“Proud Boys - stand back and stand by”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump disavowed white supremacy for decades yet we have 100 plus pages on it .

He used to seem a lot sharper, not stroked out, and undemented. But he's not that man anymore.

He is still the guy who shell-gamed to try to look rich and important, though, so I guess not everything changes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump disavowed white supremacy for decades yet we have 100 plus pages on it .

The problem, as with all things Trump, is that he says a lot of things that contradict each other and most people hear what they want to hear. The white supremacists and Trumps opponents hear one thing. His supporters who are not white supremacists hear something else.

If you don't hear how he does both, then you aren't listening hard enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Proud Boys Chairman is Black, Enrique Tarrio

His response to Trump's comments:

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1311424560970039296?s=20


Most of America has realized the Dems are the true racists and use that term and nazi much like a elementary school kid to slander.

He is a conservative Cuban who uses the white power symbol. I don't think he identifies as Black.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People here and GOP in the Senate may want to make excuses and rationalize Trump's words.

The actual "Proud Boys"understood exactly what he said and are making appropriate preparations.

Great, do let us know when/if they actually take action and do anything illegal. You know, like the violent rioters *actually did*.

The moment Georgetown or Northwest is under attack by Antifa, the same people outraged would welcome the Proud Boys if it helped quell the violence, looting and burning. Remember, police aren’t welcome either

but guess what, the real world is that Antifa is not looting and burning Georgetown or NW.....

and if there ever was any issue, the last thing I'd like for help would be a bunch of small d$ck, empty headed bozos with assault rifles

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump disavowed white supremacy for decades yet we have 100 plus pages on it .

Let's just say that he has a track record of it.

https://www.npr.org/2016/09/29/495955920/donald-trump-plagued-by-decades-old-housing-discrimination-case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Token? He's the chairman.

I guess Thomas Sowell is another, as is Larry Elder, Walter Williams, and the millions of other black conservatives.

There is only one party of slavery, KKK, Jim Crow, segregation, etc. It's the democratic party. Please review actual history and not propaganda and rhetoric.

Then came the 1964 civil rights act where the parties flipped (you'll notice the majority of the Confederate states are red), and Republicans supported Barry Goldwater (a racist). Even a young bright eyed Mitch McConnell didn't support his racist ass. Strom Thurmond another racist switched from the Democrat party and went to the Republicans around that time as well.

Why don't you go read a history book before you ever speak again. The first amendment doesn't give you the right to be ignorant.

[Anonymous]

Thank god for the Proud Boys- who else will take back our cities when left wing mayors tell the police to stand down?

The proud boys are a multiracial patriotic society.

[Anonymous]

Given the lack of repudiation by the GOP, I don't think it can claim to be the party of Lincoln anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thank god for the Proud Boys- who else will take back our cities when left wing mayors tell the police to stand down?

The proud boys are a multiracial patriotic society.

K, little nazi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thank god for the Proud Boys- who else will take back our cities when left wing mayors tell the police to stand down?

The proud boys are a multiracial patriotic society.

lol, you might want to look for some reinforcement then. there are over 800,000 sworn police officers in the USA and a few thousands PB. the most recent rally in Portland drew a few hundreds. kind of hard to "take back our cities" with that kind of manpower

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Token? He's the chairman.

I guess Thomas Sowell is another, as is Larry Elder, Walter Williams, and the millions of other black conservatives.

There is only one party of slavery, KKK, Jim Crow, segregation, etc. It's the democratic party. Please review actual history and not propaganda and rhetoric.

Then came the 1964 civil rights act where the parties flipped (you'll notice the majority of the Confederate states are red), and Republicans supported Barry Goldwater (a racist). Even a young bright eyed Mitch McConnell didn't support his racist ass. Strom Thurmond another racist switched from the Democrat party and went to the Republicans around that time as well.

Why don't you go read a history book before you ever speak again. The first amendment doesn't give you the right to be ignorant.

Nice try, but way to show your own ignorance. Your beloved confederate states were all blue back then. The parties flipped? Nice Dem talking point, but since you're the expert what did LBJ say about having a certain group voting Democrat for the next 200 years? 91 Dems, 35 Rep voted against. 156 Dems and 135 Rep for. Hmmm

[Anonymous]

Yes, the parties flipped

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Token? He's the chairman.

I guess Thomas Sowell is another, as is Larry Elder, Walter Williams, and the millions of other black conservatives.

There is only one party of slavery, KKK, Jim Crow, segregation, etc. It's the democratic party. Please review actual history and not propaganda and rhetoric.

Then came the 1964 civil rights act where the parties flipped (you'll notice the majority of the Confederate states are red), and Republicans supported Barry Goldwater (a racist). Even a young bright eyed Mitch McConnell didn't support his racist ass. Strom Thurmond another racist switched from the Democrat party and went to the Republicans around that time as well.

Why don't you go read a history book before you ever speak again. The first amendment doesn't give you the right to be ignorant.

Nice try, but way to show your own ignorance. Your beloved confederate states were all blue back then. The parties flipped? Nice Dem talking point, but since you're the expert what did LBJ say about having a certain group voting Democrat for the next 200 years? 91 Dems, 35 Rep voted against. 156 Dems

and 135 Rep for. Hmmm

Omg you are obtuse and reading some right wing propaganda about how you are so reasonable opposing the modern day “Democrat Party”, right??

So if 1950s Southern Democrats are right in step with the modern day Democratic Party, there should be no issue with flipping the Senate blue right?? All those current day Republicans misunderstand their party’s platform! Gun control and abolish slavery!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Nice try, but way to show your own ignorance. Your beloved confederate states were all blue back then. The parties flipped? Nice Dem talking point, but since you're the expert what did LBJ say about having a certain group voting Democrat for the next 200 years? 91 Dems, 35 Rep voted against. 156 Dems and 135 Rep for. Hmmm

Thought piece....the confederates were democrats, right?

Who was upset about the Confederate statues coming down?

[Anonymous]

Looks like Trump is flip-flopping on the issue of white supremacy.