Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ginni Thomas still isn’t being held accountable for her role in the GOP attempt to overthrow the government and Clarence Thomas still sits on the court, spitting at the notion of an impartial court.

Nope. Who is going to hold her accountable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Were they trolling Herschel when he was given the reward? I thought I remembered someting pretty specific about Hoaratio Alger. This is NOT an honor but it's pretty typical of Republicans. From Wikipedia:

" Child sexual abuse
Early in 1866, a church committee of men was formed to investigate reports that Alger had sexually molested boys. Church officials reported to the hierarchy in Boston that Alger had been charged with "the abominable and revolting crime of gross familiarity with boys".[35][a] Alger denied nothing, admitted he had been imprudent, considered his association with the church dissolved, and left town.[37][38] Alger sent Unitarian officials in Boston a letter of remorse, and his father assured them his son would never seek another post in the church. The officials were satisfied and decided no further action would be taken"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horatio_Alger

Pretty bad when you are accused of child sexual in 1866! And Clarence is the first Supreme Court Justice to pose with a political candidate. He's just showing off that he's untouchable.

I think sexually molesting boys is one of the few problems that Herschel Walker does not have.

Whoosh. You must read at a sub seventh grade level. I didn’t say Walker is a pedo. I said it’s surprising that winning an honor named after a pedo isn’t much of an honor. Either Republicans are against child sexual abuse or…

[Anonymous]

Her name has been bandied about as the possible leaker but let’s not forget that we know Ginni Thomas was enmeshed in the GOP’s attempt to overthrow the government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her name has been bandied about as the possible leaker but let’s not forget that we know Ginni Thomas was enmeshed in the GOP’s attempt to overthrow the government.

She’s hideous. If the spouse of a liberal justice had behaved as she did, the GOP would be screaming that she needs to be impeached

[Anonymous]

But.....her emails

And how DARE the first lady work on policy! She should be reading to students and redecorating the WH

I'm old enough to remember how HRC was treated as first lady

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her name has been bandied about as the possible leaker but let’s not forget that we know Ginni Thomas was enmeshed in the GOP’s attempt to overthrow the government.

She’s hideous. If the spouse of a liberal justice had behaved as she did, the GOP would be screaming that she needs to be impeached

No, the Democrats have been saying that Clarence Thomas needs to be investigated. Ginni Thomas, while a ball of dung, holds no public position and thus cannot be impeached.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her name has been bandied about as the possible leaker but let’s not forget that we know Ginni Thomas was enmeshed in the GOP’s attempt to overthrow the government.

She’s hideous. If the spouse of a liberal justice had behaved as she did, the GOP would be screaming that she needs to be impeached

No, the Democrats have been saying that Clarence Thomas needs to be investigated. Ginni Thomas, while a ball of dung, holds no public position and thus cannot be impeached.

He enjoyed $600k of her income from The Family Foundation and failed to report it on his financial disclosure statements for several years. He was allowed to revise the statements after three years. Ginni earns more as a RW activist than Clarence does at his day job. He’s pulling in a lot from his speaking engagements lately. He should resign. He’s corrupt.

[Anonymous]

I’m glad this thread is going strong. Let’s keep Ginny’s conspiracy and Clarence’s lack of ethics front page news!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her name has been bandied about as the possible leaker but let’s not forget that we know Ginni Thomas was enmeshed in the GOP’s attempt to overthrow the government.

She’s hideous. If the spouse of a liberal justice had behaved as she did, the GOP would be screaming that she needs to be impeached

No, the Democrats have been saying that Clarence Thomas needs to be investigated. Ginni Thomas, while a ball of dung, holds no public position and thus cannot be impeached.

Which is just what she was thinking when she leaked the abortion decision to the WSJ and then Politico. Unlike a Supreme Court law clerk, she has nothing to lose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her name has been bandied about as the possible leaker but let’s not forget that we know Ginni Thomas was enmeshed in the GOP’s attempt to overthrow the government.

She’s hideous. If the spouse of a liberal justice had behaved as she did, the GOP would be screaming that she needs to be impeached

No, the Democrats have been saying that Clarence Thomas needs to be investigated. Ginni Thomas, while a ball of dung, holds no public position and thus cannot be impeached.

Which is just what she was thinking when she leaked the abortion decision to the WSJ and then Politico. Unlike a Supreme Court law clerk, she has nothing to lose.

If she did, she got it from her husband, so it would be on him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m glad this thread is going strong. Let’s keep Ginny’s conspiracy and Clarence’s lack of ethics front page news!

If that brutally stupid and morally compromised moron John Roberts cared about democracy and the legitimacy of his court, he would investigate Ginni and Clarence. But he doesn’t. Because he knows and agrees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:But.....her emails

And how DARE the first lady work on policy! She should be reading to students and redecorating the WH

I'm old enough to remember how HRC was treated as first lady

Yup.

Ginni should be at home, baking those god damn cookies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But.....her emails

And how DARE the first lady work on policy! She should be reading to students and redecorating the WH

I'm old enough to remember how HRC was treated as first lady

Yup.

Ginni should be at home, baking those god damn cookies.

More like if her husband is going to hold a seat that’s supposed to be impartial, she shouldn’t be engaging in the kind of work she is engaged in.

Of course Roberts is fine with being the big chief of a Sharia court so he doesn’t care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But.....her emails

And how DARE the first lady work on policy! She should be reading to students and redecorating the WH

I'm old enough to remember how HRC was treated as first lady

Yup.

Ginni should be at home, baking those god damn cookies.

More like if her husband is going to hold a seat that’s supposed to be impartial, she shouldn’t be engaging in the kind of work she is engaged in.

Of course Roberts is fine with being the big chief of a Sharia court so he doesn’t care.

I’m disappointed in Roberts. He talks a big game about the integrity of the Supreme Court as an institution but he does nothing when justices are clearly engaged in conflicts of interest. There needs to be some rules codified for these justices because they’re not adhering to them voluntarily.

[Anonymous]

What public office does she currently hold?