Is this clip really demonstrative of how Trump voters feel about the trans community?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Straight white cis woman. It is not a slur. Your feelings are not reality, pp. Sorry if that disrupts your view of your mind as the arbiter of objective reality.

Some mentally fragile broads on the right, huh? It’s like all that religious indoctrination just melted their brains.

Those are slurs, PP. Although factual…

I voted for Harris and consider cis to be a slur, and I am an atheist.

It’s always so shocking how quickly the vicious misogyny pours out of trans activists when they encounter an opinion from a woman they don’t like.

I’m a (cis) woman, and it’s not a slur. It’s an adjective. It costs me nothing to be respectful and inclusive. Whole lot of “victim dysmorphia syndrome” over here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Straight white cis woman. It is not a slur. Your feelings are not reality, pp. Sorry if that disrupts your view of your mind as the arbiter of objective reality.

Some mentally fragile broads on the right, huh? It’s like all that religious indoctrination just melted their brains.

Those are slurs, PP. Although factual…

I voted for Harris and consider cis to be a slur, and I am an atheist.

It’s always so shocking how quickly the vicious misogyny pours out of trans activists when they encounter an opinion from a woman they don’t like.

I’m a (cis) woman, and it’s not a slur. It’s an adjective. It costs me nothing to be respectful and inclusive. Whole lot of “victim dysmorphia syndrome” over here.

While I disagree that "cis" is a slur...please explain to me how the use of "cis" is in any way "respectful and inclusive"?

I think the use of "cis" should not be the norm. The norm - for 98% of the population - is that they are "cis-gender", a woman is a female and a man is a male. As this is the norm...you shouldn't have to make "cis" a common term used in everyday language. It's pointless. Now...I'm perfectly fine if people want to use that term for themselves...but don't expect the majority of the population to just roll over and agree to start saying "cis-gender" as a self descriptive gender identity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Straight white cis woman. It is not a slur. Your feelings are not reality, pp. Sorry if that disrupts your view of your mind as the arbiter of objective reality.

Some mentally fragile broads on the right, huh? It’s like all that religious indoctrination just melted their brains.

Those are slurs, PP. Although factual…

I voted for Harris and consider cis to be a slur, and I am an atheist.

It’s always so shocking how quickly the vicious misogyny pours out of trans activists when they encounter an opinion from a woman they don’t like.

I’m a (cis) woman, and it’s not a slur. It’s an adjective. It costs me nothing to be respectful and inclusive. Whole lot of “victim dysmorphia syndrome” over here.

While I disagree that "cis" is a slur...please explain to me how the use of "cis" is in any way "respectful and inclusive"?

I think the use of "cis" should not be the norm. The norm - for 98% of the population - is that they are "cis-gender", a woman is a female and a man is a male. As this is the norm...you shouldn't have to make "cis" a common term used in everyday language. It's pointless. Now...I'm perfectly fine if people want to use that term for themselves...but don't expect the majority of the population to just roll over and agree to start saying "cis-gender" as a self descriptive gender identity.

I've only ever seen the term cis used in discussions about transgender people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Straight white cis woman. It is not a slur. Your feelings are not reality, pp. Sorry if that disrupts your view of your mind as the arbiter of objective reality.

Some mentally fragile broads on the right, huh? It’s like all that religious indoctrination just melted their brains.

Those are slurs, PP. Although factual…

I voted for Harris and consider cis to be a slur, and I am an atheist.

It’s always so shocking how quickly the vicious misogyny pours out of trans activists when they encounter an opinion from a woman they don’t like.

I’m a (cis) woman, and it’s not a slur. It’s an adjective. It costs me nothing to be respectful and inclusive. Whole lot of “victim dysmorphia syndrome” over here.

When people are referred to by a name or adjective they find hate or find demeaning, it is a slur.

The End.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Straight white cis woman. It is not a slur. Your feelings are not reality, pp. Sorry if that disrupts your view of your mind as the arbiter of objective reality.

Some mentally fragile broads on the right, huh? It’s like all that religious indoctrination just melted their brains.

Those are slurs, PP. Although factual…

I voted for Harris and consider cis to be a slur, and I am an atheist.

It’s always so shocking how quickly the vicious misogyny pours out of trans activists when they encounter an opinion from a woman they don’t like.

I’m a (cis) woman, and it’s not a slur. It’s an adjective. It costs me nothing to be respectful and inclusive. Whole lot of “victim dysmorphia syndrome” over here.

When people are referred to by a name or adjective they find hate or find demeaning, it is a slur.


The End.

