Youngkin is a book banner

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Graph depictions of how to how have anal sex is not ok for school children at school. Sorry, OP.

If you choose to instruct your children about that, it can certainly be done in your home. No one cares.

I dispute your premise. This doesn’t exist in school materials and you know it.

Sorry, Snopes tells us it’s true - https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tampa-school-sex-book/

Meh. Sounds very clinical. And the book makes a point — we tell children how to have heterosexual sex. Why is it wrong to clinically explain gay sex? Especially if the point is to protect children from harm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't worry, all of these porno books are available for you to buy your kid on amazon. Keeping age inappropriate books out of schools and libraries is not book banning.

Truthfully, at what age are these books appropriate for YOUR children?

We aren’t talking about “porno books” so your comment is irrelevant.

Sadly we are. I genuinely don’t understand why some people are pushing for books that depict sex acts to be in our school libraries but they are. When you go against community standards, don’t be surprised when the community pushes back.

Like the Bible. Also, Shakespeare.

The Bible doesn’t have graphic drawings of how to suck cock or have anal.

What does any of this have to do with the question from the transgender child?

[Anonymous]

You want Youngkin to be able to ban books from schools.

We will likely have a Democrat in Richmond in two years.

You want him or her to be able to ban books?

Be careful what you wish for, republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Graph depictions of how to how have anal sex is not ok for school children at school. Sorry, OP.

If you choose to instruct your children about that, it can certainly be done in your home. No one cares.

I dispute your premise. This doesn’t exist in school materials and you know it.

Sorry, Snopes tells us it’s true - https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tampa-school-sex-book/

Meh. Sounds very clinical. And the book makes a point — we tell children how to have heterosexual sex. Why is it wrong to clinically explain gay sex? Especially if the point is to protect children from harm?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You want Youngkin to be able to ban books from schools.

We will likely have a Democrat in Richmond in two years.

You want him or her to be able to ban books?

Be careful what you wish for, republicans.

I say we ban churches. Starting with cornerstone chapel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't worry, all of these porno books are available for you to buy your kid on amazon. Keeping age inappropriate books out of schools and libraries is not book banning.

Truthfully, at what age are these books appropriate for YOUR children?

We aren’t talking about “porno books” so your comment is irrelevant.

Sadly we are. I genuinely don’t understand why some people are pushing for books that depict sex acts to be in our school libraries but they are. When you go against community standards, don’t be surprised when the community pushes back.

Like the Bible. Also, Shakespeare.

The Bible doesn’t have graphic drawings of how to suck cock or have anal.

Oh, you're only objecting to pictures? Words are fine, you just want to ban pictures?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Graph depictions of how to how have anal sex is not ok for school children at school. Sorry, OP.

If you choose to instruct your children about that, it can certainly be done in your home. No one cares.

I dispute your premise. This doesn’t exist in school materials and you know it.

Sorry, Snopes tells us it’s true - https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tampa-school-sex-book/

According to Snopes, the book says:

This chapter is about sex. Therefore it has sex in it. WELL, DUH. If you are a younger reader and you feel you aren't ready for the finer details of same-sex pairings, then simply skip this whole chapter.

HOWEVER, before you do, I'd like to remind you that we taught you all about straight sex when you were ELEVEN YEARS OLD during sixth grade. The fact that they didn't also teach you what same-sex couples do is nothing less than institutionalized homophobia. Straight sex was presented as the norm to make five percent of the population feel abnormal. Is there something icky about gay sex? Is there something wrong with it? I challenge any politician to discuss this with me. I WILL RUIN THEM.

This chapter is simply all the stuff teachers SHOULD be saying if they want to be inclusive of people with same-sex feelings.

Of course, I'm guessing that in Florida, the schools also no longer are allowed to teach about what non-gay people may or may not do in the sheets. Because if the schools don't teach children and teenagers about what people do in the sheets, they just won't do it, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Graph depictions of how to how have anal sex is not ok for school children at school. Sorry, OP.

If you choose to instruct your children about that, it can certainly be done in your home. No one cares.

I dispute your premise. This doesn’t exist in school materials and you know it.

Sorry, Snopes tells us it’s true - https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tampa-school-sex-book/

Meh. Sounds very clinical. And the book makes a point — we tell children how to have heterosexual sex. Why is it wrong to clinically explain gay sex? Especially if the point is to protect children from harm?

