
I think I was referring to Trump, MAGA and Putin. That’s the only correct interpretation. Has nothing to do with pornography. |
I think we’ve been had. |
Oh puh-leez!; spare us the bible lecture. fact is PORNOGRAPHY EXPLOITS WOMEN! period. It utterly destroys the lives and futures of so many young, vulnerable women, who are e plotted by these disgusting creeps profiting from it. And it ruins so many relationships; even breaks up marriages. It’s unhealthy and even addictive. It’s just UNBELIEVABLE some creep is on here defending defending PORN like we are all just supposed to suddenly be fine with it! IN SCHOOLS!! WTF !!?!? |
Returning to this. So far, the only "FACTS" I've actually seen anywhere here are: a.) Some photos of pages from the book. No real evidence given about where the photos were taken. For all I know it might not even have been in a school library. And, the book looked pristine and untouched apart from whoever taking the pictures opening it to take the pictures, as opposed to looking like a typical library book in circulation being mauled by kids b.) Info about ONE copy of the book, found in ONE school library, and it had never been checked out c.) Some handwavey, completely nonspecific information about it being removed elsewhere d.) Info that it's been banned in various locations, whether or not they actually ever even had it in the first place That's the "facts" presented so far, whether you like my laying out of them as such or not. Note, that I am not saying the book does not exist, nor am I saying it's never been in a school library, nor am I saying kids should be reading this book and I never have said any of those things, despite all of the flailing deflections and accusations you all keep making, along with your repeated confusing of one poster for another and your confused responses to various forms of trolling going on in this thread. I'm just questioning the (in my opinion) grossly overblown hyperbole surrounding the info here. There are nearly 129,000 k-12 schools in the US, a huge percentage of which have libraries of some form. For all I know, one might only be able to count on one's fingers how many copies of the book existed in those 129,000 schools. And for all I care, fine, fine, take that tiny handful of books out of schools. Or don't. I'm saying you have a huge gap between a handful of schools with bad judgement versus a "VaST LgBTq AgENdA AtTaCkiNG OuR ScHOoLs" on this one. And meanwhile I still think it's a much greater and higher priority that we need to focus on things like protecting our kids from things like, you know, ACTUALLY GETTING SHOT TO DEATH IN MASS SHOOTINGS and until that's solved, there's absolutely no way in heaven or hell that you're ever going to convince me that your cause and crusade is somehow more important than mine. Your priorities are DEFINITELY out of kilter. |
You sound like a total lunatic (though at least you were open about your real “cause and crusade.” |
This has absolutely nothing to do with LGBTQ. I would be just as outraged if there was a cartoon depicting a woman pegging her husband with a strap on. Really - does this even have to be explained? |
You're the lunatic for thinking this is more important than preventing mass shootings, you sicko. |
You’re so right. Let’s drop every other issue in America. Couldn’t possibly be concerned about two issues at once! |
Oh dear. Three copies of a questionable book ended up in schools. Thoughts and prayers. /s |
Three copies? Now you’ve resorted to making things up. Good job! Keep trying - you may get there someday. |
It's really hard to argue with an intellect that is so devoid of common sense and the ability to think critically. Maybe we should try this a different way.... if the book is not in any (school) libraries, passing a law to ensure it doesn't make it into any (school) libraries shouldn't be a big deal. It's a shame you're so dishonest in your arguments with folks on here. I'm sure you also have some decent qualities that many of us would enjoy. |
|
Classical far left gaslighting: "what you are seeing with your own eyes isn't actually happening." We are over it and over your extremist views. |
It's not "gaslighting." Here's what you ACTUALLY SAW with your own eyes: a.) Some photos of pages from the book. No real evidence given about where the photos were taken. For all I know it might not even have been in a school library. And, the book looked pristine and untouched apart from whoever taking the pictures opening it to take the pictures, as opposed to looking like a typical library book in circulation being mauled by kids b.) Info about ONE copy of the book, found in ONE school library, and it had never been checked out c.) Some handwavey, completely nonspecific information about it being removed elsewhere d.) Info that it's been banned in various locations, whether or not they actually ever even had it in the first place That's the "facts" presented so far, whether you like my laying out of them as such or not. If you saw more than that, you're going to have to provide evidence of it, because so far, nobody in this thread has. |
Are you still refusing to read the previously posted NYT article? Why yes, yes you are! Either that, or a NYT article is information is too “handwavey” for you. Either way, you’re being deliberately obtuse. |