Pitt Jolie FINALLY reach divorce settlement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The children don’t want to be with Brad bc of parental alienation. That’s why we don’t see Brad with the kids now.

The kids have heard years and years of Jolie bad mouthing Brad and painting herself as the victim. Their crazy, deranged “mother” purposefully ruined their relationship with their father because of her own mental issues and need to get revenge against Brad. She has used the legal system, the kids, and the winery in order to try to hurt Brad, because she’s a vengeful, angry woman who cannot move on.

🤣🤣 Brad's obsessed to the point he dragged his feet finalizing and even then the lawyer still had to sign for him.

Yeah and Brad still loves Angie. We know Angeloonie. 🙄 The whole world is obsessed with her. Brad is in Carmel so inconsolable he couldn’t even bear to sign the documents.

Meanwhile, in the real world:The lawyer signed and then Brad signed. They became legally single years ago with the birfucated divorce initiated by Brad and officially divorced again just recently. The nail is finally in the coffin of that disaster of a relationship.

In love? Who said anything about that? In the real world the lawyer signed on the 26th and signed for Brad on the 30th. Color me that 😊

Color you what…?😒 How exactly is him signing a few days later during the holidays somehow a win(for you at least)? Very strange. The point remains he DID sign it and that sham of a relationship is over.

He didn't even sign it. His lawyer signed it for him. He dragged his feet to the very end.

What is your argument? He has a live-in girlfriend, yet you believe he secretly wants Jolie, a woman who has made his life h*ll for eight years, back ?

🤣🤣 it's hilarious you think obsession = love.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

He spent millions of dollars on therapists and custody proceedings. He has legal joint custody just not physical. Angelina stated that's why she couldn't move out of LA and he had to agree to the youngest daughter staying in New York for several months, stipulating his visits with Knox would continue. Seems like he's doing the best he can in a terrible situation. Not forcing himself on the kids and hoping they come around one day. How they handled the chateau sale (both of them!) seems to be what really destroyed any possibility of peace in the family for a long time.

You keep saying how much he spent but again he’s worth hundreds of millions or rolled and what he spent on getting more visits etc is a fraction of what this alcoholic spent on his booze company. Give it a rest. If it were a priority it would’ve been.

He spent millions. He was up against a lunatic who used every dirty underhanded trick to prevent him from getting any custody. Kids are allowed a say in their parental custody arrangements after a certain age, so it wouldn’t have worked for him to continue pursuing the custody case. Jolie had already poisoned the children against him. The judge in their custody case even warned her about parental alienation, so we know she was actively trying to destroy her children’s relationship with their father for a long time.

Whoever you are, you are not helping Brad's position, behavior, or "fatherly" connections to his children -- quite the opposite. Most of us are old enough and experienced enough to dismiss your comments with a shrug, smirk, or laugh. Get real.

I’m posting to point out that Jolie is a garbage mother. A good mother is someone like Jennifer Garner, who encourages her children to have a good relationship with their father and creates a stable co-parenting relationship. If Brad had married someone normal, the divorce and custody arrangement could have been amicably settled and everyone would have been better off. Jolie is the one who has kept the acrimony going on for eight years. Jolie is a deeply damaged person who cannot seem to move on from events of eight years ago.

Ben never abused his children so again you're not making his position any better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect her family healing story will continue in future interviews. And she’ll still press the abuse accusations.

She has nothing else to talk about. She’s a tiresome bore, endlessly talking about being a victim and “healing” her family. I remember when her fans used to attack Jen after she stole her husband. They claimed Jen was playing a victim and couldn’t move on. Yet, Jen moved on very quickly; Angelina is the one who keeps droning on eight years later with the victimhood narrative.

Hi Jan, er Jen!

Jen is a classy lady. Angelina is pure trash. She started an affair with a married man, broke up a marriage, and flaunted her affair in the ex-wife’s face. She jumped right into letting Brad adopt her child, adopting another child, and having a baby before Brad’s divorce was final. No one should be surprised that their relationship, which was built on an extremely poor foundation, collapsed in scandal, just like it started. These two were never going to live happily ever after. They mistook lust for love and rushed into adding children to their relationship in rapid succession, which was irresponsible. Brad and Angelina ultimately ended up making each other’s lives miserable. Both of them received the karma they deserved. Brad, especially, overlooked Jolie’s massive red flags and history that showed she wasn’t a stable woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect her family healing story will continue in future interviews. And she’ll still press the abuse accusations.

She has nothing else to talk about. She’s a tiresome bore, endlessly talking about being a victim and “healing” her family. I remember when her fans used to attack Jen after she stole her husband. They claimed Jen was playing a victim and couldn’t move on. Yet, Jen moved on very quickly; Angelina is the one who keeps droning on eight years later with the victimhood narrative.

