We are a donut hole family and we are saving for in state tuition. For VA, that can be up to $160k per kid. $320k. It’s crazy. |
| This is why we only had 1 kid. If the US wants to increase their birth rate, they need to reign in the cost of daycare and higher education. |
NP. Oh FFS. Where do I begin. It’s clear from your post that you have no idea what first-gen students and students who qualify for significant financial aid at top privates go through. THEY “work there a$$es” off. I put myself through college from 2002-2006. I worked 30 hours/week year-round, took out loans and it frankly sucked. Quit whining. You are in a bubble. |
Yeah that’s why Ethiopia has the lowest birthrate, and Scandinavian countries have the highest birthrates. |
You’re assuming that all kids are “strong students”. No one is giving aid to kids with a 3.0. |
No, there is a path for all students. It may not be elite and it may not be totally free, but community college and pell grants are available. Established online options sponsored by various employers also exist. There are many paths for a student that wants a college education with limited resources. The mythical 4 year "college experience" is not available to all. |
We're a donut hole family but we've always emphasized to our kids that they can get a good education at most colleges if they put in the effort. In-state publics, OOS publics with merit, LACs and private universities with merit, regional colleges, etc. They're still excited by their options! |
There are plenty of excellent schools that give merit. Might not be t50, but I’m smart enough to know there are good schools. My own kid got 60% merit at a t40-50 school. And they are only at 1470 Sat and 8 APs. Similarly, my 25 act kid got 40% merit at a t80 school and 60% at at120. All good schools. If you haven’t saved thereARE good schools, just maybe not t20 schools. In our family rankings are only a small part of the process—we look at the actual school and what it has to offer. And best schools include those we can afford. |
Correct, but elite schools can choose to give that experience to all students they deem needy, and that’s what they do. They have the right and resources to that, and exercise that right. |
+1 my friend also recommended her now $70k+ no-merit LAC for my DD who wants a small school. I just let her know what it costs now (she had no idea) and that it wasn't in our budget. But we have a lot of good choices that will work. I did not feel at all insulted, diminished, shamed, or whatever because we can't/choose not to spend a ridiculous about on college. I feel really lucky we can spend up to $40k per year. |
I am the PP and I would make that an "and" not a "but". Agree completely that it is awesome for elite schools to make their schools accessible to students with significant need, who are also those that re likely to benefit the most from the resources and cohort at the elite institutions. This doesn't take away from the fact that there are also options for students at all income levels to access a college education. |
Yeah I guess this is us. Except we live in DC so we have no in-state option. Yay. |
Not the PP, but when people complain about being in a "donut hole" and implying that they have it worse off than middle income families, they are only talking about a small set of elite schools that guarantee to meet full need. For kids who have a chance at those schools there are plenty of other schools that will give them merit aid. For kids who don't have a chance at those schools, the "donut hole" kids are definitely better off than the lower income kids, because they can go to a lower status LAC which offers merit aid to everyone, or a state school where the tuition will be affordable to them, but likely still out of reach for the lower income kid, since those schools don't meet full need. I'm not sure I believe the "donut hole" problem at all (not saying I don't believe that there are UMC families who want schools they can't afford, of course there are, I just don't think that this is a separate problem from there being families in every group but very rich who can't meet their EFC), but if it exists at all, it only applies to high stats kids. |
This. I never felt all this handwringing about not being able to pay so much for college. We are well able to pay in the $35-$45k range per year and my kids aren't competitive for elite schools. So I have no problem with our state U options and mid tier schools that give merit and offer something the kids want that the state options don't. One kid is at VT. The other's best in-state option was UMW but she found a better fit at at OOS private w/ merit and that's fine. At the same time I work with low income kids and I see how limited their options are and know we are very lucky. Sure, the low income kid who gets into Harvard gets a free ride but very, very, very few achieve that. Most of the kids I work with go do Nova-->GMU. A few stronger students get into UVA or W&M, both of which "meet need" so those can work out with loans (meeting need and meeting need without loans are not the same thing). |
If that is your income range and you live in DC then You need to become acquainted with the net price calculators at the private schools that appeal to your kids. You will actually demonstrate need. DC TAG helps. If you have navigated DCPS or a charter school successfully then you can navigate this process. |