Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

They talking points now are to pray that the Killer finds Jesus and pray for his family. This story is going to go away now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has been itching to use this as an excuse to wreak vengeance on Dems. What’s he going to do now that the narrative isn’t so convenient?

They’re inventing a new narrative.

They don’t need to. What Robison wrote on the bullets is enough.

The media is consistently reporting that police found three unfired bullets inside the chamber of the rifle used by Robinson.

The three unified bullets were inscribed with left-wing slogans like “Hey fascist! Catch!”

The slogans were accompanied by left-wing symbols, like an up arrow, a right arrow and three down arrows.

Symbols have meanings. Politically slogans have meanings.

The meaning here is clear.

Sshhhhh. People here are busy disassociating their values with the assassin.

From a Headstamps? So you think a Headstamps is a political statement?

Keep up. These are the actual scribblings from the shooter.

What else do you know about him? Other than the "scribblings" he used as a diversion?

That he shot Charlie Kirk in the neck with one of those bullets he inscribed on, from over 200 yards and managed to escape.

Not diversions, intentions laid bare on the bullets.

You're really desperate to keep your narrative alive. I suppose today is a good day for that kind of cope...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has been itching to use this as an excuse to wreak vengeance on Dems. What’s he going to do now that the narrative isn’t so convenient?

They’re inventing a new narrative.

They don’t need to. What Robison wrote on the bullets is enough.

The media is consistently reporting that police found three unfired bullets inside the chamber of the rifle used by Robinson.

The three unified bullets were inscribed with left-wing slogans like “Hey fascist! Catch!”

The slogans were accompanied by left-wing symbols, like an up arrow, a right arrow and three down arrows.

Symbols have meanings. Politically slogans have meanings.

The meaning here is clear.

Sshhhhh. People here are busy disassociating their values with the assassin.

From a Headstamps? So you think a Headstamps is a political statement?

Keep up. These are the actual scribblings from the shooter.

Oh really? Post a link to a credit news source with a photo of what was scribbled.

There are legitimate sources for the scratching and... They're 4Chan video game memes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The slogans were accompanied by left-wing symbols, like an up arrow, a right arrow and three down arrows.

Please explain to the class how these symbols are “left-wing.” TIA!

It’s a Headstamps. Everyone knows it. Even maga.

I think you need to read updated news articles. That was yesterday’s news. Maybe read the transcript or watch the press conference from earlier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So it was mental illness + guns after all.

Always has been.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Highly educated, employed, church going (preacher ID'd him) young white male who likes to hunt..... Huh.....how original, how unexpected for a murderer.

Do we want to talk who commits the most murders in this country per capita now?

Sure, let’s have that discussion! You first.

This thread is about who made a political statement by killing Charlie Kirk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The slogans were accompanied by left-wing symbols, like an up arrow, a right arrow and three down arrows.

Please explain to the class how these symbols are “left-wing.” TIA!

It’s a Headstamps. Everyone knows it. Even maga.

Say more

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man. All this damn fighting from grown adults is ridiculous. Can we all agree a mentally disturbed young man, regardless of politics, committed murder and should be punished. Whether you liked Charlie Kirk or not, hopefully we can agree that he didn’t deserve to murdered in broad daylight, especially in front of his wife and two young children. That’s it. Who cares about politics. This is right and wrong. There have been Democrat, Republican, and mentally ill shooters in these past event years. All messed up and wrong, regardless of their motive. He was a father na husband who didn’t deserve to be murdered.

Guns and 2A are the common denominator.

No, being online is. Young men spending too much time online that maybe are prone to mental instability or have some underlying problem are always the ones doing this.

People all over the world spend too much time online and this is the only country that has this problem with shootings.

This isn't the only country that has problems with it. This is the only country you're paying attention to.

It's also part and parcel why the right felt so much about his death. He was a social media influencer and nothing more, yet people thought they knew him personally because they saw a lot of packaged and edited clips on their social media feeds.

There was a moment of silence for him on September 11th of all days. Let's get real.

It amazes me that people give over their minds and bodies and brains like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a maga. Sorry guys.

https://mol.im/a/15092613

Marxist left.

Nancy Mace has already made the pivot to forgiveness. Try to keep up.

That makes sense, you have to seek forgiveness for lost white male MAGA souls. Of course, this would be different if we were talking about a hate-able group of people (trans, immigrants), but now let's talk about redemption and Charlie Kirk's generous, Christian values.

Well, Trump has already sentenced him to death, so too late, I guess.

It will be interesting to watch that back-peddling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has been itching to use this as an excuse to wreak vengeance on Dems. What’s he going to do now that the narrative isn’t so convenient?

They’re inventing a new narrative.

They don’t need to. What Robison wrote on the bullets is enough.

The media is consistently reporting that police found three unfired bullets inside the chamber of the rifle used by Robinson.

The three unified bullets were inscribed with left-wing slogans like “Hey fascist! Catch!”

The slogans were accompanied by left-wing symbols, like an up arrow, a right arrow and three down arrows.

Symbols have meanings. Politically slogans have meanings.

The meaning here is clear.

Sshhhhh. People here are busy disassociating their values with the assassin.

From a Headstamps? So you think a Headstamps is a political statement?

Keep up. These are the actual scribblings from the shooter.

What else do you know about him? Other than the "scribblings" he used as a diversion?

That he shot Charlie Kirk in the neck with one of those bullets he inscribed on, from over 200 yards and managed to escape.

Not diversions, intentions laid bare on the bullets.

You're really desperate to keep your narrative alive. I suppose today is a good day for that kind of cope...

lol. Wow enjoy your delusion.

Hope you can stay in it until you get bored of it.

[Anonymous]

Sounds like the prez had moved on already, lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They talking points now are to pray that the Killer finds Jesus and pray for his family. This story is going to go away now.

Poor Charlie didn't deserve this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anybody feel this is also a result of violent video games, some being exposed to it from a very early age? That 22 year age mark seems to be an age that keeps coming up

Kind of feel this is a result of easy access to guns and ammunition

For most of history, nearly every home owned guns. And didn’t even keep them locked up

For most of the history they used to be pretty difficult to load up and kill a lot of people. That changed and it is much easier to do a lot of damage.

Yes, guns used to be respected, not treated like toys and given to pre-pubescent boys to play with. The Sandy Hook shooter had a similar, to take a phrase I think from Bill Maher, "ammosexual" upbringing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anybody feel this is also a result of violent video games, some being exposed to it from a very early age? That 22 year age mark seems to be an age that keeps coming up

Kind of feel this is a result of easy access to guns and ammunition

For most of history, nearly every home owned guns. And didn’t even keep them locked up

I guess you will have to watch Bowling for Columbine to solve this mystery, guy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They talking points now are to pray that the Killer finds Jesus and pray for his family. This story is going to go away now.

Bye! Don't let the door hit ya!