Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up

[Anonymous]

Option 3 is stupid and won’t actually do what it professes to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Option 3 is stupid and won’t actually do what it professes to do.

Is Option 3 sentient? What does it "profess" to do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Option 3 is stupid and won’t actually do what it professes to do.

Is Option 3 sentient? What does it "profess" to do?

Equalize demographics, or some such shit. Go ahead and be pedantic, troll. Your posts will just be deleted like they always are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Option 3 is stupid and won’t actually do what it professes to do.

Is Option 3 sentient? What does it "profess" to do?

Equalize demographics, or some such shit. Go ahead and be pedantic, troll. Your posts will just be deleted like they always are.

You are claiming Option 3 has a particular goal, but you are making that goal up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Option 3 is stupid and won’t actually do what it professes to do.

Is Option 3 sentient? What does it "profess" to do?

Equalize demographics, or some such shit. Go ahead and be pedantic, troll. Your posts will just be deleted like they always are.

You are claiming Option 3 has a particular goal, but you are making that goal up.

Trolly troll troll

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's talk about the socio economic diversity between WJ and Woodward. How wrong did they get it

WJ is White. Woodward is not.
WJ is English. Woodward is Spanish.
WJ is rich. Woodward is poor.
WJ is old. Woodward is new.

We don’t fully know what Woodward will be.

Writing is on the wall. Don't act like you can change it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was expecting a range of options on the demographics/equalizing FARMS dimension. But options 1, 2 and 4 do basically nothing to improve on that front, or in some cases make things worse. And option 3 is only a moderate improvement, the kind of thing I would have expected as a middle-ground option between "no improvement on demographics/diversity" and "significant improvement on demographics/diversity."

I feel like all the options other than #3 are non-starters. #3 has plenty of flaws but it feels like we need to focus on iterating off of it to make it better. It's ridiculous to have some schools with 6% FARMS rates and some schools with over 60% FARMS rates (or up to 75% at some middle schools!) and have 3 of the 4 options not do a thing to try to address that.

Option 3 will destroy neighborhoods plain and simple. Only a complete idiot should suggest that option 3 should even exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was expecting a range of options on the demographics/equalizing FARMS dimension. But options 1, 2 and 4 do basically nothing to improve on that front, or in some cases make things worse. And option 3 is only a moderate improvement, the kind of thing I would have expected as a middle-ground option between "no improvement on demographics/diversity" and "significant improvement on demographics/diversity."

I feel like all the options other than #3 are non-starters. #3 has plenty of flaws but it feels like we need to focus on iterating off of it to make it better. It's ridiculous to have some schools with 6% FARMS rates and some schools with over 60% FARMS rates (or up to 75% at some middle schools!) and have 3 of the 4 options not do a thing to try to address that.

Option 3 will destroy neighborhoods plain and simple. Only a complete idiot should suggest that option 3 should even exist.

Just think of neighborhoods more broadly. I support option 3. It is the best option for all children.

[Anonymous]

Option 3 promotes diversity among schools. Everyone loves diversity. Am I right? Bus ride time.... It's extra time to bond with your friends. Let's equalize the community. The government can solve all problems very easily through changing boundaries.

[Anonymous]

Option 3 is move to Virginia!

[Anonymous]

Option 5 : private school

Can we get some vouchers up in here?

[Anonymous]

Sanctuary State caused the disagreement in this boundary study. Prove me wrong

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Option 3 is move to Virginia!

Option 3 is option flee!

[Anonymous]

No one should be allowed to go to their home school, everyone should be lotteried into schools and get to spend more time on buses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was expecting a range of options on the demographics/equalizing FARMS dimension. But options 1, 2 and 4 do basically nothing to improve on that front, or in some cases make things worse. And option 3 is only a moderate improvement, the kind of thing I would have expected as a middle-ground option between "no improvement on demographics/diversity" and "significant improvement on demographics/diversity."

I feel like all the options other than #3 are non-starters. #3 has plenty of flaws but it feels like we need to focus on iterating off of it to make it better. It's ridiculous to have some schools with 6% FARMS rates and some schools with over 60% FARMS rates (or up to 75% at some middle schools!) and have 3 of the 4 options not do a thing to try to address that.

Option 3 will destroy neighborhoods plain and simple. Only a complete idiot should suggest that option 3 should even exist.

Just think of neighborhoods more broadly. I support option 3. It is the best option for all children.

Why is that? What do you think will improve for all children?