Trump says he's agreed to Fox debate while Harris sticks with ABC plan

[Anonymous]

But there is no Fox debate so old man Trump is chickening out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:However they rationalize Trump's failure to show, he is not going to show. It is actually one of his smarter moves. He has no good option here but getting smashed in the debate is worse then just not showing up. But make no mistake, he is well aware he can't manage a successful debate against Harris on ABC.

It's a no-win scenario for him. He needs to smash her to reverse his polling slide, which is why he's trying to set up the wrestling match on Fox. He can't do a September 4th event by himself because it would be disastrous to answer moderator questions on live TV (particularly with no breaks between questions). If he doesn't show up on September 10th, he's going to look weak. Plus, he'll probably be screeching on Twitter in real time, which adds to the bad look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:However they rationalize Trump's failure to show, he is not going to show. It is actually one of his smarter moves. He has no good option here but getting smashed in the debate is worse then just not showing up. But make no mistake, he is well aware he can't manage a successful debate against Harris on ABC.

It's a no-win scenario for him. He needs to smash her to reverse his polling slide, which is why he's trying to set up the wrestling match on Fox. He can't do a September 4th event by himself because it would be disastrous to answer moderator questions on live TV (particularly with no breaks between questions). If he doesn't show up on September 10th, he's going to look weak. Plus, he'll probably be screeching on Twitter in real time, which adds to the bad look.

There is no reason for her to change the debate to fox. Zero reason. And he likely won't show up for that one either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

+100

Not surprising though. They vote based on emotion. So I guess this tracks.

This is ironic coming from such whiny weirdos and their scared old leader

Weird to hear from you when Kamala was the one who chickened out from the personal debate invite. Oh, and no single interview since presumptive nomination. Weird.

Harris is showing up to the previously agreed upon debate. What’s your orange felon afraid of?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Actually they showed the contract and it says Republican and Democratic nominees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Actually they showed the contract and it says Republican and Democratic nominees.

Can you link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

+100

Not surprising though. They vote based on emotion. So I guess this tracks.

This is ironic coming from such whiny weirdos and their scared old leader

Weird to hear from you when Kamala was the one who chickened out from the personal debate invite. Oh, and no single interview since presumptive nomination. Weird.

Oh, was she actually invited? Or rather, told to be there by Trump via Twitter? Also, you trying to take back 'weird' sounds really awkward and forced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

Hilarious. Trump is afraid and needs the “safe space” afforded by Fox and a MAGA audience. What a wimp!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

+100

Not surprising though. They vote based on emotion. So I guess this tracks.

This is ironic coming from such whiny weirdos and their scared old leader

Weird to hear from you when Kamala was the one who chickened out from the personal debate invite. Oh, and no single interview since presumptive nomination. Weird.

lol “personal debate invite”

Most people don’t accept invitations from criminals. The debates are handled through a long and established process, not X posts made from the bathroom

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

Hilarious. Trump is afraid and needs the “safe space” afforded by Fox and a MAGA audience. What a wimp!

How quickly we forget the safe space needed for Biden. How did that work out for you guys?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

Hilarious. Trump is afraid and needs the “safe space” afforded by Fox and a MAGA audience. What a wimp!

How quickly we forget the safe space needed for Biden. How did that work out for you guys?

So… you think that’s a good idea for Trump?? 🧐

[Anonymous]

So a more accurate headline would read, TRUMP backed out of debate.

He's now proposing another debate on the far-right entertainment network which recently made a multi-billion dollar payout to settle promoting 2020 election falsehoods.

Fox knowingly pushes falsehoods for the GOP. ABC is only biased because they attempt to report actual news without pushing far-right falsehoods.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

Hilarious. Trump is afraid and needs the “safe space” afforded by Fox and a MAGA audience. What a wimp!

Old man Trump is a delicate snowflake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.


Democrats are not the ones supporting a convicted sex offender and 34 time felon for president.