Great, then stick to that and leave out your editorializing about how everyone is going to go back to masking because their quality of life will be so diminished by long COVID. You are fear mongering and misinterpreting the science. |
I NEVER said that. You are the disingenuous one. |
It’s been almost 3 years. When will people give up masks exactly? Most of the families at our daycare are still masking their 2-4yos even though not required anymore and I truly don’t get what the endgame is. Masks are mostly a joke in that environment anyway but clearly they think the minimal benefit is worth it. For how long though? |
This is an anonymous message board, so I have no way of knowing what exactly you said, but you clearly believe everyone who gets COVID will be impacted by it long term. The studies you are citing and quoting do not support that assertion. You are mischaracterizing them. Stop lying to people. If you have a personal feeling that everyone around you who isn't doing what you are doing is totally screwed, say that, don't pretend the studies support your lunacy and self-righteousness. |
Where have I been self righteous? You sure sound it though. I am very careful with my words and have said “may” in response to others saying “will”. You don’t have a problem with their stating assumptions as fact I noticed, since you see them as on your side. I fear everyone may become impacted even if indirectly because the costs of long Covid alone are likely in the trillions now. I never once said people who aren’t doing what I am doing are totally screwed. That is your inference. You sound unsettled at the prospect. |
Okay, at this point I have no idea what you are talking about. Just like I don't know which posts you made, you don't know which posts I made. Yes, I am unsettled about people who post misinformation online. As you know, misinformation can be quite harmful. Your "fears" are just that, to cite studies that supposedly support them, when they do not, is dishonest. You're obviously not willing to admit that, which is unsurprising since you are a dishonest person. |
DP but PP should lay off calling people psychopaths, P.O.S., dishonest, etc. Stop. You are the problem.
You asked for studies and PP has cited several and characterized them honestly and appropriately. Please take some time for yourself and go for a walk or get some air. Stop typing and take a break. I say this sincerely. Take some downtime for you and for your child. Good luck. |
Pot meet kettle? ![]() |
No, they haven't. |
Why not ask them? The endgame for them is to probably limit Covid infections in their chidren, but I can't read their minds. That's our reason to mask our school age kids. |
I never said you can assume effects in severe cases definitely carry over to mild infections. I simply said you can't discount the effect of Covid on the brain in severe cases of autopsied patients. I said that because the mechanism by which it ages the brain COULD also be why milder cases experience brain fog and other neurological issues. I stated nothing as definitive cause and effect, despite your repeated attempts to characterize me that way. And I have been called a fear monger many times on this page when I said: Covid likely coming to US (back in early Feb 2020) and will dramatically change life as we know it Strong evidence that Covid is airborne Kids likely do catch Covid Kids likely do spread Covid Immunity debt not likely the reason for RSV and flu surges I have never once acted like I have all the answers, and if I could wipe Covid off the face of the earth by giving my right arm, I sure as hell would. It's easy to characterize people who say things you find uncomfortable as crazy or fear mongers, but if they aren't stating their theories as fact, but rather expressing opinions to explain what could be going on, trying to shut them down on a discussion board is kind of absurd. |
DP you know exactly why we don't ask. Because anyone who questions masking, even toddler masking, gets accused of causing mass death/disability (see the first page of this thread). Even our therapist, who indicated privately to me that DD's in-school therapy would be easier without masks (and in fact once they dropped the mask requirement for everyone suddenly we saw a lot of progress) did not want to come out and say that to the teachers. It had been a struggle to get them to even allow the therapist into the school, so it was a very calculated decision. What this really comes down to is for how long should the general population make sacrifices to prevent death/disability in a small (but definitely significant) percentage of people. And how do we decide which sacrifices are worth it? What I see a lot on these boards is that folks do not think masking (of toddlers or older children and adults) or avoiding indoor activities is a sacrifice at all, and that COVID precautions don't cause any significant harm. Many of us did change our behavior significantly in 2020-2021 because we do recognize that COVID is serious. By the time 2022 rolled around, it became clear that the cost to ourselves and our child was too much. These precautions are fine for short periods of time. When they are in place for years, for many of us the harms build up. Maybe you haven't experienced that in your family and that's great. But we have and the harms are real. It's a risk though, to say this publicly, because those that haven't had the issues we have deny that they even exist and think of us as murderers. No thanks. The risk is not worth the benefit of such a conversation. I will stick to the people in my life who recognize that different people have different priorities and priorities other than COVID are valid. |
I am so glad that we can agree that the studies you cited do not offer evidence of long term harm in mild cases of COVID. I suspect you'll continue to cite these studies to support your personal feeling that they do, which is incredibly dishonest. |
There was a separate thread on this. The answer is: IDK. |
Of course our kids have experienced Covid related frustrations. It's not fun to be the only kid sitting outside for lunch, or any number of situations that they deal with. And I don't know anyone who would prefer to wear masks if there were zero perceived threat. People approach risk differently. If you child is able to receive maskless therapy right now, that's great and I hope it continues. I don't think forcing toddlers to mask is fair either, despite all the assumptions made about me because I mask. If mandates ever came back, I would support exceptions for small children and certain other children. Just don't judge parents who do mask their toddlers. They aren't your enemy. We aren't giving up the masks in our house because we have found workarounds. We try to live a full life, but to us, the risk of infection is high to long term quality of life. If that calculus changes, so will our behavior. I certainly hope it does, but for now that's where we are at. |