Anonymous wrote:Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation
July 20, 2023
Press Release
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation.
It was orchestrated by Lev Parnas, Rudy Guiliani, Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGenova...literally Russian disinformation.
And you have not a single credible source to link to that shows that is accurate. Why do people make claims like you are doing without a single credible source?
Here is a credible source, which completely destroys the whole 1023-bribery-tax-fraud-coverup narrative.
And he should know, because he is the source from which it all started. The FBI FD-1023 in which it says someone heard about a Ukraine bribery scheme was based on false information from Lev Parnas. And, the "whistleblowers" are calling it "tax fraud" because the supposed bribe money was not declared in taxes. But here's Lev Parnas telling us that there never was a bribe in the first place, that this was false information that he and Giuliani planted in an attempt to smear Biden.
The whistleblowers have actual bank records to prove money was received from foreign sources and never declared on his taxes.
Do yourself a favor and do some research. Listen to the testimony of the IRS whistleblowers.
Post the records then.
The records are not public records.
Here is their testimony.
1:46 at this link regarding the 2014 income....https://www.c-span.org/video/?529320-1/irs-whistleblowers-testify-hunter-biden-investigation-part-1
No records in your links. Broad allegations, no substantiation.
So, you are saying that these two IRS investigators - one with 10 years of experience and the other with 13 years - are lying. Under penalty of perjury.
They have seen the documents. They have seen the evidence. Their testimony was quite specific with very specific numbers.
Sorry, pal. Your denials are worthless.
DP, I would assert they are because they are trying to cover their a$$es for leaking the case since they didn't get traction from their superiors, who knew this was a sham.
Well, you would be the first one to believe this.
And, "leak" the case to whom exactly?
The investigation should never have been leaked to the media, same as the Steel stuff. Y'all upset about that but not the equivelent here.
If you believe these IRS agents leaked the story, you are believing Hunter's desperate lawyers.
Shapley told CBS that he was warned off from probing further into Hunter Biden's lucrative business deals abroad or investigating possible involvement by the president himself.
It prompted his legal team to release a statement accusing Shapley of regularly planting stories in the media and call for a DOJ investigation.
Mark D. Lytle, one of [Shapley's] lawyers, wrote to the two reporters behind the Post story, Devlin Barrett and Perry Stein, urging them to clear the former tax official's name.
'As you know, SSA Shapley was not a source for you on that story, or any other story for that matter,' he wrote.
'If you had ever given him any pledge of confidentiality, you are hereby released from that pledge, so that you may contradict his denial if it were inaccurate. Thus, you are now free to correct Mr. Biden's attorneys and clear SSA Shapley's good name of these false and retaliatory charges,' the letter said.
'Mr Biden's lawyers … are not entitled to make false and defamatory statements about SSA Shapley,' read the letter who was also signed by Tristan Leavitt and Jason Foster of nonprofit transparency group Empower Oversight.
Shapley, and a fellow whistleblower who wants to remain anonymous, testified to the powerful Republican-led House Ways and Means Committee in Congress for six hours in May.
Tax secrecy laws forbid him from releasing all the information he has from the Hunter Biden investigation, but testimony to Congress is protected.
Along with the letter, Shapley's lawyers also released a sworn affidavit to Congress attesting that he has 'never leaked confidential taxpayer information.'
'I was not the source for the October 6, 2022 Washington Post article, nor have I ever had any contact with Barrett or Stein,' the affidavit said.
Anonymous wrote:Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation
July 20, 2023
Press Release
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation.
It was orchestrated by Lev Parnas, Rudy Guiliani, Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGenova...literally Russian disinformation.
And you have not a single credible source to link to that shows that is accurate. Why do people make claims like you are doing without a single credible source?
Here is a credible source, which completely destroys the whole 1023-bribery-tax-fraud-coverup narrative.
And he should know, because he is the source from which it all started. The FBI FD-1023 in which it says someone heard about a Ukraine bribery scheme was based on false information from Lev Parnas. And, the "whistleblowers" are calling it "tax fraud" because the supposed bribe money was not declared in taxes. But here's Lev Parnas telling us that there never was a bribe in the first place, that this was false information that he and Giuliani planted in an attempt to smear Biden.
The whistleblowers have actual bank records to prove money was received from foreign sources and never declared on his taxes.
Do yourself a favor and do some research. Listen to the testimony of the IRS whistleblowers.
Post the records then.
The records are not public records.
Here is their testimony.
1:46 at this link regarding the 2014 income....https://www.c-span.org/video/?529320-1/irs-whistleblowers-testify-hunter-biden-investigation-part-1
No records in your links. Broad allegations, no substantiation.
So, you are saying that these two IRS investigators - one with 10 years of experience and the other with 13 years - are lying. Under penalty of perjury.
They have seen the documents. They have seen the evidence. Their testimony was quite specific with very specific numbers.
Sorry, pal. Your denials are worthless.
DP, I would assert they are because they are trying to cover their a$$es for leaking the case since they didn't get traction from their superiors, who knew this was a sham.
Well, you would be the first one to believe this.
And, "leak" the case to whom exactly?
Info has definitely been leaked. How can you say by whom it was or wasn't leaked?
Anonymous wrote:Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation
July 20, 2023
Press Release
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation.
It was orchestrated by Lev Parnas, Rudy Guiliani, Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGenova...literally Russian disinformation.
And you have not a single credible source to link to that shows that is accurate. Why do people make claims like you are doing without a single credible source?
