Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Slate and the other actress hasn’t come out to say the HR complaints are false makes me wonder if they are real.

Stranger that they haven’t said they are real

The way I see it is…their silence is acceptance. If those HR complaints were false wouldn’t you want to set the record straight? I am Team Baldoni by the way but I am thinking that the complaints may have been filed after Blake’s complaint was filed in support of her.
The other 2 actresses probably are stepping back now because of public opinion and the backlash that has happened with Blake. I still don’t think Baldoni is guilty but that doesn’t mean that Blake didn’t convince these ladies after the fact to complain. It would be nice if the dates weren’t redacted.

Also where is Sony in all this? Surely they should say something if it’s in accurate info. I wouldn’t want anyone that works for me thinking the company’s HR department just allows leaks of confidential info.

Lady, no serious person responds to you tube podcasts and reddit threads. No “news” outlet has run with them, which suggests their provenance is very sketchy. I have a theory about who would benefit from their release but want to see the Amemded Complaint first.

Lady here (😒) it would be really nice if you could’ve found a better way to begin your response which outside of lady was very helpful. I didn’t realize that the news of the HR complaints hadn’t been picked up by anyone else, so that makes a lot of sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kevin Costner not amused by RR making light of his wife’s SH.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14404705/Kevin-Costner-reaction-Ryan-Reynolds-Justin-Baldoni-joke-SNL50-Anniversary.html

Pro tip, when an article says "the internet is abuzz with..." That's a tell for a planted story. The PR team creates the phony "buzz" and then runs to a trusted outlet with the "story."

See also, "video of X resurfaces!"

This whole thing is a made up story. Watch the whole thing - Costner mildly smiles by the end of the joke about the coneheads. He’s just chewing gum. (Though, if serial cheater Kevin Costner disapproves of how you treat your wife, you might be doing something right.)

Kevin and Cher did not clap for RR.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Both things can be true - the SNL appearance means Hollywood is on their side. But also shows RR/BL don't think this SH was very serious or they wouldn't be joking about it.

Hollywood appears to accepted Alec Baldwin, Harvey Weinstein, etc. However this doesn’t mean they’ll continue to actively work in Hollywood. The roles were drying up, especially for Blake Lively prior to this.

[Anonymous]

I’ll ask again cause people seem to be glossing over this.

Could someone please explain to me why Isabel and Jenny were allowed to file official complaints with Sony, while Sony rejected Blake’s complaints, telling her they were the distributor and their HR wouldn’t be the one to handle this?

Could someone also tell me why Isabel and Jenny did didn’t go follow official protocol and file with SAG? And while there is no report of a sexual harassment investigation which would come from following protocol?

Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kevin Costner not amused by RR making light of his wife’s SH.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14404705/Kevin-Costner-reaction-Ryan-Reynolds-Justin-Baldoni-joke-SNL50-Anniversary.html

Pro tip, when an article says "the internet is abuzz with..." That's a tell for a planted story. The PR team creates the phony "buzz" and then runs to a trusted outlet with the "story."

See also, "video of X resurfaces!"

This whole thing is a made up story. Watch the whole thing - Costner mildly smiles by the end of the joke about the coneheads. He’s just chewing gum. (Though, if serial cheater Kevin Costner disapproves of how you treat your wife, you might be doing something right.)

Kevin and Cher did not clap for RR.

lol Kevin and Cher probably did not clap for anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ll ask again cause people seem to be glossing over this.

Could someone please explain to me why Isabel and Jenny were allowed to file official complaints with Sony, while Sony rejected Blake’s complaints, telling her they were the distributor and their HR wouldn’t be the one to handle this?

Could someone also tell me why Isabel and Jenny did didn’t go follow official protocol and file with SAG? And while there is no report of a sexual harassment investigation which would come from following protocol?

Thanks.

Because they are fake documents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Angles are everything

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/1ira911/blake_lively_and_amy_schumer_at_snl50/?share_id=32ZKDzf0srkkPPaI-dO00&utm_content=1&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1

Did Amy consent to Blake constantly touching and petting her?

These are far from Alist actresses. This looks like a local Beef N Beer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ll ask again cause people seem to be glossing over this.

Could someone please explain to me why Isabel and Jenny were allowed to file official complaints with Sony, while Sony rejected Blake’s complaints, telling her they were the distributor and their HR wouldn’t be the one to handle this?

Could someone also tell me why Isabel and Jenny did didn’t go follow official protocol and file with SAG? And while there is no report of a sexual harassment investigation which would come from following protocol?

Thanks.

Because they are fake documents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Slate and the other actress hasn’t come out to say the HR complaints are false makes me wonder if they are real.

