Has the Coalition for TJ (or any other groups) considered another lawsuit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

Good thing it's not happening with respect to TJ.

And if you think it is, you're going to have to show your work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

Wink, Wink, Nod, Nod

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

Racial selection to fit a preplanned diversity composition. Yet, all diversity is concentrated in the bottom of the class?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

Racial selection to fit a preplanned diversity composition. Yet, all diversity is concentrated in the bottom of the class?

Neither of those sentences have any basis in reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

Wink, Wink, Nod, Nod

No one believes your dumbass Republican conspiracy theories.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

Racial selection to fit a preplanned diversity composition. Yet, all diversity is concentrated in the bottom of the class?

Neither of those sentences have any basis in reality.

DEI out, reopens the door for Merit! The biggest beneficiaries will be the hardworking UMRs, not the random lottery UMR selections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

Good thing it's not happening with respect to TJ.

And if you think it is, you're going to have to show your work.

DP

The new admissions process was driven by a desire for more racial diversity at TJ.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JP8k8g3fphU&t=807s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

Racism often appears race blind but when you change a selection process because the previous process was selecting too many people of one race, that is a racism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

Racial selection to fit a preplanned diversity composition. Yet, all diversity is concentrated in the bottom of the class?

Neither of those sentences have any basis in reality.

The first sentence is certainly true.
The second sentence is mostly true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

Wink, Wink, Nod, Nod

No one believes your dumbass Republican conspiracy theories.

It was pretty open and notorious attempt at racial diversity when it happened.
At the time people thought racial preferences were OK if you were trying to achieve diversity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

Wink, Wink, Nod, Nod

No one believes your dumbass Republican conspiracy theories.

It was pretty open and notorious attempt at racial diversity when it happened.
At the time people thought racial preferences were OK if you were trying to achieve diversity.

“Racial preference” was never a thing for admission. The original idea tossed around was a lotter.

They haven’t done anything race based since the early 2000s after some court rulings.

[Anonymous]

^lottery

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks like the Dept of Ed might make the litigation unnecessary.

https://www.ed.gov/media/document/dear-colleague-letter-sffa-v-harvard-109506.pdf

Discrimination based on a student's skin color is unacceptable. Every student, regardless of how rich or poor, should be recognized for their individual efforts and their own dedication. It is unfair to give rewards solely based on skin color, especially when it overlooks the hard work of one poor kid over another poor kid who does not. Merit should be the key factor in recognizing a student's accomplishments, even among students of same skin color. America was founded on the principle of rewarding hard work of individuals, not on skin color.

I agree with you but that last sentence seems weird considering our history. I think that we are trying to get there and this is one more step in the right direction.

I hate trump and his wrecking ball attitude towards governing and a lot of this seems like overreach (freedom of association), but I don't hate the anti-DEI stuff. Getting rid of racial preferences is good for the country.

There are no "racial preferences" for TJ admissions. It's race blind.

Racial selection to fit a preplanned diversity composition. Yet, all diversity is concentrated in the bottom of the class?

Neither of those sentences have any basis in reality.

The first sentence is certainly true.
The second sentence is mostly true.

I get that Republicans are disconnected from reality, but…

THERE IS NO RACIAL SELECTION.

IT IS RACE BLIND.

STOP SPREADING RWNJ LIES.