well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tiger Mom got her daughter a Sup Ct clerkship

Only suckers think any swamps are getting drained

https://twitter.com/ElieNYC/status/1138100488606535680


Can the editor of Above the Law (left wing blog) name just one female candidate to Kavanaugh's clerkship who is more qualified than Sophia? He can't.


that's absurd. there are likely hundreds if not thousands of young female law grads just as qualified as she is. This is payola, clear as day. Sophia will be ostracized by elite legal institutions and will have to scrape the bottom of the barrel after she peters out at her post-clerkship firm job.


No she won't. That's not how this works. Those who benefit from the swamp don't end up getting taken down by it - they stay on top. They marry each other. They consolidate power. She'll do great in life. And someone else, who didn't have Amy Chua as her mom, will do worse.


Yep.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tiger Mom got her daughter a Sup Ct clerkship

Only suckers think any swamps are getting drained

https://twitter.com/ElieNYC/status/1138100488606535680


Can the editor of Above the Law (left wing blog) name just one female candidate to Kavanaugh's clerkship who is more qualified than Sophia? He can't.


that's absurd. there are likely hundreds if not thousands of young female law grads just as qualified as she is. This is payola, clear as day. Sophia will be ostracized by elite legal institutions and will have to scrape the bottom of the barrel after she peters out at her post-clerkship firm job.


Please just name one who applied and didn’t get it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tiger Mom got her daughter a Sup Ct clerkship

Only suckers think any swamps are getting drained

https://twitter.com/ElieNYC/status/1138100488606535680


Can the editor of Above the Law (left wing blog) name just one female candidate to Kavanaugh's clerkship who is more qualified than Sophia? He can't.


that's absurd. there are likely hundreds if not thousands of young female law grads just as qualified as she is. This is payola, clear as day. Sophia will be ostracized by elite legal institutions and will have to scrape the bottom of the barrel after she peters out at her post-clerkship firm job.


Please just name one who applied and didn’t get it.

Why should we? Just because you won’t acknowledge that Kavanaugh is a bought and paid for swamp beast supported by swamp beasts doesn’t mean the rest of us can’t see favoritism.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tiger Mom got her daughter a Sup Ct clerkship

Only suckers think any swamps are getting drained

https://twitter.com/ElieNYC/status/1138100488606535680


Can the editor of Above the Law (left wing blog) name just one female candidate to Kavanaugh's clerkship who is more qualified than Sophia? He can't.


that's absurd. there are likely hundreds if not thousands of young female law grads just as qualified as she is. This is payola, clear as day. Sophia will be ostracized by elite legal institutions and will have to scrape the bottom of the barrel after she peters out at her post-clerkship firm job.


Please just name one who applied and didn’t get it.


I didn't realize that's how this works. I guess we should assume no one is more qualified than Javanka to be White House advisors too since we don't have the names and resumes of the other applicants.

What nepotism? What swamp?? Nothing like that going on over here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tiger Mom got her daughter a Sup Ct clerkship

Only suckers think any swamps are getting drained

https://twitter.com/ElieNYC/status/1138100488606535680


Can the editor of Above the Law (left wing blog) name just one female candidate to Kavanaugh's clerkship who is more qualified than Sophia? He can't.


that's absurd. there are likely hundreds if not thousands of young female law grads just as qualified as she is. This is payola, clear as day. Sophia will be ostracized by elite legal institutions and will have to scrape the bottom of the barrel after she peters out at her post-clerkship firm job.


Please just name one who applied and didn’t get it.


I didn't realize that's how this works. I guess we should assume no one is more qualified than Javanka to be White House advisors too since we don't have the names and resumes of the other applicants.

What nepotism? What swamp?? Nothing like that going on over here.



Dear crazy poster,

Nepotism is NOT when someone hires the completely unrelated yet amazingly well-qualified woman whose mom happened to write an OpEd.

