2028 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stars will get more girls on Capital. If kid goes to SSSAS it’s pretty much guaranteed

If they want the team to be compete it will only have 4 from stars max.

Probably right. Some other clubs will surprise you with talent you do not know about. Pride will definitely have the lions share. This is not a controversial take at this point.

Yeah it is. Once you get kids out of schemes and see their individual skills the playing field will be leveled. Stars has some great talent that will shine in tryouts. Don’t be deterred.

What schemes? What are you talking about? You are saying that Stars has more talent than Pride but for the schemes? Enjoy SSSAS privilege card.

[Anonymous]

True colors showing again. And you wonder why folks hate pride parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:True colors showing again. And you wonder why folks hate pride parents.

Just calling out BS.

[Anonymous]

To be fair, everyone hates all the 2028 parents. That’s why so many others are on this thread, to be amused by your antics and throw shade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To be fair, everyone hates all the 2028 parents. That’s why so many others are on this thread, to be amused by your antics and throw shade.

Garage. All of them garage. Enjoy Cap tryouts (already decided).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stars will get more girls on Capital. If kid goes to SSSAS it’s pretty much guaranteed

If they want the team to be compete it will only have 4 from stars max.

Probably right. Some other clubs will surprise you with talent you do not know about. Pride will definitely have the lions share. This is not a controversial take at this point.

Yeah it is. Once you get kids out of schemes and see their individual skills the playing field will be leveled. Stars has some great talent that will shine in tryouts. Don’t be deterred.

In retrospect, it would have been a good idea to utilize some schemes with all that available talent. I guess the question is why did that not happen. Were the coaches and other leaders, who are some pretty influential people, actually incompetents? Or could the players just not process?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is how I think the Top Ten will look when the rankings come out later this week:

1. Yellow Jackets LI Maget (2028)
2. Hero's Green (2028)
3. Eagle Stix Blue (2028)
4. Coppermine Black (2028)
5. Mass Elite Red (2028)
6. Crush MD (2028)
7. M&D Black (2028)
8. Pride Red NOVA (2028)
9. Prime Time (2028)
10. MD United East (2028)

No big shakeup is expected, though I have a few notable changes:

Hero's up 1 spot to #2
Eagle Stix down 1 spot to #3
Prime Time up 1 spot to #9
MDU up 1 spot to #10
Aces falls out of Top 10 to #11

I suspect Mass Elite will come back to earth as the summer progresses, but for now they will still be #5.

Are you DG?

No, some other G.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stars will get more girls on Capital. If kid goes to SSSAS it’s pretty much guaranteed

If they want the team to be compete it will only have 4 from stars max.

Probably right. Some other clubs will surprise you with talent you do not know about. Pride will definitely have the lions share. This is not a controversial take at this point.

Yeah it is. Once you get kids out of schemes and see their individual skills the playing field will be leveled. Stars has some great talent that will shine in tryouts. Don’t be deterred.

In retrospect, it would have been a good idea to utilize some schemes with all that available talent. I guess the question is why did that not happen. Were the coaches and other leaders, who are some pretty influential people, actually incompetents? Or could the players just not process?

Now Pride Dad is calling Stars’ kids stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stars will get more girls on Capital. If kid goes to SSSAS it’s pretty much guaranteed

If they want the team to be compete it will only have 4 from stars max.

Probably right. Some other clubs will surprise you with talent you do not know about. Pride will definitely have the lions share. This is not a controversial take at this point.

Yeah it is. Once you get kids out of schemes and see their individual skills the playing field will be leveled. Stars has some great talent that will shine in tryouts. Don’t be deterred.

In retrospect, it would have been a good idea to utilize some schemes with all that available talent. I guess the question is why did that not happen. Were the coaches and other leaders, who are some pretty influential people, actually incompetents? Or could the players just not process?

Now Pride Dad is calling Stars’ kids stupid.

No, just someone who likes to watch this 250 page train wreck.

It is a legitimate question, though. The suggestion was Stars had "great talent" but was unable to utilize "schemes" the same extent as other teams. I am curious to know why they were not able to. I actually meat to suggest they were unable to physically process the schemes, but I suppose executing schemes is both mental and physical.

