What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?

[Anonymous]

What democrats have done in the past 150 days

- Introduced bogus articles of impeachment
- Visited an MS-13 terrorist in El Salvador
- Opposed eliminating waste and fraud
- Refused to stand for Laken Riley
- Voted against proof-of-citizenship to vote
- Sided with men in women's sports

The democrats' dismal 21% approval rating will continue to decline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's also saddening when puberty blockers are government/state covered but IVF is not covered by insurance. It's saddening when poisonous food dyes and high prescription drug prices are addressed by President Trump instead of the two previous Democrat presidents.

It's not discussed often enough that on some core issues (foreign and domestic), Trump is actually moving the Republican Party to the left.

It's even sadder that men who want their own pair of breasts to fondle get full coverage for their breast implants, but female breast cancer victims can't get even partial coverage for reconstructive surgery. A woman's abusive husband can get full insurance coverage for "facial feminization" surgeries which amount to endless cosmetic procedures, but the woman whose face he beat in will have to come out of pocket to have her nose reconstructed. The greed and freeloading of the trans movement, the sex-based double standards while insisting sex doesn't exist, and the resulting burden on the rest of us to make do with less coverage and bear higher insurance costs is the aspect that turned me against that particular cause.

By law, reconstruction surgery after breast cancer must be covered. I've had several hundreds of thousands of dollars in reconstruction covered.

No, honey. Just no. Allow me to educate you on how America works for women who aren't white with generous insurance plans like you.

First, the only federal law that potentially mandates coverage for breast cancer victims is the WHCRA. Only if the WHCRA applies might an insurance company even potentially be required to cover mastectomy and reconstruction under federal law. Otherwise, you're sh-t outta luck if you don't live in one of only a few states with expansive breast cancer coverage requirements.

Second, all sorts of very common insurance plans are exempt from the WHCRA, including some government plans, religious orgs' plans, Medicaid, and Medicare.

Third, the WHCRA does NOT require health plans or health insurance issuers to cover mastectomies at all. That's right. If an insurance plan opts not to cover mastectomies, it is NOT required to cover anything mastectomy-related such as reconstruction for women.

Fourth, even if a health plan/insurance issuer opts to cover mastectomy, there are still exceptions under which it can decline coverage of reconstruction.

Fifth, even if a health plan/insurance issuer covers both mastectomies and reconstruction, the fine print is key. Even women who "have coverage" are regularly left with out-of-pocket costs that are so high that they cannot afford reconstruction. Insurance companies can and do pull stunts like technically "covering" reconstruction, but then defining this narrowly to carve out all sorts of physical complications that women who aren't upper middle class with family help can't afford to pay for out of pocket. Again, this effectively denies coverage to women with such insurance plans.

In comparison, men who claim to be trans enjoy absurd levels of drama-free full coverage for frivolities because they'll die from hearing the word no. I personally used to handle pro bono matters from a number of LGBTQ nonprofits before I decided these grifters don't need my services to be free with all the other free stuff they get. A typical matter would feature a "trans woman" on Medicaid because the same transgender identity that they claim is not a mental illness nonetheless entitles them to disability and Medicaid. I got really good at spotting the expensive work. There's nothing like having a man sitting in front of you with several hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of cosmetic procedures from browbone shaving to lip filler to jaw surgery to lipo to BBLs to breast implants to cheekbone implants to laser hair removal to skin bleaching to even human hair wigs that cost $1,500 each and his next surgeries are already on the calendar. Meanwhile, he hasn't worked in years and he is being referred to me because a shelter "discriminated" against him by asking him to consider leaving in 90 days after he physically assaulted staff repeatedly and walked around with his penis out.

Rapacious trans lobbyists and Democrats have put such ludicrous, excessive federal and state packages of "gender affirming" benefits for men who claim to be trans and taxpayers don't even know the half of it.

This is apparently what the Democrats are going to stand for in 2026 and 2028. Horrifying.

Yup, I hate Trump, but I definitely didn't vote for Harris. Both parties are captured by shadowy groups of very creepy, wealthy white men with disturbing social agendas. Republicans, however, won't make me refer to their white male overlords as women. This is what we're reduced to in this country. Dark times.

