WSJ 2022 College Ranking

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1 Harvard University
2 Stanford University
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4 Yale University
5 Duke University
6 Brown University
7 California Institute of Technology
8 Princeton University
9 Johns Hopkins University
9 Northwestern University
11 Cornell University
12 University of Pennsylvania
13 Dartmouth College
14 The University of Chicago
15 Vanderbilt University
16 Columbia University
17 Washington University in St Louis
18 Rice University
19 University of Southern California
20 Emory University

Absurd absence of quality public schools - U Cs and U Mich, among other top public schools, are meritocracies and do not give preference to legacies … many public schools in lists of most cited US universities … They are often at the cutting edge of STEM research …

Also complete absence of US military academies, theee of which rank in top 5 in terms of STEM innovation and job generation.

https://www.bachelorsdegreecenter.org/best-schools-stem-majors/

Medical Nobel laureates overwhelmingly from public universities and institutions both in US and around world.

Chemistry, physics and economic laureates also draw heavily from public universities around world.

https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/citation-laureates/

The Nobel Prize is five separate prizes that, according to Sir Alfred Nobel's will of 1895, are awarded to ”those who, during the preceding year, have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind.”

Given how heavily Nobel prize winners in science hail from public universities - in contrast to the WSJ rankings that totally ignores public schools - There is a big chasm between private prestige and public goods.

Maybe because there are way more public universities out there than HYPSM?

+1 And numbers of students at public universities--some have 40K +

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1 Harvard University
2 Stanford University
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4 Yale University
5 Duke University
6 Brown University
7 California Institute of Technology
8 Princeton University
9 Johns Hopkins University
9 Northwestern University
11 Cornell University
12 University of Pennsylvania
13 Dartmouth College
14 The University of Chicago
15 Vanderbilt University
16 Columbia University
17 Washington University in St Louis
18 Rice University
19 University of Southern California
20 Emory University

Absurd absence of quality public schools - U Cs and U Mich, among other top public schools, are meritocracies and do not give preference to legacies … many public schools in lists of most cited US universities … They are often at the cutting edge of STEM research …

Also complete absence of US military academies, theee of which rank in top 5 in terms of STEM innovation and job generation.

https://www.bachelorsdegreecenter.org/best-schools-stem-majors/

Medical Nobel laureates overwhelmingly from public universities and institutions both in US and around world.

Chemistry, physics and economic laureates also draw heavily from public universities around world.

https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/citation-laureates/

The Nobel Prize is five separate prizes that, according to Sir Alfred Nobel's will of 1895, are awarded to ”those who, during the preceding year, have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind.”

Given how heavily Nobel prize winners in science hail from public universities - in contrast to the WSJ rankings that totally ignores public schools - There is a big chasm between private prestige and public goods.

Maybe because there are way more public universities out there than HYPSM?

+1 And numbers of students at public universities--some have 40K +

-1,000

Does not explain why no public schools listed in WSJ rankings which some here argue has credible methodology .., extreme bias is obvious and undermines any credibility as to its worth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1 Harvard University
2 Stanford University
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4 Yale University
5 Duke University
6 Brown University
7 California Institute of Technology
8 Princeton University
9 Johns Hopkins University
9 Northwestern University
11 Cornell University
12 University of Pennsylvania
13 Dartmouth College
14 The University of Chicago
15 Vanderbilt University
16 Columbia University
17 Washington University in St Louis
18 Rice University
19 University of Southern California
20 Emory University

Absurd absence of quality public schools - U Cs and U Mich, among other top public schools, are meritocracies and do not give preference to legacies … many public schools in lists of most cited US universities … They are often at the cutting edge of STEM research …

Also complete absence of US military academies, theee of which rank in top 5 in terms of STEM innovation and job generation.

https://www.bachelorsdegreecenter.org/best-schools-stem-majors/

Medical Nobel laureates overwhelmingly from public universities and institutions both in US and around world.

Chemistry, physics and economic laureates also draw heavily from public universities around world.

https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/citation-laureates/

The Nobel Prize is five separate prizes that, according to Sir Alfred Nobel's will of 1895, are awarded to ”those who, during the preceding year, have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind.”

Given how heavily Nobel prize winners in science hail from public universities - in contrast to the WSJ rankings that totally ignores public schools - There is a big chasm between private prestige and public goods.

Maybe because there are way more public universities out there than HYPSM?

+1 And numbers of students at public universities--some have 40K +

-1,000

Does not explain why no public schools listed in WSJ rankings which some here argue has credible methodology .., extreme bias is obvious and undermines any credibility as to its worth.

The WSJ’s methodology is murky at best. It’s not as obvious as either Forbes or US News. I really don’t know what they are trying to measure.