It's amazing what amount of crazy sh#t you make up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tiger Mom got her daughter a Sup Ct clerkship

Only suckers think any swamps are getting drained

https://twitter.com/ElieNYC/status/1138100488606535680


Can the editor of Above the Law (left wing blog) name just one female candidate to Kavanaugh's clerkship who is more qualified than Sophia? He can't.


that's absurd. there are likely hundreds if not thousands of young female law grads just as qualified as she is. This is payola, clear as day. Sophia will be ostracized by elite legal institutions and will have to scrape the bottom of the barrel after she peters out at her post-clerkship firm job.


Please just name one who applied and didn’t get it.


I didn't realize that's how this works. I guess we should assume no one is more qualified than Javanka to be White House advisors too since we don't have the names and resumes of the other applicants.

What nepotism? What swamp?? Nothing like that going on over here.



Dear crazy poster,

Nepotism is NOT when someone hires the completely unrelated yet amazingly well-qualified woman whose mom happened to write an OpEd.

It's amazing what amount of crazy sh#t you make up.


Well I'll tell you what- Amy Chua isn't trending on Twitter because people see it your way, that's for sure
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She's obviously qualified.

BTW - did you hear that RBG praised Kavanaugh for hiring so many female clerks (ALL women) that this is the first time there are more women than men SCOTUS clerks?


+1
Good for him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tiger Mom got her daughter a Sup Ct clerkship

Only suckers think any swamps are getting drained

https://twitter.com/ElieNYC/status/1138100488606535680


Can the editor of Above the Law (left wing blog) name just one female candidate to Kavanaugh's clerkship who is more qualified than Sophia? He can't.


that's absurd. there are likely hundreds if not thousands of young female law grads just as qualified as she is. This is payola, clear as day. Sophia will be ostracized by elite legal institutions and will have to scrape the bottom of the barrel after she peters out at her post-clerkship firm job.


Please just name one who applied and didn’t get it.


I didn't realize that's how this works. I guess we should assume no one is more qualified than Javanka to be White House advisors too since we don't have the names and resumes of the other applicants.

What nepotism? What swamp?? Nothing like that going on over here.



Dear crazy poster,

Nepotism is NOT when someone hires the completely unrelated yet amazingly well-qualified woman whose mom happened to write an OpEd.

It's amazing what amount of crazy sh#t you make up.


Well I'll tell you what- Amy Chua isn't trending on Twitter because people see it your way, that's for sure



Hahahaha.

Trending on Twitter IS NOT about thinking or about facts.

It's about the senseless mob -- your tribe. Congrats!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She's obviously qualified.

BTW - did you hear that RBG praised Kavanaugh for hiring so many female clerks (ALL women) that this is the first time there are more women than men SCOTUS clerks?


There were lots of available women whose moms didn't help whitewash his nomination

It's a real bad look



You mean, stand up for innocent until proven guilty? Last I checked, defending the constitution is NOT whitewashing anything. Face it - that was a 30+ yr. old allegation with zero evidence to go on. Of course he should have been confirmed. You just didn't *want* a conservative on the court, so you and other Democrats decided to attempt a witch hunt. Sorry it failed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She's obviously qualified.

BTW - did you hear that RBG praised Kavanaugh for hiring so many female clerks (ALL women) that this is the first time there are more women than men SCOTUS clerks?


There were lots of available women whose moms didn't help whitewash his nomination

It's a real bad look



You mean, stand up for innocent until proven guilty? Last I checked, defending the constitution is NOT whitewashing anything. Face it - that was a 30+ yr. old allegation with zero evidence to go on. Of course he should have been confirmed. You just didn't *want* a conservative on the court, so you and other Democrats decided to attempt a witch hunt. Sorry it failed.


Oh no. It wasn't his behavior 30 years ago that was important but his behavior during the hearing. He knew he was in the wrong, he wrote that apology-not-an-apology immediately afterwards.