In what world do we explain heterosexual sex to 11 year olds? If that is what is going on in public schools, that is wrong too.

It is not clinical. You can view the pages if you watch the DeSantis clip. It’s vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't worry, all of these porno books are available for you to buy your kid on amazon. Keeping age inappropriate books out of schools and libraries is not book banning.

Truthfully, at what age are these books appropriate for YOUR children?

We aren’t talking about “porno books” so your comment is irrelevant.

Sadly we are. I genuinely don’t understand why some people are pushing for books that depict sex acts to be in our school libraries but they are. When you go against community standards, don’t be surprised when the community pushes back.

Like the Bible. Also, Shakespeare.

The Bible doesn’t have graphic drawings of how to suck cock or have anal.

Oh, you're only objecting to pictures? Words are fine, you just want to ban pictures?

Where does the Bible instruct children how to have sex? Or Shakespeare? Waiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Graph depictions of how to how have anal sex is not ok for school children at school. Sorry, OP.

If you choose to instruct your children about that, it can certainly be done in your home. No one cares.

I dispute your premise. This doesn’t exist in school materials and you know it.

Sorry, Snopes tells us it’s true - https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tampa-school-sex-book/

Meh. Sounds very clinical. And the book makes a point — we tell children how to have heterosexual sex. Why is it wrong to clinically explain gay sex? Especially if the point is to protect children from harm?

In what world do we explain heterosexual sex to 11 year olds? If that is what is going on in public schools, that is wrong too.

It is not clinical. You can view the pages if you watch the DeSantis clip. It’s vile.

Oh boy. Well, if you have children, and they are heterosexual, you should not be surprised if you become grandparents at a very young age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't worry, all of these porno books are available for you to buy your kid on amazon. Keeping age inappropriate books out of schools and libraries is not book banning.

Truthfully, at what age are these books appropriate for YOUR children?

We aren’t talking about “porno books” so your comment is irrelevant.

Sadly we are. I genuinely don’t understand why some people are pushing for books that depict sex acts to be in our school libraries but they are. When you go against community standards, don’t be surprised when the community pushes back.

Like the Bible. Also, Shakespeare.

The Bible doesn’t have graphic drawings of how to suck cock or have anal.

Oh, you're only objecting to pictures? Words are fine, you just want to ban pictures?

Where does the Bible instruct children how to have sex? Or Shakespeare? Waiting.

What do you think Romeo and Juliet are doing in Juliet's bedroom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Graph depictions of how to how have anal sex is not ok for school children at school. Sorry, OP.

If you choose to instruct your children about that, it can certainly be done in your home. No one cares.

I dispute your premise. This doesn’t exist in school materials and you know it.

Sorry, Snopes tells us it’s true - https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tampa-school-sex-book/

Meh. Sounds very clinical. And the book makes a point — we tell children how to have heterosexual sex. Why is it wrong to clinically explain gay sex? Especially if the point is to protect children from harm?

In what world do we explain heterosexual sex to 11 year olds? If that is what is going on in public schools, that is wrong too.

It is not clinical. You can view the pages if you watch the DeSantis clip. It’s vile.

Family Life Education, dude. There is a whole curriculum. There are pictures, even.

And yes, we need our schools to teach these things. Can’t leave it to adults like you to do it. You will give bad information. That much is crystal clear.

[Anonymous]

Keep it up with this. Most of Americ does NOT want this stuff in schools. You sound like the insane lefties you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't worry, all of these porno books are available for you to buy your kid on amazon. Keeping age inappropriate books out of schools and libraries is not book banning.

Truthfully, at what age are these books appropriate for YOUR children?

We aren’t talking about “porno books” so your comment is irrelevant.

Sadly we are. I genuinely don’t understand why some people are pushing for books that depict sex acts to be in our school libraries but they are. When you go against community standards, don’t be surprised when the community pushes back.

Having sexual content does NOT mean “porno”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We teach kids about heterosexual sex so that they understand reproduction and how to prevent it for themselves as teenagers. Parents aren’t asking schools to teach their kids to masterbate, perform blowjobs, or participate in anal sex. These subjects do not belong in schools.

If you want to share that information with your children, go right ahead. But it doesn’t belong in the school system.

Where exactly do schools teach these topics?