well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks can litigate this and relitigate this all you want.

Fact is.........Kavanaugh sits on SCOTUS and can hire the clerks he wants. Seems he has done a good job so far.... gets high praise from RBG for increasing the number of female clerks so that now, there are more women then men clerks.

Not a bad thing, IMO.
And, he seems to be doing a good job on the court.

Bingo. End of story.

Nope. Not end of story. Here we are again in 2019 with some inappropriate behavior and a pretty young woman.

He hired a clerk. Sorry you don't like that.

May I never approach issues like a conservative.

Seriously. I couldn't live with myself.

Some day you'll grow up and realize your viewpoint is myopic and void of reason.

Projecting again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks can litigate this and relitigate this all you want.

Fact is.........Kavanaugh sits on SCOTUS and can hire the clerks he wants. Seems he has done a good job so far.... gets high praise from RBG for increasing the number of female clerks so that now, there are more women then men clerks.

Not a bad thing, IMO.
And, he seems to be doing a good job on the court.

Bingo. End of story.

Nope. Not end of story. Here we are again in 2019 with some inappropriate behavior and a pretty young woman.

Do you hear yourself? Do you have any idea how utterly insane you sound? There has been no “inappropriate behavior with a pretty young woman,” you dolt. Stop trying to smear this man by suggesting something nefarious is going on. Also, are only unattractive women considered suitable for clerkships in your bizarre worldview?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks can litigate this and relitigate this all you want.

Fact is.........Kavanaugh sits on SCOTUS and can hire the clerks he wants. Seems he has done a good job so far.... gets high praise from RBG for increasing the number of female clerks so that now, there are more women then men clerks.

Not a bad thing, IMO.
And, he seems to be doing a good job on the court.

Bingo. End of story.

Nope. Not end of story. Here we are again in 2019 with some inappropriate behavior and a pretty young woman.

Do you hear yourself? Do you have any idea how utterly insane you sound? There has been no “inappropriate behavior with a pretty young woman,” you dolt. Stop trying to smear this man by suggesting something nefarious is going on. Also, are only unattractive women considered suitable for clerkships in your bizarre worldview?

It was inappropriate for him to offer her a clerkship. Even she recognized that last year and said it wasn’t happening. Try to keep up here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks can litigate this and relitigate this all you want.

Fact is.........Kavanaugh sits on SCOTUS and can hire the clerks he wants. Seems he has done a good job so far.... gets high praise from RBG for increasing the number of female clerks so that now, there are more women then men clerks.

Not a bad thing, IMO.
And, he seems to be doing a good job on the court.

Bingo. End of story.

Nope. Not end of story. Here we are again in 2019 with some inappropriate behavior and a pretty young woman.

Do you hear yourself? Do you have any idea how utterly insane you sound? There has been no “inappropriate behavior with a pretty young woman,” you dolt. Stop trying to smear this man by suggesting something nefarious is going on. Also, are only unattractive women considered suitable for clerkships in your bizarre worldview?

Not *my* worldview. How many of his clerks are attractive? They are all female, right? Creepy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's obviously qualified.

BTW - did you hear that RBG praised Kavanaugh for hiring so many female clerks (ALL women) that this is the first time there are more women than men SCOTUS clerks? [/quote]


+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks can litigate this and relitigate this all you want.

Fact is.........Kavanaugh sits on SCOTUS and can hire the clerks he wants. Seems he has done a good job so far.... gets high praise from RBG for increasing the number of female clerks so that now, there are more women then men clerks.

Not a bad thing, IMO.
And, he seems to be doing a good job on the court.

Bingo. End of story.

Nope. Not end of story. Here we are again in 2019 with some inappropriate behavior and a pretty young woman.

Do you hear yourself? Do you have any idea how utterly insane you sound? There has been no “inappropriate behavior with a pretty young woman,” you dolt. Stop trying to smear this man by suggesting something nefarious is going on. Also, are only unattractive women considered suitable for clerkships in your bizarre worldview?

Not *my* worldview. How many of his clerks are attractive? They are all female, right? Creepy.

This is hilarious. He has been lauded by many - even RBG - for hiring more female (and minority) clerks than ANY other justice. And yet all you can do is insinuate that something is wrong with him hiring a lot of females (and dammit, why aren’t they UGLY??). Meanwhile, if he was instead hiring mainly men (and God forbid, WHITE men), you’d be outraged about *that* because diversity, etc.! You guys are absolutely absurd. Why people even bother to pander to your complete hypocrisy is beyond me. There is no winning with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks can litigate this and relitigate this all you want.

Fact is.........Kavanaugh sits on SCOTUS and can hire the clerks he wants. Seems he has done a good job so far.... gets high praise from RBG for increasing the number of female clerks so that now, there are more women then men clerks.

Not a bad thing, IMO.
And, he seems to be doing a good job on the court.

Bingo. End of story.

Nope. Not end of story. Here we are again in 2019 with some inappropriate behavior and a pretty young woman.

Do you hear yourself? Do you have any idea how utterly insane you sound? There has been no “inappropriate behavior with a pretty young woman,” you dolt. Stop trying to smear this man by suggesting something nefarious is going on. Also, are only unattractive women considered suitable for clerkships in your bizarre worldview?

Not *my* worldview. How many of his clerks are attractive? They are all female, right? Creepy.

