Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the prez had moved on already, lol.

LOL! That's a case study in how fast media cycles move. From one sentence to the next.

It's like Charlie has been tossed aside like a piece of garbage now that his death is no longer useful to serve an agenda.

You are talking as if Charlie just turned into a piece of garbage. He has been a piece of garbage his all useless life.

Yeah. Any violent death like that is tragic. Those types of deaths happen every day. Charlie Kirk was a bad person and while the manner and circumstances of his death are tragic, the world is a better place without him.

Kirk was not a nice person given his public statements. However, he did not deserve to be shot like he was. He deserved to become painfully unpopular and a social pariah but not assassinated in front of his wife and kids.

+1. I feel as horrified in this situation as I do in all the other MANY cases of mental illness + guns resulting in a traumatic incident. Not only to Kirk and his family but everyone there was traumatized. Gun control. Now.

I have supported sensible gun control for my entire adult life but there is not a thing sensible gun control could do to prevent this shooting.

Repeating the lie over and over doesn't make it true. The messages were 4Chan gaming references.

Not sure what lie you think I’m repeating - did you respond to the wrong post? 100% this guy had a legally purchased single bolt action rifle. There’s no possible way in America to ever make that illegal.

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile it's confirmed the shooter from Colorado shared white supremacists views online.

https://www.denverpost.com/2025/09/11/evergreen-high-school-shooting-colorado-updates/amp/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's a helpful explainer for the slow ones on here:

One positive is that it is exposing the deep internet world that our children are exposed to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone summarize the political leanings of the shooter?

The only intel is that he inscirbed anti fascist messages on the gun and bullets. He also wore a Halloween costume mocking Trump. He's likely left leaning.

Drink your milk. It's memes from a far-alt-right group. He's a gun-loving, Christian, Republican raised in a good home by a cop/minister and his mommy is proud of him. CK wasn't right enough for this kid.

The suspect isn’t talking. Where are you getting your information from?

Every news source? The NY Post has pictures of him at all the gunshows the family used to go to. JFC, you're already online, all you have to do is search google for news on the killing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the prez had moved on already, lol.

LOL! That's a case study in how fast media cycles move. From one sentence to the next.

It's like Charlie has been tossed aside like a piece of garbage now that his death is no longer useful to serve an agenda.

You are talking as if Charlie just turned into a piece of garbage. He has been a piece of garbage his all useless life.

Yeah. Any violent death like that is tragic. Those types of deaths happen every day. Charlie Kirk was a bad person and while the manner and circumstances of his death are tragic, the world is a better place without him.

Kirk was not a nice person given his public statements. However, he did not deserve to be shot like he was. He deserved to become painfully unpopular and a social pariah but not assassinated in front of his wife and kids.

This must be repeated again and again. There is NO justification for this shooting. None. If you didn't like what he said, you had every right to challenge him VERBALLY, online or in person. No one has the right to just shoot another person like that. His character is a completely separate and unrelated discussion.

The irony is that Charlie would have gladly debated with his assassin if given the chance.
Such a huge loss and a senseless murder.

[Anonymous]

His family should have negotiated a "no death penalty" before handing him over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the prez had moved on already, lol.

LOL! That's a case study in how fast media cycles move. From one sentence to the next.

It's like Charlie has been tossed aside like a piece of garbage now that his death is no longer useful to serve an agenda.

You are talking as if Charlie just turned into a piece of garbage. He has been a piece of garbage his all useless life.

Yeah. Any violent death like that is tragic. Those types of deaths happen every day. Charlie Kirk was a bad person and while the manner and circumstances of his death are tragic, the world is a better place without him.

Kirk was not a nice person given his public statements. However, he did not deserve to be shot like he was. He deserved to become painfully unpopular and a social pariah but not assassinated in front of his wife and kids.

+1. I feel as horrified in this situation as I do in all the other MANY cases of mental illness + guns resulting in a traumatic incident. Not only to Kirk and his family but everyone there was traumatized. Gun control. Now.

