Kavanaugh Accuser reveals her Identity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The GOP probably knew about this over the summer when the whole "sen feinstein hired a chinese spy" think broke.

BS. The Dems planned this. They sat on the letter until the 11th hour. Their timing is choreographed, just like their playacting the morning of the first hearing. This is "he said, she said" on steroids. For two months they said nothing to the GOP on the committee. It gave her time to get her social media cleaned up--although I did find one site where she gave a "clap" for an article about the Women's March.

[Anonymous]

Have not read the entire thread but the FBI did not administer a polygraph test. From the article:

"Ford took a polygraph test administered by a former FBI agent in early August."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She feared for her life based on that? She actually thought they would kill her at a high school party with lots of people in attendance? She sounds a little nutty and hysterical.

She believes she endured a sexual assault. I feel for her. But I don’t believe her version of events is true.

Unlike her, I actually was raped by an acquaintance at a party. And I was scared shitless, but I never thought for a second that the guy was going to kill me. I do understand that their are situations in which one would justiably fear for their life (like if one were being raped at gun point). But in her set of facts, I don’t see how a rational person would fear for her life. She sounds a bit delusional.

Have you ever had a guy pin you down and cover your mouth with his hand? Human nature is to panic and fear that you might suffocate.

It's quite rational to fear getting a life threatening STD from forced sex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't pass the smell test.

If that smell is partisanship and voting-blaming, correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Question: Can this go to a vote if Judiciary votes no?

No.. and there would probably be no point. It would mean that at least one R on judiciary had voted No. at that point, there would only be one left to lose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP probably knew about this over the summer when the whole "sen feinstein hired a chinese spy" think broke.

BS. The Dems planned this. They sat on the letter until the 11th hour. Their timing is choreographed, just like their playacting the morning of the first hearing. This is "he said, she said" on steroids. For two months they said nothing to the GOP on the committee. It gave her time to get her social media cleaned up--although I did find one site where she gave a "clap" for an article about the Women's March.

GOP knew about it and were trying to shove it through without proper vetting and you blame the dems? Heck, there are hundreds of thousands of documents that still haven't been reviewed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm fascinated that there are people willing to spend time poking holes into someone's sexual assault story. Living your best life, huh?

Ask the Duke lacrosse team.

Or the UVA fraternity members.

The "well she has nothing to gain so obvously she's being truthful" trope needs to end NOW. What did Jackie from UVA have to gain from concoting the RS story? Nothing. Some people are just mentally ill.

Why did she tell a therapist and her husband about it several years before Trump even ran for office? Perhaps she can tell the future and was preparing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP probably knew about this over the summer when the whole "sen feinstein hired a chinese spy" think broke.

BS. The Dems planned this. They sat on the letter until the 11th hour. Their timing is choreographed, just like their playacting the morning of the first hearing. This is "he said, she said" on steroids. For two months they said nothing to the GOP on the committee. It gave her time to get her social media cleaned up--although I did find one site where she gave a "clap" for an article about the Women's March.

Merrick Garland says "hold my beer."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A hit job; Roy Moore part deux

Well, if you think it's helpful to compare Kavanaugh to Roy Moore by all means go for it. Perhaps they have more in common than one would guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm fascinated that there are people willing to spend time poking holes into someone's sexual assault story. Living your best life, huh?

Ask the Duke lacrosse team.

Or the UVA fraternity members.

The "well she has nothing to gain so obvously she's being truthful" trope needs to end NOW. What did Jackie from UVA have to gain from concoting the RS story? Nothing. Some people are just mentally ill.

Are there any accusers you believe? Or do you always default to the outliers?

NP. I believe innocent until proven guilty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP probably knew about this over the summer when the whole "sen feinstein hired a chinese spy" think broke.

BS. The Dems planned this. They sat on the letter until the 11th hour. Their timing is choreographed, just like their playacting the morning of the first hearing. This is "he said, she said" on steroids. For two months they said nothing to the GOP on the committee. It gave her time to get her social media cleaned up--although I did find one site where she gave a "clap" for an article about the Women's March.

Oh, I'm sure Dems did choreographed timing of it. Dirty, but you know what? a la guerre com a la guerre.
I wouldn't expect them to get a high road after all of the Mitch's dirty games - Garland, blocking most if the Obama's judutiary appointments, cancelled resses, I can go on and on.

[Anonymous]

Maybe Mark Judge ultimately did the right thing in this matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The GOP probably knew about this over the summer when the whole "sen feinstein hired a chinese spy" think broke.

Of course they knew.

I hope the tireless media will confirm that before Thursday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Mark Judge ultimately did the right thing in this matter.

How so?

[Anonymous]

assuming the allegations are true, if Mark Judge has not jumped on top of BK and Chrissy, she would not have been able to get away. He, Mark, may have been a jerk, but he has/had a conscience. Now, as a recovered alcoholic, he may genuinely not remember what happened.