
TJ is not mentioned in this article. |
Ironically one of the things that makes it great is its diverse student body. |
BINGO. And it is rapidly becoming one of the great things about TJ. |
My DC is one of them too. |
Precisely how are you defining the top 10% of TJ and precisely how are you defining mediocre schools? |
“BINGO” - Great in the spirit of Make America Great Again. Congratulations |
DC has >4.6GPA, international/national/state awards in FPS, debate, hackathon, etc to name a few with 2 officer positions in school clubs and volunteering. And is going to a T50 school. I am pretty sure with this stats, kids went to a T10 or atleast T20 before. |
Make America Great Again exists in contradistinction to the forces seeking to desegregate TJ. MAGA wants to re-segregate TJ. |
Got rejected from higher-ranked schools? Genuinely wanted to attend at least one of those for reasons beyond their prestige? Were there essays and/or interviews involved? Many elite schools turn down students who they don't believe will accept their offer because they place such a high value on their yield metrics. |
Haters. |
Yes, got rejected from higher-ranked schools. DC genuinely had a dream school, not for prestige but for the education and that school's culture. DC was in debate, so essays weren't mediocre. All the interviews went great! |
?? what are you trying to say? |
Did your child get scholarship offers from top 50 schools? |
DP. Used to be employed at a top-25 school where my office regularly interfaced with admissions. Two mistakes that high-end students make all of the time in the admissions process: 1) Especially with the prevalence of the Common App, they don't do enough to convince the school that they'll accept the offer if given. This is important because parents are obsessed with rankings, and therefore more and more admissions offices are obsessed with rankings (see the recent scandal at Columbia). Admissions offices want two numbers to be optimized - their admit rate (which needs to be low, and supported by a higher number of applications) and their yield rate (which needs to be high, meaning that a high percentage of students offered end up matriculating). This is the biggest reason why students who appear exceptional like yours do not get admitted to schools that they seemingly should coast into based purely on stats - it doesn't help admissions offices in any way to extend an offer to a student who they think will turn it down. 2) They don't do enough to explain to the school how they will contribute to the overall academic environment once they're there. Universities don't get very much (beyond a tuition check) out of a student who is simply going to show up on campus, excel in their schoolwork, and then take their degree off to the private sector never to be heard from again. There are no end of students who, believe it or not, have very similar profiles to your student. Hell, there are a ton of them just coming from TJ - your assessment that they're in the top 10% is probably generous because you're placing too much weight on the GPA. Admissions officers love activities that show a student's desire to be a part of and contribute to something bigger than themselves; this is why activities like FPS, debate, hackathon, individual sports like golf or tennis or wrestling, and other such activities aren't looked upon as strongly as tutoring, team sports, performing arts, and service organizations. In the end, most elite schools would rather graduate a student who was deeply engaged in campus activities than a 4.0 kid who did nothing but study - because the deeply engaged kid is more likely to donate and contribute in other ways to the school down the road. College is a business, and they behave as such. |
Foot in the mouth much! Did not know desegregation was a goal of reform. Such racism. |