Their statements aren't factual. The lottery was done because of the pandemic after the makers of the CogAT stated their test could not be administered remotely. They're just making up crazy conspiracy theories for which there is 0 evidence because it supports their extreme political agenda. |
Right, even if what you are saying is true, is COGAT is the only possible test? Really? Instead of spending millions of $ on consultants.MCPS could actually create a test where prep wouldn't even matter. what extreme political agenda is it please? The lottery defamation league agenda? I see one side in power making power and some people asking questions and resisting politically expedient lazy solutions. |
Don't kid yourself. MCPS is corrupt as s***. I wouldn't trust any test devised by MCPS. Cogat was (a) Nationally recognized, (b) race neutral and (c) accepted by international organizations such as Mensa. Let's be honest here - the only reason why MCPS threw it out is because it catches their hand in the cookie jar. |
The PP was correct. Most of this stuff is misinformation to rile up the uninformed. They didn't set out to make a lottery it was the consequence of circumstances beyond their control. A more valid question is now that they could adminster the cogAT why are they keeping it? |
That's not true. The year before Covid, MCPS did not adhere to the standards publicly posted on how to calculate the MCPS Percentile used to select MS Magnet students. It's interesting that now MCPS is not publishing the exact "local norming" and "lottery" methodologies? Notice a pattern there? |
|
|
"Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities. Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome."
The MCPS Lottery is neither - it's just gambling with the future's of our children. |
|
Neither you nor they seem to he using the word correctly.
Doesn't anybody use a dictionary anymore????? |
| You could give rug rats all the tea in China and a few will excel but systemically they will still fail without society’s expectation to succeed and it will take a thousand years to close the current gap. Put all the poor kids in the magnet and society will just not value the magnet any longer. Harvard wants future leaders who can contribute back, not necessarily the smartest. Never have. The smart kids sprinkled into the legacies and good families are to raise the perception of Chad’s intellectual bonafides not bring an underclass up. |
|
It's not curious at all because anyone should be able to figure it out it's basic stuff and detailed on their website so I don't know what you're talking about. |
Please post the link to the methodology for local norming and lottery formulation. I am interested and want to understand it. |
+1. Everyone says that is “obvious” or “easy” to understand but I would really like MCPS to help me understand. |
|
If we are committed to a system that has fewer seats in the magnet than deserving kids, then I like the lottery. And that is speaking as a parent whose kids were in the lottery pool but didn't get a seat in the magnet.
The old system relied too much on teacher recommendations and other soft measures, which advantage the kids who sit still and color in the lines and do all the pedagogical nonsense that teachers now use. Everyone who has had kids in MCPS knows that the kids selected for magnet programs under the old system are often not the most gifted or intellectually curious or needing of extra stimulation. Certainly they were not the ones who tested the highest. They were the kids who played along the best. So at least the lottery acknowledges the essential randomness of selection and the calls attention to the fact that we have chosen as a community not to provide the resources. |
The previous system didn't use teacher recs or anything of the sort. I'm not for or against the lottery, but your post seems misinformed. |