This is hilarious. He has been lauded by many - even RBG - for hiring more female (and minority) clerks than ANY other justice. And yet all you can do is insinuate that something is wrong with him hiring a lot of females (and dammit, why aren’t they UGLY??). Meanwhile, if he was instead hiring mainly men (and God forbid, WHITE men), you’d be outraged about *that* because diversity, etc.! You guys are absolutely absurd. Why people even bother to pander to your complete hypocrisy is beyond me. There is no winning with you.

He’s got a bad history with women. Just like Roy Moore with teenagers.

[Anonymous]

He also has a bad history with rage and booze.

But you numbskulls keep ignoring that.

Keep on circling that wagon - hope you can live with yourselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He also has a bad history with rage and booze.

But you numbskulls keep ignoring that.

Keep on circling that wagon - hope you can live with yourselves.

Is this apropos of nothing at all or do you know something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks can litigate this and relitigate this all you want.

Fact is.........Kavanaugh sits on SCOTUS and can hire the clerks he wants. Seems he has done a good job so far.... gets high praise from RBG for increasing the number of female clerks so that now, there are more women then men clerks.

Not a bad thing, IMO.
And, he seems to be doing a good job on the court.

Bingo. End of story.

Nope. Not end of story. Here we are again in 2019 with some inappropriate behavior and a pretty young woman.

Do you hear yourself? Do you have any idea how utterly insane you sound? There has been no “inappropriate behavior with a pretty young woman,” you dolt. Stop trying to smear this man by suggesting something nefarious is going on. Also, are only unattractive women considered suitable for clerkships in your bizarre worldview?

Not *my* worldview. How many of his clerks are attractive? They are all female, right? Creepy.

This is hilarious. He has been lauded by many - even RBG - for hiring more female (and minority) clerks than ANY other justice. And yet all you can do is insinuate that something is wrong with him hiring a lot of females (and dammit, why aren’t they UGLY??). Meanwhile, if he was instead hiring mainly men (and God forbid, WHITE men), you’d be outraged about *that* because diversity, etc.! You guys are absolutely absurd. Why people even bother to pander to your complete hypocrisy is beyond me. There is no winning with you.

He’s got a bad history with women. Just like Roy Moore with teenagers.

Oh! Is that why *hundreds* of women came to his defense, to attest to his character as a friend, colleague, and mentor over several decades? On the contrary, he has a very GOOD history with women. Nice try, dolt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He also has a bad history with rage and booze.

But you numbskulls keep ignoring that.

Keep on circling that wagon - hope you can live with yourselves.

Really? Exactly what evidence - in his ADULT life - points to a "bad history with rage and booze"? He's allowed to drink and enjoy beer. Just as RBG drinks and enjoys her wine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He also has a bad history with rage and booze.

But you numbskulls keep ignoring that.

Keep on circling that wagon - hope you can live with yourselves.

Is this apropos of nothing at all or do you know something?

That would be the former. They know nothing at all, which is why they're constantly lying.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He also has a bad history with rage and booze.

But you numbskulls keep ignoring that.

Keep on circling that wagon - hope you can live with yourselves.

Really? Exactly what evidence - in his ADULT life - points to a "bad history with rage and booze"? He's allowed to drink and enjoy beer. Just as RBG drinks and enjoys her wine.

His hysterics and rage-filled rant, never mind his inappropriate snipping at Senators, at the hearing was evidence of a man who at the very least couldn’t control his temper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He also has a bad history with rage and booze.

But you numbskulls keep ignoring that.

Keep on circling that wagon - hope you can live with yourselves.

Really? Exactly what evidence - in his ADULT life - points to a "bad history with rage and booze"? He's allowed to drink and enjoy beer. Just as RBG drinks and enjoys her wine.

His hysterics and rage-filled rant, never mind his inappropriate snipping at Senators, at the hearing was evidence of a man who at the very least couldn’t control his temper.

Nope.
Had he remained calm and not passionately defended himself, you folks would have, no doubt, said, "See. He is acting guilty. He can't even defend himself."
No - I think had I been accused of even HALF of what the left threw at him, I would be quite indignant and angry at those who falsely accused me as well.
I was glad to see him defend himself AND his family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks can litigate this and relitigate this all you want.

Fact is.........Kavanaugh sits on SCOTUS and can hire the clerks he wants. Seems he has done a good job so far.... gets high praise from RBG for increasing the number of female clerks so that now, there are more women then men clerks.

Not a bad thing, IMO.
And, he seems to be doing a good job on the court.

Bingo. End of story.

Nope. Not end of story. Here we are again in 2019 with some inappropriate behavior and a pretty young woman.

Do you hear yourself? Do you have any idea how utterly insane you sound? There has been no “inappropriate behavior with a pretty young woman,” you dolt. Stop trying to smear this man by suggesting something nefarious is going on. Also, are only unattractive women considered suitable for clerkships in your bizarre worldview?

Not *my* worldview. How many of his clerks are attractive? They are all female, right? Creepy.

This is hilarious. He has been lauded by many - even RBG - for hiring more female (and minority) clerks than ANY other justice. And yet all you can do is insinuate that something is wrong with him hiring a lot of females (and dammit, why aren’t they UGLY??). Meanwhile, if he was instead hiring mainly men (and God forbid, WHITE men), you’d be outraged about *that* because diversity, etc.! You guys are absolutely absurd. Why people even bother to pander to your complete hypocrisy is beyond me. There is no winning with you.

What % of his clerks are attractive young women? Is that representative of the demographics of law school graduates? If not, why?