Stranger that they haven’t said they are real

The way I see it is…their silence is acceptance. If those HR complaints were false wouldn’t you want to set the record straight? I am Team Baldoni by the way but I am thinking that the complaints may have been filed after Blake’s complaint was filed in support of her.
The other 2 actresses probably are stepping back now because of public opinion and the backlash that has happened with Blake. I still don’t think Baldoni is guilty but that doesn’t mean that Blake didn’t convince these ladies after the fact to complain. It would be nice if the dates weren’t redacted.

Also where is Sony in all this? Surely they should say something if it’s in accurate info. I wouldn’t want anyone that works for me thinking the company’s HR department just allows leaks of confidential info.

Lady, no serious person responds to you tube podcasts and reddit threads. No “news” outlet has run with them, which suggests their provenance is very sketchy. I have a theory about who would benefit from their release but want to see the Amemded Complaint first.

Lady here (😒) it would be really nice if you could’ve found a better way to begin your response which outside of lady was very helpful. I didn’t realize that the news of the HR complaints hadn’t been picked up by anyone else, so that makes a lot of sense.

I hear you. I also dislike when posters refer to each other as lady and babe.

[Anonymous]

Blake‘s complaint that was published in the New York Times, detailed the extreme physical and mental stress this has caused both Blake and her children. But now they’re joking on SNL about it? Make it make sense.

I think they know that there will never be an actual case, there will probably be a huge settlement at sometime in the next few months. There’s just no way they want to go to trial like Johnny and Amber. And I think they are now trying to work to change their image and make it a blemish instead of defining moments in their career.

The thing is, I think it will work to a degree. I don’t really think there’s such a thing as canceling unless you are someone like Harvey Weinstein who have decades of actual rape under your belt. Most people are able to make it back. But I don’t think they’re ever going to be able to return to what they used to be able to do with the silly banter and “we’re just like you! So relatable!” We’ve now seen too much behind the curtains.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blake‘s complaint that was published in the New York Times, detailed the extreme physical and mental stress this has caused both Blake and her children. But now they’re joking on SNL about it? Make it make sense.

I think they know that there will never be an actual case, there will probably be a huge settlement at sometime in the next few months. There’s just no way they want to go to trial like Johnny and Amber. And I think they are now trying to work to change their image and make it a blemish instead of defining moments in their career.

The thing is, I think it will work to a degree. I don’t really think there’s such a thing as canceling unless you are someone like Harvey Weinstein who have decades of actual rape under your belt. Most people are able to make it back. But I don’t think they’re ever going to be able to return to what they used to be able to do with the silly banter and “we’re just like you! So relatable!” We’ve now seen too much behind the curtains.

I agree that most people bounce back from things rather than being cancelled completely. I don’t think that’s a bad thing. People should be able to redeem themselves and hopefully end up as better humans after all is said and done. Hopefully these two learn something from this whole thing. Only time will tell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blake‘s complaint that was published in the New York Times, detailed the extreme physical and mental stress this has caused both Blake and her children. But now they’re joking on SNL about it? Make it make sense.

I think they know that there will never be an actual case, there will probably be a huge settlement at sometime in the next few months. There’s just no way they want to go to trial like Johnny and Amber. And I think they are now trying to work to change their image and make it a blemish instead of defining moments in their career.

The thing is, I think it will work to a degree. I don’t really think there’s such a thing as canceling unless you are someone like Harvey Weinstein who have decades of actual rape under your belt. Most people are able to make it back. But I don’t think they’re ever going to be able to return to what they used to be able to do with the silly banter and “we’re just like you! So relatable!” We’ve now seen too much behind the curtains.

Hollywood may not care, foul behavior runs rampant amongst ‘elites’ anyhow. However, Blake was not exactly a highly sought after actress prior to all of this. She has the confidence and arrogance to come back from this, in her own mind, but I don’t see her working much from this point on. Unless she creates something on her own.

[Anonymous]

They should fire their PR team. Last night was a mistake.

https://pagesix.com/2025/02/17/entertainment/fans-slam-snl-for-joking-about-blake-lively-ryan-reynolds-legal-drama-with-justin-baldoni/

[Anonymous]

Lots of commoners on social are saying that Cecily Strong’s girl you wish you hadn’t started a conversation with at a party was a dig a Blake. She was visibly pregnant and when Che complimented her, she drunkenly slurred, wow you think it’s OK to say that I’m pregnant just because I have a baby inside of me? Misogynistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lots of commoners on social are saying that Cecily Strong’s girl you wish you hadn’t started a conversation with at a party was a dig a Blake. She was visibly pregnant and when Che complimented her, she drunkenly slurred, wow you think it’s OK to say that I’m pregnant just because I have a baby inside of me? Misogynistic.

I believe it had to be a dig at Blake. She should have taken it further.