Republicans will, however, keep you on life support against your and your family's will, just to birth your baby. Dark times indeed.

https://www.npr.org/2025/05/21/nx-s1-5405542/a-brain-dead-womans-pregnancy-raises-questions-about-georgias-abortion-law

"Adriana Smith, a 30 year-old nurse and mother, was about nine weeks pregnant in February when doctors declared her brain dead after she suffered a medical emergency.

But Smith's mother, April Newkirk, told Atlanta TV station WXIA that doctors at Emory University Hospital have been keeping her organs functioning since then until the fetus can be delivered, citing Georgia's law banning most abortions after fetal cardiac activity can be detected, or roughly six weeks into pregnancy.

Smith is now roughly 22 weeks into the pregnancy and has been on life support for more than 90 days.

"My grandson may be blind, may not be able to walk, we don't know if he'll live once she has him," Newkirk told WXIA last week. "And I'm not saying we would have chose to terminate her pregnancy. What I'm saying is we should have had a choice."

Republicans took that choice away.

Abortions affect only menstrual age women. Breast cancer or simply using the bathroom affects women of all ages.

At least Republicans believe in harsh sentences (life sentence, deportation, or death penalty) for rapists in the case of abortion. Democrats think crime is a misunderstanding.


The problem with progressives is they dont have a stop button or any self awareness and they are just like the religious right wingers they dislike. There's a need to evangelize and fellowship and preach the ideology to families and attack anyone that doesnt accept the belief as backward or lost.

Most Americans are smart and see the bullshit with the Democrat Party and its donors. The erasure of gender , decriminalizing theft/ property vandalism, defunding police, disarming the public of guns, government censored media, jailing political opponents, universal basic income, gas/carbon taxes, even AI is literal communism right before our eyes.

My word. I don’t even know where to begin with this one. You’re really saying that issues around abortion/childbirth aren’t as important because it is only a portion of a woman’s life? I have to assume you are a man because no woman would say that. So maybe you don’t realize that those menstrual years are from about 10-55 years old. Those 45 years are less important than who is in the bathroom??? I don’t know why/how republicans have so much knowledge of the genitals of people they share public restrooms with. I am 50 years old. I have used hundreds of piblic restrooms and locker rooms. Never once saw someone’s genitals, so I hsve no idea how many trans women I have been around in those situations. Maybe stop looking at everyone’s genitals..?

Give me one instance of a child being raped in a bathroom by a trans woman and democrats called it a misunderstanding. But let’s play along and say these trans women are rapists and shouldn’t be in women’s restrooms. Ok. So you think they should be in men’s restrooms where they can rape little boys? This is what I have never understood.

Everything you listed in your last paragraph is pure BS. Until I got to that paragraph, I thought you were brainwashed by Fox News, but even they aren’t that unhinged and delusional. I am guessing you spend a lot of time getting your “news” from youtube and tiktok. You seem to be deep into some effed up algorithms.

I am a woman and I didnt say abortion isnt important. I said that rights over female bodily autonomy and "my body, my choice" starts with bodily autonomy. A man should not compete against a woman in sports nor should a man use the womens bathroom. Men are dangerous to women and many straight men are taking advantage of the trans movement and gender erasure to attack women and girls. This is something that affects women of all ages. Public facilities are used every day. Many women are tired of abortion being the central voting issue spoonfed to us. Yes, it is problematic that Republicans are so anti abortion but guess what? Republicans have been president for many years since Roe v. Wade including a 12 year stretch in the 80s and abortion still existed. It's not going anywhere

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What democrats have done in the past 150 days

- Introduced bogus articles of impeachment
- Visited an MS-13 terrorist in El Salvador
- Opposed eliminating waste and fraud
- Refused to stand for Laken Riley
- Voted against proof-of-citizenship to vote
- Sided with men in women's sports

The democrats' dismal 21% approval rating will continue to decline.

Democrats are a sinking ship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What democrats have done in the past 150 days

- Introduced bogus articles of impeachment
- Visited an MS-13 terrorist in El Salvador
- Opposed eliminating waste and fraud
- Refused to stand for Laken Riley
- Voted against proof-of-citizenship to vote
- Sided with men in women's sports

The democrats' dismal 21% approval rating will continue to decline.

How are they able to gross billions in ActBlue donations with such a dismal approval rating?
I believe the DNC is laundering donor money. The only real grassroots donation campaign was probably Bernie Sanders

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another thread taken over by republicans who think all democrats care about is trans issues. Notice that it’s the republicans bringing it up all the time. You think it is the center of the democratic platform because Trump told you so. Nobody is trying to “push men into women’s spaces.” Democrats simply think most of these issues are not federal cases!