I find the term short offensive. Call me vertically impaired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white straight biological woman. That makes me a normal woman. Anything else is a slur. Prove me wrong and I’ll show you the definition in the dictionary.

How does 'cis' say you are not normal? It doesn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white straight biological woman. That makes me a normal woman. Anything else is a slur. Prove me wrong and I’ll show you the definition in the dictionary.

How does 'cis' say you are not normal? It doesn't.

It's the reason behind the use of the term "cis" that really has everyone the most upset. Why?

Because 98% of the population believe Woman/Girl=Female and Man/Boy=Male -- therefore this is the norm. Period. Why start using a term and forcing people to use a term that is not necessary?

The default -- as it is 98% the norm -- is that women are female and men are male. The other 2% are the exception and must use "trans" -- meaning Trans Man or Trans Woman. The majority are "cis" - there is simply no need to use "cis" as a descriptor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white straight biological woman. That makes me a normal woman. Anything else is a slur. Prove me wrong and I’ll show you the definition in the dictionary.

This is the issue. The word "woman" does not need a modifier when referring to 99% of the population. The only terms necessary are woman and transwoman. The difference between the two is abundantly clear.

I agree very much that the word woman doesn't need a modifier. Usually it doesn't have one, thankfully.

I do however think the word cis can be necessary when transgender people are talking about their experiences. "When people think I'm cis..." or "I didn't have this problem when I was cis" or "A lot of cis people don't realize this about trans people," etc.

No. Cis is not necessary. When it’s only used in opposite to trans Cis means normal. Cis is offensive.

‘When people think I’m a girl’, What a lot of people don’t realize about trans individuals

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white straight biological woman. That makes me a normal woman. Anything else is a slur. Prove me wrong and I’ll show you the definition in the dictionary.

This is the issue. The word "woman" does not need a modifier when referring to 99% of the population. The only terms necessary are woman and transwoman. The difference between the two is abundantly clear.

I agree very much that the word woman doesn't need a modifier. Usually it doesn't have one, thankfully.

I do however think the word cis can be necessary when transgender people are talking about their experiences. "When people think I'm cis..." or "I didn't have this problem when I was cis" or "A lot of cis people don't realize this about trans people," etc.

No. Cis is not necessary. When it’s only used in opposite to trans Cis means normal. Cis is offensive.

‘When people think I’m a girl’, What a lot of people don’t realize about trans individuals

"Cis means normal and it's also offensive"

Trans doesn't mean weird, and it shouldn't even if it's only a small portion of people. Do you want trans people to go around saying "When I was normal..."
This is just 2000s homophobia with a different target.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white straight biological woman. That makes me a normal woman. Anything else is a slur. Prove me wrong and I’ll show you the definition in the dictionary.

This is the issue. The word "woman" does not need a modifier when referring to 99% of the population. The only terms necessary are woman and transwoman. The difference between the two is abundantly clear.

I agree very much that the word woman doesn't need a modifier. Usually it doesn't have one, thankfully.

I do however think the word cis can be necessary when transgender people are talking about their experiences. "When people think I'm cis..." or "I didn't have this problem when I was cis" or "A lot of cis people don't realize this about trans people," etc.

No. Cis is not necessary. When it’s only used in opposite to trans Cis means normal. Cis is offensive.

‘When people think I’m a girl’, What a lot of people don’t realize about trans individuals

"Cis means normal and it's also offensive"

Trans doesn't mean weird, and it shouldn't even if it's only a small portion of people. Do you want trans people to go around saying "When I was normal..."
This is just 2000s homophobia with a different target.

OMG this thread is full of ignorant posts. Let's be clear...."cis" DOES NOT mean normal. It is simply the "norm" -- meaning the standard of what the majority of the population is. Everyone who is not "cis" is simply the exception.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Straight white cis woman. It is not a slur. Your feelings are not reality, pp. Sorry if that disrupts your view of your mind as the arbiter of objective reality.

Some mentally fragile broads on the right, huh? It’s like all that religious indoctrination just melted their brains.

Those are slurs, PP. Although factual…

I voted for Harris and consider cis to be a slur, and I am an atheist.

It’s always so shocking how quickly the vicious misogyny pours out of trans activists when they encounter an opinion from a woman they don’t like.

I’m a (cis) woman, and it’s not a slur. It’s an adjective. It costs me nothing to be respectful and inclusive. Whole lot of “victim dysmorphia syndrome” over here.

When people are referred to by a name or adjective they find hate or find demeaning, it is a slur.

The End.

Wrong. When someone refers to a person by a name or adjective intended to be hateful or demeaning, it is a slur.