Hi Jan, er Jen!

Jen is a classy lady. Angelina is pure trash. She started an affair with a married man, broke up a marriage, and flaunted her affair in the ex-wife’s face. She jumped right into letting Brad adopt her child, adopting another child, and having a baby before Brad’s divorce was final. No one should be surprised that their relationship, which was built on an extremely poor foundation, collapsed in scandal, just like it started. These two were never going to live happily ever after. They mistook lust for love and rushed into adding children to their relationship in rapid succession, which was irresponsible. Brad and Angelina ultimately ended up making each other’s lives miserable. Both of them received the karma they deserved. Brad, especially, overlooked Jolie’s massive red flags and history that showed she wasn’t a stable woman.

exactly, and 6 kids are now suffering because of it. Aniston is the only winner here.

[Anonymous]

So what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

He spent millions of dollars on therapists and custody proceedings. He has legal joint custody just not physical. Angelina stated that's why she couldn't move out of LA and he had to agree to the youngest daughter staying in New York for several months, stipulating his visits with Knox would continue. Seems like he's doing the best he can in a terrible situation. Not forcing himself on the kids and hoping they come around one day. How they handled the chateau sale (both of them!) seems to be what really destroyed any possibility of peace in the family for a long time.

You keep saying how much he spent but again he’s worth hundreds of millions or rolled and what he spent on getting more visits etc is a fraction of what this alcoholic spent on his booze company. Give it a rest. If it were a priority it would’ve been.

He spent millions. He was up against a lunatic who used every dirty underhanded trick to prevent him from getting any custody. Kids are allowed a say in their parental custody arrangements after a certain age, so it wouldn’t have worked for him to continue pursuing the custody case. Jolie had already poisoned the children against him. The judge in their custody case even warned her about parental alienation, so we know she was actively trying to destroy her children’s relationship with their father for a long time.

Whoever you are, you are not helping Brad's position, behavior, or "fatherly" connections to his children -- quite the opposite. Most of us are old enough and experienced enough to dismiss your comments with a shrug, smirk, or laugh. Get real.

I’m posting to point out that Jolie is a garbage mother. A good mother is someone like Jennifer Garner, who encourages her children to have a good relationship with their father and creates a stable co-parenting relationship. If Brad had married someone normal, the divorce and custody arrangement could have been amicably settled and everyone would have been better off. Jolie is the one who has kept the acrimony going on for eight years. Jolie is a deeply damaged person who cannot seem to move on from events of eight years ago.

Ben never abused his children so again you're not making his position any better.

+1 i will add that it's quite telling when all 6 children want to keep their distance from him and some even change their last names. The estrangement cannot all be placed on Jolie, no matter what she may have said or done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

He spent millions of dollars on therapists and custody proceedings. He has legal joint custody just not physical. Angelina stated that's why she couldn't move out of LA and he had to agree to the youngest daughter staying in New York for several months, stipulating his visits with Knox would continue. Seems like he's doing the best he can in a terrible situation. Not forcing himself on the kids and hoping they come around one day. How they handled the chateau sale (both of them!) seems to be what really destroyed any possibility of peace in the family for a long time.

You keep saying how much he spent but again he’s worth hundreds of millions or rolled and what he spent on getting more visits etc is a fraction of what this alcoholic spent on his booze company. Give it a rest. If it were a priority it would’ve been.

He spent millions. He was up against a lunatic who used every dirty underhanded trick to prevent him from getting any custody. Kids are allowed a say in their parental custody arrangements after a certain age, so it wouldn’t have worked for him to continue pursuing the custody case. Jolie had already poisoned the children against him. The judge in their custody case even warned her about parental alienation, so we know she was actively trying to destroy her children’s relationship with their father for a long time.

Whoever you are, you are not helping Brad's position, behavior, or "fatherly" connections to his children -- quite the opposite. Most of us are old enough and experienced enough to dismiss your comments with a shrug, smirk, or laugh. Get real.

I’m posting to point out that Jolie is a garbage mother. A good mother is someone like Jennifer Garner, who encourages her children to have a good relationship with their father and creates a stable co-parenting relationship. If Brad had married someone normal, the divorce and custody arrangement could have been amicably settled and everyone would have been better off. Jolie is the one who has kept the acrimony going on for eight years. Jolie is a deeply damaged person who cannot seem to move on from events of eight years ago.

Ben never abused his children so again you're not making his position any better.

+1 i will add that it's quite telling when all 6 children want to keep their distance from him and some even change their last names. The estrangement cannot all be placed on Jolie, no matter what she may have said or done.

