Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Flake is going to be pissed off when the Dems start calling for a longer investigation that the one-week deal they were able to strong arm him into. He'll feel duped, rightfully so, and will vote yes - which is what he said he was going to do before the Dems got to him.

And I think Flake is going to be pissed that Trump is jerking him around on the investigation, and has nothing to lose, since he isn’t running again.

Let’s see who’s right, shall we?

Flake already has what he wants - cover to vote yes.

I just hope that's not how Collins, Murkowski and the red-state Democrats see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Toast by Thursday.

Agree. Too much coming out just tonight. But given he said he wouldn't withdraw, will he make Trump pull him, or will they force a vote?

Twitter says force a vote. And Trump has been know to force losing votes. See also, the ACA repeal. But more to the point, they never staffed up adequately, and Kav is McGann’s guy and McGann is leaving. They have been too busy with Kav to vet anyone as Plan B.

Barrett was recently vetted because she was the runner up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

I don't know Latin, but that one is obvious.

What you're saying is that since Ford lied about flying, her entire testimony is thrown into doubt.

Except she never lied about flying.

She said she needed to delay the hearing until Thursday because she was afraid to fly.

She is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Toast by Thursday.

Agree. Too much coming out just tonight. But given he said he wouldn't withdraw, will he make Trump pull him, or will they force a vote?

Twitter says force a vote. And Trump has been know to force losing votes. See also, the ACA repeal. But more to the point, they never staffed up adequately, and Kav is McGann’s guy and McGann is leaving. They have been too busy with Kav to vet anyone as Plan B.

Barrett was recently vetted because she was the runner up.

Liberals don't want her because she's "too Christian." They're probably already devising their plan of attack.

[Anonymous]

It will be interesting to hear what Charles Ludington tells the FBI. How the FBI handles his statement will be a big clue about how serious this investigation really is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Toast by Thursday.

Agree. Too much coming out just tonight. But given he said he wouldn't withdraw, will he make Trump pull him, or will they force a vote?

Twitter says force a vote. And Trump has been know to force losing votes. See also, the ACA repeal. But more to the point, they never staffed up adequately, and Kav is McGann’s guy and McGann is leaving. They have been too busy with Kav to vet anyone as Plan B.

Barrett was recently vetted because she was the runner up.

Liberals don't want her because she's "too Christian." They're probably already devising their plan of attack.

Nobody wants her because she has said explicitly that she would overturn RvW.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to hear what Charles Ludington tells the FBI. How the FBI handles his statement will be a big clue about how serious this investigation really is.

Or Elizabeth Rasor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The world of sheltered Bethesda area preps from the early 80s has been torn open for all to behold and....it turns out to be pretty much what we public school folks in FCPS thought it would look like along. (Maybe a little more beer than wine coolers, to be fair.)

IKR!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Toast by Thursday.

Agree. Too much coming out just tonight. But given he said he wouldn't withdraw, will he make Trump pull him, or will they force a vote?

What’s coming out tonight? Or a you just making up wishful thinking stories?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Toast by Thursday.

Agree. Too much coming out just tonight. But given he said he wouldn't withdraw, will he make Trump pull him, or will they force a vote?

Twitter says force a vote. And Trump has been know to force losing votes. See also, the ACA repeal. But more to the point, they never staffed up adequately, and Kav is McGann’s guy and McGann is leaving. They have been too busy with Kav to vet anyone as Plan B.

Barrett was recently vetted because she was the runner up.

Liberals don't want her because she's "too Christian." They're probably already devising their plan of attack.

Nobody wants her because she has said explicitly that she would overturn RvW.

Well then the liberals are taking a big chance. Could be an instance of "out of the frying pan and into the fire."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Toast by Thursday.

Agree. Too much coming out just tonight. But given he said he wouldn't withdraw, will he make Trump pull him, or will they force a vote?

Twitter says force a vote. And Trump has been know to force losing votes. See also, the ACA repeal. But more to the point, they never staffed up adequately, and Kav is McGann’s guy and McGann is leaving. They have been too busy with Kav to vet anyone as Plan B.

Barrett was recently vetted because she was the runner up.

Liberals don't want her because she's "too Christian." They're probably already devising their plan of attack.

1) she is beyond Christian
2) she is proactively anti-Roe, which is a non-starter for Collins and Murkowski.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kevin McCullough
@KMCRadio

BREAKING: Multiple sources now telling me 3 additional investigations are about to open:

1. @FBI - felony lying to Congress by accusers making false claims.
2. Congress - @SenFeinstein’s handling of Ford letter.
3. DC Bar - into Ford’s attorneys malpractice.

????? lol

[Anonymous]

Comey is right. The artificial deadline for this investigation is idiotic. We owe it to Brett Kavanaugh to clear him with a complete investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did she say she could not fly when she does all the time? Why did she remove all traces of herself on the web...so that we can not hear her real voice? She will have to talk like a baby for the rest of her life....
Why does she not have one friend, not one that will vouch for her? Was she bullied? Why didn’t they turn over the therapist notes as promised...they say that she mentioned Kavanaugh by name. Prediction: he is not named. She is lyyyyyyyying and her go fund me page is pissing me off. It better be illegal for her to keep that money. Dems paying her legal expense, and new haicolor. As for the calendar...if swimmingfor her Country Club weeknight are meets. FYI.

Ask the President why he won't let the FBI investigate or interview the friends in California she discussed this with years ago.

such a great question!
He knows he nominated a drunk loser. He just didn't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of the locals who grew up here believe her. I don’t want to trash her online but if the FBI investigators go fully into her high school years it will be interesting.

Also interesting that neither her parents nor siblings support her

I've been kind of surprised that there haven't been a bunch of people who went to high school and college with her piping up to defend her. Seems there would be a ton of people from her teenage years and early 20s who'd have something to say about her character like there has been (in both good and bad terms) with Kavanaugh.

She has had a lot of friends and classmates come forward to defend her.

Remember, though, Kavanaugh is prominent socially and will soon be a Supreme Court justice. It's hard to go agains that. Ford's lawyer had to resign from his firm before he took her on as a client, because they didn't want to possibly get on the wrong side of a Supreme Court justice.

Friends (plural) and acquaintances from her teens and early 20s? I’ve only read about later friends from CA.

high school friends from Holton.