I have supported sensible gun control for my entire adult life but there is not a thing sensible gun control could do to prevent this shooting.

Repeating the lie over and over doesn't make it true. The messages were 4Chan gaming references.

Not sure what lie you think I’m repeating - did you respond to the wrong post? 100% this guy had a legally purchased single bolt action rifle. There’s no possible way in America to ever make that illegal.

Background check, cooling off period. Both things could've diverted him from this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the prez had moved on already, lol.

LOL! That's a case study in how fast media cycles move. From one sentence to the next.

It's like Charlie has been tossed aside like a piece of garbage now that his death is no longer useful to serve an agenda.

You are talking as if Charlie just turned into a piece of garbage. He has been a piece of garbage his all useless life.

Yeah. Any violent death like that is tragic. Those types of deaths happen every day. Charlie Kirk was a bad person and while the manner and circumstances of his death are tragic, the world is a better place without him.

Kirk was not a nice person given his public statements. However, he did not deserve to be shot like he was. He deserved to become painfully unpopular and a social pariah but not assassinated in front of his wife and kids.

This must be repeated again and again. There is NO justification for this shooting. None. If you didn't like what he said, you had every right to challenge him VERBALLY, online or in person. No one has the right to just shoot another person like that. His character is a completely separate and unrelated discussion.

The irony is that Charlie would have gladly debated with his assassin if given the chance.
Such a huge loss and a senseless murder.

I don't think so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile it's confirmed the shooter from Colorado shared white supremacists views online.

https://www.denverpost.com/2025/09/11/evergreen-high-school-shooting-colorado-updates/amp/

I think we need to give up the computer and cellphones for children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a helpful explainer for the slow ones on here:

One positive is that it is exposing the deep internet world that our children are exposed to.

Ok, I am admitting I have no idea what that cartoon is about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone summarize the political leanings of the shooter?

The only intel is that he inscirbed anti fascist messages on the gun and bullets. He also wore a Halloween costume mocking Trump. He's likely left leaning.

He's a white, Christian, gun-loving Republican raised in a good home. Dad was a minister and LEO. Don't let the bots from China-Russia fool you.

Other than him being white, none of those things have been established.

His Dad worked in the county sheriff's department for 27 years, the assassin donated to Trump's campaign, and was a good shot from two football fields out. So we've definitely established that he's a white, gun-loving Republican raised by a LEO.

To separate out the known facts from your cartoon version: There is no credible source that he donated to Trump's campaign. That is just a rumor floating around the internet based on a "Tyler Robinson" making a donation while this Tyler Robinson was still in high school. We know he used a gun, but we don't know anything else about how he or his family felt about guns. We know he lived in a Republican area, but we don't know anything about his political leanings other than the scribblings. We know his father was a registered Republican who worked in law enforcement, but we don't know if Tyler was aligned with his father. The recounting of the dinner conversation suggested he was rebelling from his upbringing rather than doubling down on it. It's possible that the evidence will eventually support what you are saying but so far it is pointing in the other direction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a helpful explainer for the slow ones on here:

One positive is that it is exposing the deep internet world that our children are exposed to.

Ok, I am admitting I have no idea what that cartoon is about.

Neither do I.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's a helpful explainer for the slow ones on here:

Funny Tim Miller posted this. I have spent the last 20 minutes discussing that reference with my teenager. According to her, this has zero political meaning. It’s associated with Incels.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His family should have negotiated a "no death penalty" before handing him over.

This may be the dumbest thing I've ever read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the prez had moved on already, lol.

LOL! That's a case study in how fast media cycles move. From one sentence to the next.

It's like Charlie has been tossed aside like a piece of garbage now that his death is no longer useful to serve an agenda.

His widow is gonna find out real fast how many real friends she has. The right will be climbing all over themselves to take Charlies spot. Let’s see if Trump follow through with any of his promises. Who knows maybe the wife will learn How it’s all a grift and MAGA will happy to stab you in the back at the first chance

Umm hes being flown on AF2 with the VP and Usha and Kirks wife. On our tax dollars.

All that was arranged before the shooters profile was released.