well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He also has a bad history with rage and booze.

But you numbskulls keep ignoring that.

Keep on circling that wagon - hope you can live with yourselves.

Really? Exactly what evidence - in his ADULT life - points to a "bad history with rage and booze"? He's allowed to drink and enjoy beer. Just as RBG drinks and enjoys her wine.

His hysterics and rage-filled rant, never mind his inappropriate snipping at Senators, at the hearing was evidence of a man who at the very least couldn’t control his temper.

Nope.
Had he remained calm and not passionately defended himself, you folks would have, no doubt, said, "See. He is acting guilty. He can't even defend himself."
No - I think had I been accused of even HALF of what the left threw at him, I would be quite indignant and angry at those who falsely accused me as well.
I was glad to see him defend himself AND his family.

Right but you’re a nobody. He was auditioning for justice. They’re supposed to be preternaturally calm, above the fray, dispassionate. Hence: rage issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks can litigate this and relitigate this all you want.

Fact is.........Kavanaugh sits on SCOTUS and can hire the clerks he wants. Seems he has done a good job so far.... gets high praise from RBG for increasing the number of female clerks so that now, there are more women then men clerks.

Not a bad thing, IMO.
And, he seems to be doing a good job on the court.

Bingo. End of story.

Nope. Not end of story. Here we are again in 2019 with some inappropriate behavior and a pretty young woman.

Do you hear yourself? Do you have any idea how utterly insane you sound? There has been no “inappropriate behavior with a pretty young woman,” you dolt. Stop trying to smear this man by suggesting something nefarious is going on. Also, are only unattractive women considered suitable for clerkships in your bizarre worldview?

Not *my* worldview. How many of his clerks are attractive? They are all female, right? Creepy.

This is hilarious. He has been lauded by many - even RBG - for hiring more female (and minority) clerks than ANY other justice. And yet all you can do is insinuate that something is wrong with him hiring a lot of females (and dammit, why aren’t they UGLY??). Meanwhile, if he was instead hiring mainly men (and God forbid, WHITE men), you’d be outraged about *that* because diversity, etc.! You guys are absolutely absurd. Why people even bother to pander to your complete hypocrisy is beyond me. There is no winning with you.

He’s got a bad history with women. Just like Roy Moore with teenagers.

Oh! Is that why *hundreds* of women came to his defense, to attest to his character as a friend, colleague, and mentor over several decades? On the contrary, he has a very GOOD history with women. Nice try, dolt.

You know that many of those women later said they hadn’t heard the charges and didn’t know him directly, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He also has a bad history with rage and booze.

But you numbskulls keep ignoring that.

Keep on circling that wagon - hope you can live with yourselves.

Really? Exactly what evidence - in his ADULT life - points to a "bad history with rage and booze"? He's allowed to drink and enjoy beer. Just as RBG drinks and enjoys her wine.

His hysterics and rage-filled rant, never mind his inappropriate snipping at Senators, at the hearing was evidence of a man who at the very least couldn’t control his temper.

Nope.
Had he remained calm and not passionately defended himself, you folks would have, no doubt, said, "See. He is acting guilty. He can't even defend himself."
No - I think had I been accused of even HALF of what the left threw at him, I would be quite indignant and angry at those who falsely accused me as well.
I was glad to see him defend himself AND his family.

+1,000
There is truly nothing that will please these imbeciles.

[Anonymous]

His hysterics and rage-filled rant, never mind his inappropriate snipping at Senators, at the hearing was evidence of a man who at the very least couldn’t control his temper.


Nope.
Had he remained calm and not passionately defended himself, you folks would have, no doubt, said, "See. He is acting guilty. He can't even defend himself."
No - I think had I been accused of even HALF of what the left threw at him, I would be quite indignant and angry at those who falsely accused me as well.
I was glad to see him defend himself AND his family.


+1,000
There is truly nothing that will please these imbeciles.

+1001

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

His hysterics and rage-filled rant, never mind his inappropriate snipping at Senators, at the hearing was evidence of a man who at the very least couldn’t control his temper.


Nope.
Had he remained calm and not passionately defended himself, you folks would have, no doubt, said, "See. He is acting guilty. He can't even defend himself."
No - I think had I been accused of even HALF of what the left threw at him, I would be quite indignant and angry at those who falsely accused me as well.
I was glad to see him defend himself AND his family.


+1,000
There is truly nothing that will please these imbeciles.

+1001

LOL. Looks like you both have rage issues too. Must run in the party.

Dude can’t keep his calm. Not a good look for a SCOTUS justice.

Still waiting to hear what % of his clerks are attractive young females...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He also has a bad history with rage and booze.

But you numbskulls keep ignoring that.

Keep on circling that wagon - hope you can live with yourselves.

Really? Exactly what evidence - in his ADULT life - points to a "bad history with rage and booze"? He's allowed to drink and enjoy beer. Just as RBG drinks and enjoys her wine.

