The OIG finds that Biedleman violated MCPS policies and code of conduct

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just embrace the troll. I’ve grown to appreciate his work. Although it’s getting a bit stale. Need a new schtick beyond “the MCPS investigation exonerated him so we can’t trust anything”, “there will be more investigations until ‘they’ get the answer they want”, “he didn’t do anything wrong - the lady sent nude pics to him and it was consensual”.

The only problem is each of these statements is true.

Although the first investigation cleared him, they launched a couple of other investigations that have different conclusions.

I don't know whether he did anything wrong, but the relationship with the woman who sent him nude photos of herself does kind of sound consensual.

I don't think there is anyone claiming that one relationship was not consensual, but:

1) For school administrators, even a consensual relationship with an employee is a violation of the Code of Conduct, not to mention the adultery aspect;

2) There are 34 other people saying they were bulled or sexually harassed. So, you have one consensual relationship and 33 non-consensual touchings, comments, and bullying.

Those were mostly anonymous or unsubstantiated, so they cleared the guy in the first investigation.

So your information seems to not match the rest of the information that has been reported by Jackson Lewis, the IG, and the Post. Can you provide links to where you are finding your information. I’d love to be able to read it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just embrace the troll. I’ve grown to appreciate his work. Although it’s getting a bit stale. Need a new schtick beyond “the MCPS investigation exonerated him so we can’t trust anything”, “there will be more investigations until ‘they’ get the answer they want”, “he didn’t do anything wrong - the lady sent nude pics to him and it was consensual”.

The only problem is each of these statements is true.

Although the first investigation cleared him, they launched a couple of other investigations that have different conclusions.

I don't know whether he did anything wrong, but the relationship with the woman who sent him nude photos of herself does kind of sound consensual.

I don't think there is anyone claiming that one relationship was not consensual, but:

1) For school administrators, even a consensual relationship with an employee is a violation of the Code of Conduct, not to mention the adultery aspect;

2) There are 34 other people saying they were bulled or sexually harassed. So, you have one consensual relationship and 33 non-consensual touchings, comments, and bullying.

Those were mostly anonymous or unsubstantiated, so they cleared the guy in the first investigation.

So your information seems to not match the rest of the information that has been reported by Jackson Lewis, the IG, and the Post. Can you provide links to where you are finding your information. I’d love to be able to read it

You won't get an answer because PP used other ways of knowing as the source for that BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just embrace the troll. I’ve grown to appreciate his work. Although it’s getting a bit stale. Need a new schtick beyond “the MCPS investigation exonerated him so we can’t trust anything”, “there will be more investigations until ‘they’ get the answer they want”, “he didn’t do anything wrong - the lady sent nude pics to him and it was consensual”.

The only problem is each of these statements is true.

Although the first investigation cleared him, they launched a couple of other investigations that have different conclusions.

I don't know whether he did anything wrong, but the relationship with the woman who sent him nude photos of herself does kind of sound consensual.

I don't think there is anyone claiming that one relationship was not consensual, but:

1) For school administrators, even a consensual relationship with an employee is a violation of the Code of Conduct, not to mention the adultery aspect;

2) There are 34 other people saying they were bulled or sexually harassed. So, you have one consensual relationship and 33 non-consensual touchings, comments, and bullying.

Those were mostly anonymous or unsubstantiated, so they cleared the guy in the first investigation.

So your information seems to not match the rest of the information that has been reported by Jackson Lewis, the IG, and the Post. Can you provide links to where you are finding your information. I’d love to be able to read it

I found it in the Post and Jackson Lewis report. Seems like you're just seeing what you want to see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just embrace the troll. I’ve grown to appreciate his work. Although it’s getting a bit stale. Need a new schtick beyond “the MCPS investigation exonerated him so we can’t trust anything”, “there will be more investigations until ‘they’ get the answer they want”, “he didn’t do anything wrong - the lady sent nude pics to him and it was consensual”.

The only problem is each of these statements is true.

Although the first investigation cleared him, they launched a couple of other investigations that have different conclusions.

I don't know whether he did anything wrong, but the relationship with the woman who sent him nude photos of herself does kind of sound consensual.

I don't think there is anyone claiming that one relationship was not consensual, but:

1) For school administrators, even a consensual relationship with an employee is a violation of the Code of Conduct, not to mention the adultery aspect;

2) There are 34 other people saying they were bulled or sexually harassed. So, you have one consensual relationship and 33 non-consensual touchings, comments, and bullying.

Those were mostly anonymous or unsubstantiated, so they cleared the guy in the first investigation.

So your information seems to not match the rest of the information that has been reported by Jackson Lewis, the IG, and the Post. Can you provide links to where you are finding your information. I’d love to be able to read it

I found it in the Post and Jackson Lewis report. Seems like you're just seeing what you want to see.

Provide links. How about you show some pull quotes as well?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just embrace the troll. I’ve grown to appreciate his work. Although it’s getting a bit stale. Need a new schtick beyond “the MCPS investigation exonerated him so we can’t trust anything”, “there will be more investigations until ‘they’ get the answer they want”, “he didn’t do anything wrong - the lady sent nude pics to him and it was consensual”.

The only problem is each of these statements is true.

Although the first investigation cleared him, they launched a couple of other investigations that have different conclusions.

I don't know whether he did anything wrong, but the relationship with the woman who sent him nude photos of herself does kind of sound consensual.

I don't think there is anyone claiming that one relationship was not consensual, but:

1) For school administrators, even a consensual relationship with an employee is a violation of the Code of Conduct, not to mention the adultery aspect;

2) There are 34 other people saying they were bulled or sexually harassed. So, you have one consensual relationship and 33 non-consensual touchings, comments, and bullying.

Those were mostly anonymous or unsubstantiated, so they cleared the guy in the first investigation.

So your information seems to not match the rest of the information that has been reported by Jackson Lewis, the IG, and the Post. Can you provide links to where you are finding your information. I’d love to be able to read it

I found it in the Post and Jackson Lewis report. Seems like you're just seeing what you want to see.

I guess if the facts were clear they wouldn't need 6 different investigations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just embrace the troll. I’ve grown to appreciate his work. Although it’s getting a bit stale. Need a new schtick beyond “the MCPS investigation exonerated him so we can’t trust anything”, “there will be more investigations until ‘they’ get the answer they want”, “he didn’t do anything wrong - the lady sent nude pics to him and it was consensual”.

The only problem is each of these statements is true.

Although the first investigation cleared him, they launched a couple of other investigations that have different conclusions.

I don't know whether he did anything wrong, but the relationship with the woman who sent him nude photos of herself does kind of sound consensual.

I don't think there is anyone claiming that one relationship was not consensual, but:

1) For school administrators, even a consensual relationship with an employee is a violation of the Code of Conduct, not to mention the adultery aspect;

2) There are 34 other people saying they were bulled or sexually harassed. So, you have one consensual relationship and 33 non-consensual touchings, comments, and bullying.

Those were mostly anonymous or unsubstantiated, so they cleared the guy in the first investigation.

So your information seems to not match the rest of the information that has been reported by Jackson Lewis, the IG, and the Post. Can you provide links to where you are finding your information. I’d love to be able to read it

I found it in the Post and Jackson Lewis report. Seems like you're just seeing what you want to see.

I guess if the facts were clear they wouldn't need 6 different investigations.

Genuinely curious who the persistent Beidleman defender is. PP, are you willing to disclose your relationship to him? I'm guessing you're a MCPS colleague or friend of his?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just embrace the troll. I’ve grown to appreciate his work. Although it’s getting a bit stale. Need a new schtick beyond “the MCPS investigation exonerated him so we can’t trust anything”, “there will be more investigations until ‘they’ get the answer they want”, “he didn’t do anything wrong - the lady sent nude pics to him and it was consensual”.

The only problem is each of these statements is true.

Although the first investigation cleared him, they launched a couple of other investigations that have different conclusions.

I don't know whether he did anything wrong, but the relationship with the woman who sent him nude photos of herself does kind of sound consensual.

