GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a fan of Trump and was planning on voting for someone else in the primary. However, after all these indictments, I'm 100% behind him

Thank you for throwing away your vote in support of the rapist.

I don't understand all the posts in this thread calling Trump a rapist. There's a whole different thread ("Will our beloved United States of America elect a RAPIST to lead us as POTUS in 2024?") for discussing his designation as a rapist. Just remember, this thread is for discussing the crimes committed in Georgia, which do not (to our knowledge) include rape. If I didn't know better, I'd say people are going out of their way to call Trump a rapist instead of the many other terrible but accurate descriptions. So please restrict any use of the word "rapist" to the rapist thread.

I don't understand all the deplorables like you shining RAPIST trump's shoes every day either. Go figure...

PP here and not a deplorable...just wanted to see how many times I could use the word "rapist" in a post telling people not to use that word.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oops, saying the quiet part outloud again...

Really? Did you actually listen to him? He is saying that it's an opportunity for REPUBLICANS to take the party back, run on actual policy positions, and where hold the Biden administration for their shortcomings. This guy is a Republican, who understands that as long as the party is beholden to the three ring circus that is Trump, they will lose, and is willing to say it out loud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any leads on who the 30 unnamed co-conspirators are?

One of them is the current lieutenant governor of Georgia.
Others are the fake electors who weren’t named/indicted.

No senators or representatives then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oops, saying the quiet part outloud again...

Don’t need to be quiet about sending such a prolific criminal to trial. The fact that it may sideline Trump is just another benefit for the Republicans (and all party affiliations).

The problem the republicans have is that half the party are the "deplorables" whose vote any "traditional conservative" will need in order to be viable in purple state and national elections. If they repudiate Trump, they alienate the MAGAs and if they defend Trump, they alienate the traditional conservatives and independents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a fan of Trump and was planning on voting for someone else in the primary. However, after all these indictments, I'm 100% behind him

Thank you for throwing away your vote in support of the rapist.

I don't understand all the posts in this thread calling Trump a rapist. There's a whole different thread ("Will our beloved United States of America elect a RAPIST to lead us as POTUS in 2024?") for discussing his designation as a rapist. Just remember, this thread is for discussing the crimes committed in Georgia, which do not (to our knowledge) include rape. If I didn't know better, I'd say people are going out of their way to call Trump a rapist instead of the many other terrible but accurate descriptions. So please restrict any use of the word "rapist" to the rapist thread.

He’s a rapist and a grifter and a crook all the time. All three of these words should be used every time regardless of the thread subject. They are the proper description of the dirt bag.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any leads on who the 30 unnamed co-conspirators are?

One of them is the current lieutenant governor of Georgia.
Others are the fake electors who weren’t named/indicted.

No senators or representatives then.

They haven’t all been identified yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oops, saying the quiet part outloud again...

Don’t need to be quiet about sending such a prolific criminal to trial. The fact that it may sideline Trump is just another benefit for the Republicans (and all party affiliations).

The problem the republicans have is that half the party are the "deplorables" whose vote any "traditional conservative" will need in order to be viable in purple state and national elections. If they repudiate Trump, they alienate the MAGAs and if they defend Trump, they alienate the traditional conservatives and independents.

ALL of them are forced birthers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oops, saying the quiet part outloud again...

Really? Did you actually listen to him? He is saying that it's an opportunity for REPUBLICANS to take the party back, run on actual policy positions, and where hold the Biden administration for their shortcomings. This guy is a Republican, who understands that as long as the party is beholden to the three ring circus that is Trump, they will lose, and is willing to say it out loud.

.

He’s correct. We need at least two viable parties in this country. I would prefer more, but at least two to have any chance at all of robustly developing policies.

We have a lot of serious challenges, including economic inequality and climate change. I wish the GOP would step up and be a real voice. Remember when the GOP wanted the U.S. to be a global leader in green energy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oops, saying the quiet part outloud again...

Really? Did you actually listen to him? He is saying that it's an opportunity for REPUBLICANS to take the party back, run on actual policy positions, and where hold the Biden administration for their shortcomings. This guy is a Republican, who understands that as long as the party is beholden to the three ring circus that is Trump, they will lose, and is willing to say it out loud.

.

He’s correct. We need at least two viable parties in this country. I would prefer more, but at least two to have any chance at all of robustly developing policies.

We have a lot of serious challenges, including economic inequality and climate change. I wish the GOP would step up and be a real voice. Remember when the GOP wanted the U.S. to be a global leader in green energy!

