I never said that. The question of what happens to the unreached is a difficult one and I am comfortable saying that I don’t know the answer. You also don’t need to have every answer in order to believe. |
Have you read the Sermon on the Mount? |
I am not saying that all atheists are “bad” — I am saying that ALL of us have an inherent sinful nature. But many athesists might live a more “moral” life than me. Christianity is not a contest about who lives a more moral life. That’s moralism and not Christianity. |
Yes, and the rest of the book. I don't pick and choose passages - I consider the whole thing. |
Or we simply disagree about the nature of the universe. That’s it. I do not understand why atheists feel this “need” to try to prove they are right to the point of insults and the like. Its every bit a fundamentalist mindset as any other religious fundamentalist who cannot accept the idea that some people may have different views and perspectives (and yes many religious fundamentalists do have this view). I am not saying that anyone has to agree with me or that they are stupid or worse if they don’t. I am just expressing what my beliefs are. Tolerance is the ability to respectfully hear a different point of view. |
Which part of the post (or any previous posts) indicated that religion has never had a positive impact? I don't see that anywhere. That is a distraction to the basis of the last couple of pages which are 1) morals don't have to be based on religion and 2) religion does have a negative impact on society. And, if the 12 step meetings were part of AA, those are problematic since they have a heavy infusion of religion into them. |
You know, Christians often speak about trying to show our good side when we're trying to convert someone. If I judge by this thread, atheists think flinging around insults is the best way to convert people to their belief system. |
Not if you want salvation. |
We do not have an inherent sinful nature. Sin is a construct of religion. You're right about christianity and moralism, but the problem, as pointed out before, are the overwhelming number of christians trying to impose their beliefs on others. |
Truth is truth. It is not good or bad. It simply is. Those that cannot accept truth may view it as an insult. |
Oh, so now, we can agree that religion can in fact have a positive impact? Please read back through this entire thread where, yes, multiple people — especially whoever kept calling religion the “Bronze Age myth” — were implying on every single post that religion was not capable of providing this social good. But, hey, I am happy to see it acknowledged now. I have many problems with twelves step meetings. There is no guarantee that people who are just as screwed up as you are actually have any advice useful about how to change your life. Many of them have very bad advice in my experience. Also, believing in some abstract “god” or “higher power” did very little for me in terms of change for me. It was only until I discovered a savior who actually lived amongst us that God became beautiful and real to me. |
+1. |
Thanks for your conduct of yourself on this thread, PP. Your humility shows and does credit to you and to your Savior. |
Thanks for clarifying. |
I am the "bronze age myth" poster. I implied no such thing, and in fact I was very explicit about what my issue is. That people's modern adherence to bronze age myths is doing real harm to real people in real time today. That's it. |