And you bought it. I guess.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She's obviously qualified.

BTW - did you hear that RBG praised Kavanaugh for hiring so many female clerks (ALL women) that this is the first time there are more women than men SCOTUS clerks?


There were lots of available women whose moms didn't help whitewash his nomination

It's a real bad look



You mean, stand up for innocent until proven guilty? Last I checked, defending the constitution is NOT whitewashing anything. Face it - that was a 30+ yr. old allegation with zero evidence to go on. Of course he should have been confirmed. You just didn't *want* a conservative on the court, so you and other Democrats decided to attempt a witch hunt. Sorry it failed.


Oh no. It wasn't his behavior 30 years ago that was important but his behavior during the hearing. He knew he was in the wrong, he wrote that apology-not-an-apology immediately afterwards.

And you bought it. I guess.


These irritating MAGA-heads will buy anything. They'll buy tariffs until Trump tells them we don't need tariffs anymore. They'll buy everify until Trump tells them not to like everify anymore. They looove Kavanaugh - until I'm sure he'll issue some ruling that Trump doesn't like and then they'll turn on him, too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She's obviously qualified.

BTW - did you hear that RBG praised Kavanaugh for hiring so many female clerks (ALL women) that this is the first time there are more women than men SCOTUS clerks?


There were lots of available women whose moms didn't help whitewash his nomination

It's a real bad look



You mean, stand up for innocent until proven guilty? Last I checked, defending the constitution is NOT whitewashing anything. Face it - that was a 30+ yr. old allegation with zero evidence to go on. Of course he should have been confirmed. You just didn't *want* a conservative on the court, so you and other Democrats decided to attempt a witch hunt. Sorry it failed.


Oh no. It wasn't his behavior 30 years ago that was important but his behavior during the hearing. He knew he was in the wrong, he wrote that apology-not-an-apology immediately afterwards.

And you bought it. I guess.


This.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She's obviously qualified.

BTW - did you hear that RBG praised Kavanaugh for hiring so many female clerks (ALL women) that this is the first time there are more women than men SCOTUS clerks?


There were lots of available women whose moms didn't help whitewash his nomination

It's a real bad look



You mean, stand up for innocent until proven guilty? Last I checked, defending the constitution is NOT whitewashing anything. Face it - that was a 30+ yr. old allegation with zero evidence to go on. Of course he should have been confirmed. You just didn't *want* a conservative on the court, so you and other Democrats decided to attempt a witch hunt. Sorry it failed.



+1.

So glad the totalitarian mob failed.
Anonymous
Tiger Mom is gross and her kid is too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tiger Mom got her daughter a Sup Ct clerkship

Only suckers think any swamps are getting drained

https://twitter.com/ElieNYC/status/1138100488606535680


Can the editor of Above the Law (left wing blog) name just one female candidate to Kavanaugh's clerkship who is more qualified than Sophia? He can't.


that's absurd. there are likely hundreds if not thousands of young female law grads just as qualified as she is. This is payola, clear as day. Sophia will be ostracized by elite legal institutions and will have to scrape the bottom of the barrel after she peters out at her post-clerkship firm job.


Please just name one who applied and didn’t get it.


I didn't realize that's how this works. I guess we should assume no one is more qualified than Javanka to be White House advisors too since we don't have the names and resumes of the other applicants.

What nepotism? What swamp?? Nothing like that going on over here.



Dear crazy poster,

Nepotism is NOT when someone hires the completely unrelated yet amazingly well-qualified woman whose mom happened to write an OpEd.

It's amazing what amount of crazy sh#t you make up.


Well I'll tell you what- Amy Chua isn't trending on Twitter because people see it your way, that's for sure



Hahahaha.

Trending on Twitter IS NOT about thinking or about facts.

It's about the senseless mob -- your tribe. Congrats!!


This is so true. Twitter is all about feelings. And about how the mob attempts to silence or demonize those with whom they disagree.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: