ECNL moving to school year not calendar

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m mot for this but I just don’t see how ECNL and other academies will not go with grad year model. Hopefully I am wrong but it seems to eliminate trapped players and any hold back or early starter kids.

Yes some people abuse the system and hold kids back but idk if it will be enough kids or care from ECNL when it aligns so perfectly with college recruiting.

Won't give up will you?

Your stupid held back player can play with kids their own age. You're not going to cheat your way into playing down for wins.

[Anonymous]

my kid is on an ECNL team. so you're saying his current team will break up and these players will be realigned to school year teams this UPCOMING spring?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:my kid is on an ECNL team. so you're saying his current team will break up and these players will be realigned to school year teams this UPCOMING spring?

How many players are Q4. I'm going to guess it's not that many.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:my kid is on an ECNL team. so you're saying his current team will break up and these players will be realigned to school year teams this UPCOMING spring?

How many players are Q4. I'm going to guess it's not that many.

3 out of 11

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:my kid is on an ECNL team. so you're saying his current team will break up and these players will be realigned to school year teams this UPCOMING spring?

How many players are Q4. I'm going to guess it's not that many.

3 out of 11

actually 4 out of 11. just double checked the DOBs on the roster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m mot for this but I just don’t see how ECNL and other academies will not go with grad year model. Hopefully I am wrong but it seems to eliminate trapped players and any hold back or early starter kids.

Yes some people abuse the system and hold kids back but idk if it will be enough kids or care from ECNL when it aligns so perfectly with college recruiting.

Won't give up will you?

Your stupid held back player can play with kids their own age. You're not going to cheat your way into playing down for wins.

This was my first post? Which I guess we don’t know who says what. Just makes sense to go with grad year for ECNL. Also my kid will play up still next year because she can. You don’t know what you’re taking about. So stop projecting on people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:my kid is on an ECNL team. so you're saying his current team will break up and these players will be realigned to school year teams this UPCOMING spring?

How many players are Q4. I'm going to guess it's not that many.

3 out of 11

actually 4 out of 11. just double checked the DOBs on the roster.

You only have 11 players on your team? Or of the 11 starters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:my kid is on an ECNL team. so you're saying his current team will break up and these players will be realigned to school year teams this UPCOMING spring?

How many players are Q4. I'm going to guess it's not that many.

3 out of 11

actually 4 out of 11. just double checked the DOBs on the roster.

You only have 11 players on your team? Or of the 11 starters?

we only have 11. we have 2 guest players for every game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:my kid is on an ECNL team. so you're saying his current team will break up and these players will be realigned to school year teams this UPCOMING spring?

How many players are Q4. I'm going to guess it's not that many.

3 out of 11

actually 4 out of 11. just double checked the DOBs on the roster.

You only have 11 players on your team? Or of the 11 starters?

we only have 11. we have 2 guest players for every game.

For an ECNL team? Lots of playing time is awesome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m mot for this but I just don’t see how ECNL and other academies will not go with grad year model. Hopefully I am wrong but it seems to eliminate trapped players and any hold back or early starter kids.

Yes some people abuse the system and hold kids back but idk if it will be enough kids or care from ECNL when it aligns so perfectly with college recruiting.

Won't give up will you?

Your stupid held back player can play with kids their own age. You're not going to cheat your way into playing down for wins.

This was my first post? Which I guess we don’t know who says what. Just makes sense to go with grad year for ECNL. Also my kid will play up still next year because she can. You don’t know what you’re taking about. So stop projecting on people.

As long as we agree that held back kids are stupid and playing down for wins is cheating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:my kid is on an ECNL team. so you're saying his current team will break up and these players will be realigned to school year teams this UPCOMING spring?

How many players are Q4. I'm going to guess it's not that many.

3 out of 11

actually 4 out of 11. just double checked the DOBs on the roster.

You only have 11 players on your team? Or of the 11 starters?

we only have 11. we have 2 guest players for every game.

For an ECNL team? Lots of playing time is awesome.

Not really. My kid gets 40 min max.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m mot for this but I just don’t see how ECNL and other academies will not go with grad year model. Hopefully I am wrong but it seems to eliminate trapped players and any hold back or early starter kids.

Yes some people abuse the system and hold kids back but idk if it will be enough kids or care from ECNL when it aligns so perfectly with college recruiting.

Won't give up will you?

Your stupid held back player can play with kids their own age. You're not going to cheat your way into playing down for wins.

This was my first post? Which I guess we don’t know who says what. Just makes sense to go with grad year for ECNL. Also my kid will play up still next year because she can. You don’t know what you’re taking about. So stop projecting on people.

As long as we agree that held back kids are stupid and playing down for wins is cheating.

Held back or not, the new system won’t allow kids to play outside of their age group. You’re caught up on this graduation year stuff, which isn’t happening anyway. So relax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:my kid is on an ECNL team. so you're saying his current team will break up and these players will be realigned to school year teams this UPCOMING spring?

How many players are Q4. I'm going to guess it's not that many.

3 out of 11

actually 4 out of 11. just double checked the DOBs on the roster.

You only have 11 players on your team? Or of the 11 starters?

we only have 11. we have 2 guest players for every game.

For an ECNL team? Lots of playing time is awesome.

Not really. My kid gets 40 min max.

How with only 2 subs or is this "pre-ecnl"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m mot for this but I just don’t see how ECNL and other academies will not go with grad year model. Hopefully I am wrong but it seems to eliminate trapped players and any hold back or early starter kids.

Yes some people abuse the system and hold kids back but idk if it will be enough kids or care from ECNL when it aligns so perfectly with college recruiting.

Won't give up will you?

Your stupid held back player can play with kids their own age. You're not going to cheat your way into playing down for wins.

This was my first post? Which I guess we don’t know who says what. Just makes sense to go with grad year for ECNL. Also my kid will play up still next year because she can. You don’t know what you’re taking about. So stop projecting on people.

As long as we agree that held back kids are stupid and playing down for wins is cheating.

Held back or not, the new system won’t allow kids to play outside of their age group. You’re caught up on this graduation year stuff, which isn’t happening anyway. So relax.

I'm saying this so the private school parents hear it. They think nobody notices their 16 year old high school freshman.

We do and we think it's pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m mot for this but I just don’t see how ECNL and other academies will not go with grad year model. Hopefully I am wrong but it seems to eliminate trapped players and any hold back or early starter kids.

Yes some people abuse the system and hold kids back but idk if it will be enough kids or care from ECNL when it aligns so perfectly with college recruiting.

Won't give up will you?

Your stupid held back player can play with kids their own age. You're not going to cheat your way into playing down for wins.

This was my first post? Which I guess we don’t know who says what. Just makes sense to go with grad year for ECNL. Also my kid will play up still next year because she can. You don’t know what you’re taking about. So stop projecting on people.

As long as we agree that held back kids are stupid and playing down for wins is cheating.

Held back or not, the new system won’t allow kids to play outside of their age group. You’re caught up on this graduation year stuff, which isn’t happening anyway. So relax.

I'm saying this so the private school parents hear it. They think nobody notices their 16 year old high school freshman.

We do and we think it's pathetic.

If they are autistic or have learning difficulties and were held back do you still think it’s pathetic? For you to judge people is really gross. You don’t know why a kid was held back. Most elite players actually leave school early. Anyone who hold a kid back because of sports is silly but to say no kid should be able to play their senior year is silly.
Should at least have it for U18-19.