I don't think there is anyone claiming that one relationship was not consensual, but:

1) For school administrators, even a consensual relationship with an employee is a violation of the Code of Conduct, not to mention the adultery aspect;

2) There are 34 other people saying they were bulled or sexually harassed. So, you have one consensual relationship and 33 non-consensual touchings, comments, and bullying.

Those were mostly anonymous or unsubstantiated, so they cleared the guy in the first investigation.

So your information seems to not match the rest of the information that has been reported by Jackson Lewis, the IG, and the Post. Can you provide links to where you are finding your information. I’d love to be able to read it

I found it in the Post and Jackson Lewis report. Seems like you're just seeing what you want to see.

I guess if the facts were clear they wouldn't need 6 different investigations.

Genuinely curious who the persistent Beidleman defender is. PP, are you willing to disclose your relationship to him? I'm guessing you're a MCPS colleague or friend of his?

My guess is someone who still works at Farquhar who he probably enabled. One heard there are people there who still support him and the county has turned a blind eye to it

[Anonymous]

Anyone he helped gain employment or got drunk with will support him. Like the secretary that he was drunk with on several occasions. Where was his mentors or a male mcps figure to pull him aside and say wtf are you doing.
Never put a black man in an all white school. He will fail every time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just embrace the troll. I’ve grown to appreciate his work. Although it’s getting a bit stale. Need a new schtick beyond “the MCPS investigation exonerated him so we can’t trust anything”, “there will be more investigations until ‘they’ get the answer they want”, “he didn’t do anything wrong - the lady sent nude pics to him and it was consensual”.

The only problem is each of these statements is true.

Although the first investigation cleared him, they launched a couple of other investigations that have different conclusions.

I don't know whether he did anything wrong, but the relationship with the woman who sent him nude photos of herself does kind of sound consensual.

I don't think there is anyone claiming that one relationship was not consensual, but:

1) For school administrators, even a consensual relationship with an employee is a violation of the Code of Conduct, not to mention the adultery aspect;

2) There are 34 other people saying they were bulled or sexually harassed. So, you have one consensual relationship and 33 non-consensual touchings, comments, and bullying.

Those were mostly anonymous or unsubstantiated, so they cleared the guy in the first investigation.

So your information seems to not match the rest of the information that has been reported by Jackson Lewis, the IG, and the Post. Can you provide links to where you are finding your information. I’d love to be able to read it

I found it in the Post and Jackson Lewis report. Seems like you're just seeing what you want to see.

I guess if the facts were clear they wouldn't need 6 different investigations.

Genuinely curious who the persistent Beidleman defender is. PP, are you willing to disclose your relationship to him? I'm guessing you're a MCPS colleague or friend of his?

It seems like some posters have tried and convicted him without even looking at the facts, but they're also clearly more interested in finding fault with McKnight than anything else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone he helped gain employment or got drunk with will support him. Like the secretary that he was drunk with on several occasions. Where was his mentors or a male mcps figure to pull him aside and say wtf are you doing.
Never put a black man in an all white school. He will fail every time.

Farquhar is 33% White, 23% Black, 22% Hispanic, and 12% Asian.

[Anonymous]

Let’s look at the racial percentages of the staff not the kids.

[Anonymous]

I wonder if this case will mean that more cases get investigated- old complaints? I hope so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this case will mean that more cases get investigated- old complaints? I hope so.

What would be the point, especially if they don't do anything about it? Are these all just a bunch of unverifiable anonymous complaints too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this case will mean that more cases get investigated- old complaints? I hope so.

What would be the point, especially if they don't do anything about it? Are these all just a bunch of unverifiable anonymous complaints too?

Sure, if by unverifiable you mean folks who go on the record, use their legal names, get their own counsel and have their stories corroborated by eyewitnesses to the events. If anonymity equals falsehood, why don't you name yourself here? Otherwise, your posts by your own logic are meaningless.

[Anonymous]

White women have a history of others corroborating with their stories against black men. ie Emmett Till
White women will always been seen as victims in our society. It’s just sad that the black men fall into the trap time and time again.