Democrats think it is none of our business what pronouns people use. Why do you care so much? You don’t have to like it, but that doesn’t mean you need to run to the feds. Maybe you work with someone who uses they/them and you don’t want to comply. Ok, fine. It is actually pretty easy to avoid third person pronouns all together. I have relatives you don’t want to use they/them for a non-binary relative. They just avoid it by using their name all the time. So maybe try that simple solution rather than pushing for legislation?

There’s been very few cases of trans women competing in HS sports. Why shouldn’t this be handled locally on a case-by-case basis? There are many factors that should be considered, such as hormone levels. It simply isn’t a an issue that is prevalent enough to need federal attention. It especially shouldn’t be a major factor in determining who you vote for.

I keep hearing republicans talk about all these little girls being raped by trans women in public restrooms. Personally, I have never heard of this happening. Maybe we can get some numbers to compare sexual assaults in bathrooms carried out by cis men vs trans women? Why do we not care about little boys being assaulted in men’s restrooms?

Republicans need to learn to deal with things without running to their orange god to make all their problems go away. Please. Go back to being the party of small government. Stop running to Daddy Warbucks every time you encounter someone different from you.

I’m going to ignore the rest of your circa 2018 rambling but as to the bolded, the answer is that Title IX is a federal, not state law. Therefore, where Title IX is concerned, federal involvement is appropriate.

This issue is one of directly conflicting legal rights under the Constitution, federal, and state law. Roughly speaking, the Democrats take the position that gender-based rights are more important than sex-based rights while the Republicans take the opposite position. It is idiotic to demand local sports organizations solve complex legal problems. Your recommendation will fail because it’s stupid and not workable in real life. Asking your local AYSO board to solve a question of competing legal rights is dumb. That is what courts are for, and that is why this will eventually be resolved at the federal level.

I actually agree with the people who say this won’t decide the 2026 and 2028 elections. It won’t. But it is deeply hurting the Democratic brand now, because the Democrats are on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of history here, and the Democrats can’t afford to keep tarnishing their brand if they want to regularly win. I see no Democrat right now that is close to being able to take on JD Vance because the Democratic brand is so toxic, and that is pathetic.

We will see what happens when Skremetti issues. If it goes the way I think, it will be a blessing in disguise for Democrats. They will be able to make the obligatory noises to satisfy the unhinged blue cultists, but won’t have to go out on the campaign trail fighting for a morally and ethically wrong position, which is what they have to do now on this issue. It might be the beginning of their long climb out of this hole.

[Anonymous]

I think that a huge problem the Democrats have is that they treat everyone as being literate and rational. The average American reads at roughly a 7th grade level, sadly, and Democratic messaging misses a lot of the public because of this.

The group American Opposition has been running Democratic messaging through ChatGPT and asking that it translate it to a 7th grade reading level and the results seem much more digestible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another thread taken over by republicans who think all democrats care about is trans issues. Notice that it’s the republicans bringing it up all the time. You think it is the center of the democratic platform because Trump told you so. Nobody is trying to “push men into women’s spaces.” Democrats simply think most of these issues are not federal cases!

Democrats think it is none of our business what pronouns people use. Why do you care so much? You don’t have to like it, but that doesn’t mean you need to run to the feds. Maybe you work with someone who uses they/them and you don’t want to comply. Ok, fine. It is actually pretty easy to avoid third person pronouns all together. I have relatives you don’t want to use they/them for a non-binary relative. They just avoid it by using their name all the time. So maybe try that simple solution rather than pushing for legislation?

There’s been very few cases of trans women competing in HS sports. Why shouldn’t this be handled locally on a case-by-case basis? There are many factors that should be considered, such as hormone levels. It simply isn’t a an issue that is prevalent enough to need federal attention. It especially shouldn’t be a major factor in determining who you vote for.

I keep hearing republicans talk about all these little girls being raped by trans women in public restrooms. Personally, I have never heard of this happening. Maybe we can get some numbers to compare sexual assaults in bathrooms carried out by cis men vs trans women? Why do we not care about little boys being assaulted in men’s restrooms?

Republicans need to learn to deal with things without running to their orange god to make all their problems go away. Please. Go back to being the party of small government. Stop running to Daddy Warbucks every time you encounter someone different from you.

