US Capitol Breached by Trump's lunatics

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/pentagon-inspector-general-raises-questions-about-former-d-c-guard-commander-s-jan-6-account/ar-AAQPClL?ocid=msedgntp

IG seems to think the DC National Guard was told it could deploy--contrary to Commander's testimony. ...

Why didn't the "powers that be" want protection on Capitol Hill? Capitol Police, DC Mayor, Pelosi, et. al.

'when city officials asked for National Guard assistance and senior Army officers — Lt. Gens. Charles Flynn and Walter Piatt — advised against providing it.'

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/11/17/january-6-william-walker-national-guard/

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Yes. Now that they are getting time I hope they are angry at trump and someone squeals.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

That's a brazen lie by someone in the FBI - FBI was given intel of potential threat from multiple sources, social media is full of posts where they planned and coordinated, and FBI even had a CI who was live-tweeting what was going on during the attack.

There needs to be an investigation of the FBI to find out who was involving in squashing the intel and providing false reports that there was no threat.

[Anonymous]

Yes, it is a wonder why the GOP and Trumpists are opposed to such an investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, it is a wonder why the GOP and Trumpists are opposed to such an investigation.

Of FBI involvement. GOP wants this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Still too broad. These people are being abused for political reasons. Specifically

No, they are being held for breaking the law. Unless you think it is ok to stage an insurrection in a failed coup.

How many are charged with insurrection?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Still too broad. These people are being abused for political reasons. Specifically

No, they are being held for breaking the law. Unless you think it is ok to stage an insurrection in a failed coup.

How many are charged with insurrection?

What difference does it make? Are you ok with armed civilians storming the Capitol, beating the crap out of cops and entering restricted government space?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That's a brazen lie by someone in the FBI - FBI was given intel of potential threat from multiple sources, social media is full of posts where they planned and coordinated, and FBI even had a CI who was live-tweeting what was going on during the attack.

There needs to be an investigation of the FBI to find out who was involving in squashing the intel and providing false reports that there was no threat.

FOIA doesn’t cover classified information.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Who are these organizers? New names or names we know? Can’t wait!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who are these organizers? New names or names we know? Can’t wait!

Perhaps it’s in the article PP linked to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who are these organizers? New names or names we know? Can’t wait!

Perhaps it’s in the article PP linked to.

There are names. Too bad RS doesn’t have a whole lot of credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who are these organizers? New names or names we know? Can’t wait!

Perhaps it’s in the article PP linked to.

There are names. Too bad RS doesn’t have a whole lot of credibility.

If the texts are real, RS’s credibility doesn’t matter. Investigators just need to determine the authenticity of the texts.