Here is a credible source, which completely destroys the whole 1023-bribery-tax-fraud-coverup narrative.
And he should know, because he is the source from which it all started. The FBI FD-1023 in which it says someone heard about a Ukraine bribery scheme was based on false information from Lev Parnas. And, the "whistleblowers" are calling it "tax fraud" because the supposed bribe money was not declared in taxes. But here's Lev Parnas telling us that there never was a bribe in the first place, that this was false information that he and Giuliani planted in an attempt to smear Biden.
The whistleblowers have actual bank records to prove money was received from foreign sources and never declared on his taxes.
Do yourself a favor and do some research. Listen to the testimony of the IRS whistleblowers.
Post the records then.
The records are not public records.
Here is their testimony.
1:46 at this link regarding the 2014 income....https://www.c-span.org/video/?529320-1/irs-whistleblowers-testify-hunter-biden-investigation-part-1
No records in your links. Broad allegations, no substantiation.
So, you are saying that these two IRS investigators - one with 10 years of experience and the other with 13 years - are lying. Under penalty of perjury.
They have seen the documents. They have seen the evidence. Their testimony was quite specific with very specific numbers.
Sorry, pal. Your denials are worthless.
DP, I would assert they are because they are trying to cover their a$$es for leaking the case since they didn't get traction from their superiors, who knew this was a sham.
Well, you would be the first one to believe this.
And, "leak" the case to whom exactly?
Info has definitely been leaked. How can you say by whom it was or wasn't leaked?
Anonymous wrote:The laptop is irrelevant. Investigators have the iCloud and backups of his laptops and his phones so they don’t need the tainted laptop that has passed through so many shady hands.
The plea deal is all you are going to get on Hunter. The Burisma and Bobulinski and bank transfer stuff is all bullshit. Hunter had legitimate business partnerships, though the one proposed by Bobulinski didn’t happen. Joe was not involved and did not use his office to help any of the companies or partnerships. All of that has been investigated and there is nothing there.
Where are the reputable links that prove this?
[$arcasm]There is no proof. People regularly setup 17 shell corporations all over the world and ping-pong large sums of money from foreign organizations through them for entertainment. [/$arcasm]
Oh dear. Wait til you find out how many shell companies Trump has ping-ponging money around.
Anonymous wrote:Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation
July 20, 2023
Press Release
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation.
It was orchestrated by Lev Parnas, Rudy Guiliani, Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGenova...literally Russian disinformation.
And you have not a single credible source to link to that shows that is accurate. Why do people make claims like you are doing without a single credible source?
Here is a credible source, which completely destroys the whole 1023-bribery-tax-fraud-coverup narrative.
And he should know, because he is the source from which it all started. The FBI FD-1023 in which it says someone heard about a Ukraine bribery scheme was based on false information from Lev Parnas. And, the "whistleblowers" are calling it "tax fraud" because the supposed bribe money was not declared in taxes. But here's Lev Parnas telling us that there never was a bribe in the first place, that this was false information that he and Giuliani planted in an attempt to smear Biden.
The whistleblowers have actual bank records to prove money was received from foreign sources and never declared on his taxes.
Do yourself a favor and do some research. Listen to the testimony of the IRS whistleblowers.
Post the records then.
The records are not public records.
Here is their testimony.
1:46 at this link regarding the 2014 income....https://www.c-span.org/video/?529320-1/irs-whistleblowers-testify-hunter-biden-investigation-part-1
No records in your links. Broad allegations, no substantiation.
So, you are saying that these two IRS investigators - one with 10 years of experience and the other with 13 years - are lying. Under penalty of perjury.
They have seen the documents. They have seen the evidence. Their testimony was quite specific with very specific numbers.
Sorry, pal. Your denials are worthless.
DP, I would assert they are because they are trying to cover their a$$es for leaking the case since they didn't get traction from their superiors, who knew this was a sham.
Well, you would be the first one to believe this.
And, "leak" the case to whom exactly?
Info has definitely been leaked. How can you say by whom it was or wasn't leaked?
Read the post above yours.
Shapley has been saying things inconsistent with other facts. so that's not enough for me.
But if it wasn't Shapley then it was likely a Republican committee member or staffer.
Anonymous wrote:I find it really strange and discomforting that this isn’t all over the news.
What are these foreign governments getting in return for these millions of dollars sent to the first family?
What did the Saudis get in exchange for the $2B given to Javanka? What did China get in exchange for all of the fast-tracked TRUMP trademarks and business rights?
Anonymous wrote:I find it really strange and discomforting that this isn’t all over the news.
What are these foreign governments getting in return for these millions of dollars sent to the first family?
What did the Saudis get in exchange for the $2B given to Javanka? What did China get in exchange for all of the fast-tracked TRUMP trademarks and business rights?
China got the pull out of the TPP at a minimum, plus they expanded their military holdings in the South China Sea.
Saudi Arabia got nuclear secrets, more weaponry, a weaker Israel and more standing over the Qataris and UAE. Hell, Kushner blackmailed using international policy, Qatar into bailing out his 666 Park Ave project.
Anonymous wrote:I find it really strange and discomforting that this isn’t all over the news.
What are these foreign governments getting in return for these millions of dollars sent to the first family?
Its foreign companies controlled by their governments. In the case of Burisma, they wanted to buy an American energy company for $20 million and get a listing on the NYSE, but they knew US regulators wouldnt approve it because the Ukrainian prosecutor general Shokin had been invesrigating them. Burisma paid the Bidens $10 million to make the problem go away. Ironically Burisma never bought the oil company