I’m going to ignore the rest of your circa 2018 rambling but as to the bolded, the answer is that Title IX is a federal, not state law. Therefore, where Title IX is concerned, federal involvement is appropriate.

This issue is one of directly conflicting legal rights under the Constitution, federal, and state law. Roughly speaking, the Democrats take the position that gender-based rights are more important than sex-based rights while the Republicans take the opposite position. It is idiotic to demand local sports organizations solve complex legal problems. Your recommendation will fail because it’s stupid and not workable in real life. Asking your local AYSO board to solve a question of competing legal rights is dumb. That is what courts are for, and that is why this will eventually be resolved at the federal level.

I actually agree with the people who say this won’t decide the 2026 and 2028 elections. It won’t. But it is deeply hurting the Democratic brand now, because the Democrats are on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of history here, and the Democrats can’t afford to keep tarnishing their brand if they want to regularly win. I see no Democrat right now that is close to being able to take on JD Vance because the Democratic brand is so toxic, and that is pathetic.

We will see what happens when Skremetti issues. If it goes the way I think, it will be a blessing in disguise for Democrats. They will be able to make the obligatory noises to satisfy the unhinged blue cultists, but won’t have to go out on the campaign trail fighting for a morally and ethically wrong position, which is what they have to do now on this issue. It might be the beginning of their long climb out of this hole.

You think that they can’t take on JD Vance because the DEMOCRATS are too toxic? Ok, let’s go with that, I like our odds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think that a huge problem the Democrats have is that they treat everyone as being literate and rational. The average American reads at roughly a 7th grade level, sadly, and Democratic messaging misses a lot of the public because of this.

The group American Opposition has been running Democratic messaging through ChatGPT and asking that it translate it to a 7th grade reading level and the results seem much more digestible.

Example, please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What democrats have done in the past 150 days

- Introduced bogus articles of impeachment
- Visited an MS-13 terrorist in El Salvador
- Opposed eliminating waste and fraud
- Refused to stand for Laken Riley
- Voted against proof-of-citizenship to vote
- Sided with men in women's sports

The democrats' dismal 21% approval rating will continue to decline.

You're genuinely an idiot. An idiot spreading misinformation. But carry on, the Republicans are counting on you in 2026 to continue with this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another thread taken over by republicans who think all democrats care about is trans issues. Notice that it’s the republicans bringing it up all the time. You think it is the center of the democratic platform because Trump told you so. Nobody is trying to “push men into women’s spaces.” Democrats simply think most of these issues are not federal cases!

Democrats think it is none of our business what pronouns people use. Why do you care so much? You don’t have to like it, but that doesn’t mean you need to run to the feds. Maybe you work with someone who uses they/them and you don’t want to comply. Ok, fine. It is actually pretty easy to avoid third person pronouns all together. I have relatives you don’t want to use they/them for a non-binary relative. They just avoid it by using their name all the time. So maybe try that simple solution rather than pushing for legislation?

There’s been very few cases of trans women competing in HS sports. Why shouldn’t this be handled locally on a case-by-case basis? There are many factors that should be considered, such as hormone levels. It simply isn’t a an issue that is prevalent enough to need federal attention. It especially shouldn’t be a major factor in determining who you vote for.

I keep hearing republicans talk about all these little girls being raped by trans women in public restrooms. Personally, I have never heard of this happening. Maybe we can get some numbers to compare sexual assaults in bathrooms carried out by cis men vs trans women? Why do we not care about little boys being assaulted in men’s restrooms?

Republicans need to learn to deal with things without running to their orange god to make all their problems go away. Please. Go back to being the party of small government. Stop running to Daddy Warbucks every time you encounter someone different from you.

I’m going to ignore the rest of your circa 2018 rambling but as to the bolded, the answer is that Title IX is a federal, not state law. Therefore, where Title IX is concerned, federal involvement is appropriate.

This issue is one of directly conflicting legal rights under the Constitution, federal, and state law. Roughly speaking, the Democrats take the position that gender-based rights are more important than sex-based rights while the Republicans take the opposite position. It is idiotic to demand local sports organizations solve complex legal problems. Your recommendation will fail because it’s stupid and not workable in real life. Asking your local AYSO board to solve a question of competing legal rights is dumb. That is what courts are for, and that is why this will eventually be resolved at the federal level.