[Anonymous]

I don’t think Stars coaches/others are incompetent, nor do I think Stars players are too stupid. Running schemes properly requires having lots of players who are going to execute consistently. Hero’s, Coppermine, Crush, and M&D, for example, are better than Pride because they have more players who can consistently execute, and Pride is better than Stars for the same reason. I think it is definitely true there is some great talent on Stars; it’s just not as deep as the other teams I mentioned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stars will get more girls on Capital. If kid goes to SSSAS it’s pretty much guaranteed

If they want the team to be compete it will only have 4 from stars max.

Probably right. Some other clubs will surprise you with talent you do not know about. Pride will definitely have the lions share. This is not a controversial take at this point.

Yeah it is. Once you get kids out of schemes and see their individual skills the playing field will be leveled. Stars has some great talent that will shine in tryouts. Don’t be deterred.

What are these “schemes” that you speak of? If kids haven’t stood out by now what is miraculously going to happen in a 4 hour tryout?

[Anonymous]

After all this progress between Stars and Pride, we have interlopers posing as “Pride Dad” spewing snark. Ignore the trolls.

Nothing changed with the weekend’s results in terms of Capital tryouts. Stars has a number of very strong players with a good chance at Cap Blue. And while Pride played well as a team, no new locks for Capital emerged. Most predictions by all rational parties have been pretty consistent: Pride and Stars will both have players make Capital Blue and, likely, at roughly a 2:1 ratio. Ones and twos from other clubs will provide the remainder.

A more controversial take, but one I happen to agree with, is that if Pride is a top 10 team on its own, the combined group at Capital will be pretty good.

And for the PP struggling with the word “schemes”, the reference is to offensive plays and defensive structures, not backroom dealings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:After all this progress between Stars and Pride, we have interlopers posing as “Pride Dad” spewing snark. Ignore the trolls.

Nothing changed with the weekend’s results in terms of Capital tryouts. Stars has a number of very strong players with a good chance at Cap Blue. And while Pride played well as a team, no new locks for Capital emerged. Most predictions by all rational parties have been pretty consistent: Pride and Stars will both have players make Capital Blue and, likely, at roughly a 2:1 ratio. Ones and twos from other clubs will provide the remainder.

A more controversial take, but one I happen to agree with, is that if Pride is a top 10 team on its own, the combined group at Capital will be pretty good.

And for the PP struggling with the word “schemes”, the reference is to offensive plays and defensive structures, not backroom dealings.

God you sound like a do$che.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think Stars coaches/others are incompetent, nor do I think Stars players are too stupid. Running schemes properly requires having lots of players who are going to execute consistently. Hero’s, Coppermine, Crush, and M&D, for example, are better than Pride because they have more players who can consistently execute, and Pride is better than Stars for the same reason. I think it is definitely true there is some great talent on Stars; it’s just not as deep as the other teams I mentioned.

Generally agree with this take, but would offer that practice, timing, and unselfish play all contribute to execution, along with talent level and player capability.

Well said re Hero’s, Coppermine, and Crush, but I would offer that there is no strong evidence that present day M&D Black 2028 is better than the Pride team that played this past weekend. Better club? Sure. But last head to head was a tie. Comparative results against common opponents this season are pretty balanced if not leaning Pride’s way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After all this progress between Stars and Pride, we have interlopers posing as “Pride Dad” spewing snark. Ignore the trolls.

Nothing changed with the weekend’s results in terms of Capital tryouts. Stars has a number of very strong players with a good chance at Cap Blue. And while Pride played well as a team, no new locks for Capital emerged. Most predictions by all rational parties have been pretty consistent: Pride and Stars will both have players make Capital Blue and, likely, at roughly a 2:1 ratio. Ones and twos from other clubs will provide the remainder.

A more controversial take, but one I happen to agree with, is that if Pride is a top 10 team on its own, the combined group at Capital will be pretty good.

And for the PP struggling with the word “schemes”, the reference is to offensive plays and defensive structures, not backroom dealings.

God you sound like a do$che.

Way to add value in a way that proves that you certainly are one. If you disagree with any points, make a case; if not, I’m not super-interested in your views.