The Twitter Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Elon may save america yet. God bless him!

Did you forget the /s?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for this Jim Baker guy. How does one guy keep getting wrapped up in all these RW conspiracies?

Because it’s a lot easier to sell your followers on conspiracy theories when you have a consistent boogeyman. It’s like all of the ridiculous conspiracy theories about the Clintons. Most of them would get no traction if they were about anyone else, but the right has built the Clintons up into these mythic figures that RWNJs are eager to believe the worst about so it’s an easy sell. Now they’re doing the same thing with Jim Baker, but it doesn’t translate as well outside of true RWNJ circles because many Americans barely remember who Jim Baker is, if they ever knew of him in the first place.

LOL.

Nice try. The more you folks claim this is a "conspiracy theory," the more we know that the smoke is real.

And, Jim Baker deserves all the scrutiny he is getting.

DP. Speaking as a lawyer, I feel sorry for him. By doing his job, he's had his career spun sideways, again. Lawyers are conservative people by nature, not partisan or crackpots, want no part of any of this nonsense.

Executives get fired all the time during corporate takeovers.

That's interesting, but he didn't get fired during the takeover.

[jsteele]

From Defector.com:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for this Jim Baker guy. How does one guy keep getting wrapped up in all these RW conspiracies?

Because it’s a lot easier to sell your followers on conspiracy theories when you have a consistent boogeyman. It’s like all of the ridiculous conspiracy theories about the Clintons. Most of them would get no traction if they were about anyone else, but the right has built the Clintons up into these mythic figures that RWNJs are eager to believe the worst about so it’s an easy sell. Now they’re doing the same thing with Jim Baker, but it doesn’t translate as well outside of true RWNJ circles because many Americans barely remember who Jim Baker is, if they ever knew of him in the first place.

LOL.

Nice try. The more you folks claim this is a "conspiracy theory," the more we know that the smoke is real.

And, Jim Baker deserves all the scrutiny he is getting.

DP. Speaking as a lawyer, I feel sorry for him. By doing his job, he's had his career spun sideways, again. Lawyers are conservative people by nature, not partisan or crackpots, want no part of any of this nonsense.

Signed
John Eastman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for this Jim Baker guy. How does one guy keep getting wrapped up in all these RW conspiracies?

Because it’s a lot easier to sell your followers on conspiracy theories when you have a consistent boogeyman. It’s like all of the ridiculous conspiracy theories about the Clintons. Most of them would get no traction if they were about anyone else, but the right has built the Clintons up into these mythic figures that RWNJs are eager to believe the worst about so it’s an easy sell. Now they’re doing the same thing with Jim Baker, but it doesn’t translate as well outside of true RWNJ circles because many Americans barely remember who Jim Baker is, if they ever knew of him in the first place.

LOL.

Nice try. The more you folks claim this is a "conspiracy theory," the more we know that the smoke is real.

And, Jim Baker deserves all the scrutiny he is getting.

DP. Speaking as a lawyer, I feel sorry for him. By doing his job, he's had his career spun sideways, again. Lawyers are conservative people by nature, not partisan or crackpots, want no part of any of this nonsense.

Signed
John Eastman

Sorry, not sure how you went from vetting internal company docs before release to advocating overturning an election. I'd ask you to elaborate but I can't imagine you would have anything sensible to say.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think this is a disputed:

https://www.westernjournal.com/fbi-confirms-hunter-bidens-laptop-says-story-not-russian-disinformation-report/

Everything the “Western Journal” publishes is disputed.

To be clear, Ratcliffe did say that the laptop was not Russian disinformation. However, Ratcliffe himself is not a credible source, despite the position he had.

Russia must’ve spent years faking all that info

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think this is a disputed:

https://www.westernjournal.com/fbi-confirms-hunter-bidens-laptop-says-story-not-russian-disinformation-report/

Everything the “Western Journal” publishes is disputed.

To be clear, Ratcliffe did say that the laptop was not Russian disinformation. However, Ratcliffe himself is not a credible source, despite the position he had.

Russia must’ve spent years faking all that info

Fake "all that" info? LMAO you're kidding, right?

That's not how it works. When you already have a bunch of info to start with, you only have to salt it with a small handful of "smoking gun" fakes. Russian FSB does this all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Elon may save america yet. God bless him!

He’s trying to be a Bond villain, but his efforts are more like KAOS from Get Smart.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:

It is pretty embarrassing how Taibbi is sockpuppeting for Musk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:

It is pretty embarrassing how Taibbi is sockpuppeting for Musk.

But he’s not alone in the shift from fake populist left to fake populist right. Anti Iraq War - Occupy Wall Street - Anti-Hillary - Anti-Major Media - Accumulated Imaginary Grievances - Right-wing conspiracy grifter. He’s burned all his bridges on the left so he has to grift the suckers on the right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think this is a disputed:

https://www.westernjournal.com/fbi-confirms-hunter-bidens-laptop-says-story-not-russian-disinformation-report/

Everything the “Western Journal” publishes is disputed.

To be clear, Ratcliffe did say that the laptop was not Russian disinformation. However, Ratcliffe himself is not a credible source, despite the position he had.

Russia must’ve spent years faking all that info

Fake "all that" info? LMAO you're kidding, right?

That's not how it works. When you already have a bunch of info to start with, you only have to salt it with a small handful of "smoking gun" fakes. Russian FSB does this all the time.

And that just taints everything, even the photos!! They are really good at photoshop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for this Jim Baker guy. How does one guy keep getting wrapped up in all these RW conspiracies?

Because it’s a lot easier to sell your followers on conspiracy theories when you have a consistent boogeyman. It’s like all of the ridiculous conspiracy theories about the Clintons. Most of them would get no traction if they were about anyone else, but the right has built the Clintons up into these mythic figures that RWNJs are eager to believe the worst about so it’s an easy sell. Now they’re doing the same thing with Jim Baker, but it doesn’t translate as well outside of true RWNJ circles because many Americans barely remember who Jim Baker is, if they ever knew of him in the first place.

LOL.

Nice try. The more you folks claim this is a "conspiracy theory," the more we know that the smoke is real.

And, Jim Baker deserves all the scrutiny he is getting.

DP. Speaking as a lawyer, I feel sorry for him. By doing his job, he's had his career spun sideways, again. Lawyers are conservative people by nature, not partisan or crackpots, want no part of any of this nonsense.

Signed
John Eastman

Sorry, not sure how you went from vetting internal company docs before release to advocating overturning an election. I'd ask you to elaborate but I can't imagine you would have anything sensible to say.

Most of the crackpots and partisans are lawyers. I guess you are just too smart to see that.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:

This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:

This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.

That is the primary invented story. Reality has not lived up to it. The Twitter Files are turning out to be a bigger bellyflop than the Durham investigation.

[Anonymous]

YET AGAIN you wonder why so many of us are so skeptical of the laptop story? It's because it's so tainted. And the fallout from it continues...

Story: Rudy Guiliani's Russian spy buddy who fed him fake Biden dirt nailed for money laundering: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/giuliani-russian-spy-pal-andrii-derkach-charged-money-laundering-1234643249/