I actually agree with the people who say this won’t decide the 2026 and 2028 elections. It won’t. But it is deeply hurting the Democratic brand now, because the Democrats are on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of history here, and the Democrats can’t afford to keep tarnishing their brand if they want to regularly win. I see no Democrat right now that is close to being able to take on JD Vance because the Democratic brand is so toxic, and that is pathetic.

We will see what happens when Skremetti issues. If it goes the way I think, it will be a blessing in disguise for Democrats. They will be able to make the obligatory noises to satisfy the unhinged blue cultists, but won’t have to go out on the campaign trail fighting for a morally and ethically wrong position, which is what they have to do now on this issue. It might be the beginning of their long climb out of this hole.

You think that they can’t take on JD Vance because the DEMOCRATS are too toxic? Ok, let’s go with that, I like our odds.

You are a blue cultist. You still think it’s 2018. Your assessment of reality is not solid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What democrats have done in the past 150 days

- Introduced bogus articles of impeachment
- Visited an MS-13 terrorist in El Salvador
- Opposed eliminating waste and fraud
- Refused to stand for Laken Riley
- Voted against proof-of-citizenship to vote
- Sided with men in women's sports

The democrats' dismal 21% approval rating will continue to decline.

How are they able to gross billions in ActBlue donations with such a dismal approval rating?
I believe the DNC is laundering donor money. The only real grassroots donation campaign was probably Bernie Sanders

Exactly. ActBlue got caught for massive fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think that a huge problem the Democrats have is that they treat everyone as being literate and rational. The average American reads at roughly a 7th grade level, sadly, and Democratic messaging misses a lot of the public because of this.

The group American Opposition has been running Democratic messaging through ChatGPT and asking that it translate it to a 7th grade reading level and the results seem much more digestible.

Definitely continue with this open disdain for working class voters. That’s sure to help Democrats win! 👍

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another thread taken over by republicans who think all democrats care about is trans issues. Notice that it’s the republicans bringing it up all the time. You think it is the center of the democratic platform because Trump told you so. Nobody is trying to “push men into women’s spaces.” Democrats simply think most of these issues are not federal cases!

Democrats think it is none of our business what pronouns people use. Why do you care so much? You don’t have to like it, but that doesn’t mean you need to run to the feds. Maybe you work with someone who uses they/them and you don’t want to comply. Ok, fine. It is actually pretty easy to avoid third person pronouns all together. I have relatives you don’t want to use they/them for a non-binary relative. They just avoid it by using their name all the time. So maybe try that simple solution rather than pushing for legislation?

There’s been very few cases of trans women competing in HS sports. Why shouldn’t this be handled locally on a case-by-case basis? There are many factors that should be considered, such as hormone levels. It simply isn’t a an issue that is prevalent enough to need federal attention. It especially shouldn’t be a major factor in determining who you vote for.

I keep hearing republicans talk about all these little girls being raped by trans women in public restrooms. Personally, I have never heard of this happening. Maybe we can get some numbers to compare sexual assaults in bathrooms carried out by cis men vs trans women? Why do we not care about little boys being assaulted in men’s restrooms?

Republicans need to learn to deal with things without running to their orange god to make all their problems go away. Please. Go back to being the party of small government. Stop running to Daddy Warbucks every time you encounter someone different from you.

I’m going to ignore the rest of your circa 2018 rambling but as to the bolded, the answer is that Title IX is a federal, not state law. Therefore, where Title IX is concerned, federal involvement is appropriate.

This issue is one of directly conflicting legal rights under the Constitution, federal, and state law. Roughly speaking, the Democrats take the position that gender-based rights are more important than sex-based rights while the Republicans take the opposite position. It is idiotic to demand local sports organizations solve complex legal problems. Your recommendation will fail because it’s stupid and not workable in real life. Asking your local AYSO board to solve a question of competing legal rights is dumb. That is what courts are for, and that is why this will eventually be resolved at the federal level.

I actually agree with the people who say this won’t decide the 2026 and 2028 elections. It won’t. But it is deeply hurting the Democratic brand now, because the Democrats are on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of history here, and the Democrats can’t afford to keep tarnishing their brand if they want to regularly win. I see no Democrat right now that is close to being able to take on JD Vance because the Democratic brand is so toxic, and that is pathetic.

