Fire in upper NW?

[Anonymous]

Just because they got 40k doesnt mean thats what they expected to get when drawing up this genius plan. All five or six of them need to be put down in the same fashion they dealt it out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of this makes any sense. Why would your standard street thug commit such sadistic murders just for $40,000? Something just doesn't add up. Not at all suggesting that this POS isn't the murderer, but it just doesn't make sense.

Because he's not your standard street thug. He's a psychopath.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People seem to be getting some comfort with the belief that this scum of the earth will "get his due" in prison and that his fellow inmates will show him no mercy. Is that really true?? Likely he will link up with some fellow sociopaths in a prison gang for protection and will enjoy the rest of his years fed and clothed by the state. WHy do people seem to believe that inmates have some code of morality when it comes to crimes involving children. I know people always talk about this, but ask Scott Peterson or the Pettit killers how rough their lives are in jail and the answer likely is not too bad.

It's not. They have school. exercise yard. Too bad no death penalty

The deal is it's our advantage. They can't do this to good people again. It's over. We can let them go, and not care a whit about their experience in jail. Good or bad, those SOB's are on their own.
We are free from them. Advantage us.

No, I believe in the death penalty for cases like this. Living on our taxes for the rest of their lives is a piece of cake. Minimal work, free meals, gangs to protect and smuggle stuff in, workout room, movie nights, etc... Ridiculous. The only jail worth sending him to is Sheriff Joe's in AZ.

Killing someone costs more than life. Appeals.

Correct. Anyone who knows anything about the death penalty knows this. It's nice for that revenge feeling, but it does not save money.

Ah, money. We should definitely consider that first. Wait! Isn't that what these ruthless bastards were after?

"Revenge feeling" PP and I am anti-death penalty for many reasons. I only brought the money issue up because it was introduced earlier, seemingly as a benefit to the death penalty over life imprisonment. It's not.

The death penalty is a tough one. I'm not for it any more. But I think execution/impairment-on-the-spot is a great idea. You have a weapon. You take care of business and save yourself. Everyone benefits. Cheaper. Psychologically cleaner - we can all understand the sentence. Job done. In addition, it is a real deterrent, unlike the death penalty, which is a maybe-maybe-not scenario. It also means we law-abiding people do not have to disgust ourselves with a cold-blooded execution on a Tuesday, with our now impotent aggressor looking back at us through blank eyes that we fill with human emotion. To perform this barbaric act is not in our nature because we are decent.

Allowing gun ownership for self-defense solves so many problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of this makes any sense. Why would your standard street thug commit such sadistic murders just for $40,000? Something just doesn't add up. Not at all suggesting that this POS isn't the murderer, but it just doesn't make sense.

I am with you on this one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good lord, what where these fools thinking. This sounds like they were acting out a bad movie script. I still wonder if there was something deeper that connected him to the crime, something other than money. Most street dealers can make more money in a few months.

There are not many smart criminals. The criminals thought that the rich people had money or jewelry on hand in the house, which they did not. Then the criminals thought that the rich people had easy access to money or jewelry, which they did not. This just goes to show you how much criminals know. They see a big house and they think its an effing ATM machine. Idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of this makes any sense. Why would your standard street thug commit such sadistic murders just for $40,000? Something just doesn't add up. Not at all suggesting that this POS isn't the murderer, but it just doesn't make sense.

I am with you on this one.

The criminals are lazy and would rather kill a rich family than actually work for the money.

[Anonymous]

But I think execution/impairment-on-the-spot is a great idea. You have a weapon. You take care of business and save yourself. Everyone benefits. Cheaper. Psychologically cleaner - we can all understand the sentence. Job done.

That's probably exactly what that guy in Michigan thought when the woman approached his front porch looking for help after she was in an accident.

[Anonymous]

Was it some kind of silent helicopter that followed the cars?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

But I think execution/impairment-on-the-spot is a great idea. You have a weapon. You take care of business and save yourself. Everyone benefits. Cheaper. Psychologically cleaner - we can all understand the sentence. Job done.

That's probably exactly what that guy in Michigan thought when the woman approached his front porch looking for help after she was in an accident.

Point taken. But I'm speaking of intruders. Home invaders. Not a person on your porch. People who truly mean you harm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of this makes any sense. Why would your standard street thug commit such sadistic murders just for $40,000? Something just doesn't add up. Not at all suggesting that this POS isn't the murderer, but it just doesn't make sense.

That was my initial thought. But while $40,000 may seem kind of trivial to some of us, it may not be to him, especially if there is a substance abuse problem (and I have no idea if there was). I'm guessing that if you need money and you're a sociopath (which he clearly is) and you're not thinking long term, then this may have seemed to be a reasonable course of action, horrific as it is. Sooner or later this guy will be caught and he will get justice either here or in the afterlife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of this makes any sense. Why would your standard street thug commit such sadistic murders just for $40,000? Something just doesn't add up. Not at all suggesting that this POS isn't the murderer, but it just doesn't make sense.

That was my initial thought. But while $40,000 may seem kind of trivial to some of us, it may not be to him, especially if there is a substance abuse problem (and I have no idea if there was). I'm guessing that if you need money and you're a sociopath (which he clearly is) and you're not thinking long term, then this may have seemed to be a reasonable course of action, horrific as it is. Sooner or later this guy will be caught and he will get justice either here or in the afterlife.

He's been caught.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

He was detained on Thursday night in Northeast Washington D.C. after police followed him from a motel in Maryland.
Detectives confirmed Wint was being driven by a female in a white Sedan, which was trailing a box truck filled with large amounts of cash. As they reached D.C., officers cornered the vehicles.
Five other people, including his brother, were arrested with him and taken into custody without incident, chief Cathy Lanier confirmed.
Police followed the Sedan and box truck from a motel parking lot in Prince George's County, Maryland. When it reached Northeast D.C., officers blocked them in.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3092208/Police-catch-prime-suspect-brutal-family-murder-near-home-address-Northeast-DC.html#ixzz3aq9o9bAU

Five other people.

Holy crap, I saw this happen on the way home from work last night, it was right under the overpass by Rhode island Avenue metro station. It was a FedEx truck that the police caused to run up onto the curb and crash under the overpass, there were tons of police and fire trucks. I didn't even realize at the time that it was connected to this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of this makes any sense. Why would your standard street thug commit such sadistic murders just for $40,000? Something just doesn't add up. Not at all suggesting that this POS isn't the murderer, but it just doesn't make sense.

That was my initial thought. But while $40,000 may seem kind of trivial to some of us, it may not be to him, especially if there is a substance abuse problem (and I have no idea if there was). I'm guessing that if you need money and you're a sociopath (which he clearly is) and you're not thinking long term, then this may have seemed to be a reasonable course of action, horrific as it is. Sooner or later this guy will be caught and he will get justice either here or in the afterlife.[/quote

Revenge. Almost certainly he was a disgruntled ex employee. The money was perhaps just a bonus.

[Anonymous]

I read somewhere that his brother also worked at AIW and was fired-not sure how/why Daron left employment there. Clearly they both had an axe to grind and sought revenge and opportunity to extort $$. Fry these bastards!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:News reports indicate a long history of offenses that include threats of violence again family members. I don't understand why he hasn't been locked up for an extended time.

He has a long record but mostly for making extreme threats but not actually following through on the threats. So he was ordered to stay away from the people he had threatened, but was not locked up.

He wasn't locked up because of reasons I don't know (leniency?) but I call his history one of violent threats. A 2 foot long machete?!