Potomac Yard (Alexandria) HOA — Issues?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:HOA rules cannot contradict state or federal laws. This parking policy is unlawful. The law has been this way since 2012. This parking policy was enacted in 2014.

Frank — stop talking to yourself. I see the isp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you read the assignment of spaces that was posted? It was done by the board. It has been stated ad nauseam how the HOA and/or board cannot give away a common area for exclusive use to individual owners.

But how do we know that the Board didn’t have authorization, from a required percentage of the owners, to modify the Declaration to effect this change?

Simple. Because there was no vote. Or minutes. Or a call for quorum. Or anything.

And it's affect, not effect.

Saying we’ve seen no evidence that it was done right is very different from saying there’s no way it could have been done right. Right?

I’m sticking with “effect”.

Yes, it's "effect change". Anyone who reads and writes a great deal knows this. It's hilarious when grammar nancys jump in and are just wrong wrong wrong.
https://kris-spisak.com/writing-tip-affect-change-or-effect-change/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This was all addressed in the lawsuit. Frank wins. I am guessing there will be a settlement offered where Frank is sworn into secrecy.

Frank goes into the witness protection program.
Frank launches a reality tv show
Frank goes city to city antiques roadshow style for HOA Roadshow

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HOA rules cannot contradict state or federal laws. This parking policy is unlawful. The law has been this way since 2012. This parking policy was enacted in 2014.

Frank — stop talking to yourself. I see the isp.

Your technology is less accurate than your realtor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was all addressed in the lawsuit. Frank wins. I am guessing there will be a settlement offered where Frank is sworn into secrecy.

Frank goes into the witness protection program.
Frank launches a reality tv show
Frank goes city to city antiques roadshow style for HOA Roadshow

I have my doubts about all of this. But karma will be kind to Frank because your neighbors across the street will be able to park in front of their homes and their future neighbors across the street will be car-less or car-lite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you read the assignment of spaces that was posted? It was done by the board. It has been stated ad nauseam how the HOA and/or board cannot give away a common area for exclusive use to individual owners.

But how do we know that the Board didn’t have authorization, from a required percentage of the owners, to modify the Declaration to effect this change?

Simple. Because there was no vote. Or minutes. Or a call for quorum. Or anything.

And it's affect, not effect.

Saying we’ve seen no evidence that it was done right is very different from saying there’s no way it could have been done right. Right?

I’m sticking with “effect”.

Yes, it's "effect change". Anyone who reads and writes a great deal knows this. It's hilarious when grammar nancys jump in and are just wrong wrong wrong.
https://kris-spisak.com/writing-tip-affect-change-or-effect-change/

What happened to the poster who liked to use "bigly"? I miss his imperious tone.

[Anonymous]

He's meeting this morning with his new realtor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you read the assignment of spaces that was posted? It was done by the board. It has been stated ad nauseam how the HOA and/or board cannot give away a common area for exclusive use to individual owners.

But how do we know that the Board didn’t have authorization, from a required percentage of the owners, to modify the Declaration to effect this change?

Simple. Because there was no vote. Or minutes. Or a call for quorum. Or anything.

And it's affect, not effect.

Saying we’ve seen no evidence that it was done right is very different from saying there’s no way it could have been done right. Right?

I’m sticking with “effect”.

Yes, it's "effect change". Anyone who reads and writes a great deal knows this. It's hilarious when grammar nancys jump in and are just wrong wrong wrong.
https://kris-spisak.com/writing-tip-affect-change-or-effect-change/

What happened to the poster who liked to use "bigly"? I miss his imperious tone.

This is bigly sad.

Frank’s life must be painfully empty if his idea of purpose is suing over petty HOA squabbles. A middle-aged man with nothing better to do than obsess over declarations and arcane Virginia HOA statutes is a sad sight indeed. Even if his legal arguments held water—they don’t—anyone with perspective knows life is about picking battles that matter. Time with family and meaningful pursuits is priceless, yet he squanders it on trivial fights, burning both hours and money in the process. Sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HOA rules cannot contradict state or federal laws. This parking policy is unlawful. The law has been this way since 2012. This parking policy was enacted in 2014.

Frank — stop talking to yourself. I see the isp.

Show us your ISP!

[Anonymous]

Frank’s lawsuit isn’t a crusade. It’s a tantrum in legal form. All the filings, motions, and citations won’t change the fact that this is about ego, not principle. The only lasting outcome will be a stack of legal bills and a reputation for being the guy who took HOA drama to court because he couldn’t let it go.

-a garaged owner

[Anonymous]

He won’t post his complaint because he knows daylight kills weak arguments. Once people see what he actually filed, they’ll realize it’s not a bold stand—it’s a petty grudge wrapped in legal jargon. Better to keep it hidden and let folks imagine it’s something more than a self-inflicted embarrassment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Frank’s lawsuit isn’t a crusade. It’s a tantrum in legal form. All the filings, motions, and citations won’t change the fact that this is about ego, not principle. The only lasting outcome will be a stack of legal bills and a reputation for being the guy who took HOA drama to court because he couldn’t let it go.

-a garaged owner [/quote


Show us your IP address..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He won’t post his complaint because he knows daylight kills weak arguments. Once people see what he actually filed, they’ll realize it’s not a bold stand—it’s a petty grudge wrapped in legal jargon. Better to keep it hidden and let folks imagine it’s something more than a self-inflicted embarrassment.

Margo will send you a copy.

[Anonymous]

Do we know what time our neighbor in an ungarage town home is giving mass tomorrow? The word of God.


https://stjosephsdc.org/about-us/our-staff/rev-mr-gary-bockweg/

[Anonymous]

Wow. Sock puppet central here.