Why not? It is not uncommon for a parent to turn the kids against the other parent.Obviously I don't know if it happened here, but it's not out of the question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

He spent millions of dollars on therapists and custody proceedings. He has legal joint custody just not physical. Angelina stated that's why she couldn't move out of LA and he had to agree to the youngest daughter staying in New York for several months, stipulating his visits with Knox would continue. Seems like he's doing the best he can in a terrible situation. Not forcing himself on the kids and hoping they come around one day. How they handled the chateau sale (both of them!) seems to be what really destroyed any possibility of peace in the family for a long time.

You keep saying how much he spent but again he’s worth hundreds of millions or rolled and what he spent on getting more visits etc is a fraction of what this alcoholic spent on his booze company. Give it a rest. If it were a priority it would’ve been.

He spent millions. He was up against a lunatic who used every dirty underhanded trick to prevent him from getting any custody. Kids are allowed a say in their parental custody arrangements after a certain age, so it wouldn’t have worked for him to continue pursuing the custody case. Jolie had already poisoned the children against him. The judge in their custody case even warned her about parental alienation, so we know she was actively trying to destroy her children’s relationship with their father for a long time.

Whoever you are, you are not helping Brad's position, behavior, or "fatherly" connections to his children -- quite the opposite. Most of us are old enough and experienced enough to dismiss your comments with a shrug, smirk, or laugh. Get real.

I’m posting to point out that Jolie is a garbage mother. A good mother is someone like Jennifer Garner, who encourages her children to have a good relationship with their father and creates a stable co-parenting relationship. If Brad had married someone normal, the divorce and custody arrangement could have been amicably settled and everyone would have been better off. Jolie is the one who has kept the acrimony going on for eight years. Jolie is a deeply damaged person who cannot seem to move on from events of eight years ago.

Ben never abused his children so again you're not making his position any better.

+1 i will add that it's quite telling when all 6 children want to keep their distance from him and some even change their last names. The estrangement cannot all be placed on Jolie, no matter what she may have said or done.

Why not? It is not uncommon for a parent to turn the kids against the other parent.Obviously I don't know if it happened here, but it's not out of the question.

They're all saying he was scary and abusive drunkn. Not things like "oh he didn't want to see" that some parents lie about. All six kids of various ages aren't lying

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

He spent millions of dollars on therapists and custody proceedings. He has legal joint custody just not physical. Angelina stated that's why she couldn't move out of LA and he had to agree to the youngest daughter staying in New York for several months, stipulating his visits with Knox would continue. Seems like he's doing the best he can in a terrible situation. Not forcing himself on the kids and hoping they come around one day. How they handled the chateau sale (both of them!) seems to be what really destroyed any possibility of peace in the family for a long time.

You keep saying how much he spent but again he’s worth hundreds of millions or rolled and what he spent on getting more visits etc is a fraction of what this alcoholic spent on his booze company. Give it a rest. If it were a priority it would’ve been.

He spent millions. He was up against a lunatic who used every dirty underhanded trick to prevent him from getting any custody. Kids are allowed a say in their parental custody arrangements after a certain age, so it wouldn’t have worked for him to continue pursuing the custody case. Jolie had already poisoned the children against him. The judge in their custody case even warned her about parental alienation, so we know she was actively trying to destroy her children’s relationship with their father for a long time.

Whoever you are, you are not helping Brad's position, behavior, or "fatherly" connections to his children -- quite the opposite. Most of us are old enough and experienced enough to dismiss your comments with a shrug, smirk, or laugh. Get real.

I’m posting to point out that Jolie is a garbage mother. A good mother is someone like Jennifer Garner, who encourages her children to have a good relationship with their father and creates a stable co-parenting relationship. If Brad had married someone normal, the divorce and custody arrangement could have been amicably settled and everyone would have been better off. Jolie is the one who has kept the acrimony going on for eight years. Jolie is a deeply damaged person who cannot seem to move on from events of eight years ago.

Ben never abused his children so again you're not making his position any better.

+1 i will add that it's quite telling when all 6 children want to keep their distance from him and some even change their last names. The estrangement cannot all be placed on Jolie, no matter what she may have said or done.

Why not? It is not uncommon for a parent to turn the kids against the other parent.Obviously I don't know if it happened here, but it's not out of the question.

You might have an argument if the three oldest children were teenagers and had witnessed enough of their parents behavior to form their own opinions. They were not babies, and the fourth child was ten or eleven and old enough to understand some of what was happening. If Brad had established a strong, loving relationship with the three older children, it would have been difficult for Angelina to alienate, your words, all the older children. So stop with the alienation bullshat and be glad you did not have an abusive parent that you would go in the opposite direction if you saw them coming in your direction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

He spent millions of dollars on therapists and custody proceedings. He has legal joint custody just not physical. Angelina stated that's why she couldn't move out of LA and he had to agree to the youngest daughter staying in New York for several months, stipulating his visits with Knox would continue. Seems like he's doing the best he can in a terrible situation. Not forcing himself on the kids and hoping they come around one day. How they handled the chateau sale (both of them!) seems to be what really destroyed any possibility of peace in the family for a long time.

You keep saying how much he spent but again he’s worth hundreds of millions or rolled and what he spent on getting more visits etc is a fraction of what this alcoholic spent on his booze company. Give it a rest. If it were a priority it would’ve been.

He spent millions. He was up against a lunatic who used every dirty underhanded trick to prevent him from getting any custody. Kids are allowed a say in their parental custody arrangements after a certain age, so it wouldn’t have worked for him to continue pursuing the custody case. Jolie had already poisoned the children against him. The judge in their custody case even warned her about parental alienation, so we know she was actively trying to destroy her children’s relationship with their father for a long time.

Whoever you are, you are not helping Brad's position, behavior, or "fatherly" connections to his children -- quite the opposite. Most of us are old enough and experienced enough to dismiss your comments with a shrug, smirk, or laugh. Get real.

I’m posting to point out that Jolie is a garbage mother. A good mother is someone like Jennifer Garner, who encourages her children to have a good relationship with their father and creates a stable co-parenting relationship. If Brad had married someone normal, the divorce and custody arrangement could have been amicably settled and everyone would have been better off. Jolie is the one who has kept the acrimony going on for eight years. Jolie is a deeply damaged person who cannot seem to move on from events of eight years ago.

Ben never abused his children so again you're not making his position any better.

+1 i will add that it's quite telling when all 6 children want to keep their distance from him and some even change their last names. The estrangement cannot all be placed on Jolie, no matter what she may have said or done.

Why not? It is not uncommon for a parent to turn the kids against the other parent.Obviously I don't know if it happened here, but it's not out of the question.

You might have an argument if the three oldest children were teenagers and had witnessed enough of their parents behavior to form their own opinions. They were not babies, and the fourth child was ten or eleven and old enough to understand some of what was happening. If Brad had established a strong, loving relationship with the three older children, it would have been difficult for Angelina to alienate, your words, all the older children. So stop with the alienation bullshat and be glad you did not have an abusive parent that you would go in the opposite direction if you saw them coming in your direction.

I do think it was probably tough for the oldest three to forget that he had been a crap father for a few years before the split when he was in the throes of alcoholism. And they remember their mom protecting and taking care of them and how they were afraid he would hurt her, like on the plane. Remember a pap caught them fighting, and Pitt looked enraged in the pics while she looked sad. When siblings are close, the younger siblings might want to be part of a united front, too. If Jolie remained in opposition to Pitt, easy to see how reunification would be challenging if not impossible. Do I think she should have been more conciliatory for the sake of the children? Yes. But I also think he was and is a spoiled @sshole who may well have not owned up to the hurt and damage he inflicted on his family. Blame to go around imo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

He spent millions of dollars on therapists and custody proceedings. He has legal joint custody just not physical. Angelina stated that's why she couldn't move out of LA and he had to agree to the youngest daughter staying in New York for several months, stipulating his visits with Knox would continue. Seems like he's doing the best he can in a terrible situation. Not forcing himself on the kids and hoping they come around one day. How they handled the chateau sale (both of them!) seems to be what really destroyed any possibility of peace in the family for a long time.

You keep saying how much he spent but again he’s worth hundreds of millions or rolled and what he spent on getting more visits etc is a fraction of what this alcoholic spent on his booze company. Give it a rest. If it were a priority it would’ve been.

He spent millions. He was up against a lunatic who used every dirty underhanded trick to prevent him from getting any custody. Kids are allowed a say in their parental custody arrangements after a certain age, so it wouldn’t have worked for him to continue pursuing the custody case. Jolie had already poisoned the children against him. The judge in their custody case even warned her about parental alienation, so we know she was actively trying to destroy her children’s relationship with their father for a long time.

Whoever you are, you are not helping Brad's position, behavior, or "fatherly" connections to his children -- quite the opposite. Most of us are old enough and experienced enough to dismiss your comments with a shrug, smirk, or laugh. Get real.