What is the contra to what the Dems are proposing for Healthcare, Reproductive Rights, Energy, Environment? I mean other than subjugation, corporate supremacy and drill baby drill, what is the GOP platform?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a fan of Trump and was planning on voting for someone else in the primary. However, after all these indictments, I'm 100% behind him

Thank you for throwing away your vote in support of the rapist.

I don't understand all the posts in this thread calling Trump a rapist. There's a whole different thread ("Will our beloved United States of America elect a RAPIST to lead us as POTUS in 2024?") for discussing his designation as a rapist. Just remember, this thread is for discussing the crimes committed in Georgia, which do not (to our knowledge) include rape. If I didn't know better, I'd say people are going out of their way to call Trump a rapist instead of the many other terrible but accurate descriptions. So please restrict any use of the word "rapist" to the rapist thread.

He’s a rapist and a grifter and a crook all the time. All three of these words should be used every time regardless of the thread subject. They are the proper description of the dirt bag.

Hey, when the shoe fits...I mean Republicans have perfected the art of coining a phrase and weaponizing it against anyone that stands in their way. Remember, "Ben Ghazi", "Buttery Males", "Lock Her Up", "Drain the Swamp", "Witch Hunt", ANTIFA, "Enemy of the People", "Deep State", "Fake News", "Hoax", and "Biden Crime Family", among others. I think referring to Trump as a rapist or perhaps, a convicted rapist will continue to remind folks of one of his many, many indefensible acts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oops, saying the quiet part outloud again...

Really? Did you actually listen to him? He is saying that it's an opportunity for REPUBLICANS to take the party back, run on actual policy positions, and where hold the Biden administration for their shortcomings. This guy is a Republican, who understands that as long as the party is beholden to the three ring circus that is Trump, they will lose, and is willing to say it out loud.

.

He’s correct. We need at least two viable parties in this country. I would prefer more, but at least two to have any chance at all of robustly developing policies.

We have a lot of serious challenges, including economic inequality and climate change. I wish the GOP would step up and be a real voice. Remember when the GOP wanted the U.S. to be a global leader in green energy!

What is the contra to what the Dems are proposing for Healthcare, Reproductive Rights, Energy, Environment? I mean other than subjugation, corporate supremacy and drill baby drill, what is the GOP platform?

Pp here. That’s my point. Currently there is no GOP policy platform. But the U.S. needs to have a fiscally prudent voice in the mix. It’s the best way to get to having our cake and eating it to the greatest extent possible.

For example. Imagine if the Koch brothers had not been unleashed by citizens United and if our energy policy over the last decade or so had included green energy sources driven by market demands.

[Anonymous]

Noting that Trump is a rapist is just as appropriate as noting that he is a former President or an alleged billionaire. "Rapist, former President, and alleged billionaire Donald John Trump has been indicted for attempting to overthrow the United States government" is a pretty informative and accurate lede.

[Anonymous]

"You can run the best campaign. You can even be the nominee and have the election stolen from you."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a fan of Trump and was planning on voting for someone else in the primary. However, after all these indictments, I'm 100% behind him

Thank you for throwing away your vote in support of the rapist.

I don't understand all the posts in this thread calling Trump a rapist. There's a whole different thread ("Will our beloved United States of America elect a RAPIST to lead us as POTUS in 2024?") for discussing his designation as a rapist. Just remember, this thread is for discussing the crimes committed in Georgia, which do not (to our knowledge) include rape. If I didn't know better, I'd say people are going out of their way to call Trump a rapist instead of the many other terrible but accurate descriptions. So please restrict any use of the word "rapist" to the rapist thread.

He’s a rapist and a grifter and a crook all the time. All three of these words should be used every time regardless of the thread subject. They are the proper description of the dirt bag.

Hey, when the shoe fits...I mean Republicans have perfected the art of coining a phrase and weaponizing it against anyone that stands in their way. Remember, "Ben Ghazi", "Buttery Males", "Lock Her Up", "Drain the Swamp", "Witch Hunt", ANTIFA, "Enemy of the People", "Deep State", "Fake News", "Hoax", and "Biden Crime Family", among others. I think referring to Trump as a rapist or perhaps, a convicted rapist will continue to remind folks of one of his many, many indefensible acts.

I’m the pp you quoted and I agree. I meant that in your defense. Carry on with rapist trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oops, saying the quiet part outloud again...

They are setting the stage to dump DJT at the nominating convention. I’m willing to bet money on it.

It’s going to be sheer chaos. It wouldn’t surprise me if it caused a riot on the convention floor.