We will see what happens when Skremetti issues. If it goes the way I think, it will be a blessing in disguise for Democrats. They will be able to make the obligatory noises to satisfy the unhinged blue cultists, but won’t have to go out on the campaign trail fighting for a morally and ethically wrong position, which is what they have to do now on this issue. It might be the beginning of their long climb out of this hole.

You think that they can’t take on JD Vance because the DEMOCRATS are too toxic? Ok, let’s go with that, I like our odds.

You are a blue cultist. You still think it’s 2018. Your assessment of reality is not solid.

It's 2025. We have the same POTUS in office who was in office in 2018. That sitting POTUS, as an incumbent, LOST in 2020 to one of the weakest major party nominees in American history because he was a very, very unpopular sitting POTUS. Outlooks can change as Trump's second term evolves but to suggest it more likely for the GOP to be in a politically advantageous position in 2028 than the Dems is as ludicrous based on what we all saw happen in 2020 and 2024.

Vance, if the 2028 GOP nominee, will benefit from having a high floor of support carry over from the 30% to 35% of the electorate who make up Trump's loyal base but he is very likely to face a swing voter portion of the electorate seeking change from status quo just as the incumbent parties faced in 2020 and 2024. To retain support from a majority of the swing voters who determine POTUS election outcomes, the sitting POTUS needs to be a relatively popular POTUS. It's possible Trump could be relatively popular in 2028 but it's much more likely an even more unfit 82 year old Trump will be as unpopular in 2028 and he was in 2020.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What democrats have done in the past 150 days

- Introduced bogus articles of impeachment
- Visited an MS-13 terrorist in El Salvador
- Opposed eliminating waste and fraud
- Refused to stand for Laken Riley
- Voted against proof-of-citizenship to vote
- Sided with men in women's sports

The democrats' dismal 21% approval rating will continue to decline.

How are they able to gross billions in ActBlue donations with such a dismal approval rating?
I believe the DNC is laundering donor money. The only real grassroots donation campaign was probably Bernie Sanders

Well the DNC torpedoed Bernie. I guess he was a "Threat to Democrazy".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another thread taken over by republicans who think all democrats care about is trans issues. Notice that it’s the republicans bringing it up all the time. You think it is the center of the democratic platform because Trump told you so. Nobody is trying to “push men into women’s spaces.” Democrats simply think most of these issues are not federal cases!

Democrats think it is none of our business what pronouns people use. Why do you care so much? You don’t have to like it, but that doesn’t mean you need to run to the feds. Maybe you work with someone who uses they/them and you don’t want to comply. Ok, fine. It is actually pretty easy to avoid third person pronouns all together. I have relatives you don’t want to use they/them for a non-binary relative. They just avoid it by using their name all the time. So maybe try that simple solution rather than pushing for legislation?

There’s been very few cases of trans women competing in HS sports. Why shouldn’t this be handled locally on a case-by-case basis? There are many factors that should be considered, such as hormone levels. It simply isn’t a an issue that is prevalent enough to need federal attention. It especially shouldn’t be a major factor in determining who you vote for.

I keep hearing republicans talk about all these little girls being raped by trans women in public restrooms. Personally, I have never heard of this happening. Maybe we can get some numbers to compare sexual assaults in bathrooms carried out by cis men vs trans women? Why do we not care about little boys being assaulted in men’s restrooms?

Republicans need to learn to deal with things without running to their orange god to make all their problems go away. Please. Go back to being the party of small government. Stop running to Daddy Warbucks every time you encounter someone different from you.

Your old talking points didn't work and these new ones about "local" handling of your regressive agenda won't work either. No, we're not going to leave your agenda to the local level that you can more easily co-opt now that you have lost the nation as a whole after years of misusing federal mechanisms for trans overreach. Right is right and wrong is wrong and men in women's spaces and sports is wrong. It needs to end locally, federally, everywhere. We're not negotiating a middle ground with you any more than we're negotiating with the local pedophile a number between the 0 we prefer and the 100 he prefers for a middle ground on how many children he gets to molest. He gets 0, you get a firm no on picking taxpayers' pockets to pay for men's breast implants and everything else you claim is a trans right, and you can both deal.

Also, you know that the 79% of Americans who openly reject your agenda admit despite your emotional blackmail are on both sides of the aisle. This isn't a Republican issue any more than the trans agenda is a human rights issue. This is about reality and beating back your cabal of highly organized grifters who have taken America for a ride for way too long.

Well said.