I’m posting to point out that Jolie is a garbage mother. A good mother is someone like Jennifer Garner, who encourages her children to have a good relationship with their father and creates a stable co-parenting relationship. If Brad had married someone normal, the divorce and custody arrangement could have been amicably settled and everyone would have been better off. Jolie is the one who has kept the acrimony going on for eight years. Jolie is a deeply damaged person who cannot seem to move on from events of eight years ago.

Ben never abused his children so again you're not making his position any better.

+1 i will add that it's quite telling when all 6 children want to keep their distance from him and some even change their last names. The estrangement cannot all be placed on Jolie, no matter what she may have said or done.

Why not? It is not uncommon for a parent to turn the kids against the other parent.Obviously I don't know if it happened here, but it's not out of the question.

You might have an argument if the three oldest children were teenagers and had witnessed enough of their parents behavior to form their own opinions. They were not babies, and the fourth child was ten or eleven and old enough to understand some of what was happening. If Brad had established a strong, loving relationship with the three older children, it would have been difficult for Angelina to alienate, your words, all the older children. So stop with the alienation bullshat and be glad you did not have an abusive parent that you would go in the opposite direction if you saw them coming in your direction.

+1 exactly!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

He spent millions of dollars on therapists and custody proceedings. He has legal joint custody just not physical. Angelina stated that's why she couldn't move out of LA and he had to agree to the youngest daughter staying in New York for several months, stipulating his visits with Knox would continue. Seems like he's doing the best he can in a terrible situation. Not forcing himself on the kids and hoping they come around one day. How they handled the chateau sale (both of them!) seems to be what really destroyed any possibility of peace in the family for a long time.

You keep saying how much he spent but again he’s worth hundreds of millions or rolled and what he spent on getting more visits etc is a fraction of what this alcoholic spent on his booze company. Give it a rest. If it were a priority it would’ve been.

He spent millions. He was up against a lunatic who used every dirty underhanded trick to prevent him from getting any custody. Kids are allowed a say in their parental custody arrangements after a certain age, so it wouldn’t have worked for him to continue pursuing the custody case. Jolie had already poisoned the children against him. The judge in their custody case even warned her about parental alienation, so we know she was actively trying to destroy her children’s relationship with their father for a long time.

Whoever you are, you are not helping Brad's position, behavior, or "fatherly" connections to his children -- quite the opposite. Most of us are old enough and experienced enough to dismiss your comments with a shrug, smirk, or laugh. Get real.

I’m posting to point out that Jolie is a garbage mother. A good mother is someone like Jennifer Garner, who encourages her children to have a good relationship with their father and creates a stable co-parenting relationship. If Brad had married someone normal, the divorce and custody arrangement could have been amicably settled and everyone would have been better off. Jolie is the one who has kept the acrimony going on for eight years. Jolie is a deeply damaged person who cannot seem to move on from events of eight years ago.

Ben never abused his children so again you're not making his position any better.

+1 i will add that it's quite telling when all 6 children want to keep their distance from him and some even change their last names. The estrangement cannot all be placed on Jolie, no matter what she may have said or done.

Why not? It is not uncommon for a parent to turn the kids against the other parent.Obviously I don't know if it happened here, but it's not out of the question.

You might have an argument if the three oldest children were teenagers and had witnessed enough of their parents behavior to form their own opinions. They were not babies, and the fourth child was ten or eleven and old enough to understand some of what was happening. If Brad had established a strong, loving relationship with the three older children, it would have been difficult for Angelina to alienate, your words, all the older children. So stop with the alienation bullshat and be glad you did not have an abusive parent that you would go in the opposite direction if you saw them coming in your direction.

I do think it was probably tough for the oldest three to forget that he had been a crap father for a few years before the split when he was in the throes of alcoholism. And they remember their mom protecting and taking care of them and how they were afraid he would hurt her, like on the plane. Remember a pap caught them fighting, and Pitt looked enraged in the pics while she looked sad. When siblings are close, the younger siblings might want to be part of a united front, too. If Jolie remained in opposition to Pitt, easy to see how reunification would be challenging if not impossible. Do I think she should have been more conciliatory for the sake of the children? Yes. But I also think he was and is a spoiled @sshole who may well have not owned up to the hurt and damage he inflicted on his family. Blame to go around imo.

+1 My thoughts as well

[Anonymous]

Yeah people love to blame mothers for alienation- instead of blaming the men who have failed their children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah people love to blame mothers for alienation- instead of blaming the men who have failed their children.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah people love to blame mothers for alienation- instead of blaming the men who have failed their children.

She fought him in court to deny him any custody of the children. She never tried to come to an amicable custody arrangement. She did engage in alienation and using the children to hurt him by denying him custody. I don’t see how it benefits the children to not have their father in their lives. She is a selfish mother.