in our rigged system enjoy. Trump has made societal favoritism blatant and explicitly transactional. But that means it’s even more important that the Democrats nominate someone who runs on fairness and opportunity while NOT taking advantage of their special status. Someone who attends a luxe birthday dinner at an exclusive French restaurant during Covid when he himself had banned such gatherings, that person can’t be the nominee. It has to be someone who has opportunities to trade on their position or status and does not do so. It has to be someone who pushes for fairness and opportunity for all, while also pushing to ban the privileged from exploiting those special privileges.

That’s the contrast the Democrats must draw, a contrast that will surely cost big-dollar donors and will push ostensibly moderate Cuomo “Democrats” into the MAGA fold. But the public will be craving authenticity in the next Presidential election. That authenticity is critical to overcome all the obstacles the Republicans to throw up as they seek to consolidate their power. The question for me is which Democrat can meet that standard, but it’s certainly not Newsom.

The French Laundry thing? LOLOL

This comment is a pretty representative sample of the level of democratic discourse. I'm not sure that calling people names, LOLing, and insisting that you're the smartest and richest people in America will be a winning strategy.

In any case, the image of Newsom dining at a Thomas Keller restaurant while the rest of California was locked down and either banned or discouraged from activities basic to modern life, is absolutely going to haunt him if he runs.

+1 indeed. That picture will be featured in ads.

GMAFB. Trump has destroyed political norms.

Ok. Feel free to say it doesn't matter and run Newsom and maybe AOC as candidates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The "Catholic" Gavin with the biggest unforced error I've ever seen in parroting the DNC mocking Christianity crap. This is up there with Whitmer's lesbian mock Eucharist Dorito video. Way to shoot yourself in the foot. So dumb and teases out Gavin doesn't have any genuine Catholics in his immediate orbit and his social media team is all atheist libs.

The mayor of MN said those words. But, it's true, those kids were praying. He wasn't mocking them. He was mocking Rs' "thoughts and prayers". But you are too much of a dunce to realize this.

-lifelong church goer

Why mock someone saying thoughts and prayers?

Because they are fake Christians that refuse to do anything about it, and just revel in killing kids? I guess from the party of pedos it’s not a surprise.

You don't know that their prayers are fake, and you certainly take on an air of superioriry and judgment to think you know who's a "fake Christian."

Saying "thoughts and prayers" is perhaps the most useless and laziest thing to stay and do. It literally requires no effort and does nothing to help anyone.

Also, spotting a fake Christian is perhaps the easiest thing to do. Usually they have some sort of proverb in their social media (that they never follow), some modern farmhouse decor, and that they vote MAGA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s the best. There will be a primary and the most popular candidate will win. Until then, he is the de facto leader of the Democratic Party.

And maga is freaking out. Just look at all the comments on this thread alone.

You aren’t understanding. It’s CA Democrats who are posting we can’t stand him.

He’s a nepobaby who got tapped to be a politician by an intertwined family /very close friends of intertwined connected SF elite- Governor Browns (father and son), the Newsom family, the Getty’s and Pelosi families.

He’s a guy who got 960 on his SAT and lives saying he got in because of baseball. Yet he only tried out and never practiced or played games with the baseball team.

He got in because he was so well connected his family got letters of recommendations from power people.

Newsom’s family solicited letters of recommendation from former Gov. Jerry Brown, who appointed his father William Newsom to the Superior Court and the state Court of Appeal during his first term as governor. His father was also and advisor to the Getty family. He also go a letter from John Mallen, an attorney who served on Santa Clara’s board of regents at the time.

Mallen, who described William Newsom as “my best friend for 75 years,” said he did not frequently write letters of recommendation for applicants while he was on the board.

You could write very similar stories about FDR and John Kennedy. Neither were the “best and brightest” of their generation, and advanced on someone else’s coattails. But I’d sure take them today.

A very different era. That was the 1920s, 1930s and 40s. When the offspring of the elite often grew up with a sense of purpose and obligation. JFK jr was probably the last remnant of that era, which I don't think he wanted. But it's a different time today. In 2025, does anyone want Mark Zuckerberg's kids or the Walmart heirs running anything?

The inherited rich have been useless for a very long time now. And actually, the wealthy offspring of successful families are often the enemy to all that is good and decent about America. Leave those children to their instagram posts and do not encourage wealthy parasites to become involved in politics. Money matters so much in contemporary politics. But we really don't need useless, untalented rich kids to represent anyone today. That time is done.

How soon George W. Bush has been forgotten. Ouch. George W. = great grandson of American steel scion. grandson of U.S. senator and business executive. son of former POTUS.

But you'll note that the Bush family is done as a political force in America today. The only person keeping the Kennedy family relevant in 2025 is Trump. Just boomer legacy bc Trump is old and that's a catch for him.

There aren't any other scions of prominent families making a name for themselves today. Now it's all dark money - like Ken Griffen at Citadel and the hedge fund money or Miriam Adelson and the casino money. Not good people. The billionaire people today are profoundly trashy. There is no Roosevelt or Kennedy family today. Those that inherit all that money nowadays tend to be very scummy individuals - whether the Walton family or the Sackler family and so on.

It's been decades since anyone with inherited wealth did anything good. And Newsom is a part of that world. He is not a champion of the working or middle class because he doesn't even know what that is.

I cannot vote for anyone today that has no life experience in the working or middle class. Today's inherited rich are genuine scum, and Newsom is a part of that. There are no Kennedys or Roosevelts among these families.

The rich today are very different. And Democrats would be absolute idiots for choosing some mediocre rich guy as their candidate.

The Democrats need to choose a clear alternative, in affect and in positions. That’s not Newsom.

Newsom has brilliantly shined a light to the double standard Trump enjoys. Newsom’s tweets highlight the sanewashing of Trump’s tweets and other statements and actions. It’s been a huge service to the Democratic brand to stand up to Trump rather than capitulate the way so many do.

But the French Laundry thing crystallizes how Newsom enjoys the “Rules for Thee, Not for Me” level of privilege that so many others in our rigged system enjoy. Trump has made societal favoritism blatant and explicitly transactional. But that means it’s even more important that the Democrats nominate someone who runs on fairness and opportunity while NOT taking advantage of their special status. Someone who attends a luxe birthday dinner at an exclusive French restaurant during Covid when he himself had banned such gatherings, that person can’t be the nominee. It has to be someone who has opportunities to trade on their position or status and does not do so. It has to be someone who pushes for fairness and opportunity for all, while also pushing to ban the privileged from exploiting those special privileges.

That’s the contrast the Democrats must draw, a contrast that will surely cost big-dollar donors and will push ostensibly moderate Cuomo “Democrats” into the MAGA fold. But the public will be craving authenticity in the next Presidential election. That authenticity is critical to overcome all the obstacles the Republicans to throw up as they seek to consolidate their power. The question for me is which Democrat can meet that standard, but it’s certainly not Newsom.

The French Laundry thing? LOLOL

This comment is a pretty representative sample of the level of democratic discourse. I'm not sure that calling people names, LOLing, and insisting that you're the smartest and richest people in America will be a winning strategy.

In any case, the image of Newsom dining at a Thomas Keller restaurant while the rest of California was locked down and either banned or discouraged from activities basic to modern life, is absolutely going to haunt him if he runs.

+1 indeed. That picture will be featured in ads.

GMAFB. Trump has destroyed political norms.

Ok. Feel free to say it doesn't matter and run Newsom and maybe AOC as candidates.

Trump won so I see no reason Newsom can’t. Anything can happen people!