His hysterics and rage-filled rant, never mind his inappropriate snipping at Senators, at the hearing was evidence of a man who at the very least couldn’t control his temper.

Nope.
Had he remained calm and not passionately defended himself, you folks would have, no doubt, said, "See. He is acting guilty. He can't even defend himself."
No - I think had I been accused of even HALF of what the left threw at him, I would be quite indignant and angry at those who falsely accused me as well.
I was glad to see him defend himself AND his family.

+1,000
There is truly nothing that will please these imbeciles.

Decency would please us. He and his defenders lack that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

His hysterics and rage-filled rant, never mind his inappropriate snipping at Senators, at the hearing was evidence of a man who at the very least couldn’t control his temper.


Nope.
Had he remained calm and not passionately defended himself, you folks would have, no doubt, said, "See. He is acting guilty. He can't even defend himself."
No - I think had I been accused of even HALF of what the left threw at him, I would be quite indignant and angry at those who falsely accused me as well.
I was glad to see him defend himself AND his family.


+1,000
There is truly nothing that will please these imbeciles.

+1001

LOL. Looks like you both have rage issues too. Must run in the party.

Dude can’t keep his calm. Not a good look for a SCOTUS justice.

Still waiting to hear what % of his clerks are attractive young females...

I’m impressed that he has hired more minority and female clerks than *any other SC justice*. Clearly that just burns you up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

His hysterics and rage-filled rant, never mind his inappropriate snipping at Senators, at the hearing was evidence of a man who at the very least couldn’t control his temper.


Nope.
Had he remained calm and not passionately defended himself, you folks would have, no doubt, said, "See. He is acting guilty. He can't even defend himself."
No - I think had I been accused of even HALF of what the left threw at him, I would be quite indignant and angry at those who falsely accused me as well.
I was glad to see him defend himself AND his family.


+1,000
There is truly nothing that will please these imbeciles.

+1001

LOL. Looks like you both have rage issues too. Must run in the party.

Dude can’t keep his calm. Not a good look for a SCOTUS justice.

Still waiting to hear what % of his clerks are attractive young females...

I’m impressed that he has hired more minority and female clerks than *any other SC justice*. Clearly that just burns you up!

Given his past questionable behavior it’s inappropriate for him to pack his office with attractive young women. Guess you don’t mind - boys will be boys, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

His hysterics and rage-filled rant, never mind his inappropriate snipping at Senators, at the hearing was evidence of a man who at the very least couldn’t control his temper.


Nope.
Had he remained calm and not passionately defended himself, you folks would have, no doubt, said, "See. He is acting guilty. He can't even defend himself."
No - I think had I been accused of even HALF of what the left threw at him, I would be quite indignant and angry at those who falsely accused me as well.
I was glad to see him defend himself AND his family.


+1,000
There is truly nothing that will please these imbeciles.

+1001

LOL. Looks like you both have rage issues too. Must run in the party.

Dude can’t keep his calm. Not a good look for a SCOTUS justice.

Still waiting to hear what % of his clerks are attractive young females...

I’m impressed that he has hired more minority and female clerks than *any other SC justice*. Clearly that just burns you up!

Given his past questionable behavior it’s inappropriate for him to pack his office with attractive young women. Guess you don’t mind - boys will be boys, right?

And if he hired all men, it would be the boy's club again.

Attractive is subjective BTW.

[Anonymous]

hm. weird you guys think it's either his booster's kid with the job, or all dudes, who get to clerk for old bart o'kavanaugh. no one else could possibly get the job. just amy chua's daughter, or dudes.

[Anonymous]

What an icky family. Gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What an icky family. Gross.

You have contributed oh, so much, to this thread.
Or, was this your ridiculous effort to bump this thread to the top?

And, I am sure your family is picture perfect, right? No skeletons in your closet.........

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What an icky family. Gross.

You have contributed oh, so much, to this thread.
Or, was this your ridiculous effort to bump this thread to the top?

And, I am sure your family is picture perfect, right? No skeletons in your closet.........

No sexual assaults or secret financial transactions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What an icky family. Gross.

You have contributed oh, so much, to this thread.
Or, was this your ridiculous effort to bump this thread to the top?

And, I am sure your family is picture perfect, right? No skeletons in your closet.........

No sexual assaults or secret financial transactions.

Nor are there any with Kavanaugh.
I am betting your past is not as clean as his.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What an icky family. Gross.

You have contributed oh, so much, to this thread.
Or, was this your ridiculous effort to bump this thread to the top?

And, I am sure your family is picture perfect, right? No skeletons in your closet.........

No sexual assaults or secret financial transactions.

Nor are there any with Kavanaugh.
I am betting your past is not as clean as his.

Sadly, it is. I’m pretty boring. Not a “Renate Alumnius”.