Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McClintock is full of it.

I'm livid hearing this. Impeachment is not nullification. Impeachment is in the Constitution.

When you've been screaming impeachment since the election, it is nullification.

So, screaming impeachment since the election gives Trump license to break the law?

Who said that? What does that have to do with nullification?

You don't seem to understand the definition of nullification and that it is literally impossible to do that via impeachment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McClintock is full of it.

I'm livid hearing this. Impeachment is not nullification. Impeachment is in the Constitution.

When you've been screaming impeachment since the election, it is nullification.

So, screaming impeachment since the election gives Trump license to break the law?

Who said that? What does that have to do with nullification?

You don't seem to understand the definition of nullification and that it is literally impossible to do that via impeachment.

Sure it is. If it is purely politically motivated, it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People knew from before he took office that he would commit impeachable offenses. He can't tell the truth, he breaks contracts, he doest seem to believe in civil rights, and he doesn't know the laws and rules that apply to the office. Impeachable offenses were always inevitable. That is why people have been talking impeachment from the get go. And they were right. Obviously.

I don't remember hearing Dems saying that he should be impeached because it was inevitable that he commit impeachable offenses.

Nobody said that; not even the PP.

See above.

That isn't the same thing you wrote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People knew from before he took office that he would commit impeachable offenses. He can't tell the truth, he breaks contracts, he doest seem to believe in civil rights, and he doesn't know the laws and rules that apply to the office. Impeachable offenses were always inevitable. That is why people have been talking impeachment from the get go. And they were right. Obviously.

I don't remember hearing Dems saying that he should be impeached because it was inevitable that he commit impeachable offenses.

Nobody said that; not even the PP.

See above.

That isn't the same thing you wrote.

What is different about the two?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McClintock is full of it.

I'm livid hearing this. Impeachment is not nullification. Impeachment is in the Constitution.

When you've been screaming impeachment since the election, it is nullification.

So, screaming impeachment since the election gives Trump license to break the law?

Who said that? What does that have to do with nullification?

You don't seem to understand the definition of nullification and that it is literally impossible to do that via impeachment.

Sure it is. If it is purely politically motivated, it is.

Impeachment IS a political process. It is not a criminal justice process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People knew from before he took office that he would commit impeachable offenses. He can't tell the truth, he breaks contracts, he doest seem to believe in civil rights, and he doesn't know the laws and rules that apply to the office. Impeachable offenses were always inevitable. That is why people have been talking impeachment from the get go. And they were right. Obviously.

I don't remember hearing Dems saying that he should be impeached because it was inevitable that he commit impeachable offenses.

Nobody said that; not even the PP.

See above.

That isn't the same thing you wrote.

What is different about the two?

The use of the word because. Learn to read. I'm done here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McClintock is full of it.

I'm livid hearing this. Impeachment is not nullification. Impeachment is in the Constitution.

When you've been screaming impeachment since the election, it is nullification.

McClintock seemed totally fine with overturning the will of the voters when he ran in the Gray Davis recall election as a candidate for Governor.

[Anonymous]

Steube just referred to Berke as a “New York Lawyer” so there’s that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McClintock is full of it.

I'm livid hearing this. Impeachment is not nullification. Impeachment is in the Constitution.

When you've been screaming impeachment since the election, it is nullification.

So, screaming impeachment since the election gives Trump license to break the law?

Who said that? What does that have to do with nullification?

You don't seem to understand the definition of nullification and that it is literally impossible to do that via impeachment.

Sure it is. If it is purely politically motivated, it is.

Impeachment IS a political process. It is not a criminal justice process.

A politically motivated process is not the same as "political process".

[Anonymous]

I love Goldman talking about a lack of contrition from Trump which means he may do everything again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McClintock is full of it.

I'm livid hearing this. Impeachment is not nullification. Impeachment is in the Constitution.

When you've been screaming impeachment since the election, it is nullification.

So, screaming impeachment since the election gives Trump license to break the law?

Who said that? What does that have to do with nullification?

You don't seem to understand the definition of nullification and that it is literally impossible to do that via impeachment.

Sure it is. If it is purely politically motivated, it is.

Impeachment IS a political process. It is not a criminal justice process.

A politically motivated process is not the same as "political process".

Blow it out your Benghazi, you flaming hypocrite. The GOP are criminals. The end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McClintock is full of it.

I'm livid hearing this. Impeachment is not nullification. Impeachment is in the Constitution.

When you've been screaming impeachment since the election, it is nullification.

So, screaming impeachment since the election gives Trump license to break the law?

Who said that? What does that have to do with nullification?

You don't seem to understand the definition of nullification and that it is literally impossible to do that via impeachment.

Sure it is. If it is purely politically motivated, it is.

So do you honestly believe the goal of this process is to instate Hillary Clinton as president?

Are you really, really THAT stupid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McClintock is full of it.

I'm livid hearing this. Impeachment is not nullification. Impeachment is in the Constitution.

When you've been screaming impeachment since the election, it is nullification.

So, screaming impeachment since the election gives Trump license to break the law?

Who said that? What does that have to do with nullification?

You don't seem to understand the definition of nullification and that it is literally impossible to do that via impeachment.

Sure it is. If it is purely politically motivated, it is.

So do you honestly believe the goal of this process is to instate Hillary Clinton as president?

Are you really, really THAT stupid?

No one said that. The goal, since the day he started, has been to get rid of him.

[Anonymous]

He has violated the emoluments clause since day 1.

And now, he has violated more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He has violated the emoluments clause since day 1.

And now, he has violated more.

Then why wasn't he impeached for it?